I have done so already. I said the overwhelming imperative is to vote more credible opposition in, and GD's posts in this thread don't conflict with this imperative. I also said track record matters. When I first came on board (in my present form), I accused you of being a TNP reporter. Later your track record proved me wrong; no TNP reporter can possibly write your 7,844 posts with the same content and with the hidden intent for getting a new story for his chief editor. That's what i meant by judging someone from his track record.
You and GD are both necessary voices. I don't see the conflict of interest you see.
wauhahhaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!! you never failed to amaze me. always pre-judged people and got it all wrong...you intellectual hardnuts are all like that...think so highly of yourselves and then branded people like you know them from adams!!!...and in the end, all wrong...but too proud to apologise, too proud to admit mistakes..but continue to shoulder that bruised ego and pride to hide their utter stewpidities...what a shame!!!