Peer-reviewed manuscript concludes that CDC massively inflates COVID-19 case and death numbers with creative statistics - The COVID Blog
5-6 minutes
TheCOVIDBlog.com
February 12, 2021
ATLANTA — Dr. Joseph Mercola published an article in 2015 entitled “How Conflicts of Interest have Corrupted the CDC.” He cited, among other things, a 2009 investigation by the Office of the Inspector General. It concluded that 97% of disclosure forms filed by the Centers for Disease Control were incomplete.
The article talks about the obscure CDC Foundation, a nonprofit created by Congress in 1995. Its purpose is “to mobilize philanthropic and private-sector resources.” Pharmaceutical companies and other private interests gave the CDC Foundation at least $28 million in 2014, according to Dr. Mercola. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation gave the CDC Foundation $13.5 million in 2013. Further, Dr. Julie Gerberding was CDC Director from 2002 to 2009. She left the position to become President of the Merck vaccine division.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in 1982 that the Federal Reserve is not a federal agency, despite most people believing it is. We’re unaware of any similar court decisions about the CDC. But the agency is listed on the Dun and Bradstreet business directory. It also owns at least 57 patents, including 20 vaccine patents. The CDC clearly has vested business interests and is beholden to the pharmaceutical industry. Now a peer-reviewed manuscript is revealing the extent of CDC manipulation to promote its products and satisfy its “shareholders.”
CDC violated data collection laws?
The manuscript, entitled “COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective,” was published on October 12, 2020 in the journal Science, Public Health Policy & the Law. The Institute of Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK) and the Public Health Policy Initiative launched the journal on August 1, 2019. Ten scientists, doctors and professors authored the manuscript. The lead researcher is Dr. Henry Ealy, a naturopathic doctor based in Portland, Oregon.
The manuscript focuses on the Paper Reduction Act (PRA) of 1980/1995 (44 U.S.C. §§ 3501–3521) and the Information Quality Act (IQA) (Section 515 of the Congressional Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001 Public Law 106-554). PRA mandates procedures on agencies collecting information from the public. IQA “provide
The CDC, without repercussions, missed several deadlines and bypassed federal oversight of its data collection methods related to COVID-19 beginning in late 2019 and spanning the middle of 2020. The most glaring was March 24, 2020. The CDC, in potential violation of PRA and IQA “issued COVID-19 Alert No. 2, significantly altering cause of death reporting exclusively for COVID-19.”
The manuscript is a fascinating, thorough chronology of what appears to be manipulative data practices by the CDC, in violation of federal law. One damning piece of evidence against the CDC speaks for itself. It is a comparison chart of COVID-19 deaths based on 2003 statistical reporting guidelines versus 2020 reporting guidelines.
Note that the 2003 guidelines were in effect through 2020, until the CDC changed them to accommodate COVID-19 reporting.
Statements by Dr. Ealy
Lead researcher Dr. Ealy said via Facebook that the manuscript, “was reviewed by at least 9 attorneys and a judge prior to peer-review submission and survived an extensive 7-week peer-review process to ensure accuracy.” It was a successful collaboration with attorney Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense organization, he said. RFK Jr. was censored and de-platformed from Instagram yesterday under the mainstream and social media euphemism “vaccine misinformation.”
Dr. Ealy continued:
Dr. Ealy is likely to be de-platformed as well. You can read the full manuscript here.
