• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Guess??? With several farms closing or struggling to break even, what is the future for agriculture in Singapore?

Hightech88

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
4,237
Points
113
All kum gong kernah played out by the PAP-Gov advocating their ranjiao ambitious “30-by-30” goal of producing 30 per cent of its nutritional needs by 2030.

So how? Guess who is paying for all these startup failures with subsidies?

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/today/big-read/high-tech-low-returns-farming-4684566

With several farms closing or struggling to break even, what is the future for agriculture in Singapore?​

Without a large amount of capital, very few agriculture startups are able to come up with a business model that allows them to survive. It may be time to reassess the role that high-tech farming can play in Singapore’s ongoing quest for food security.
20241020-ns-rlbigread1020.jpg

(Illustration: CNA/ Nurjannah Suhaimi) 19 Oct 2024 09:30PM(Updated: 20 Oct 2024 02:33PM)

These days, when wide-eyed entrepreneurs in Singapore approach agri-tech consultant Lionel Wong for help with starting their vertical vegetable farming business, his advice tends to be: “Don’t do it.”

Not that Mr Wong lacks passion for the business. The co-founder of Upgrown Farming has been in the agriculture industry for over a decade, years before the nation touted its ambitious “30-by-30” goal of producing 30 per cent of its nutritional needs by 2030.

In that time, he has seen his fair share of startups dive into the high-tech farming hype, only to drag themselves out of the soil with their pockets significantly lighter.

Without a large amount of capital, very few are able to come up with a business model that allows them to survive, Mr Wong believes.

He told CNA TODAY: “(High-tech) farming is not the devil here, it’s just a tool – and knowing how to use this tool is the responsibility of the business owner.”

In high-tech farming, science and technology are often integrated to replicate natural environments while optimising growth conditions, allowing farms to grow more food faster, better and with less.

It has been heralded as a key pillar in growing local produce in land-scarce Singapore.

However, despite millions of dollars allocated to various funds, grants and research and development (R&D) programmes to grow the nation’s nascent agricultural industry, it does not appear to have yielded the desired tangible output.

The proportion of locally grown vegetables and seafood has dropped for two consecutive years, with only hen shell egg production bucking the trend slightly.

Furthermore, clouds of doubt have gathered over once-promising developments in vertical farming — the system of cultivating crops in vertically stacked layers.

Local indoor farm I.F.F.I closed its mega 38,000 sqm facility in Tuas in April 2024. Shortly after, VertiVegies scrapped plans to construct its indoor farm in Lim Chu Kang. Sky Greens is also scaling down its operations, with many of its greenhouses reportedly torn down.

Worldwide, vertical farm startups with once-high valuations such as Agricool, Kalera and Aerofarms have also faced heavy losses and filed for bankruptcy, in part due to unsustainable business models. Venture capital investments into the agri-tech space have fallen by 60 per cent since late 2021.

In the aquaculture space, things have not gone swimmingly either for local firms.

Barramundi Group, which sold 9.5 per cent of locally produced fish in 2020, stopped stocking its three ocean-based farm sites with juvenile fish in June 2023 due to a deadly fish virus outbreak.

Compounding the bleak mood surrounding the local farming scene are reports that Singapore’s fourth egg farm, IFH, may be reconsidering the viability of setting up its operations here.

The Singapore Food Agency (SFA) said in response to CNA TODAY's queries that it has been working closely with IFH to help it set up the farm.

There was also recent news that developmental work for the Lim Chu Kang masterplan — an initiative to redevelop about 390 hectares of land there into a high-productivity agri-food zone — has been delayed.

But there are also bright sparks — businesses that have managed to succeed by either carving a niche for themselves or diversifying their revenue streams by going beyond just selling produce.

Mr Ray Poh, the founder of local indoor farm Artisan Green, for instance, said his firm consistently rolls out products with more demand than supply in the market, like baby spinach, leading to a sustainable business.

They have broken even on their vegetable farm and are in the midst of building a bigger one in Sungei Tengah which will be operational in 2025.

Nonetheless, such encouraging stories are few and far between, raising questions whether Singapore can create a viable high-tech agricultural sector that will help reduce its reliance on food imports.

As 2030 looms over the horizon, CNA TODAY looks at why it is difficult for agri-tech firms here to succeed, and the role that high-tech farming can play in Singapore’s ongoing quest for food security in the future.

------------------------

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/cna...allenge-singapore-farms-30-food-vision-515836

PRODUCTIVITY PLATFORMS AND PITFALLS​

To further help with productivity, the government has made several grants available since 2014. At least three are targeted specifically at the agriculture industry.

One is the Singapore Food Agency’s (SFA’s) S$63-million Agriculture Productivity Fund. It is meant for farmers to invest in more innovative systems that can boost their yield, for example under a scheme — capped at S$50,000 — for the purchase of equipment.

There is also a scheme for farmers to convert their farm into a more high-tech farming system.
--------------
 
Electricity in Singapore so expensive, how to sustain indoor farms. Even with the cheapest ah neh labour will also be difficult.
 
When u go woke u go broke!

Nobody wants shit grown from shining a bright light on it in a lab. And have u seen those vegetables? They look like shit!
 
When u go woke u go broke!

Nobody wants shit grown from shining a bright light on it in a lab. And have u seen those vegetables? They look like shit!

Correct, esp. those home-grown NTUC Kai Kan looks weird out of shape and taste like shit, even you shave off the outer skin of the stem still can chew the fibres like eating sugar cane and the leaf does not taste a bit like traditional Kai Lan leaf at all, NBCB.
 
Last edited:
For whatever reason, the Davos demons and their fanboys are super obsessed about the year 2030. :unsure:

2030 this target, 2030 that target. :rolleyes:

 
All kum gong kernah played out by the PAP-Gov advocating their ranjiao ambitious “30-by-30” goal of producing 30 per cent of its nutritional needs by 2030.

So how? Guess who is paying for all these startup failures with subsidies?

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/today/big-read/high-tech-low-returns-farming-4684566

With several farms closing or struggling to break even, what is the future for agriculture in Singapore?​

Without a large amount of capital, very few agriculture startups are able to come up with a business model that allows them to survive. It may be time to reassess the role that high-tech farming can play in Singapore’s ongoing quest for food security.
20241020-ns-rlbigread1020.jpg

(Illustration: CNA/ Nurjannah Suhaimi) 19 Oct 2024 09:30PM(Updated: 20 Oct 2024 02:33PM)

These days, when wide-eyed entrepreneurs in Singapore approach agri-tech consultant Lionel Wong for help with starting their vertical vegetable farming business, his advice tends to be: “Don’t do it.”

Not that Mr Wong lacks passion for the business. The co-founder of Upgrown Farming has been in the agriculture industry for over a decade, years before the nation touted its ambitious “30-by-30” goal of producing 30 per cent of its nutritional needs by 2030.

In that time, he has seen his fair share of startups dive into the high-tech farming hype, only to drag themselves out of the soil with their pockets significantly lighter.

Without a large amount of capital, very few are able to come up with a business model that allows them to survive, Mr Wong believes.

He told CNA TODAY: “(High-tech) farming is not the devil here, it’s just a tool – and knowing how to use this tool is the responsibility of the business owner.”

In high-tech farming, science and technology are often integrated to replicate natural environments while optimising growth conditions, allowing farms to grow more food faster, better and with less.

It has been heralded as a key pillar in growing local produce in land-scarce Singapore.

However, despite millions of dollars allocated to various funds, grants and research and development (R&D) programmes to grow the nation’s nascent agricultural industry, it does not appear to have yielded the desired tangible output.

The proportion of locally grown vegetables and seafood has dropped for two consecutive years, with only hen shell egg production bucking the trend slightly.

Furthermore, clouds of doubt have gathered over once-promising developments in vertical farming — the system of cultivating crops in vertically stacked layers.

Local indoor farm I.F.F.I closed its mega 38,000 sqm facility in Tuas in April 2024. Shortly after, VertiVegies scrapped plans to construct its indoor farm in Lim Chu Kang. Sky Greens is also scaling down its operations, with many of its greenhouses reportedly torn down.

Worldwide, vertical farm startups with once-high valuations such as Agricool, Kalera and Aerofarms have also faced heavy losses and filed for bankruptcy, in part due to unsustainable business models. Venture capital investments into the agri-tech space have fallen by 60 per cent since late 2021.

In the aquaculture space, things have not gone swimmingly either for local firms.

Barramundi Group, which sold 9.5 per cent of locally produced fish in 2020, stopped stocking its three ocean-based farm sites with juvenile fish in June 2023 due to a deadly fish virus outbreak.

Compounding the bleak mood surrounding the local farming scene are reports that Singapore’s fourth egg farm, IFH, may be reconsidering the viability of setting up its operations here.

The Singapore Food Agency (SFA) said in response to CNA TODAY's queries that it has been working closely with IFH to help it set up the farm.

There was also recent news that developmental work for the Lim Chu Kang masterplan — an initiative to redevelop about 390 hectares of land there into a high-productivity agri-food zone — has been delayed.

But there are also bright sparks — businesses that have managed to succeed by either carving a niche for themselves or diversifying their revenue streams by going beyond just selling produce.

Mr Ray Poh, the founder of local indoor farm Artisan Green, for instance, said his firm consistently rolls out products with more demand than supply in the market, like baby spinach, leading to a sustainable business.

They have broken even on their vegetable farm and are in the midst of building a bigger one in Sungei Tengah which will be operational in 2025.

Nonetheless, such encouraging stories are few and far between, raising questions whether Singapore can create a viable high-tech agricultural sector that will help reduce its reliance on food imports.

As 2030 looms over the horizon, CNA TODAY looks at why it is difficult for agri-tech firms here to succeed, and the role that high-tech farming can play in Singapore’s ongoing quest for food security in the future.

------------------------

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/cna...allenge-singapore-farms-30-food-vision-515836

PRODUCTIVITY PLATFORMS AND PITFALLS​

To further help with productivity, the government has made several grants available since 2014. At least three are targeted specifically at the agriculture industry.

One is the Singapore Food Agency’s (SFA’s) S$63-million Agriculture Productivity Fund. It is meant for farmers to invest in more innovative systems that can boost their yield, for example under a scheme — capped at S$50,000 — for the purchase of equipment.

There is also a scheme for farmers to convert their farm into a more high-tech farming system.
--------------
A repeat of 1970s high tech pig farm saga?
 
Huge Spendings huge tax collection, half hearted policies.
Let's see the EV.
 
All kum gong kernah played out by the PAP-Gov advocating their ranjiao ambitious “30-by-30” goal of producing 30 per cent of its nutritional needs by 2030.

So how? Guess who is paying for all these startup failures with subsidies?

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/today/big-read/high-tech-low-returns-farming-4684566

With several farms closing or struggling to break even, what is the future for agriculture in Singapore?​

Without a large amount of capital, very few agriculture startups are able to come up with a business model that allows them to survive. It may be time to reassess the role that high-tech farming can play in Singapore’s ongoing quest for food security.
20241020-ns-rlbigread1020.jpg

(Illustration: CNA/ Nurjannah Suhaimi) 19 Oct 2024 09:30PM(Updated: 20 Oct 2024 02:33PM)

These days, when wide-eyed entrepreneurs in Singapore approach agri-tech consultant Lionel Wong for help with starting their vertical vegetable farming business, his advice tends to be: “Don’t do it.”

Not that Mr Wong lacks passion for the business. The co-founder of Upgrown Farming has been in the agriculture industry for over a decade, years before the nation touted its ambitious “30-by-30” goal of producing 30 per cent of its nutritional needs by 2030.

In that time, he has seen his fair share of startups dive into the high-tech farming hype, only to drag themselves out of the soil with their pockets significantly lighter.

Without a large amount of capital, very few are able to come up with a business model that allows them to survive, Mr Wong believes.

He told CNA TODAY: “(High-tech) farming is not the devil here, it’s just a tool – and knowing how to use this tool is the responsibility of the business owner.”

In high-tech farming, science and technology are often integrated to replicate natural environments while optimising growth conditions, allowing farms to grow more food faster, better and with less.

It has been heralded as a key pillar in growing local produce in land-scarce Singapore.

However, despite millions of dollars allocated to various funds, grants and research and development (R&D) programmes to grow the nation’s nascent agricultural industry, it does not appear to have yielded the desired tangible output.

The proportion of locally grown vegetables and seafood has dropped for two consecutive years, with only hen shell egg production bucking the trend slightly.

Furthermore, clouds of doubt have gathered over once-promising developments in vertical farming — the system of cultivating crops in vertically stacked layers.

Local indoor farm I.F.F.I closed its mega 38,000 sqm facility in Tuas in April 2024. Shortly after, VertiVegies scrapped plans to construct its indoor farm in Lim Chu Kang. Sky Greens is also scaling down its operations, with many of its greenhouses reportedly torn down.

Worldwide, vertical farm startups with once-high valuations such as Agricool, Kalera and Aerofarms have also faced heavy losses and filed for bankruptcy, in part due to unsustainable business models. Venture capital investments into the agri-tech space have fallen by 60 per cent since late 2021.

In the aquaculture space, things have not gone swimmingly either for local firms.

Barramundi Group, which sold 9.5 per cent of locally produced fish in 2020, stopped stocking its three ocean-based farm sites with juvenile fish in June 2023 due to a deadly fish virus outbreak.

Compounding the bleak mood surrounding the local farming scene are reports that Singapore’s fourth egg farm, IFH, may be reconsidering the viability of setting up its operations here.

The Singapore Food Agency (SFA) said in response to CNA TODAY's queries that it has been working closely with IFH to help it set up the farm.

There was also recent news that developmental work for the Lim Chu Kang masterplan — an initiative to redevelop about 390 hectares of land there into a high-productivity agri-food zone — has been delayed.

But there are also bright sparks — businesses that have managed to succeed by either carving a niche for themselves or diversifying their revenue streams by going beyond just selling produce.

Mr Ray Poh, the founder of local indoor farm Artisan Green, for instance, said his firm consistently rolls out products with more demand than supply in the market, like baby spinach, leading to a sustainable business.

They have broken even on their vegetable farm and are in the midst of building a bigger one in Sungei Tengah which will be operational in 2025.

Nonetheless, such encouraging stories are few and far between, raising questions whether Singapore can create a viable high-tech agricultural sector that will help reduce its reliance on food imports.

As 2030 looms over the horizon, CNA TODAY looks at why it is difficult for agri-tech firms here to succeed, and the role that high-tech farming can play in Singapore’s ongoing quest for food security in the future.

------------------------

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/cna...allenge-singapore-farms-30-food-vision-515836

PRODUCTIVITY PLATFORMS AND PITFALLS​

To further help with productivity, the government has made several grants available since 2014. At least three are targeted specifically at the agriculture industry.

One is the Singapore Food Agency’s (SFA’s) S$63-million Agriculture Productivity Fund. It is meant for farmers to invest in more innovative systems that can boost their yield, for example under a scheme — capped at S$50,000 — for the purchase of equipment.

There is also a scheme for farmers to convert their farm into a more high-tech farming system.
--------------
Got gomen funds, go and grab it. Otherwise even in Sumatra, plenty of vegetables. On the volcanic slopes are their farms.
 
Welcome Produced in China agriculture products that these serfs will put in their mouths!
If they didn't mind putting melamine in milk powder that kills babies, what's is a few toxic chemicals that helps plants grow, looks fresh longer, but only slowly kills you with cancer eventually? Hey , they'll even go to great lengths to dupe HSA with fake samples and bait and switch, just for your benefit.
 
2 reasons:
It's never economically feasible.
You fail your problem.
 
All kum gong kernah played out by the PAP-Gov advocating their ranjiao ambitious “30-by-30” goal of producing 30 per cent of its nutritional needs by 2030.

It's not really about agriculture, is it? All the Davos globalist fuckboys, including the PAP technocrats, are obsessed about the year 2030 for their 'sustainability' cult. :cool:

And if food is involved, expect some kind of tech-infused or GMO'ed variation of farming, and they will use this phrase 'food security', to psycho you into believing what they do is wonderful and necessary. :wink:

SGP_2030.png
 
Correct, esp. those home-grown NTUC Kai Kan looks weird out of shape and taste like shit, even you shave off the outer skin of the stem still can chew the fibres like eating sugar cane and the leaf does not taste a bit like traditional Kai Lan leaf at all, NBCB.
So these high tech farms are failing bcos their produce taste like crap?
 
Follow this Kelantan guy

Not Even 30 And This Kelantan Farmer Is Raking In RM400k Monthly​

Starting with just 1,000 chilli plants and a modest government grant of RM10,000 (pocket change in today’s startup world), Chung now oversees an operation that ships 40 to 70 tons of premium vegetables monthly.
Kee-Soon-90x90.jpg.webp

by Fernando Fong
November 1, 2024



Untitled.jpg.webp

Facebook/@Lojing Farmers Market/Faris Mohamed
Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter, or Telegram and WhatsApp channels for the latest stories and updates.

What started as a small backyard garden has become a lucrative agricultural venture for 28-year-old Chung Chia Khang, who now earns approximately RM400,000 monthly from his 12-hectare vegetable farm in Lojing Highlands, Gua Musang.

Chung, who goes by Ah Kai, has transformed his initial 1,000-polybag chilli plantation into a thriving agricultural business that produces 40 to 70 tonnes of vegetables monthly.


His farm now cultivates over 100,000 plants, including cabbage, corn, tomatoes, and various leafy vegetables.

The timing couldn’t have been better – skyrocketing vegetable prices in recent years.

The market prices for vegetables have increased by more than 50 per cent compared to the past two years.

The School of Soil​

Chung exports much of his produce to Singapore through wholesalers in Cameron Highlands.

The young entrepreneur’s success story began after he completed his secondary education and enrolled in an agricultural course sponsored by the Rubber Industry Smallholders Development Authority (RISDA).

A modest RM10,000 grant from RISDA’s Additional Economic Activities program helped kickstart his farming journey.

Currently, Chung harvests nearly one tonne of cabbage daily from just 1.2 hectares of his land, demonstrating the potential profitability of modern farming techniques such as fertigation.

Smashing Stereotypes​

His success challenges the perception that agriculture is an unprofitable career choice for young people.

Young people have many opportunities if they’re motivated because farming is now a viable business and career.
Yet, even success stories like Chung’s can’t escape agriculture’s persistent demons: wildly fluctuating market prices that can turn profits to pennies overnight, the constant struggle for affordable farmland in an increasingly developed landscape, and the ever-present headache of finding reliable labour in a sector that young locals typically avoid.

The environmental toll adds another layer of complexity – particularly in places like Cameron Highlands, where decades of aggressive farming have left scars.
 
what will happen if mudland decides not to allow those lorries carrying produce into peesai?.....

We already buy water from them..what’s the problem with produce from private growers?
 
what will happen if mudland decides not to allow those lorries carrying produce into peesai?.....
Now I plant money cai in a small planter.
Small patch of sweet potatoes leaves for own consumption in case govt failed the import of vegetables.
 
Back
Top