• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Growth will leave no one behind: Tharman

cheekenpie

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
1,727
Points
0
We've got a black hawk down..... black hawk down...


Growth will leave no one behind: Tharman

Fri, Mar 05, 2010
my paper

By Esther Au Yong

SINGAPORE is investing in a new phase of growth and transformation outlined in Budget 2010, said Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam yesterday.

If everyone plays his part, no one will be left behind, he said, responding to points raised by 50 MPs over almost three days, wrapping up the Budget debate.


He said the Government is committing significant resources to help Singapore workers gain better skills, jobs and incomes.

This includes measures to help the lower-income group, like the enhanced Workfare Income Supplement and the new Workfare Training Scheme.

Mr Tharman rebutted opposition MP Low Thia Khiang's (Hougang) claim that the Government had depressed wages of lower-income citizens by letting in more foreign workers.

Said Mr Tharman: "By allowing the economy to grow rapidly in the second half of the (last) decade, we were able to bring unemployment down and grow the incomes of Singaporeans."

The unemployment rate for residents fell from 6 per cent in 2003 to 2.4 per cent by end- 2007.

Median income grew by 20 per cent over the decade, after adjustment for inflation. That of low-income households grew by 7 per cent over the decade.

The improvements would have been impossible if businesses were unable to hire more foreign workers, but Singapore cannot continue to rely on foreign labour alone to grow, he said.

So the Government is increasing foreign-worker levies, such that "the higher a company's dependency on foreign workers, the higher the levy rate and the bigger the levy bill it will have to bear", Manpower Minister Gan Kim Yong said earlier yesterday.

He rejected Mr Low's idea of using the dependency ratio alone to regulate foreign-worker numbers, as that would hamper certain industries heavily dependent on these workers.

He said: "The aim of the levy changes is to motivate companies to increase their productivity and deliver higher value-added products and services with fewer foreign workers.

"The increase in levies alone will not necessarily lead to productivity improvements if companies merely replace foreign workers with locals and employ the same number of workers."

Yesterday, Parliament resolved itself into a Committee of Supply (COS) to discuss the amounts allocated to each ministry for the next financial year.
 
His words certainly ring hollow when every single Minister earns more than the President of USA.
 
No Foreign Talent will be left behind....

Locals, especially the lower educated ones ( ie Malays).... have been farked properly...
 
what has productivity got to do with the real problem of low wage?

someone posted the LONG list of countries with legislated minimum wage for their people.

Singapore a "perpetual-almost-there-but-not-there-yet-first-world-wannabe" did not have one.
 
what has productivity got to do with the real problem of low wage?

someone posted the LONG list of countries with legislated minimum wage for their people.

Singapore a "perpetual-almost-there-but-not-there-yet-first-world-wannabe" did not have one.


Minimum wage is good bec it shows we value the old and lazy singaporean workers :)

Soon they will have campaign to say cleaning toilet is COOL

Appreciate 'dirty' jobs: NMP
Mar 4, 2010
A SEA-CHANGE in mindsets and attitudes is needed to make Singaporeans appreciate 'dirty' jobs.

Calling for a re-valuation of jobs that involve manual labour, Nominated MP Audrey Wong said in Parliament on Thursday: 'Instead of looking down on 'dirty' jobs, we should appreciate that they are vital aspects of our economy; workers need to feel they are respected members of society.

'This kind of re-valuing, again, demands a sea-change in our mindsets and attitudes.'

One way to do this is job redesign and investing in training and innovation, she said.

Ms Wong noted that in western countries, workers in lower-skilled jobs such as hospital cleaners have a different attitude and carry themselves differently.
'They see themselves as holding down a proper job, with proper pay and benefits, able to raise a family. These are quality of life markers that matter to the ordinary citizen,' said Ms Wong during the debate on the 2010 Budget Statement..

'As a society, let's aspire towards this. In Singapore we already have some examples of how job redesign and training have contributed towards raising professional standards and changing perceptions of certain jobs - for example, security guards.'

She also suggested that the Ministry of Education help to inculcate the value of handiwork in young Singaporeans to help build up appreciation for manual jobs.

'When our appreciation of manual labour rises, the standing of those who perform these jobs should rise too,' added Ms Wong.
 
what has productivity got to do with the real problem of low wage?

someone posted the LONG list of countries with legislated minimum wage for their people.

Singapore a "perpetual-almost-there-but-not-there-yet-first-world-wannabe" did not have one.

Now they hub on productivity like they have just woken up from a long slumber. Do the PAP parrots truly understand what it is all about?

Productivity is nothing now but just a smoke machine to digress from the real issues of the day, like a failing economic under the PAP's watch. They are fully accountable for the countries woes brought about by their bad policies forced down the people's throats for decades. Goes to prove beyond doubt that a one party government is NOT the answer.

Vote wisely for the country.
 
ministar: what! I really mean it! How to grow without the slaves to work harder, cheaper and faster? we need everyone of you, no one will be left behind!
 
Growth will leave no one behind: Tharman

Now where have I heard that before???:rolleyes: Oh yes.. it was here...

NEEDY Singaporeans do receive substantial help from the Government, and in fact the Government ensures that 'no needy Singaporean is left behind'.
Aug 19, 2009

Mrs Yu-Foo Yee Shoon, the Minister of State for Community Development, Youth and Sports (MCYS), said this in response to criticisms of Singapore's social safety net made on Tuesday by Nominated Member of Parliament Viswa Sadasivan.

Recent increases in the quantum of Public Assistance (PA) allowances means that the total sum that a large family gets can be very close to what a low-wage worker earns, she pointed out.

And the PA scheme is only one of many administered by her ministry to help the poor, she noted.
Citing another example, she said families with a monthly income of $1,500 or less receive childcare fee subsidies of at least 95per cent. They pay only $10 a month for childcare and $5 for kindergarten. As of April, an individual person on the PA scheme now gets $360 a month, up from the previous $330. Those with families get more.

MCYS provides children from PA families with additional assistance of up to $130 per child every month. Along with other aid, this means that a family of two adults and two children could get up to $1,210 a month, Mrs Yu-Foo pointed out.

This is comparable to the bottom 20per cent of wage earners in Singapore, who make $1,200 or less a month. There are fewer than 300,000 resident workers in this category.

PA recipients also receive other cash handouts and utilities and rental rebates from the Government, as well as meal vouchers and other forms of support from community organisations.

Mr Sadasivan had taken issue with what he called a 'very basic level of assistance' provided by the Government to very needy Singaporeans, which had to be supplemented by welfare organisations. He felt the Government was in a strong enough financial position to provide the necessary assistance directly.

In reply, Mrs Yu-Foo said that while MCYS could afford to give more to the 3,000 or so PA recipients, 'the greatest danger in doing so would be taking away the incentive of the much larger number of Singaporeans who are working hard, albeit in low-paying jobs'.
and here.....

[FONT=Verdana,][SIZE=+1]SWEARING IN SPEECH BY PRIME MINISTER LEE HSIEN LOONG[/SIZE][/FONT] - 12 August 2004. (6 years ago!!!!)
[FONT=Verdana,]
17 We are one nation together, building a future for ourselves and our people. As we prosper, all communities will progress and no one will be left behind. We will look after the less educated and the elderly who have helped build Singapore. And we must also have a place in our hearts and our lives for the disabled, who are our brothers and sisters too.
[/FONT]
 
we've got a black hawk down..... Black hawk down...


Growth will leave no one behind: Tharman

fri, mar 05, 2010
my paper

by esther au yong

singapore is investing in a new phase of growth and transformation outlined in budget 2010, said finance minister tharman shanmugaratnam yesterday.

If everyone plays his part, no one will be left behind, he said, responding to points raised by 50 mps over almost three days, wrapping up the budget debate.benefitting who?


He said the government is committing significant resources to help singapore workers gain better skills, jobs and incomes.

This includes measures to help the lower-income group, like the enhanced workfare income supplement and the new workfare training scheme. i didn't get it

mr tharman rebutted opposition mp low thia khiang's (hougang) claim that the government had depressed wages of lower-income citizens by letting in more foreign workers. isn't it true. Don't have to read the press to know. Can see it everywhere!
said mr tharman: "by allowing the economy to grow rapidly in the second half of the (last) decade, we were able to bring unemployment down and grow the incomes of singaporeans." don't just talk. Action speaks louder than words

the unemployment rate for residents fell from 6 per cent in 2003 to 2.4 per cent by end- 2007. whrer the hell you get figure from? Still hearing from my friends they're still not employed.

median income grew by 20 per cent over the decade, after adjustment for inflation. That of low-income households grew by 7 per cent over the decade. what income grew? Yours or the citizen?

the improvements would have been impossible if businesses were unable to hire more foreign workers, but singapore cannot continue to rely on foreign labour alone to grow, he said. you mean you papee didn't realize this all these years?

so the government is increasing foreign-worker levies, such that "the higher a company's dependency on foreign workers, the higher the levy rate and the bigger the levy bill it will have to bear", manpower minister gan kim yong said earlier yesterday. the increment of levy for the benefit of sinkie citizen or worried taxes collected not enough to pay you sitting up there?

he rejected mr low's idea of using the dependency ratio alone to regulate foreign-worker numbers, as that would hamper certain industries heavily dependent on these workers. don't just reject low, should ask the man in the streets.

he said: "the aim of the levy changes is to motivate companies to increase their productivity and deliver higher value-added products and services with fewer foreign workers. bullshit, what productivity?? Still got his meh?

"the increase in levies alone will not necessarily lead to productivity improvements if companies merely replace foreign workers with locals and employ the same number of workers."there! You see. Now say may not lead to productivity! Wtf

yesterday, parliament resolved itself into a committee of supply (cos) to discuss the amounts allocated to each ministry for the next financial year.
talk cock sing song. Song song ki jurong!
 
Now where have I heard that before???:rolleyes: Oh yes.. it was here...
and here.....
now ... where's dat blahdy button 2 gif inflaction 2 tis post 4 quoting huge chunks of message unnecessarily? ... :mad:
 
now ... where's dat blahdy button 2 gif inflaction 2 tis post 4 quoting huge chunks of message unnecessarily? ... :mad:

I'm not quoting any post you twit. They're quotes from other sources that I've included hyperlinks to. :rolleyes: That's what the
quote.gif
button is for.
 
as long as there is no powerful opposition, the pappies will not bother with the little grumbles here and there,

whatever few opposition parties we have do not have the financial muscle to challenge them
chee soon juan is one the the few brave enough and educated enough to expose their lies but there is far too few of chee soon juans around
so most will just shut the fuck up and migrate
 
No Foreign Talent will be left behind....

Locals, especially the lower educated ones ( ie Malays).... have been farked properly...


What he actually meant was No Minister 's pay
will be left behind of 8.8 percent increase .
 
Back
Top