• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Hyflux is dead and PUB hungry to Cannibalize it's Corpse @ Tuas, Huat or Not? How to bluff Sai-Chwee Hoax con Boleh-land??

Putin-land toilet, can make Sai Chwee Ice kacang!





When temperature is like that I think my sai freeze inside my ass can never crap it out!
 
Sinkie idiots like to kpkb about old fox. Malaysians coming here to rob them blind? Not a problem.
 
NOTES HOLDERS Remember to VOTE NO to the restructuring - GET ALL OUR MONEY BACK

SIAS IS BIASED AND ADVISES BECAUSE OUR LEGAL GOT A SOLUTION.

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...edium-term-noteholders-to-cast-votes-11295576

SIAS never care bothered with us. SIAS is giving stupid advises to retail investors. All of the sudden, their attention is turned to us because SIAS panic and started to worry about us after our legal explained to our core group that all we have to do is to VOTE NO. And we can get our 100% and penalty interests back.

Voting Yes means getting bullied and writen-off unfairly. Olivia and management gets a lot for turning the company around, and turning the company around means impairment. Read below we have a solution if we all vote No.
 
Skip Navigation
Main navigation and Meta Navigation
To Home
Meta Main Navigation
  • OpenAll SectionsAll SectionsClose
COMMENTARYCommentary: The fall of once-great Hyflux, a unicorn in the Singapore story
Toggle share menu



Jump to top


Singapore Edition International Edition








Commentary: The fall of once-great Hyflux, a unicorn in the Singapore story




CommentaryCommentaryCommentary: The fall of once-great Hyflux, a unicorn in the Singapore story
There is a good possibility that many bondholders will lose most of their investments in Hyflux and the company will at most exist in a reduced form, says NUS Business School’s Professor Nitin Pangarkar.
image: 
(Photo: Jeremy Long)
By Nitin Pangarkar
08 Mar 2019 06:00AM(Updated: 08 Mar 2019 08:08AM)
Share this content



Bookmark
SINGAPORE: I have been following with great interest the events surrounding Hyflux over the last few months. For many years, the company and its founder, Olivia Lum, were held up as examples of a successful home-grown company and an outstanding entrepreneur respectively.
That the company was in the water sector, a critical resource for Singapore and increasingly the rest of the world, was an added plus, when it implied the company was serving the nation and “doing good” while doing well.

NOT PRETTY



But somewhere in between its astronomical rise and the situation today, the wheels came off the wagon.
There is a good possibility that many bondholders will lose most of their investments in Hyflux and the company will exist in a reduced form – that is if it manages to survive and secure the necessary support from financial backers and key stakeholders for the proposed restructuring.
The situation is not pretty. Hyflux defaulting on its bondholders has been discussed extensively in the media. A recent report suggests that the PUB has also served a notice of default on Hyflux, for its potential inability to supply water.

Advertisement

Too bad, Hyflux. Water being a critical resource for Singapore is now a double-edged sword.
I will focus on the non-financial aspects of the Hyflux situation precisely because financial default is the most likely outcome of underlying strategic decisions. My intent is not to find fault with Hyflux’s decisions since hindsight is perfect, but to dissect the problems it faced to glean lessons for the benefit of Hyflux and other Singapore companies.
SHIFT TOWARDS OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
A central premise is that Hyflux took on a greater amount of strategic complexity over time. Some risks of this greater strategic complexity may not have been factored in when decisions were taken while other risks only became apparent over time, because of an evolving environment.

image: 
Hyflux CEO Olivia Lum. (File photo: AFP/Tengku Bahar)

READ: I am deeply saddened for the pain and loss suffered by investors, lenders - Hyflux CEO

Hyflux started with a simple strategy of focusing on being a water treatment specialist, which served it well over its first two decades. All seemed to pan out well in its favour, including listing on the Singapore Exchange, a remarkable feat considering its modest beginnings, and after-tax profits of S$59 million in 2008.
In fact, 2008 was also remarkable because the company was able to grow its sales by 188 per cent - from S$192 million in 2007 to S$554 million, helped by a five-fold increase in revenue from the municipal (or government) sector.
In its 2008 annual report, the company noted that Hyflux membranes and systems had been installed in more than 1,000 plants in over 300 locations worldwide, again an impressive achievement.
But someone in that giant corporation should have spotted obvious early warning signs. Revenue was geographically concentrated, however, with China and Middle East and North Africa (MENA) accounting for 54 per cent and 40 per cent of the total revenue in respectively.
By 2008, Hyflux started placing greater emphasis on its Operations and Maintenance (O&M) business instead of its traditional Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) focus.
One advantage of the former was its stable revenue generation with contract duration of 20 to 30 years.
On the other hand, revenue chunkiness was a key disadvantage of EPC, because it means lumpy and unpredictable annual shareholder returns. So Hyflux began to see advantages in the former and maintained a portfolio of both O&M and EPC contracts.
The downside of chasing after O&M contracts was revealed in the recent news of PUB serving a notice of default on Hyflux. Unlike EPC contracts, where a project is handed off to the client who operates the plant (and hence bears all subsequent risks), O&M contracts would require Hyflux to continue to operate the plant.
If, for any reason, Hyflux’s ability to continue to operate the plant became impaired, given the critical resource that water is, the consequences for Hyflux would be severe.
READ: The Marina Barrage, a dream 20 years in the making, a commentary
TUASPRING THE STRAW THAT BROKE THE CAMEL’S BACK?
A major increase in strategic complexity occurred when Hyflux took on the Tuas Power project.
While the capital intensity of the Tuas Power project has been discussed extensively, the strategic implication was that taking on the business pushed Hyflux into a new market: Power generation.

image: 
The Tuaspring Integrated Water and Power Plant. (Photo: Hyflux)

Though there may be some synergies across the water-desalination and power projects, like many diversification decisions where perceived synergies may be emphasised more than the downsides in evaluating project risk, the risks in the power project may have been underestimated - or possibly even overlooked.
Two factors may have further complicated the risk assessment. First, the location of the Tuas Power project in its Singapore home market may have led to an underestimation of the risks because Hyflux was familiar with the context, unlike many of its projects which were in emerging economies that imply significant uncertainty.
Funding infrastructure projects in the latter category would also require political risk insurance, encouraging Hyflux to exercise project discipline.
READ: What Singapore can do to prepare for the next flood, a commentary
As later events showed, however, the Singapore Government can be a demanding customer. Failure to deliver on its commitments would probably imply a swifter penalty to be imposed.
Second, the deregulation of the power sector culminating in the Open Electricity Marketmay be another factor that exposed Hyflux’s power sector to the wild fluctuations of commodity prices. As luck would have it, the gyrations in oil prices have been more pronounced over the last few years.
EROSION OF FINANCIAL HEALTH
While strategic complexity rose, a number of other factors were slowly but surely eroding Hyflux’s financial health. Its revenue was erratic — between 2012 and 2016, revenue fluctuated between S$321 million (2014) and S$986 million in 2016.
Clearly, despite greater emphasis on O&M, revenue had not stabilised. For an asset-based company like Hyflux, erratic revenue tends to have a disproportionately large impact on profits because costs are less flexible than revenue.
In fact, the earning per share showed a steady downward trend after 2012, before turning negative in 2016. Even in 2016 when Hyflux reported record revenues, profits were rather modest — in fact, they exhibited a decline over the years prior to 2016.
Through these years, Hyflux’s capital intensity rose with its asset base ballooning from S$2.1 billion in 2012 to S$3.8 billion in 2016. The increased asset base was financed by issuing debt which carried a high interest rate and drained valuable cash.

image: 
The headquarters of Singapore water treatment firm Hyflux on Bendemeer Road. (Photo: Jeremy Long)

Though Hyflux’s dividend per share peaked in 2010 at 4.77 cents, the company had to cut it drastically in 2016. Dividend payments would represent another drain on cash.
MIND THE RISKS
So, what are the lessons from the Hyflux story? The most important lesson is: Mind the risks. Diversification is an important growth strategy for many firms but is not a panacea when risk evaluations tend to overemphasise synergies and downplay risks.
Some of the risks also can become magnified over time — as borne out in the case of the power sector.
READ: Are Singapore businesses just not creative enough? A commentary

A second important lesson is about minding small changes in the environment that might cumulatively have a huge impact on your strategy and its viability.
A number of changes have taken place on top of the deregulation of the power sector that had huge impact on Hyflux, including fluctuating fortunes for economies in the Middle East, a key source of revenue for Hyflux before 2012 and reduced orders from Chinese customers, which used to be Hyflux’s biggest market.
Though each of these changes was not large enough to undermine Hyflux, their collective impact on Hyflux was substantial.
READ: For explosive growth, look to these two models of business, a commentary

A third and final lesson is about preparing for the worst-case scenario, especially when large, capital-intensive strategic projects are financed with debt.
Looking ahead, even if Hyflux is able to win a reprieve from bondholders, it faces the possibility of PUB taking over the plant because non-performance of a strategic plant may be viewed as a national security issue.
One hopes this is not the end of the story for this rare Singapore unicorn.
Nitin Pangarkar is an Associate Professor in the Department of Strategy and Policy at the National University of Singapore (NUS) Business School. The opinions expressed are those of the writer and do not represent the views and opinions of NUS.
Source: CNA/nr
Share this content



Bookmark
More stories for you


Get the Channel NewsAsia newsletter in your inbox
SUBSCRIBE
Advertisement




More information about Channel News Asia
jump to top of page
Sections
About Us
Advertise with us
Get the news that matters in your inbox every morning!
Please enter your email address
I consent to the use of my personal data by Mediacorp and the Mediacorp group of companies (collectively "Mediacorp") to send me marketing and advertising materials in relation to goods and services of Mediacorp and its business partners and for research and analysis
SUBSCRIBE

Follow our news
Experience news with our apps
Copyright© Mediacorp 2019. Mediacorp Pte Ltd. All rights reserved.




image: https://secure-sg.imrworldwide.com/...-11320640&rp=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/

m

image: https://rp.gwallet.com/r1/cm/p46

p46





Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...at-hyflux-unicorn-in-singapore-story-11320640
 
They just announced that they are prepared to confiscate more Hyflux's three other PPP assets in Singapore. Dear noteholders, we have the upper hands. Government continue to engage in scare-tactics because we determine the outcome of the voting. Please stay united and vote No. We constitute a small part of the total debts, we can get 100% back, instead of 25%, if we vote No. Everyone will have to give in to us. This is our seniority and importance, in return for accepting a lower yield for our debts all these years. Even bankers get more than 4%. (Some of Hyflux's bankers charge more than 5% according to court documents).

If government dares to confiscate Tuaspring, SingSpring desalination plant, the Bedok Newater plant and the membrane bioreactor plant in Jurong,, let them face the anger from the PnPs retail investors and bankers. We just need to stand firm and united. Please pass the message to fellow noteholders. We will survive.




PUB monitoring Hyflux's other plants and will step in if they default https://www.sgsme.sg/news/pub-monitoring-hyfluxs-other-plants-and-will-step-if-they-default

National water agency PUB has been monitoring Hyflux's other facilities in addition to the Tuaspring water and power plant, and will invoke the same step-in rights if they should also default, Environment and Water Resources Minister Masagos Zulkifli said yesterday.

Mr Masagos was responding in Parliament yesterday to Workers' Party Non-Constituency MP Daniel Goh's questions on whether Hyflux's financial and operational woes will affect the SingSpring desalination plant, the Bedok Newater plant and the membrane bioreactor plant in Jurong, and in turn the water supply.
 
Bwa Ha Ha Ha !

PAP is doing the right thing for once !

Break contract = terminate 25 years lease , for free !
 
Bwa Ha Ha Ha !

PAP is doing the right thing for once !

Break contract = terminate 25 years lease , for free !

Free? they are doing this to minimise potential damage in GE year....by breaking the contract, PUB will now run the inefficient operations. More money will be down the hole without anyone seeing it...
 
...hear say this PUbpy has been doing alot of re deployment...making life difficult for old staffs..... so much so that they have to leave.....NO more benefits if you leave on your own... after you have worked 30 years...HUat ah PUBpy
 
Wonder if it's that straightforward for PUB to take over TPL? Will PUB have the manpower to do this? This saga reminded me of NOL. Perhaps the Indons will do a better job with TPL.
 
Let's put aside the conspiracy that Maybank is screwing Singapore on behalf of China and Dr M. Commercially, Maybank is exposed to Hyflux and a bigger shit-hole called PacificLight . Maybank's plotted with Indonesians to create synergies between post-restructuring Hyflux and Pacific Light is alike using POSB to make DBS healther. If this is the case, NEA will rather confiscate Tuaspring.

1174dnb.jpg


It is also unclear how Tuaspring might fit with the Salim Group, which already controls PacificLight Power, an 800 MW genco on Jurong Island. PacificLight is in a US$553 million net debt position with a negative interest coverage ratio of -0.6.

As recently as August last year, holding company First Pacific was trying to divest its stake in PacificLight, to limit further capital commitments.

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/will-salim-medco-walk-away-from-hyflux-deal


So our dear Salim is also flip-flopping about what they do with PacificLight. Just plain opportunistic businessmen with no plans. Their focus is to make money from our haircuts.
 
Let's put aside the conspiracy that Maybank is screwing Singapore on behalf of China and Dr M. Commercially, Maybank is exposed to Hyflux and a bigger shit-hole called PacificLight . Maybank's plotted with Indonesians to create synergies between post-restructuring Hyflux and Pacific Light is alike using POSB to make DBS healther. If this is the case, NEA will rather confiscate Tuaspring.

1174dnb.jpg


It is also unclear how Tuaspring might fit with the Salim Group, which already controls PacificLight Power, an 800 MW genco on Jurong Island. PacificLight is in a US$553 million net debt position with a negative interest coverage ratio of -0.6.

As recently as August last year, holding company First Pacific was trying to divest its stake in PacificLight, to limit further capital commitments.

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/will-salim-medco-walk-away-from-hyflux-deal


So our dear Salim is also flip-flopping about what they do with PacificLight. Just plain opportunistic businessmen with no plans. Their focus is to make money from our haircuts.
Don't sound and maketh Salim group like a villian. Everyone is lining up like a vulture trying to feed on the dead corpse of Hyflux.
 
Don't sound and maketh Salim group like a villian. Everyone is lining up like a vulture trying to feed on the dead corpse of Hyflux.

the only villain is auntie olivia , ownself pay ownself $60M ! :biggrin:
 
https://www.straitstimes.com/busine...-warns-will-take-control-of-plant-if-defaults
Desalinated water is one of Singapore's four national taps to ensure a diversified and sustainable water supply. "Singapore's desalination plants are integral to our water security," said the PUB.
It noted that under the water purchase agreement, TPL has to deliver up to 70 million gallons of desalinated water per day to the PUB for a 25-year period from 2013 to 2038.
"PUB has provided sufficient time for TPL to resolve its operational and financial defaults," it said.
"Given TPL's current financial position, TPL's inability to fulfil its contractual obligations is unlikely to change in the immediate to longer term. PUB is taking steps to ensure that our water security is safeguarded."
It added that "with the issuance of the default notice, PUB requires TPL to fully resolve all defaults within the default notice period, failing which, upon the expiry of the default notice period, PUB will exercise its right to terminate the WPA (water purchase agreement) and take control of the plant".

How could Hyflux ever be profitable selling desalinated water to PUB when PUB can buy fresh water at 3 sens per thousand gallons from Johor? It’s like selling snow to Eskimos. No wonder they are going out of business.
 
see everyone, especially @ginfreely? agreement can be prematurely terminated one, when one party buay song about other party for non compliance or defaults. but in this case instead of just terminating the contract one party wants to seize the other party’s assets entirely. with sg authorities heads you lose tails they win. cannot argue and negotiate one. they can suka suka do anything including let loose firecrackers even though it’s banned.
 
The story is simple. Idiots bought hyflux shares BECAUSE pap linked. Now they kpkb bdcause pap screwed them.
 
Back
Top