Good Quran explains why muslim women should wear hijab!

[JohnTan]

The Greeks most certainly did not use the terms Hind or Sind; the Persians used the word Hindustan or Hindu

You're a retard who believes in revisionist history, forever living in your own fantasy world.

The name derives ultimately from Sanskrit Sindhu (सिन्धु), which was the name of the Indus River as well as the lower Indus basin (modern Sindh, in Pakistan).[5][6] The Old Persian equivalent of Síndhu was Hindu.[7] Darius I conquered Sindh in about 516 BCE, upon which the Persian equivalent Hinduš was used for the province at the lower Indus basin.[8][9] Skylax of Karyanda who explored the Indus river for the Persian emperor probably took over the Persian name and passed it into Greek.[10] The terms Indos (Ἰνδός) for the Indus river as well as "an Indian" are found in Herodotus's Geography.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_for_India#Hind_/_Hindustān

For example, Khalifa Umar ibn Khattab (RA) was killed by a Persian traitor who pretended to be a Muslim so he could assassinate him since Puuuursians have long been losers who can't fight and really are not a fighting, warrior nation

That 'persian traitor' was actually a Persian who was captured and enslaved by the arabs during their war against Persia Sassanid.

That 'traitor' is still revered by fellow persians as a war hero for killing the caliph who invaded Persia and killed many persians in the name of his mohammedan religion.
There's a shrine in iran today, hundreds of years old, to commemorate his slaying of the tyrant moslem king who enslaved the Persians.

The Shrine of Abu Lu'lu'a is a mausoleum built over what is popularly believed to be the final resting place of Abu Lu'lu'a Firuz, a Persian slave who assassinated the second Islamic caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab in 644 CE.[2] The structure was built by the Ilkhanid Mongols,[1][better source needed] and is located in Kashan, Isfahan Province, Iran.[3]

During the 16th-century Safavid conversion of Iran to Shia Islam, a festival started to be celebrated in honor of Abu Lu'lu'a, commemorating his assassination of Umar ibn al-Khattab.[6] Named Omar-koshan (lit. 'the killing of Umar'), it was originally held around Abu Lu'lu'a's sanctuary in Kashan, each year at the anniversary of Umar's death (26 Dhu al-Hijja of the Islamic year).[7] However, later it also started to be celebrated elsewhere in Iran, sometimes on 9 Rabi' al-Awwal rather than on 26 Dhu al-Hijja.[8] The festival celebrated Abu Lu'lu'a, nicknamed for the occasion Bābā Shujāʿ al-Dīn (lit. 'Father Courageous of the Faith'), as a national hero who had defended the religion by killing the oppressive caliph.[9]

Due to political sensitivities, from the Qajar period (1789–1925) onward the festival gradually stopped being celebrated in the major cities of Iran, until it was eventually banned officially by the Islamic Republic of Iran in 1979.[10] Nevertheless, the festival itself is still celebrated in Iran, though often secretly and indoors rather than outdoors.[11] It is now held on the 9th day of the month of Rabi' Al-Awwal of the Islamic year, lasting until the 27th of the same month.[12]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrine_of_Abu_Lu'lu'a

 

[mudhatter]

You're a retard who believes in revisionist history, forever living in your own fantasy world.

The name derives ultimately from Sanskrit Sindhu (सिन्धु), which was the name of the Indus River as well as the lower Indus basin (modern Sindh, in Pakistan).[5][6] The Old Persian equivalent of Síndhu was Hindu.[7] Darius I conquered Sindh in about 516 BCE, upon which the Persian equivalent Hinduš was used for the province at the lower Indus basin.[8][9] Skylax of Karyanda who explored the Indus river for the Persian emperor probably took over the Persian name and passed it into Greek.[10] The terms Indos (Ἰνδός) for the Indus river as well as "an Indian" are found in Herodotus's Geography.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_for_India#Hind_/_Hindustān

You are a slanty nincompoop whose only source of info is wikipedia infested with zionist yankees and ceca virus. As if chink virus and cowboy virus are not bad enough, now you yearn for ceca virus.

There is no mention whatsoever of this disgusting entity called "India" anywhere before the Brits founded a fake, artificial country called "India". The fact that you can only cite Wikipedia, which is filled to the brim with CECA virus jews and yanks, only affirms how flimsy the foundation on which they cooked up this mythical entity stands.

That 'persian traitor' was actually a Persian who was captured and enslaved by the arabs during their war against Persia Sassanid.

That 'traitor' is still revered by fellow persians as a war hero for killing the caliph who invaded Persia and killed many persians in the name of his mohammedan religion.
There's a shrine in iran today, hundreds of years old, to commemorate his slaying of the tyrant moslem king who enslaved the Persians.


View attachment 163481

The Shrine of Abu Lu'lu'a is a mausoleum built over what is popularly believed to be the final resting place of Abu Lu'lu'a Firuz, a Persian slave who assassinated the second Islamic caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab in 644 CE.[2] The structure was built by the Ilkhanid Mongols,[1][better source needed] and is located in Kashan, Isfahan Province, Iran.[3]

During the 16th-century Safavid conversion of Iran to Shia Islam, a festival started to be celebrated in honor of Abu Lu'lu'a, commemorating his assassination of Umar ibn al-Khattab.[6] Named Omar-koshan (lit. 'the killing of Umar'), it was originally held around Abu Lu'lu'a's sanctuary in Kashan, each year at the anniversary of Umar's death (26 Dhu al-Hijja of the Islamic year).[7] However, later it also started to be celebrated elsewhere in Iran, sometimes on 9 Rabi' al-Awwal rather than on 26 Dhu al-Hijja.[8] The festival celebrated Abu Lu'lu'a, nicknamed for the occasion Bābā Shujāʿ al-Dīn (lit. 'Father Courageous of the Faith'), as a national hero who had defended the religion by killing the oppressive caliph.[9]

Due to political sensitivities, from the Qajar period (1789–1925) onward the festival gradually stopped being celebrated in the major cities of Iran, until it was eventually banned officially by the Islamic Republic of Iran in 1979.[10] Nevertheless, the festival itself is still celebrated in Iran, though often secretly and indoors rather than outdoors.[11] It is now held on the 9th day of the month of Rabi' Al-Awwal of the Islamic year, lasting until the 27th of the same month.[12]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrine_of_Abu_Lu'lu'a

You are a slanty nincompoop whose only source of info is wikipedia infested with zionist yankees and ceca virus. As if chink virus and cowboy virus are not bad enough, now you yearn for ceca virus.


But good thing is you admitted that Iran was forcibly converted to Shiaism by Turkic donkeys, once again, proving that Turks are a perverted, dishonest, crooked, disgusting kind. They are always intent on going off the mainstream and doing something stupid. A fine example would be forcibly converting Persia to Shia deviant ideology and trying to foment sectarian trouble all over the wider Middle East region.

If not for this accursed race, the Muslims of the wider Middle East might have far more easily bonded together and united as one. A truly despicable kind are these turkic donkeys.

 

[JohnTan]

There is no mention whatsoever of this disgusting entity called "India" anywhere before the Brits founded a fake, artificial country called "India". The fact that you can only cite Wikipedia, which is filled to the brim with CECA virus jews and yanks, only affirms how flimsy the foundation on which they cooked up this mythical entity stands

You're a real retard. The word 'India', derived from similar sounding words like 'Sind', 'Hind', "Indos", have been found in numerous historical sources. You're just using insults to cover up your fuck ups and stupidity.

The name of India is a corruption of the word Sindhu. Neighbouring Arabs, Iranians uttered's' as 'h' and called this land Hindu. Greeks pronounced this name as Indus.

Sindhu is the name of the Indus River, mentioned in the Rig-Veda, one of the oldest extant Indo-European texts, composed in the northwestern region of the Indian subcontinent roughly between 1700-1100 BC. There are strong linguistic and cultural similarities with the Iranian Avesta, often associated with the early culture of 2200-1600 BC.

The English term is from Greek Ἰνδία (Indía), via Latin India. Iindía in Byzantine ethnography denotes the region beyond the Indus (Ἰνδός) River, since Herodotus alluded to "Indian land". Ἰνδός, Indos, "an Indian", from Avestan Hinduš refers to Sindh and is listed as a conquered territory by Persian emperor Darius I (550-486 BC) in the Persepolis terrace inscription.

The name India was known in Old English (between at least the mid-5th century and the mid-12th century AD) and was used in King Alfred's translation of Orosius. The name was, under French influence, replaced by Ynde or Inde. It went into Early Modern English (the latter half of the 15th century to 1650 AD). Thus, Indie appeared the first edition of the King James Bible and the works of William Shakespeare - both belong to the late phase of Early Modern English. The name India then came back to English usage from the 17th century onwards, may be due to the influence of Latin, or Spanish or Portuguese.

https://www.worldhistory.org/article/203/etymology-of-the-name-india/

But good thing is you admitted that Iran was forcibly converted to Shiaism by Turkic donkeys, once again, proving that Turks are a perverted, dishonest, crooked, disgusting kind.

The Persians were also forcibly converted from Zoroastrianism to the arabic mohammedan religion. You can check with the surviving original Pesians who kept the faith. Some of them, the Farsi people, are sinkies.

You are a slanty nincompoop whose only source of info is wikipedia infested with zionist yankees and ceca virus. As if chink virus and cowboy virus are not bad enough, now you yearn for ceca virus.

Here are some more sources about Abu Lulu, the Persian guy who took symbolic revenge on islam for its war crimes against the Sassanid people of Iran.

Piruz Nahavandi (according to some sources Piruzan, Arabiced Firuzan alias Abu Lulu also abu-lo'lo') a Zoroastrian priest warrior, was born into a Persian royal lineage, who despite his young age was a high ranking officer. Apart from his superb military skills, Piruz was also an able carpenter and painter.(1)

After the battle of Nahavand (February 14, 642 CE) the majority of people of Nahavand and nearby city Hamadan were massacred by Arab-Muslims, cities and villages were pillaged, women and children were raped and many were taken captive and subsequently sold into slavery, including Piruz. Some claim that he was captured during the battle of Qadisiyyah.

According to Tabari, once Piruz saw Iranian children abused by the Arabs he said: "You have been enslaved at such a tender age. This Umar sees [this is] eaten my heart, I will take his heart out."

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Shias-glorify-Abu-Lulu-for-killing-Rashidun-Caliph-Omar

 

[syed putra]

Not really. The current turmoil is created mostly by asiatics and blackies who already can't stand each other. Those asiatics and blackies have been fighting and killing each other long before the white man appeared. The US were merely making use of them to kill each other.

You should notice that moslems do not view other moslems as war criminals for killing fellow moslems or killing non-moslems. So the US would naturally hire lots of local moslems and get them to kill other moslems on their behalf.



Unlikely. Most of the civilian dead in Iraq and Iran are due to unfortunate colleteral damage when US drop their bombs.

In contrast, militants and saddam deliberately killed hundreds of thousands of moslem civilians in their sectarian wars, crack down on opposition or just shot them dead for resisting their version of islam.

Saddam did not kill hundreds of thousands. Just a couple of thousand. US killed many times more collateral or not. Snd until today, countries such as syria, libya, iraq still have not been able to rebuild the destroyed infrastructure.

 

[mudhatter]

You're a real retard. The word 'India', derived from similar sounding words like 'Sind', 'Hind', "Indos", have been found in numerous historical sources. You're just using insults to cover up your fuck ups and stupidity.

The name of India is a corruption of the word Sindhu. Neighbouring Arabs, Iranians uttered's' as 'h' and called this land Hindu. Greeks pronounced this name as Indus.


https://www.worldhistory.org/article/203/etymology-of-the-name-india/

You are even dumber than I had thought.

The user who uploaded this bit of BS is a CECA virus called

Sanujit​

Biography​

I have been a civil service officer, Indian Administrative Service, since 1964, now retired.


Of coz, since "India" is a fake entity created by the Poms, only the Poms and those "Indians" would concoct fabricated history in the aftermath but no evidence, no document, no artefact, no historical proof can be submitted to that effect.

Where is the historical evidence proof artefact documents attesting to the existence of this mythical monstrosity created by the Pommies to serve their ulterior, ultimately colonial agenda that such a disgusting entity as "India" had ever existed?

Exactly, there is none.

All such myths have been concocted afterwards and can be traced to efforts in the aftermath of Pommie creation of this beastly disgusting "India", not before that.

Sindh is a province in Pakistan, by the way.

So you either admit that only a single province of Pakistan is what you call "India", or you admit that there had neve existed any such entity called "India" prior to British creation of this monstrosity.

I have long insisted there had never existed any such monstrosity as "India" ever in history.

The Persians were also forcibly converted from Zoroastrianism to the arabic mohammedan religion. You can check with the surviving original Pesians who kept the faith. Some of them, the Farsi people, are sinkies.

The Persians were forcibly converted from Sunni creed to a perverted version by the Turkic donkeys, in that there is no doubt. But converting from Zoroastrianism to Islam through force sounds absurd. There is no logical reason why anybody forcibly converted to any religion would want to stay within the fold when that force is removed.

There exists no such religion.

Hardly any Iranians are sinkies, I've seen more in Hong Kong and certainly a few more in Dubai, quite a few in Paki or CECA virus too. Well, the latter two are losers, understandably, Iranian losers would like to hobnob with them, too.

Here are some more sources about Abu Lulu, the Persian guy who took symbolic revenge on islam for its war crimes against the Sassanid people of Iran.

Piruz Nahavandi (according to some sources Piruzan, Arabiced Firuzan alias Abu Lulu also abu-lo'lo') a Zoroastrian priest warrior, was born into a Persian royal lineage, who despite his young age was a high ranking officer. Apart from his superb military skills, Piruz was also an able carpenter and painter.(1)



https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Shias-glorify-Abu-Lulu-for-killing-Rashidun-Caliph-Omar

That is as good as saying members' testimony in a forum such as this or any other web forum is counted as evidence.

Despite your single digit IQ as a yankee bot and simultaneously as a chink faggot christ-ian radical who has taken a particular liking to taking it up the arse from your ang moh kia priests and pastors, you need to ask why would a random post or commentary alone in some discussion forum count as definitive evidence?

For all you know, that could be a Yankee CIA agent or a jewish Mossad agent disguised as an Iranian making fabricated entries to sway public opinion. A lot of gullible people are fooled by these intelligence agents planted around the world to sway public opinion of the gullible, to sway decisions of the decision makers to suit their agenda. Intelligent ppl should never fall for their disgustingly devious schemes.

I know plenty of discussion fora where a lot of bots and intelligence agents from yankee or zionist jewish or ceca virus agencies assume fake names or fake IDs and pretend to be Muslims, Arabs, Pakis, Turks, Iranians, Bangla, Indon and what not and try to sow discord, try to boost yankee/western image, try to drive a wedge between those countries and their backers and/or allies and many other cunning wily things are done by these evil rats in order to divide their enemies.

I can name such a few forum but that's not relevant. It's surprising how easily many Iranians fall for the plots of their enemies, and so do plenty of other low IQ turd worlders like Pakis Turks Arabs Indon CECA Tiongs and what not.

 

[mudhatter]

Saddam did not kill hundreds of thousands. Just a couple of thousand. US killed many times more collateral or not. Snd until today, countries such as syria, libya, iraq still have not been able to rebuild the destroyed infrastructure.

Their lies never end.

Any number of civilians killed tortured injured and what not will be "written off" as collateral damage and this is after hiding real casualties on both sides so that their masses never rise up in protest like they did during vietnam war. Thjat's a lesson learnt from that expedition, how to control flow of info so masses never rise up.

I've heard enough stupid yankees and many other donkeys who told me there's no way to hide casualties by yankees. I can't believe sb from anywhere, at any time, could have been sooo soooo sooo extremely dumb. Understandably that person has slitty eyes too, slanted and small eyes. It's natural.


Like that if I were putler, I'd build 100k nuclear warheads drop them all over yankee territroy and describe all casualties as collateral damage and coward yankee military hiding behind civilians. There you go, problem solved.

Lying forcefully, repeatedly, does the trick. If not, shut down opposing media. Done and dusted. That's their modus operandi.

 

[JohnTan]

The Persians were forcibly converted from Sunni creed to a perverted version by the Turkic donkeys, in that there is no doubt. But converting from Zoroastrianism to Islam through force sounds absurd. There is no logical reason why anybody forcibly converted to any religion would want to stay within the fold when that force is removed.

Force is never removed from islam. Even arabs were killed if they wanted to leave the mohammedan religion. Your scriptures teaches moslems to kill anyone who change their islamic religion.

You are even dumber than I had thought.

The user who uploaded this bit of BS is a CECA virus called

Sanujit​

Biography​

I have been a civil service officer, Indian Administrative Service, since 1964, now retired.

You're much more retarded than I realized.

That is as good as saying members' testimony in a forum such as this or any other web forum is counted as evidence.

Don't you accept such evidence as authenticity of your silly arabic religion?

 

[mudhatter]

Force is never removed from islam. Even arabs were killed if they wanted to leave the mohammedan religion. Your scriptures teaches moslems to kill anyone who change their islamic religion.



You're much more retarded than I realized.



Don't you accept such evidence as authenticity of your silly arabic religion?

There you go.

Since I have exposed and debunked all of your misinformation and flawed "arguments", now you have resorted to silly one liners.

Obviously a faggot chink impersonating yankee single-digit-IQ bot would not be able to go further.