- Joined
- Oct 5, 2018
- Messages
- 17,588
- Points
- 113
The crash of the aviation industry affected Singapore airlines but it is not the sole reason that ruined them. Shutting down passenger operations reduces much of their variable costs and their air cargo business is still viable.
If SIA is a bus company, it also likes to buy-sell buses because they enjoyed <2%pa financing. Doing so in the past, gave SIA a youthful fleet and high-resale value for their planes. However, this bus company is now facing over capacity in the industry and new buses are likely to be cheaper than old buses.
This time, analysts are projecting SIA to lose $1.2 billion. (I suspect higher) Bear in mind that depreciation of current fleet and loss of passenger traffic will not cost them $3m loss/day. SIA is also like a bus company that speculates in oil futures. If you are on the wrong side, you bet $1, may lose $5 if you don't unwind your positions. In the past, when SIA bet wrongly, they can jolly-well charge a higher fare to passengers. This time, nobody expects oil to crash below US$22. They certainly lost a lot more than the amount they bet if they delayed the unwinding of their positions.
I believe Singapore will bail out them eventually because of national pride. However, there is more economic sense for SIA to go bust and restructure the debts before Singapore bails them out. Will we use our brains or hearts to save SIA?
Reference -
SIA bets on oil prices going up as it extends fuel hedging
https://www.straitstimes.com/business/sia-bets-on-oil-prices-going-up-as-it-extends-fuel-hedging
If SIA is a bus company, it also likes to buy-sell buses because they enjoyed <2%pa financing. Doing so in the past, gave SIA a youthful fleet and high-resale value for their planes. However, this bus company is now facing over capacity in the industry and new buses are likely to be cheaper than old buses.
This time, analysts are projecting SIA to lose $1.2 billion. (I suspect higher) Bear in mind that depreciation of current fleet and loss of passenger traffic will not cost them $3m loss/day. SIA is also like a bus company that speculates in oil futures. If you are on the wrong side, you bet $1, may lose $5 if you don't unwind your positions. In the past, when SIA bet wrongly, they can jolly-well charge a higher fare to passengers. This time, nobody expects oil to crash below US$22. They certainly lost a lot more than the amount they bet if they delayed the unwinding of their positions.
I believe Singapore will bail out them eventually because of national pride. However, there is more economic sense for SIA to go bust and restructure the debts before Singapore bails them out. Will we use our brains or hearts to save SIA?
Reference -
SIA bets on oil prices going up as it extends fuel hedging
https://www.straitstimes.com/business/sia-bets-on-oil-prices-going-up-as-it-extends-fuel-hedging