BRT is a smart move....along with road infrastructure improvement...make sense.
RTS...JB simply dont have the density....
RTS...JB simply dont have the density....
But MY cars are cheap. Do they need the BRT ? Won't it become a white elephant ?
http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se...to-be-signed-with-singapore-by-mid-2016-najib
Nice, but always talk only.
"Malaysia is expected to sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Singapore by the middle of 2016 for the development of a high-speed rail (HSR) linking both countries, said Prime Minister Najib Razak."
Just lately, the projected Passenger Flow Volume (PFV) became an issue when it was reported that the PFV can reach to only about 18 million passengers per annum, and that is after 10 years in operation!
This is far too low!
Based on the same travel distance, Shanghai to Nanjing HSR, annual PFV of about 105 million passengers charges RM150 per trip
Taipei to Tainan HSR, annual PFV of 50 million charges RM180 per trip.
So with only 18 million projected passengers, how much will be the HSR fare to break even, don't even talk about making a profit.
Too low, lose money; to high, lose passengers.
Also, is this PFV of 18 million or about 1.5 million per month realistic ?
Are they including the maciks with her chicken, who are going to ditch her regular the bus trip and take the HSR from Batu Pahat to KL?
Taipei to Tainan 320KM / Taipei population 2.6mil / Tainan population 1.9mil
- Significant lower than KL/SG by 3x
Shanghai to Nanjing 310KM / Shanghai population 14.3mil / Nanjing population 3.6mil
- Higher than KL/SG around 30% max
How does one come up with 18mil annual projection?
This was reported to be provided by the Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Nancy Shukri that the estimated annual PFV of the HSR is estimated at 18 million.
I also wonder how she got those numbers.
SG population 5.5 mil / KL population 1.8 mil so how they justify 1.5 mil (18 mil /yr) passengers per month for the HSR?
The way i read the report, some dude made an assumption of 18mil. It doesn't add up at all....this is typical Malaysian politician talk.
Klang Valley population is 7.2mil....ever fast and furious too. That's partly why Singapore have to keep up.
"Singapore-JB cabbies call for brakes on touts"
http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/transport/singapore-jb-cabbies-call-for-brakes-on-touts
There's so much demand for crossborder transport services. I was wondering is there such thing as a daily driver to fetch me to Raffles Place from JB Town? If not, then I might go buy a Alphard/Estima and hire a driver to drive me in. Then maybe find 2-3 execs and charge them S$75/return/day. Good idea?
Many are finding ways and means to save money by living in JB but working in SG while cutting short time of travel. I think there is totally no way out of this simply because we are talking about 2 different countries.
The only way this is possible is this scenario: Do away with the Customs check points. That means you don't need a passport to travel between SG and Johor. Build an MRT system that links from old JB to various parts of Iskandar.
We know the above is totally impossible.
I don't see how HSR or RTS can help boost the prospects of Singaporeans moving over to Johor to live. If you take the RTS, you still need time to travel to Woodlands from your workplace. Then you need to clear Customs. You are also likely to meet with lots of human traffic. So while you avoid the traffic jams at the Causeway, you now meet a new kind of jam -- human jam. Then when you reach JB, you still need transportation to reach your home. All in, this is going to take at least 1.5 hrs.
As for HSR, the price of ticket may not be cheap for the lower income workers to use it for everyday travel. Even if it is feasible for one to pay and use it everyday, the problems as explained above, will still be there. Your traveling time will not be shortened.