• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

How PAP devised the GRC system of elections to checkmate Singapore citizens and hold their MPs hostage.

bic_cherry

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
2,086
Points
83
How PAP devised the GRC system of elections to checkmate Singapore citizens and hold their MPs hostage.


Even LKY wasn't so evil, so did Lee Hsien Loong devise the GRC system to checkmate all Singaporeans?


Chan Chun Seng said that the opposition was trying to "checkmate" the PAP government, perhaps he should stop calling the kettle black when it was probably his own master, PM Lee Hsien Loong who devised the GRC system of elections to hold all GRC MPs hostage and thus checkmate Singaporeans as MPs are forced to obey the whip by default, save allowance to vote by conscience once in a blue moon. https://www.todayonline.com/singapo...as-it-been-lifted-and-which-countries-have-it


Even Lee Kuan Yew wasn't so evil in systematically depriving Singaporeans of their rights to just and effective political representation.


During LKY as PM-ship years prior to introduction of the GRC system in 1988, even LKY knew that he could only push a PAP MP so far in running roughshod over human rights issues, since a disenfranchised PAP MP could well spite the PAP in the face by returning as an independent or opposition candidate in a compulsory by-election if the were to be ejected from Parliament by the PAP political party by virtue of him being expelled from PAP political party membership by the PAP Exco. This is because the constitution states that all vacated MP seats must be filled in 3 months, unless parliament is to be vacated in time for a general election to happen in 6 months. Thus, there was a limit to LKY being evil and violating the human rights of Singapore citizens.


The GRC system however, has since removed that safety measure and removed the liberty of GRC MP's to vote with their conscience, since statutes pertaining to GRC system clearly almost totally dismiss the need for any by-election, save the unlikely situation that all seats in the GRC in question are altogether vacated. (See Parliamentary elections act states in Cap 24, (2A) "In respect of any group representation constituency, no writ shall be issued under subsection (1) for an election to fill any vacancy unless all the Members for that constituency have vacated their seats in Parliament." https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/PEA1954?ProvIds=P1III-#pr24-)


And the GRC is a purely superfluous and redudunt creation, devised purely to advance PAP interest, since by Snr Minister of State Maliki Osman, by way of logical extension, that the NCMP scheme would suit a guaranteed quota of minority MPs and even go further with a much more generous provision of more minority representation as well as access by all minorities to even NMP representing their religious groups if the NCMP, by way of racial affiliation, couldn't solve their displeasure with a particular government policy or proposal.


Even the GRC statutes are an absurdity and unjust and most derogatory towards minority rights, since like any, the vacancy of a minority MP from a GRC requires no replacement, making a mockery of the minority MP representation as a mere entry ticket for GRC MPs into parliament.


Thus, the creation of the creation of the GRC system was one wholly superfluous and most likely a product of mischief or malice.


And I wonder, who was the evil maths genius who devised this evil method of legislating depotism/ monarchy rule in a democratic country like Singapore should be.


========================
Reference :
CNA 2 July 2020: Singapore GE2020: NCMP scheme "already improved and enhanced", says Maliki Osman. He said the concept of Non-Constituency MPs has already seen enhancements. He added that the NCMPs who are eventually voted into Parliament will have the power to vote.
 
you are giving too much credit to the imbecile pinky, he couldnt bent down to tie his own shoelaces properly, one thing i must really admit he has done exceptionally well, employing all the yes men
these and numerous evil money making schemes are thought up by behind the scene evil minds.....they know who they are. karma will find them....eventually
 
Last edited:
you are giving too much credit to the imbecile pinky, he couldnt bent down to tie his own shoelaces properly, one thing i must really admit he has done exceptionally well, employing all the yes men
these and numerous evil money making schemes are thought up by behind the scene evil minds.....they know who they are. karma will find them....eventually
Please don't under estimate an evil maths genius .

He can dissipate your entire life savings faster than u can say "noooo".
 
Would you vote a non Chinese as MP?

To hell with it, I’ll vote for Paul T. as PM if Tharman doesn’t want to take the post!
 
Would you vote a non Chinese as MP?

To hell with it, I’ll vote for Paul T. as PM if Tharman doesn’t want to take the post!

The PAP is the biggest racist party ever and sees everything through the lens of race.

Oh, we need a minority MP in the GRC to show that the minorities are represented! :rolleyes:

Archaic, stupid and you know damn well why LKY invented the GRC system. No point sugar-coating it or including in highfalutin to justify it. :wink:
 
GRC is a ingenious system to unfairly advantage the incumbent. Minority representation is in name, in practice GRC is a slippery system to neutralize potential electoral threat. A SMC under threat can be subsumed into a neighboring GRC or new GRC created to absorb it. A ward in a GRC with high opposition votes by precinct can be redrawn and absorbed into a neigboring GRC. Right?
 
How PAP devised the GRC system of elections to checkmate Singapore citizens and hold their MPs hostage.


Even LKY wasn't so evil, so did Lee Hsien Loong devise the GRC system to checkmate all Singaporeans?


Chan Chun Seng said that the opposition was trying to "checkmate" the PAP government, perhaps he should stop calling the kettle black when it was probably his own master, PM Lee Hsien Loong who devised the GRC system of elections to hold all GRC MPs hostage and thus checkmate Singaporeans as MPs are forced to obey the whip by default, save allowance to vote by conscience once in a blue moon. https://www.todayonline.com/singapo...as-it-been-lifted-and-which-countries-have-it


Even Lee Kuan Yew wasn't so evil in systematically depriving Singaporeans of their rights to just and effective political representation.


During LKY as PM-ship years prior to introduction of the GRC system in 1988, even LKY knew that he could only push a PAP MP so far in running roughshod over human rights issues, since a disenfranchised PAP MP could well spite the PAP in the face by returning as an independent or opposition candidate in a compulsory by-election if the were to be ejected from Parliament by the PAP political party by virtue of him being expelled from PAP political party membership by the PAP Exco. This is because the constitution states that all vacated MP seats must be filled in 3 months, unless parliament is to be vacated in time for a general election to happen in 6 months. Thus, there was a limit to LKY being evil and violating the human rights of Singapore citizens.


The GRC system however, has since removed that safety measure and removed the liberty of GRC MP's to vote with their conscience, since statutes pertaining to GRC system clearly almost totally dismiss the need for any by-election, save the unlikely situation that all seats in the GRC in question are altogether vacated. (See Parliamentary elections act states in Cap 24, (2A) "In respect of any group representation constituency, no writ shall be issued under subsection (1) for an election to fill any vacancy unless all the Members for that constituency have vacated their seats in Parliament." https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/PEA1954?ProvIds=P1III-#pr24-)


And the GRC is a purely superfluous and redudunt creation, devised purely to advance PAP interest, since by Snr Minister of State Maliki Osman, by way of logical extension, that the NCMP scheme would suit a guaranteed quota of minority MPs and even go further with a much more generous provision of more minority representation as well as access by all minorities to even NMP representing their religious groups if the NCMP, by way of racial affiliation, couldn't solve their displeasure with a particular government policy or proposal.


Even the GRC statutes are an absurdity and unjust and most derogatory towards minority rights, since like any, the vacancy of a minority MP from a GRC requires no replacement, making a mockery of the minority MP representation as a mere entry ticket for GRC MPs into parliament.


Thus, the creation of the creation of the GRC system was one wholly superfluous and most likely a product of mischief or malice.


And I wonder, who was the evil maths genius who devised this evil method of legislating depotism/ monarchy rule in a democratic country like Singapore should be.


========================
Reference :
CNA 2 July 2020: Singapore GE2020: NCMP scheme "already improved and enhanced", says Maliki Osman. He said the concept of Non-Constituency MPs has already seen enhancements. He added that the NCMPs who are eventually voted into Parliament will have the power to vote.


Then why don't this clown tell the people to vote opposition - if he loses, he can always join the NCMP scheme since he thinks the world of it.
 
Would you vote a non Chinese as MP?

To hell with it, I’ll vote for Paul T. as PM if Tharman doesn’t want to take the post!

I m a Malay. Btw Masago n TPL..i rather give my vote to TPL. Nothg to do with race.

My relative at Macpherson in a dilemma. TPL or oppie. They dont like MIW btw. But they like TPL.
 
PAP has 60-70% popular vote. it's easy to gerrymander the districts for a big victory. GRC is more effective than SMC for gerrymandering cracking.
 
I m a Malay. Btw Masago n TPL..i rather give my vote to TPL. Nothg to do with race.

My relative at Macpherson in a dilemma. TPL or oppie. They dont like MIW btw. But they like TPL.

TPL is PAP. 1 person 1 vote only. doesn't matter much in the big picture. just vote from heart lah.
 
Back
Top