- Joined
- Aug 2, 2009
- Messages
- 700
- Points
- 18
IDA defended their prize employee for the following reasons:
1. The employee was not recruited based on her fake degree
2. The employee believe that the fake degree is bona fide
Here's the thing, whether the employee believes the degree is bona fide or not is immaterial.
The employee has a fake degree and has put her honesty and integrity into question. The employee must take responsibility for having her fake degree, regardless of what the employee believes whether bona fide or otherwise and leave the Singapore public service.
If the employee gets away by saying she believes that the fake degree is bona fide, can Amos Yee get away by saying he believes in freedom of speech? Why charged Amos when he thought he is entitled to free speech? Can a person who took money from the company cash box get away by saying she believes it is "bona fide" to take the money from the cash box? Can a person who abuse a pet get away by saying she is entitled to train her pet by abuse?
Many innocent people have to take responsibility when they erred. Does not matter whether they erred on purpose or unintentionally, the bottom line is they erred and they took responsibility. Whether the employee believes her fake degree is bona fide or otherwise, whether IDA took her fake degree into consideration in her employment or otherwise does not matter, the bottom line is she has a fake degree and she has to take responsibility for her fake degree.
Why IDA choose to let the fake employee have a free ride is unbelievable and will truly stunned the people in the ballot box :(
1. The employee was not recruited based on her fake degree
2. The employee believe that the fake degree is bona fide
Here's the thing, whether the employee believes the degree is bona fide or not is immaterial.
The employee has a fake degree and has put her honesty and integrity into question. The employee must take responsibility for having her fake degree, regardless of what the employee believes whether bona fide or otherwise and leave the Singapore public service.
If the employee gets away by saying she believes that the fake degree is bona fide, can Amos Yee get away by saying he believes in freedom of speech? Why charged Amos when he thought he is entitled to free speech? Can a person who took money from the company cash box get away by saying she believes it is "bona fide" to take the money from the cash box? Can a person who abuse a pet get away by saying she is entitled to train her pet by abuse?
Many innocent people have to take responsibility when they erred. Does not matter whether they erred on purpose or unintentionally, the bottom line is they erred and they took responsibility. Whether the employee believes her fake degree is bona fide or otherwise, whether IDA took her fake degree into consideration in her employment or otherwise does not matter, the bottom line is she has a fake degree and she has to take responsibility for her fake degree.
Why IDA choose to let the fake employee have a free ride is unbelievable and will truly stunned the people in the ballot box :(