Indian Lawyer asked client to belly dance for him

[Teerex1]

What so many people couldn't wait to see a lawyer or doctor fall from grace ?

Only the two of them knew what the events leading up to the house visit. The disciplinary tribunal remarked that : "The reason he gave for visiting her home was 'implausible and unlikely', given that the job of assessing how much the unit was worth belonged to a valuer."

Did the tribunal obtain the victim's confirmation that was the reason why the lawyer was invited to her condo ? If the reason was implausible and unlikely, surely it must cut both ways. If the victim had invited or allowed the lawyer to pay her a house visit based on such implausible and unlikely reason, inference must also be drawn against the victim.

The tribunal again remarked that : "But the tribunal said: 'By asking her to perform a belly dance, (he) had made verbal advances towards her while he was meeting her in his professional capacity.' "

If the reason for the visit was implausible and unlikely, then he could not be deemed as meeting her in his professional capacity. He could only be deemed to have met her in his professional capacity if the reason for the meeting put forth by the lawyer was accepted as true.

What is wrong with asking a belly-dancer to perform belly dancing ? Did the tribunal perceive belly dancing as some equivalent of lap dance or pole dance ? I felt the defence was sound. There was no sexual connotation.

Hello knock knock.......what's wrong with you....

 

[allanlee]

Mr.Singh kenna saboed..... someone allegedly told him the belly dancer client was providing FL services but apparently the info he got was false..... since he was already there he had to improvise and so asked her to belly dance.

 

[Angelo]

another keling. lol. this keling can talk until the cow come home and he is still a keling. a walking piece of shit. lol

 

[Don Muthuswamy]

If he had molested or raped, it would amount to a criminal act. It would have nothing to do whether he was acting in his professional capacity. You're moving away from the crux of the matter without realizing it.

His reason for being there determines whether he was acting in his professional capacity. The tribunal rejected his reason, i.e. he had no professional reason to be there. So how could he be acting in his professional capacity. The phrase "under the pretext" needs to be tested if you are to give both parties the benefit of the doubt. The phrase "under the pretext" itself carries no evidential value, just as the phrase "U sure are full of shit".

A conclusion must be based on evidence; a conclusion is not and cannot be presented as evidence. With the phrase "U sure are full of shit", you've just moved away from discussing the issue to attacking the person.

Is there a possibility that they could be friends or acquaintances ? After all, nobody in his right frame of mind would approach a lawyer instead of a property agent to sell his or her condo.

It seems more like you are defending the bayi Singh. Its not wrong to go to a lawyer for property matters, like if you want a title deed done. But the thing is, how many lawyers do you know of who will visit their client's premises in a "professional capacity" at a weird time like 11 pm in the night? My lawyer for example expect me to go all the way to his office to deal with business matters and has never offered to buy wine, food or cigarattes for me. :(

 

[jw5]

It seems more like you are defending the bayi Singh. Its not wrong to go to a lawyer for property matters, like if you want a title deed done. But the thing is, how many lawyers do you know of who will visit their client's premises in a "professional capacity" at a weird time like 11 pm in the night? My lawyer for example expect me to go all the way to his office to deal with business matters and has never offered to buy wine, food or cigarattes for me. :(

Maybe it's because you are not a belly dancing chio bu.