I got no idea why Iran's indigenous air defence system is a threat to regional security.

[syed putra]

It's a defensive system. Not a offensive one.

 

[k1976]

During the last IDF air raid, Iran air defence did manage to fire back at the IDF…meaning it is not as Jiak Liao Bee as many Peepur think

 

[syed putra]

Watch out china. Iran has drones too.

 

[syed putra]

During the last IDF air raid, Iran air defence did manage to fire back at the IDF…meaning it is not as Jiak Liao Bee as many Peepur think

Israel Airforce came in three waves.
First wave was the f-35 whose job was to destroy the radars and air defences.
Second wave the f-15 suppose to destroy primary targets.
Third wave f-16 maybe to defend those planes against Iran's scrambled fighter jets.
In the end, the f-35 had to offload their missiles and scrambled back and warned others to do the same hitting some obscure targets.

 

[k1976]

Watch out china. Iran has drones too.

China got 14nm GPU tech and GaN devices….minimum is 2-4x real world performance difference vs Silicon Based devices

 

[True Believer]

There are concerns Iran may share or proliferate its air defence technology and weaponry with its regional proxies, Hezbollah and the Houthis. This would further destabilise the region.

 

[syed putra]

There are concerns Iran may share or proliferate its air defence technology and weaponry with its regional proxies, Hezbollah and the Houthis. This would further destabilise the region.

Why would a air defence system destabilise the region? It's not a offensive weapon

 

[True Believer]

Why would a air defence system destabilise the region? It's not a offensive weapon

If Iran (a country that sponsors and harbours terrorist groups) believes that they can protect themselves from a counter attack, they may be more likely to launch an initial attack. This can destabilise the existing deterrence between countries in the Middle East.

 

[syed putra]

If Iran (a country that sponsors and harbours terrorist groups) believes that they can protect themselves from a counter attack, they may be more likely to launch an initial attack. This can destabilise the existing deterrence between countries in the Middle East.

So far this has not happened. They were at the receiving end always.

 

[ftan42]

A direct, large-scale attack by Iran on Israel carries a significant risk of triggering a wider regional war. This could involve not only Israel but also the United States and other regional powers. Instead Iran deploys proxies which allow to exert influence and conduct attacks on Israel without directly engaging its own military.
This approach can provide a degree of deniability and reduce the risk of direct confrontation.

 

[True Believer]

So far this has not happened. They were at the receiving end always.

Iran has engaged in actions that have contributed to the tensions with Israel and the US. Iran has been accused of supporting proxy groups (terrorist organisations) that attacked Israeli and American interests, as well as oil tankers in the gulf region. You need to stop blindly supporting Islamic regimes and terrorists.

 

[Balls2U]

Sinkieland inherited this missile system from the Israelites.

 

[syed putra]

direct, large-scale attack by Iran on Israel carries a significant risk of triggering a wider regional war. This could involve not only Israel but also the United States and other regional powers. Instead Iran deploys proxies which allow to exert influence and conduct attacks on Israel without directly engaging its own military.
This approach can provide a degree of deniability and reduce the risk of direct confrontation

Iran has engaged in actions that have contributed to the tensions with Israel and the US. Iran has been accused of supporting proxy groups (terrorist organisations) that attacked Israeli and American interests, as well as oil tankers in the gulf region. You need to stop blindly supporting Islamic regimes and terrorists

I feel you are mistaken.
The houthis, Hezbollah are previous Assad regimes are fellow Shiites. They are merely cooperating with one another.

 

[syed putra]

direct, large-scale attack by Iran on Israel carries a significant risk of triggering a wider regional war. This could involve not only Israel but also the United States and other regional powers. Instead Iran deploys proxies which allow to exert influence and conduct attacks on Israel without directly engaging its own military.
This approach can provide a degree of deniability and reduce the risk of direct confrontation

Iran has engaged in actions that have contributed to the tensions with Israel and the US. Iran has been accused of supporting proxy groups (terrorist organisations) that attacked Israeli and American interests, as well as oil tankers in the gulf region. You need to stop blindly supporting Islamic regimes and terrorists

I feel you are mistaken.
The houthis, Hezbollah are previous Assad regimes are fellow Shiites. They are merely cooperating with one another
Israel. On the other hand indiscriminately assassinate Iranian leaders, scientist, military officers openly and blatantly. And expect no retaliation.

 

[A Singaporean]

If Angmorika says so it must be true. LOL.