<TABLE id=msgUN cellSpacing=3 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD id=msgUNsubj vAlign=top>
Coffee Shop Talk - 'I don't deserve this' </TD><TD id=msgunetc noWrap align=right>
Subscribe </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=msgtable cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="96%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=msg vAlign=top><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgbfr1 width="1%"> </TD><TD><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgF noWrap align=right width="1%">From: </TD><TD class=msgFname noWrap width="68%">BadNews0 <NOBR></NOBR> </TD><TD class=msgDate noWrap align=right width="30%">2:37 am </TD></TR><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgT noWrap align=right width="1%" height=20>To: </TD><TD class=msgTname noWrap width="68%">ALL <NOBR></NOBR></TD><TD class=msgNum noWrap align=right> (1 of 2) </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgleft width="1%" rowSpan=4> </TD><TD class=wintiny noWrap align=right>5572.1 </TD></TR><TR><TD height=8></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgtxt>'I don't deserve this'
S'pore blogger's sex pictures seen worldwide
She thought only she & ex had access to them
By Liew Hanqing
September 26, 2008
THEY are explicit and sexual pictures of a Singapore blogger and her then-boyfriend.
They are supposed to be private, she claimed.
Yet she allowed her boyfriend to put them online - and attracted 10,000 eyeballs a week at one stage.
Now, the pictures have ended up on forums and websites all over the world.
And the Singapore blogger, who looked to be in her 20s, is so ashamed that she refused to be identified by name for this report - even though her face is shown in several of the pictures on the Internet.
She limited her interviews with us to e-mail, and asked that we not identify her in any way.
So why put such explicit pictures online?
She replied through e-mail that she had thought then, that only she and her then-boyfriend had access to it.
But she alleged that her ex-boyfriend later charged netizens a fee to access the blog and view the pictures.
She claimed that she had taken down the blog immediately once she found out it had been made available to the public.
But it may have been too late. Last week, some of these explicit pictures were copied and re-posted on several websites and forums.
Now, all the blogger wants is her privacy back.
She has since taken down the blog and disabled her personal image-hosting account.
She also made a police report last week claiming that the explicit pictures had been 'stolen' from her image-hosting account and used on other websites.
Image-hosting accounts are often used by photography buffs looking to store their large collection of digital photographs online.
They can be used to store images without sharing them publicly. In this case, the blogger claims the pictures were part of a private collection stored there.
A few of the pictures show her posing semi-nude in several public locations, including what appears to be a HDB stairwell, while others show her having sex with a partner.
The blogger told The New Paper that her ex-boyfriend had uploaded the pictures to her image-hosting account so he would be able to use them on the blog.
She claimed her boyfriend then used pictures from the image-hosting account to display on his blog last year.
This is how netizens could possibly have had access to her pictures.
She claimed he had assured her that their identity would remain secret.
'I did not know anybody else had access to it,' she insisted.
Attempts by The New Paper to reach the ex-boyfriend at his last-known handphone number, however, were unsuccessful, as the number is no longer in use.
So there was no way we could check what she was claiming was indeed true.
The blogger added that the blog was not intended for profit.
But she later learnt that her ex-boyfriend had been charging netizens a fee for access to the blog.
The blogger claimed she did not know how much her ex-boyfriend was charging for access.
She recalled: 'I had a lot of disagreements with him over the blog and the fact that it became open to the public for viewing. This led to our breakup.'
The New Paper understands the couple broke up more than a year ago.
She declined to reveal any information about her boyfriend.
In her police report, the blogger claimed it was not the first time the photographs had been circulated online.
It is illegal to publish materials in Singapore which are obscene in nature.
The same thing happened last year, she said, and her ex-boyfriend had also made a police report at the time.
But the law may not be on their side. Singapore law prohibits the distribution of obscene material. (See report on page 3.)
The blogger claimed she was shocked and upset that her pictures were being circulated online.
'I did not understand why this had to happen to me as these photos were never to be made known to people,' she insisted.
She added that she had agreed to have the pictures posted online after her ex-boyfriend had persuaded her to let him do so.
She added that the pictures were taken several years ago, when her then-boyfriend asked if he could take some pictures of her.
'I agreed, thinking that in this age of digital cameras and camera phones, it was not uncommon that two people in love would share such private moments with each other.
'The photos were intended for us - for me to keep,' she said.
The New Paper understands that the blogger had even made a sex video with her then-boyfriend.
The video was posted on an amateur porn website together with a handphone number and instant messaging address, urging viewers to call or send private messages.
The video was viewed more than 30,000 times by users from all around the world.
But now, it seems all the blogger feels is regret.
She said: 'The issue has blown up pretty big now not because I wanted it - I was cajoled by my ex, who was into all of this. I was never in this to be famous.
'I never wanted the publicity, nor the money. I never profited from this, and I will only live to regret this for the rest of my life.'
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
S'pore blogger's sex pictures seen worldwide
She thought only she & ex had access to them
By Liew Hanqing
September 26, 2008
THEY are explicit and sexual pictures of a Singapore blogger and her then-boyfriend.
They are supposed to be private, she claimed.
Yet she allowed her boyfriend to put them online - and attracted 10,000 eyeballs a week at one stage.
Now, the pictures have ended up on forums and websites all over the world.
And the Singapore blogger, who looked to be in her 20s, is so ashamed that she refused to be identified by name for this report - even though her face is shown in several of the pictures on the Internet.
She limited her interviews with us to e-mail, and asked that we not identify her in any way.
So why put such explicit pictures online?
She replied through e-mail that she had thought then, that only she and her then-boyfriend had access to it.
But she alleged that her ex-boyfriend later charged netizens a fee to access the blog and view the pictures.
She claimed that she had taken down the blog immediately once she found out it had been made available to the public.
But it may have been too late. Last week, some of these explicit pictures were copied and re-posted on several websites and forums.
Now, all the blogger wants is her privacy back.
She has since taken down the blog and disabled her personal image-hosting account.
She also made a police report last week claiming that the explicit pictures had been 'stolen' from her image-hosting account and used on other websites.
Image-hosting accounts are often used by photography buffs looking to store their large collection of digital photographs online.
They can be used to store images without sharing them publicly. In this case, the blogger claims the pictures were part of a private collection stored there.
A few of the pictures show her posing semi-nude in several public locations, including what appears to be a HDB stairwell, while others show her having sex with a partner.
The blogger told The New Paper that her ex-boyfriend had uploaded the pictures to her image-hosting account so he would be able to use them on the blog.
She claimed her boyfriend then used pictures from the image-hosting account to display on his blog last year.
This is how netizens could possibly have had access to her pictures.
She claimed he had assured her that their identity would remain secret.
'I did not know anybody else had access to it,' she insisted.
Attempts by The New Paper to reach the ex-boyfriend at his last-known handphone number, however, were unsuccessful, as the number is no longer in use.
So there was no way we could check what she was claiming was indeed true.
The blogger added that the blog was not intended for profit.
But she later learnt that her ex-boyfriend had been charging netizens a fee for access to the blog.
The blogger claimed she did not know how much her ex-boyfriend was charging for access.
She recalled: 'I had a lot of disagreements with him over the blog and the fact that it became open to the public for viewing. This led to our breakup.'
The New Paper understands the couple broke up more than a year ago.
She declined to reveal any information about her boyfriend.
In her police report, the blogger claimed it was not the first time the photographs had been circulated online.
It is illegal to publish materials in Singapore which are obscene in nature.
The same thing happened last year, she said, and her ex-boyfriend had also made a police report at the time.
But the law may not be on their side. Singapore law prohibits the distribution of obscene material. (See report on page 3.)
The blogger claimed she was shocked and upset that her pictures were being circulated online.
'I did not understand why this had to happen to me as these photos were never to be made known to people,' she insisted.
She added that she had agreed to have the pictures posted online after her ex-boyfriend had persuaded her to let him do so.
She added that the pictures were taken several years ago, when her then-boyfriend asked if he could take some pictures of her.
'I agreed, thinking that in this age of digital cameras and camera phones, it was not uncommon that two people in love would share such private moments with each other.
'The photos were intended for us - for me to keep,' she said.
The New Paper understands that the blogger had even made a sex video with her then-boyfriend.
The video was posted on an amateur porn website together with a handphone number and instant messaging address, urging viewers to call or send private messages.
The video was viewed more than 30,000 times by users from all around the world.
But now, it seems all the blogger feels is regret.
She said: 'The issue has blown up pretty big now not because I wanted it - I was cajoled by my ex, who was into all of this. I was never in this to be famous.
'I never wanted the publicity, nor the money. I never profited from this, and I will only live to regret this for the rest of my life.'
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
