- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
- Messages
- 14,152
- Points
- 113
https://honestreporting.com/deconstructing-the-israeli-genocide-libel/
One of the most pernicious lies that continues to be spread about Israel is the claim that the Jewish state has committed (and continues to commit) the crime of genocide against the local Arab population, including the Palestinians.
Whether it’s being advanced by Hollywood superstars like Mark Ruffalo, noted legal scholars, or United Nations officials, the genocide claim is one of the most popular and harmful libels about Israel to be spread in the 21st century.
Here we deconstruct the genocide libel.
The term “genocide” was coined in 1944 as a means of describing the atrocities that were then taking place in Nazi-controlled Europe as well as other instances of ethnic annihilation, such as the Armenian Genocide in 1915.
In 1948, the newly-formed United Nations adopted the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, codifying the crime of genocide.
According to Article II of the Convention, genocide refers to a number of acts that are “committed with an intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.”
The acts, as enumerated by the Convention include killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm, inflicting conditions of life that would bring about the group’s physical destruction, imposing measures to prevent births within the group, or transferring children out of the group.
Those who accuse Israel of committing genocide tend to focus on a number of claims:
Claim: The exodus of 700,000 Palestinian refugees in 1948 (along with the killing of Palestinians during the Israeli War of Independence) is tantamount to genocide.
The charge is inapplicable as:
For Israel to be guilty of “incremental genocide,” the Palestinian population would have to be purposefully decreased by Israel.
However, a look at the population figures for Israel’s Arab citizenry as well as the Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza shows a marked increase in these populations.
As one analyst put it, for Israel to be accused of genocide while the Palestinian and Arab Israeli populations are continually increasing would mean that the Israelis “appear to be the most incompetent genocidaires to ever walk this earth and are responsible for the only large-scale annihilation campaign in history where the victim population actually increased.”
Charge: Israel’s conduct during military operations is akin to genocide.
This accusation carries little weight.
While it is tragic whenever innocent civilians are killed in battle, Israel consistently tries to maintain low civilian casualty rates by forewarning the local population about impending strikes, calling off strategic strikes when civilians are identified in the target area, and using ground forces in high-density areas.
However, the IDF’s aim of refraining from harming civilians is hampered by the purposeful embedding of terrorists within civilian centers and the use of the local population as human shields by Palestinian terror groups.
Nevertheless, as pointed out by a number of analysts, the civilian casualty ratios during recent Israeli military engagements are some of the lowest in modern warfare, particularly when it comes to urban warfare.
Israel’s conduct, therefore, disproves the heinous accusation of Israeli genocidal intent during its military engagements.
One of the most pernicious lies that continues to be spread about Israel is the claim that the Jewish state has committed (and continues to commit) the crime of genocide against the local Arab population, including the Palestinians.
Whether it’s being advanced by Hollywood superstars like Mark Ruffalo, noted legal scholars, or United Nations officials, the genocide claim is one of the most popular and harmful libels about Israel to be spread in the 21st century.
Here we deconstruct the genocide libel.
What is Genocide?
The term “genocide” was coined in 1944 as a means of describing the atrocities that were then taking place in Nazi-controlled Europe as well as other instances of ethnic annihilation, such as the Armenian Genocide in 1915.
In 1948, the newly-formed United Nations adopted the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, codifying the crime of genocide.
According to Article II of the Convention, genocide refers to a number of acts that are “committed with an intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.”
The acts, as enumerated by the Convention include killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm, inflicting conditions of life that would bring about the group’s physical destruction, imposing measures to prevent births within the group, or transferring children out of the group.
The Legal Genocide Libel
Those who accuse Israel of committing genocide tend to focus on a number of claims:
Claim: The exodus of 700,000 Palestinian refugees in 1948 (along with the killing of Palestinians during the Israeli War of Independence) is tantamount to genocide.
The charge is inapplicable as:
- There is no intent to destroy (in whole or in part) an ethnic, national, racial, or religious group;
- Any limited expulsion of Palestinian Arabs from certain areas was strategic and not motivated by genocidal intent; and
- Furthermore, the vast majority of Palestinian refugees evacuated those areas of their own accord (whether out of fear or at the behest of Arab leaders) and were not expelled by Israeli forces.
For Israel to be guilty of “incremental genocide,” the Palestinian population would have to be purposefully decreased by Israel.
However, a look at the population figures for Israel’s Arab citizenry as well as the Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza shows a marked increase in these populations.
As one analyst put it, for Israel to be accused of genocide while the Palestinian and Arab Israeli populations are continually increasing would mean that the Israelis “appear to be the most incompetent genocidaires to ever walk this earth and are responsible for the only large-scale annihilation campaign in history where the victim population actually increased.”
Charge: Israel’s conduct during military operations is akin to genocide.
This accusation carries little weight.
While it is tragic whenever innocent civilians are killed in battle, Israel consistently tries to maintain low civilian casualty rates by forewarning the local population about impending strikes, calling off strategic strikes when civilians are identified in the target area, and using ground forces in high-density areas.
However, the IDF’s aim of refraining from harming civilians is hampered by the purposeful embedding of terrorists within civilian centers and the use of the local population as human shields by Palestinian terror groups.
Nevertheless, as pointed out by a number of analysts, the civilian casualty ratios during recent Israeli military engagements are some of the lowest in modern warfare, particularly when it comes to urban warfare.
Israel’s conduct, therefore, disproves the heinous accusation of Israeli genocidal intent during its military engagements.
