- Joined
- Jul 29, 2008
- Messages
- 3,247
- Points
- 0
If you go to a restaurant and order a dish, it does not taste good, you decided not to pay. That's why the restaurant sue the patron, in return the patron argued that the food served is not to standard and they are counter-sueing the restaurant for not providing an adequate atmosphere good enough for enjoying their food.
The rich really eat full very free. The patron should pay and move on rather than both parties spending so much money in courts just to have FACE.
1 wants money and face after being disgraced on papers. The other wants ego and wants to forfeit paying. That's how I am looking at the whole situation:p
The rich really eat full very free. The patron should pay and move on rather than both parties spending so much money in courts just to have FACE.
1 wants money and face after being disgraced on papers. The other wants ego and wants to forfeit paying. That's how I am looking at the whole situation:p