I believe it is $6000 x 2 for a couple to live ideally in Singapore. $6000 each for husband n wife.
My assumptions:
- 2 Kids Education $1000 x 2 a month = $2000
$500-600 for childcare after subsidy + top-up for enrichment classes imposed by childcare centre (or else your kid do nothing during that period)
- 2 Kids Living expenses $250 x 2 a month = $500
- Housing Loan = $1500 a month (usually from CPF Contributions)
let's assume 20-25 years loan for a resale/larger HDB
- For parents = $1000
$500 for each side (husband n wife) parents. Most don't even give $500.
- Car/Insurance/Servicing/Petrol/Tax/Fines = $1200 a month
Based on a simple Cat A car
- Utilities/Phone/Internet Bill = $500
- Living Expenses = $3000
$50 per day for each husband n wife (both working)
- Maid's wages n living expenses = $1000
Both couples are working, so need maid
- Home Cooked Food - $500
Supermarketing/Groceries
Total: $11200
my estimations on a low side to live normally.
Conclusion: RUN's wifey must work :p
The title is "Ideal salary for living in Singapore" and not "Minimum salary for living in Singapore".
Not sure why some argue for living with low salary, saving up etc.
An ideal situation, regardless of salary, is when a couple can save at least $3000 or more per month in today's money.
The title is "Ideal salary for living in Singapore" and not "Minimum salary for living in Singapore".
Not sure why some argue for living with low salary, saving up etc.
I can agree about the savings part but it is ridiculous to suggest savings of $3,000 for a family that earns $4,000 and below.
A family which earns $4000 can aim to save about $20,000 per year and extend the target 5 years to age 50.
They'll have a savings of $1.4 million at that age.
However, I cannot emphasise enough what a big difference having a chunk of savings will have to ones options in life. It opens up so many more possibilities along the way towards your goal.
In my case for example, I had sufficient confidence in my early 30s to buy investment properties because by that age, I had saved up enough to service the loans even if was out of work for 2 years. Had I lived from hand to mouth and spent all my money on fancy stuff, I would not have dared to take the plunge and the sequence of events which led to my early retirement would not have taken flight.
There is nothing more inspiring than having cold hard cash saved up when you're young. It makes you feel that you can achieve your dreams and allows you take the steps required to turn them into reality.
I think there is no such thing as "ideal salary" - if yes it has to reference to the person historical lifestyle.
E.g. my friend earn 2.5k but he has been supporting his family , and own a car, for many many years, he has got used to this sort of lifestyle. 6K to him will becomes a bonus. Is all depend on how the person define ideal.
I've never found saving money to be energy sapping. In fact spending less on frivolous activities allows for more time to indulge in healthy pursuits.Eh then their whole life is about saving $ based on your earn $4k save $20k per yr advice.
By 50 they have lots of money but no more energy to spend . They could be even end up in IMH with $1.4mil LOL
A family which earns $4000 can aim to save about $20,000 per year and extend the target 5 years to age 50.
For example, many of my work colleagues used to head to the lounges of Orchard Road 3 to 4 times a week after work. They'd spend $1000 or more per month on Black Label, Royal Salute and other fancy drinks designed to impress. In my case I'd head to MacRitchie for a 3.2 km jog. It cost me nothing and I didn't have a hangover at work the next day so I performed better at work too.
The pioneer generation package was obviously to address this phenomenon. Many elderly, the PAP's biggest vote bank, had turned away from PAP in 2011 because it was sucking the money out of their young children's pockets, causing them to be unable to provide for their parents.
The government is not sucking their money. They spend it all by themselves on fancy stuff.
http://www.straitstimes.com/digital-life/phone/story/samsung-galaxy-s5-launch-singapore-20140411
By the way thanks for telling me your story but I am not interested as it is a past story, a past PAP that did better than now.
The cost of handphones are nothing. If you own a HDB flat, one month of utilities plus conservancy charges alone already give you half the handphone price and you are talking about necessities.
If the PAP has no qualms about charging you $3 per transport ride, why do they tell Singaporeans about overspending.
The government is not sucking their money. They spend it all by themselves on fancy stuff.
http://www.straitstimes.com/digital-life/phone/story/samsung-galaxy-s5-launch-singapore-20140411
In NZ, the council rates are even more exorbitant. Nothing to do with the PAP. ALL governments do that.
a past PAP that did better than now.
In NZ and for all the governments, as you say, are struggling with majorities every day and sleepless nights over election results. Guess what. That's what people like me are planning to do to the PAP.