• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Hairstylist tracks down online attacker

metalslug

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.asiaone.com/Digital/News/Story/A1Story20090405-133355.html

Sun, Apr 05, 2009
The New Paper

20090405.014751_tracks_down_attacker.jpg


He tracks down online attacker

A HAIRSTYLIST was perplexed when his business began nosediving suddenly last year.

He received fewer calls and, worse, some regular clients cancelled their appointments.

Mr Kenny Tan, 30, who has been running a hair salon in his Hougang flat for the past two years, said his business dropped by more than 50 per cent.

Suspecting something amiss, he did an online search for his name and found the likely source of his problems.

Someone had criticised his services under an assumed name on a popular fashion and beauty website last May.

The person who went by the name 'AmandaS' had posted: 'Cut my hair into holes... Perm my hair bloat up... Appointment was said to be at 9am, end up delay to 10am when I reach there at 9.15am.

'I believe his webpage is kind of bullshit. Please don't go there, regret forever. I now need to get any haircut to save my haircut.'

The remarks angered Mr Tan.

'I was very agitated when I read the post. The accusations were not true,' he told The New Paper.

'Even if this person was unhappy with my services, he should have told me directly so that I can rectify it. It's just irresponsible to do such a thing.'

He recalled that several clients called to cancel their appointments at about the same time the comments were posted online.

'It was strange because all of a sudden, my business started to slow down tremendously,' he added.

Mr Tan said he had no idea who posted the comments and felt helpless because he thought that there was nothing he could do about it.

But he refused to just accept the online abuse, so he called the police, who advised him to make a magistrate's complaint.

After he made the complaint, the police managed to track down the person who posted the comments.

Mr Tan came face to face with his online attacker during a mediation session at the Subordinate Courts last December.

It turned out that AmandaS is actually Jackson Lim, a 19-year-old polytechnic student who had gone to Mr Tan to perm his hair last year.

No complaints

Mr Tan said he remembered Jackson as a customer, but he did not complain about the services then.

During the mediation, Jackson admitted his mistake, Mr Tan said.

Mr Tan said he would let the matter rest and not take up a civil suit against him, provided that he remove his comments on the website, apologise online to him and place an apology notice in The Straits Times Classifieds section.

In the notice which was published last Saturday, Jackson apologised to Mr Tan for the wrongful accusation of his hairstyling service in a website forum. He said the advertisement served as a gesture of his sincere apology.

Mr Tan said the online apology helped boost his business - a few new clients have called him since.

'But some damage has been done. My reputation has been affected and this is my livelihood we're talking about. I've lost some clients,' he said.

Jackson's father, taxi driver Lim See Thim, who accompanied his son to court, said he paid about $600 for the apology notice.

Said the 58-year-old in Mandarin: 'My son said that he posted the comments online because he didn't like his (Mr Tan) services. I think it's a small matter and we've already settled it.

'I've wasted enough time going to court. I just want to settle the issue and forget about it.'

Lawyer Roy Yeo said that in such circumstances, the hairdresser could possibly sue for defamation, loss of business and reputation.

Mr Tan's case shows that people who hide behind an online monicker to flame someone in cyberspace can still be caught and suffer the consequences.

Said Mr Yeo: 'If the comments are defamatory, there are ways to find out who posted the comments and to trace the person.'

This story was first published in The New Paper.
 

shOUTloud

Alfrescian
Loyal
wahaha. fucking idiot boy gets his just desserts. he is lucky the hairstylist give chance and his lao peh only waste a day and $600.
 

Hakka Tiow

Alfrescian
Loyal
Think! This is a warning to all not to defame someone on the internet if not prepare for section 400 of the penal code. Very cheap to sue. Make the person bankrupt. Better not go "STOMPING", if you know what I mean? Make sure you have clear video with audio, documentary evidence and witnesses, If not keep your mouth shut! PAP, happy?
And yes, the police can get info to the identity of the person who post comments on line. Get it?
 

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
Seems like a lots of these type of warnings going around. The more serious terrorist hoaxer who used local internet cafes and was tracked down by the local police is another eg.
And yes, the police can get info to the identity of the person who post comments on line. Get it?
 

Ah Guan

Alfrescian
Loyal
Seems like a lots of these type of warnings going around. The more serious terrorist hoaxer who used local internet cafes and was tracked down by the local police is another eg.

Flaming is not a criminal offense. But this hairstylist had a case because the ah beng's post resulted in a loss of income.

 
Top