One thing I do agree is that it is now a commercial race now that Temasek removed NTUC's political cloak from CDG after its investment in Grab.
By the way it is not an insinuation. Its a claim, and a direct one at that. Look at the Board of Directors of CDG. Tell me how many are not connected to the PAP. How did CDG end up with those particular individuals on the Board. Surely not divine intervention. Shareholding nominees are an interesting vehicle and always has served its purpose with no one better at it than the late Khoo Teck Puat.
Why do you think 6 PAP MPs got involved in the taxi association about 2 years ago and one took over CDG taxi businesses as the CEO in the last few months - bit of an overkill, fluke, coincidence, mirage etc?
If you think that NTUC has no connection to CDG and that NTUC is not connected to PAP, then it matters little to address this any further.
In Australia, both the PM and his wife on election put all their commercials interest in a blind trust or they are sold.
By the way it is not an insinuation. Its a claim, and a direct one at that. Look at the Board of Directors of CDG. Tell me how many are not connected to the PAP. How did CDG end up with those particular individuals on the Board. Surely not divine intervention. Shareholding nominees are an interesting vehicle and always has served its purpose with no one better at it than the late Khoo Teck Puat.
Why do you think 6 PAP MPs got involved in the taxi association about 2 years ago and one took over CDG taxi businesses as the CEO in the last few months - bit of an overkill, fluke, coincidence, mirage etc?
If you think that NTUC has no connection to CDG and that NTUC is not connected to PAP, then it matters little to address this any further.
In Australia, both the PM and his wife on election put all their commercials interest in a blind trust or they are sold.
I think you folks need to stick to the topic at hand and not go on anti-PAP ranting in different directions.
This thread as per the title is to discuss CDG's 51% investment in LCCR, a subsidiary of Uber. All I am saying is the various insinuations of PAP malfeasance with regards to this investment are uncalled for as no public monies are involved in this investment either through Temasek, GIC or SLF as the government has no economic stake in CDG. This investment's success or failures will be borne solely by the shareholders of CDG of which the government is not.
I'm not sure why you guys are bringing up matters like political machinations within the National Taxi Association, PAP appointed NTUC Secretary General, Temasek investing a minor stake in Grab or other histories of GLCs. I agree on most of these observations anyway, but this doesn't change the fact that CDG is not a GLC and therefore its latest investment is not really of public interest.
As far the taxi drivers are concerned, they are more than happy for the competition to heat up as the rental deals get sweeter for them. There has been reports of widespread defection to the Grab + 5 Taxi Co.s because of better deals. I would expect CDG + Uber to fight back soon with comparable terms and conditions.
As far as the general public users are concerned, the best outcome would be neither group lands a KO punch and they continue to throw promo codes and discount schemes which gives all of us more choices and lower fares.