• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Impose stamp duty on third flat

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
Feb 24, 2010

Impose stamp duty on third flat

<!-- by line --><!-- end by line -->
<!-- end left side bar --><!-- story content : start -->
I READ with interest Monday's report, "HDB review: Findings out next month".
I greatly commend the Government's timely and wise measures to curb speculation in HDB flats. There are clear signs of market exuberance and that could result in a real estate bubble at some unpredictable time.
People now have to pay a new stamp duty of about 3 per cent if they sell their properties within a year of buying them. Plus, financial institutions like banks can now grant housing loans of up to only 80 per cent of a property's value, compared to 90 per cent previously.
I suggest that flat owners who have sold their homes twice also pay the 3 per cent stamp duty when they make their third sales transaction, even if they had lived in their last flat for more than three years.
Simultaneously, when these flat owners buy another flat from the resale market, they should also pay the 3 per cent stamp duty.
The authorities must also be aware of and take action against unprofessional market practices common among property agents, sellers and buyers. This includes intentional under-declaring of the value of flats for sale. Such actions could further spur market speculation in HDB resale flats.
Teo Kueh Liang
 
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=heading>Latest comments</TD></TR><TR><TD id=messageDisplayRegion width="100%"><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" class=Post cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>All the measures are reactive! Why does the government not make PROACTIVE moves instead? (Cos helicopter vision blurred/blinded by too fat a pay cheque?)

Telling people that they should not sell their homes - like father telling a son. We are sons of Singapore but we are treated worse than the adopted sons [Privileged Citizens = Permanent Residents].

Why are residents at various locations of HDB flats owning PRIVATE PROPERTIES and yet they get TOP CLASS tax rebates? Many of these people are flat owners who dont need to sell but they own private properties and these are NOT PRs.

Does the Government go after these people to ensure that they are not given special rebates meant for the poor - the really poor! ? The Government - is it that they are closing one eye .....
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: goofyxxx1 at Wed Feb 24 12:20:33 SGT 2010
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Back
Top