Chitchat Genetically Studies Shows Ah Tiong and Nippon are Closest Relatives!

[Pinkieslut]

The DNA sequence SNP study done by Japanese researchers in 2005 (the biggest contributor of DNA of each East Asian people is bolded) showed the following results:

Korean DNA sequence is made up of:

40.6% Uniquely Korean

21.9% Chinese

1.6% Ainu

17.4% Okinawan

18.5% Unidentified

Japanese DNA sequence is made up of:

4.8% Uniquely Japanese

24.2% Korean

25.8% Chinese

8.1% Ainu

16.1% Okinawan

21% Unidentified

Chinese DNA sequence is made up of:

60.6% Uniquely Chinese

1.5% Japanese

10.6% Korean

1.5% Ainu

10.6% Okinawan

15.2% Unidentified

The biggest components in Japanese are Chinese, Korean, Okinawan.

A closer look at the Chinese gene pool

The shared Chinese gene pool between Japanese and Koreans is thought to be formed of Dong-Yi stock (originating from China’s Shandong peninsula) that later formed the Puyo peoples of the Paekche kingdom and Koguyro kingdoms of the Korean peninsula.

mtDNA haplogroup A which is widespread in Asia today occurs at levels below 10%, but reaches higher concentrations in some parts of China, Korea and Japan.

“Some ethnic Chinese populations, such as the Dong and the Yi, carry haplogroup A at levels as high as 30%. One branch of the haplogroup, A4, reaches levels of more than 15% among mitochondrial DNA samples collected in the city of Wuhan in central China. In the Spittoon… Ancient China’s famous Terracotta Army was constructed by men bearing haplogroup A. Check the Spittoon to learn more about these ancient builders.” — Source: An Introduction to Haplogroups: An Interactive Activity Activity developed by Meredith T. Knight at Tufts University

Ancient mtDNA in Siberia Haplogroup A was widespread in Siberia in ancient times. One study of skeletal remains discovered near Siberia's Lake Baikal estimated the haplogroup was present in 13-26% of the region's population 7,000 years ago, and is almost exclusively among the Chukchi and the Yupik, two small indigenous groups from northeastern Siberia.
M7, a widespread haplogroup found in China, Japan, Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands. [M8, a widespread haplogroup in central and eastern Asia that eventually sent an offshoot to the Americas. M9, which appears to have arisen in Tibet.] While Haplogroup M is widespread throughout South and East Asia, it originates from the Indian sub-continent where it is more diverse on there than anywhere else in the world.
Overall, Japanese are closest to Tibetans and Han Chinese, but only marginally more so than to the Koreans.

The Ainu who are widely considered to be of the “old” proto-Mongoloid stock closely related to the Tibetan Buryat and Yakut peoples, and descended from the Jomon people who lived in the Tohoku area until they were later pushed northwards into Hokkaido, afterwhich they resided around the Sea of Okhotsk, mainly Hokkaido, Sakhalin, Kuril Islands and the tip of Kamchatka. However, the DNA sequences show that Ainu are actually more remotely distanced from the Jomon than is commonly believed, as they were influenced by Siberians (as with Koreans). Evidence is the haplogroup C3 (no subclade) occurs at moderately high frequencies among these populations.

 

[Leongsam]

Is there an article to explain why the Japanese are so much better than the chinks despite sharing a similar gene pool?

 

[zhihau]

Is there an article to explain why the Japanese are so much better than the chinks despite sharing a similar gene pool?

The cultural revolution, the commies destroyed the core of their Confucius value system whereas the Japanese kept to their tradition

 

[ChineseDog]

Is there an article to explain why the Japanese are so much better than the chinks despite sharing a similar gene pool?

Good job my fellow honorary Chinese dog we chinks are much more inferior to the superior Japanese.

 

[islamPig]

Good job my fellow honorary .

Good job my fellow islambabi pig we mooslems pigs are genetically program to fuck our own mothers and daughters.

 

[frenchbriefs]

Is there an article to explain why the Japanese are so much better than the chinks despite sharing a similar gene pool?

matter of perspective,if look at the historical timeline of japan and china,u will be asking urself why are the chinese civilisation and culture so advanced while koreans and japs are barbarians.

remember the japs started modernizing during the meiji revolution 200 years ago,while we are still dicking around with our pigtails under the qing dynasty.

 

[po2wq]

... Korean DNA sequence is made up of: ... 18.5% Unidentified ...

Japanese DNA sequence is made up of: ... 21% Unidentified ...

Chinese DNA sequence is made up of: ... 15.2% Unidentified ...

japanese got most alien dna sequence ...

 

[frenchbriefs]

japanese got most alien dna sequence ...

its probably shiba inu DNA,i mean besides the japanese,shiba inu has to be the second most populous creature in japan.

 

[virus]

Is there an article to explain why the Japanese are so much better than the chinks despite sharing a similar gene pool?

Porn n sushi . Anyone who loves farking in the raw n porn will go full mile

 

[fupikee]

Good job my fellow honorary Chinese dog we chinks are much more inferior to the superior Japanese.

If you take a closer look at the results, the jap pool only consists of 4.8% uniquely jap genes with a lot of mixed from Chinese and Korean. Whereas for the Chinese, the gene pool is over 60% uniquely Chinese.

Conclusion - actually the japs are a race of chap cheng kias, incorporating genes from so many other distinct and separate races. They are closest with Chinese genes because a lot of them are descendants of vassals sent by Chinese emperors over the centuries to jap and showed how much influence jap makeup and culture were derived from the Chinese.

However, ungrateful jap dogs always want to deny that they are descended from Chinese and take every opportunity to attack and belittle the Chinese who are not only their ancestors but also their teachers in culture. That explains the ferocity with which the japs launched pogroms all over the whole ww11 period against their ancestors on mainland China - really typical behaviour of chap cheng race...

... sigh!!!...... barbarians are uniquely so and always behave thus, ah so, cannot be any different..... :(

 

[retrenched]

If you take a closer look at the results, the jap pool only consists of 4.8% uniquely jap genes with a lot of mixed from Chinese and Korean. Whereas for the Chinese, the gene pool is over 60% uniquely Chinese.

Conclusion - actually the japs are a race of chap cheng kias, incorporating genes from so many other distinct and separate races. They are closest with Chinese genes because a lot of them are descendants of vassals sent by Chinese emperors over the centuries to jap and showed how much influence jap makeup and culture were derived from the Chinese.

However, ungrateful jap dogs always want to deny that they are descended from Chinese and take every opportunity to attack and belittle the Chinese who are not only their ancestors but also their teachers in culture. That explains the ferocity with which the japs launched pogroms all over the whole ww11 period against their ancestors on mainland China - really typical behaviour of chap cheng race...

... sigh!!!...... barbarians are uniquely so and always behave thus, ah so, cannot be any different..... :(

+1.............

 

[flatearther]

However, ungrateful jap dogs always want to deny that they are descended from Chinese and take every opportunity to attack and belittle the Chinese who are not only their ancestors but also their teachers in culture. That explains the ferocity with which the japs launched pogroms all over the whole ww11 period against their ancestors on mainland China - really typical behaviour of chap cheng race...

There is a BIG difference between the Chinese ancestors (who lived and died over a thousand years ago) of the modern Japanese people and the modern Chinese people (some of whom lived and died from the 20th century onwards, while the remainder are still alive now in the 21st century), right?

 

[frenchbriefs]

There is a BIG difference between the Chinese ancestors (who lived and died over a thousand years ago) of the modern Japanese people and the modern Chinese people (some of whom lived and died from the 20th century onwards, while the remainder are still alive now in the 21st century), right?

whats the difference between humans of 1000 years ago and humans of today?they still eat rice,shit,sleep fuck and have slanty eyes.dna takes tens of thousands if not millions of years to evolve,not like man suddenly changed from monkey overnight within a couple hundred years.

however the first human beings that left africa 2 million years ago that is different,2 million years is a vast enough time for differences to evolve......thats why africans are most closely related to our ape ancestors.not much evolution taking place there for the lazy ones that stayed behind.

 

[frenchbriefs]

now even though the right wing facists nazis are supremacists,they do take science into consideration.

Black Africans are Genetically Closer to Bonobos Than to White Humans

Whereas chimpanzees are widespread across equatorial Africa, bonobos live only south of the Congo River in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Fig. 1a). As a result of their relatively small and remote habitat, bonobos were the last ape species to be described2 and are the rarest of all apes in captivity. As a consequence, they have, until recently, been little studied2. It is known that whereas DNA sequences in humans diverged from those in bonobos and chimpanzees five to seven million years ago, DNA sequences in bonobos diverged from those in chimpanzees around two million years ago. Bonobos are thus closely related to chimpanzees. Moreover, comparison of a small number of autosomal DNA sequences has shown that bonobo DNA sequences often fall within the variation of chimpanzees5.

Bonobos and chimpanzees are highly similar to each other in many respects. However, the behaviour of the two species differs in important ways1. For example, male chimpanzees use aggression to compete for dominance rank and obtain sex, and they cooperate to defend their home range and attack other groups3. By contrast, bonobo males are commonly subordinate to females and do not compete intensely for dominance rank1. They do not form alliances with one another and there is no evidence of lethal aggression between groups3. Compared with chimpanzees, bonobos are playful throughout their lives and show intense sexual behaviour3 that serves non-conceptive functions and often involves same-sex partners4. Thus, chimpanzees and bonobos each possess certain characteristics that are more similar to human traits than they are to one another’s. No parsimonious reconstruction of the social structure and behavioural patterns of the common ancestor of humans, chimpanzees and bonobos is therefore possible. That ancestor may in fact have possessed a mosaic of features, including those now seen in bonobo, chimpanzee and human.

To understand the evolutionary relationships of bonobos, chimpanzees and humans better, we sequenced and assembled the genome of a female bonobo individual (Ulindi) and compared it to those of chimpanzees and humans. Compared with the 6× Sanger-sequenced chimpanzee genome6 (panTro2), the bonobo genome assembly has a similar number of bases in alignment with the human genome, a similar number of lineage-specific substitutions and similar indel error rates (Table 1 and Supplementary Information, sections 2 and 3), suggesting that the two ape genomes are of similar quality. Segmental duplications affect at least 80 Mb of the bonobo genome, according to excess sequence read-depth predictions. Owing to over-collapsing of duplications, only 14.6 Mb are present in the final assembly (Supplementary Information, section 4), a common error seen in assemblies from shorter-read technologies7. We used the finished chimpanzee sequence of chromosome 21 together with the human genome sequence to estimate an error rate of approximately two errors per 10 kb in the bonobo genome, with comparable qualities for the X chromosome and autosomes. The bonobo genome can therefore serve as a high-quality sequence for comparative genome analyses.

 

[eatshitndie]

confusing enough?

 

[Semaj2357]

Porn n sushi . Anyone who loves farking in the raw n porn will go full mile

yep, and i know that mofo nihonjin who goes the whole hog just for this....ultraman! :p

 

[flatearther]

whats the difference between humans of 1000 years ago and humans of today?they still eat rice,shit,sleep fuck and have slanty eyes.

I meant cultural difference.
And it is the modern Japanese who have best managed to preserve ancient (especially Tang dynasty) Chinese culture, not the modern southern Mainland Chinese (including most of the Chinese people living in Southeast Asia now), which I've said to you before (over two months ago in another thread):
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?236380-Why-ancient-Chinese-sounds-like-Thai&p=2523071#post2523071

so basically all the southern and dialect chinese were the real chinese,the han chinese northerners and manchus and mongols are the barbarians.

In my opinion, the modern Japanese, i.e. the:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamato_people
are Chinese too (the first groups migrated to Japan possibly during the ancient Zhou dynasty), and although they are still far from perfect, they are still the only group of East Asians who have best managed to preserve ancient (especially Tang dynasty) Chinese culture, which is why I look up to them a lot, even though they are not perfect.
Just comparing the manners/mannerisms alone of the average Japanese man/woman with the average Chinese man/woman is more than enough proof, in my opinion. :o
And no other East Asian nation even comes close. :o

Furthermore, during the:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Sino-Japanese_War
from 1937 to 1945, how could the Japanese back then possibly be fighting "against their ancestors on mainland China" (which is what fupikee said)?
They were fighting against very distant cousins, not ancestors, right?

 

[frenchbriefs]

I meant cultural difference.
And it is the modern Japanese who have best managed to preserve ancient (especially Tang dynasty) Chinese culture, not the modern southern Mainland Chinese (including most of the Chinese people living in Southeast Asia now), which I've said to you before (over two months ago in another thread):
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?236380-Why-ancient-Chinese-sounds-like-Thai&p=2523071#post2523071

Furthermore, during the:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Sino-Japanese_War
from 1937 to 1945, how could the Japanese back then possibly be fighting "against their ancestors on mainland China" (which is what fupikee said)?
They were fighting against very distant cousins, not ancestors, right?

yes they managed to preserve some aspects of the ancient tang dynasty culture,some artwork,some temples,some pagodas.....but thats not the japanese culture now,the japanese culture now is a bunch of otakus,anime obssessed,manga reading,hentai figurine collecting freaks,fapping furiously to their dakimuras and mahou shojou dolls,man childs,hikikomoris,neets,shut ins,weirdos.

shit their culture is not even samurai culture anymore,the last of the samurai died in wwii when they committed seppuku when japan was defeated.

 

[flatearther]

yes they managed to preserve some aspects of the ancient tang dynasty culture,some artwork,some temples,some pagodas.....

But my point is that they have "best managed to preserve" all that, not totally/perfectly, right?
Or are you implying that the modern southern Mainland Chinese (including most of the Chinese people living in Southeast Asia now) have done a better job?

 

[Jah_rastafar_I]

I meant cultural difference.
And it is the modern Japanese who have best managed to preserve ancient (especially Tang dynasty) Chinese culture, not the modern southern Mainland Chinese (including most of the Chinese people living in Southeast Asia now), which I've said to you before (over two months ago in another thread):
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?236380-Why-ancient-Chinese-sounds-like-Thai&p=2523071#post2523071

Furthermore, during the:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Sino-Japanese_War
from 1937 to 1945, how could the Japanese back then possibly be fighting "against their ancestors on mainland China" (which is what fupikee said)?
They were fighting against very distant cousins, not ancestors, right?

is that why you used to call yourself takashi?