• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

GE 2020: What The Electorate Said

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
facebook.com

GE 2020: What The Electorate Said


7-9 minutes


This election was supposed to be a cakewalk for the PAP. Called in the midst of a pandemic, after a $93 billion set of Covid-19 budgets, the ground couldn’t have been sweeter. As Chan Chun Sing told his party activists, crisis has traditionally “saved” the PAP.

Not this time.

The PAP scraped by with 61.24% of the vote, significantly down from the 69.9% in GE 2015 and only marginally better than its 2011 tally (60.1%). It is also a discordant swansong for PM Lee, who has said he’s going to retire when he’s 70, in 2022.

Amongst the noise, what does GE 2020 tell us? Here are some quick takes.

For the PAP GE 2020 was a referendum on the 4G.

Singaporeans don’t want to have the next Prime Minister of Singapore chosen in a backroom and then foisted on them. GE 2020 was a way for Singaporeans to send key signals to the PAP about what they want and what they don’t.

Here is what Singaporeans are telling the PAP about the 4G.

It is difficult to see how Heng Swee Keat can take over as PM. Not with a 53.4% electoral margin in East Coast. There is no way to spin this. Singaporeans cannot confidently see our lives and the future of our country in Heng’s hands. This is a pity, because Heng is a fundamentally decent person who doesn’t come to politics with some of the worst instincts of PAP hardliners. He’s naturally a technocrat, not an attack dog.

This shouldn’t make Chan Chun Sing the default choice. Other things being equal, Chan’s showing in Tanjong Pagar is not much better than Heng’s. Although Chan’s vote share was numerically higher than Heng’s (63%), Tanjong Pagar is Lee Kuan Yew’s former seat in Parliament.

Chan will be haunted by his boast to party members that a crisis comes along periodically to “save the PAP”. Because of this, voters will forever remember him, fairly or not, as one of the architects of the Pandemic Election: willing to risk lives for political expediency.

So who is in serious contention to take over?

Of the 4G, Ong Ye Kung has the strongest electoral mandate.

With 67.29% in Sembawang GRC, Ong’s vote count stands head and shoulders above his 4G peers who are in serious contention for the post. Ong’s Chinese debate performance was widely acknowledged, even by opposition supporters, as a masterclass: it was commanding, confident and humorous. Ong is also widely considered to be the least hardline of all the 4G ministers, and is often compared to Tharman.

A PAP with the sensibilities of Tharman, George Yeo, and potentially Ong, is a PAP that younger Singaporeans may be able to see themselves relating to.
Lawrence Wong, who has received plaudits (or relatively less brickbats) for his handling of the COVID-19 crisis, should also be strongly considered as a DPM candidate despite a relatively tepid vote share (63.18%) in Marsiling Yew-Tee. He is confident, articulate, technocratic and a much less polarizing figure than Chan Chun Sing.

The PAP’s Western Flank Blows Wide Open

The PAP has traditionally racked up commanding margins in the West. The East has always been under threat from the WP, but for many GEs the PAP has had no serious contenders in the West. Now, the West can no longer be taken for granted.

The PAP squeaked in with a whisker in West Coast GRC against Tan Cheng Bock, with 51.69%. This is remarkable when you consider, in GE 2015, the PAP scored 78.5% of the vote.

Also nipping at the PAP’s heels in the West is their arch-nemesis, the SDP. Chee Soon Juan turned in his highest electoral vote count of his political career, which dates back to his entry into politics in 1994. His showing of 45.2% in Bukit Batok SMC was within striking distance of victory. This is despite bearing the brunt of the PAP’s POFMA attacks.

Even more impressive than Dr Chee’s showing was Dr Paul Tambyah’s electoral result in Bukit Panjang SMC, the first time he’s contesting in the ward. At 46.26%, Paul’s result is one of the best SDP electoral margins in the SDP’s post-Chiam See Tong era.

Gutter Politics Backfiring

GE 2020 will also be remembered as a referendum on gutter politics.

Sengkang is the most spectacular example of the PAP hardliners’ gutter politics exploding in their face.

Although Jamus Lim had star appeal, the WP’s win in Sengkang can’t be attributed to him alone. The Sengkang result happened because of three factors.
First, the WP fielded a team that resonated with the demography in Sengkang GRC. As He Ting Ru said in her constituency broadcast, each of the WP GRC’s team members are young parents like most of the voters in Sengkang.

Second, Jamus Lim is everything that is right about the WP’s succession planning in the same way that Heng Swee Keat is everything that is wrong with the PAP’s. In the only televised English language deabte, Jamus went toe to toe with foreign minister Vivian Balakrishnan, and appeared to be his equal if not better.
But third and probably crucially, the Raeesah attacks probably gave the little push that got the Sengkang WP team over the 50% mark.

The Raeesah attacks ripped the mask off the “new PAP”, and reminded the electorate that the PAP was still, at its core, controlled by hardliner schooled in knuckle-duster politics.

The Raeesah attacks also had the unintended effect of putting her humanitarian and NGO work under the spotlight, and younger voters liked what they saw.

Raeesah conducted herself impeccably under fire. And it also gave Pritam Singh the opportunity to provide a blinding contrast in leadership to Heng Swee Keat’s disappearing act in the campaign.

In GE 2020, the voters of Aljunied made political history again. With a WP win at 59.9%, here’s what Aljunied told us.

The Aljunied GRC team in Parliament now comprises three minorities (Leon Perera, Pritam and Faisal Manap). The Aljunied team prevailed despite 5 years of slurs, smears and litigation. Who can forget Heng Swee Keat’s botched hatchet job (with alot of prodding by PM) against Sylvia Lim in Parliament? The WP prevailed despite not having Low Thia Kiang and Chen Show Mao on the ticket.

In the middle of the campaign, PAP partisans went out of their way to paint the WP as too “westernized” and made a meal out of the WP’s failure to attend the first televised Chinese debate. They questioned whether the party of Nantah graduates like Low had lost its way. Voters of Aljunied have told us that they want nothing to do with the racialized politics of these PAP partisans, and that such insinuations have no place in modern Singapore politics.

Finally, GE 2020 may also mark the beginning of a serious rethink of the GRC system.

In one fell swoop, the PAP lost three office holders in Sengkang. With West Coast GRC under threat by PSP, and WP coming increasingly closer to winning East Coast GRC, the PAP needs to see the abolition of the GRC scheme as a matter of survival. It needs to bite the bullet, unwind the GRC system, take the risk of losing more SMCs, or face the prospect of losing swathes of office holders at a go.

The Road Ahead

For now, the opposition has a lot of work to do to consolidate the gains made in this GE.

Those of us who support the opposition can’t let this good result get to our heads. Remember that every 2011 breakthrough will be followed by a 2015 downer. Punggol-East was narrowly lost in 2015 after a hard-won by-election in 2013. Now that the opposition has two GRCs to defend, it’s time to put skin in the game and start helping the opposition between elections to make sure they are able to serve their residents well.

Let’s please never, ever, take our elected opposition for granted. Tonight, their victories have helped us sleep easier. Tomorrow, we need to make sure we have their backs.
 

theblackhole

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
The GRC is a double-edged sword: on one hand, you can use it to sneak in backdoor MPs who could never get elected in a SMC (e.g. Dr Anus Koh). On the other hand, the entire GRC can be taken down by a single 猪队友 on your team. :biggrin:

yes sir
whatever evil machinations made created
have this loophole that can destruct
jammus lim brought in all four in one sweep
pritam brought in all five
and now we have 10
dr tan cheng block nearly brought in another 5
but alas he was denied by the great iswaran the great
 

Gallego99

Alfrescian
Loyal
"For the PAP GE 2020 was a referendum on the 4G.

Singaporeans don’t want to have the next Prime Minister of Singapore chosen in a backroom and then foisted on them. GE 2020 was a way for Singaporeans to send key signals to the PAP about what they want and what they don’t.

Here is what Singaporeans are telling the PAP about the 4G.

It is difficult to see how Heng Swee Keat can take over as PM. Not with a 53.4% electoral margin in East Coast. There is no way to spin this. Singaporeans cannot confidently see our lives and the future of our country in Heng’s hands. This is a pity, because Heng is a fundamentally decent person who doesn’t come to politics with some of the worst instincts of PAP hardliners. He’s naturally a technocrat, not an attack dog."

Disagree. The support from the ground for 4G says otherwise.
 

Kee Chew

Alfrescian
Loyal
facebook.com

GE 2020: What The Electorate Said


7-9 minutes


This election was supposed to be a cakewalk for the PAP. Called in the midst of a pandemic, after a $93 billion set of Covid-19 budgets, the ground couldn’t have been sweeter. As Chan Chun Sing told his party activists, crisis has traditionally “saved” the PAP.

Not this time.

The PAP scraped by with 61.24% of the vote, significantly down from the 69.9% in GE 2015 and only marginally better than its 2011 tally (60.1%). It is also a discordant swansong for PM Lee, who has said he’s going to retire when he’s 70, in 2022.

Amongst the noise, what does GE 2020 tell us? Here are some quick takes.

For the PAP GE 2020 was a referendum on the 4G.

Singaporeans don’t want to have the next Prime Minister of Singapore chosen in a backroom and then foisted on them. GE 2020 was a way for Singaporeans to send key signals to the PAP about what they want and what they don’t.

Here is what Singaporeans are telling the PAP about the 4G.

It is difficult to see how Heng Swee Keat can take over as PM. Not with a 53.4% electoral margin in East Coast. There is no way to spin this. Singaporeans cannot confidently see our lives and the future of our country in Heng’s hands. This is a pity, because Heng is a fundamentally decent person who doesn’t come to politics with some of the worst instincts of PAP hardliners. He’s naturally a technocrat, not an attack dog.

This shouldn’t make Chan Chun Sing the default choice. Other things being equal, Chan’s showing in Tanjong Pagar is not much better than Heng’s. Although Chan’s vote share was numerically higher than Heng’s (63%), Tanjong Pagar is Lee Kuan Yew’s former seat in Parliament.

Chan will be haunted by his boast to party members that a crisis comes along periodically to “save the PAP”. Because of this, voters will forever remember him, fairly or not, as one of the architects of the Pandemic Election: willing to risk lives for political expediency.

So who is in serious contention to take over?

Of the 4G, Ong Ye Kung has the strongest electoral mandate.

With 67.29% in Sembawang GRC, Ong’s vote count stands head and shoulders above his 4G peers who are in serious contention for the post. Ong’s Chinese debate performance was widely acknowledged, even by opposition supporters, as a masterclass: it was commanding, confident and humorous. Ong is also widely considered to be the least hardline of all the 4G ministers, and is often compared to Tharman.

A PAP with the sensibilities of Tharman, George Yeo, and potentially Ong, is a PAP that younger Singaporeans may be able to see themselves relating to.
Lawrence Wong, who has received plaudits (or relatively less brickbats) for his handling of the COVID-19 crisis, should also be strongly considered as a DPM candidate despite a relatively tepid vote share (63.18%) in Marsiling Yew-Tee. He is confident, articulate, technocratic and a much less polarizing figure than Chan Chun Sing.

The PAP’s Western Flank Blows Wide Open

The PAP has traditionally racked up commanding margins in the West. The East has always been under threat from the WP, but for many GEs the PAP has had no serious contenders in the West. Now, the West can no longer be taken for granted.

The PAP squeaked in with a whisker in West Coast GRC against Tan Cheng Bock, with 51.69%. This is remarkable when you consider, in GE 2015, the PAP scored 78.5% of the vote.

Also nipping at the PAP’s heels in the West is their arch-nemesis, the SDP. Chee Soon Juan turned in his highest electoral vote count of his political career, which dates back to his entry into politics in 1994. His showing of 45.2% in Bukit Batok SMC was within striking distance of victory. This is despite bearing the brunt of the PAP’s POFMA attacks.

Even more impressive than Dr Chee’s showing was Dr Paul Tambyah’s electoral result in Bukit Panjang SMC, the first time he’s contesting in the ward. At 46.26%, Paul’s result is one of the best SDP electoral margins in the SDP’s post-Chiam See Tong era.

Gutter Politics Backfiring

GE 2020 will also be remembered as a referendum on gutter politics.

Sengkang is the most spectacular example of the PAP hardliners’ gutter politics exploding in their face.

Although Jamus Lim had star appeal, the WP’s win in Sengkang can’t be attributed to him alone. The Sengkang result happened because of three factors.
First, the WP fielded a team that resonated with the demography in Sengkang GRC. As He Ting Ru said in her constituency broadcast, each of the WP GRC’s team members are young parents like most of the voters in Sengkang.

Second, Jamus Lim is everything that is right about the WP’s succession planning in the same way that Heng Swee Keat is everything that is wrong with the PAP’s. In the only televised English language deabte, Jamus went toe to toe with foreign minister Vivian Balakrishnan, and appeared to be his equal if not better.
But third and probably crucially, the Raeesah attacks probably gave the little push that got the Sengkang WP team over the 50% mark.

The Raeesah attacks ripped the mask off the “new PAP”, and reminded the electorate that the PAP was still, at its core, controlled by hardliner schooled in knuckle-duster politics.

The Raeesah attacks also had the unintended effect of putting her humanitarian and NGO work under the spotlight, and younger voters liked what they saw.

Raeesah conducted herself impeccably under fire. And it also gave Pritam Singh the opportunity to provide a blinding contrast in leadership to Heng Swee Keat’s disappearing act in the campaign.

In GE 2020, the voters of Aljunied made political history again. With a WP win at 59.9%, here’s what Aljunied told us.

The Aljunied GRC team in Parliament now comprises three minorities (Leon Perera, Pritam and Faisal Manap). The Aljunied team prevailed despite 5 years of slurs, smears and litigation. Who can forget Heng Swee Keat’s botched hatchet job (with alot of prodding by PM) against Sylvia Lim in Parliament? The WP prevailed despite not having Low Thia Kiang and Chen Show Mao on the ticket.

In the middle of the campaign, PAP partisans went out of their way to paint the WP as too “westernized” and made a meal out of the WP’s failure to attend the first televised Chinese debate. They questioned whether the party of Nantah graduates like Low had lost its way. Voters of Aljunied have told us that they want nothing to do with the racialized politics of these PAP partisans, and that such insinuations have no place in modern Singapore politics.

Finally, GE 2020 may also mark the beginning of a serious rethink of the GRC system.

In one fell swoop, the PAP lost three office holders in Sengkang. With West Coast GRC under threat by PSP, and WP coming increasingly closer to winning East Coast GRC, the PAP needs to see the abolition of the GRC scheme as a matter of survival. It needs to bite the bullet, unwind the GRC system, take the risk of losing more SMCs, or face the prospect of losing swathes of office holders at a go.

The Road Ahead

For now, the opposition has a lot of work to do to consolidate the gains made in this GE.

Those of us who support the opposition can’t let this good result get to our heads. Remember that every 2011 breakthrough will be followed by a 2015 downer. Punggol-East was narrowly lost in 2015 after a hard-won by-election in 2013. Now that the opposition has two GRCs to defend, it’s time to put skin in the game and start helping the opposition between elections to make sure they are able to serve their residents well.

Let’s please never, ever, take our elected opposition for granted. Tonight, their victories have helped us sleep easier. Tomorrow, we need to make sure we have their backs.



A+ for this Piece :thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:
 

myfoot123

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
facebook.com

GE 2020: What The Electorate Said


7-9 minutes


This election was supposed to be a cakewalk for the PAP. Called in the midst of a pandemic, after a $93 billion set of Covid-19 budgets, the ground couldn’t have been sweeter. As Chan Chun Sing told his party activists, crisis has traditionally “saved” the PAP.

Not this time.

The PAP scraped by with 61.24% of the vote, significantly down from the 69.9% in GE 2015 and only marginally better than its 2011 tally (60.1%). It is also a discordant swansong for PM Lee, who has said he’s going to retire when he’s 70, in 2022.

Amongst the noise, what does GE 2020 tell us? Here are some quick takes.

For the PAP GE 2020 was a referendum on the 4G.

Singaporeans don’t want to have the next Prime Minister of Singapore chosen in a backroom and then foisted on them. GE 2020 was a way for Singaporeans to send key signals to the PAP about what they want and what they don’t.

Here is what Singaporeans are telling the PAP about the 4G.

It is difficult to see how Heng Swee Keat can take over as PM. Not with a 53.4% electoral margin in East Coast. There is no way to spin this. Singaporeans cannot confidently see our lives and the future of our country in Heng’s hands. This is a pity, because Heng is a fundamentally decent person who doesn’t come to politics with some of the worst instincts of PAP hardliners. He’s naturally a technocrat, not an attack dog.

This shouldn’t make Chan Chun Sing the default choice. Other things being equal, Chan’s showing in Tanjong Pagar is not much better than Heng’s. Although Chan’s vote share was numerically higher than Heng’s (63%), Tanjong Pagar is Lee Kuan Yew’s former seat in Parliament.

Chan will be haunted by his boast to party members that a crisis comes along periodically to “save the PAP”. Because of this, voters will forever remember him, fairly or not, as one of the architects of the Pandemic Election: willing to risk lives for political expediency.

So who is in serious contention to take over?

Of the 4G, Ong Ye Kung has the strongest electoral mandate.

With 67.29% in Sembawang GRC, Ong’s vote count stands head and shoulders above his 4G peers who are in serious contention for the post. Ong’s Chinese debate performance was widely acknowledged, even by opposition supporters, as a masterclass: it was commanding, confident and humorous. Ong is also widely considered to be the least hardline of all the 4G ministers, and is often compared to Tharman.

A PAP with the sensibilities of Tharman, George Yeo, and potentially Ong, is a PAP that younger Singaporeans may be able to see themselves relating to.
Lawrence Wong, who has received plaudits (or relatively less brickbats) for his handling of the COVID-19 crisis, should also be strongly considered as a DPM candidate despite a relatively tepid vote share (63.18%) in Marsiling Yew-Tee. He is confident, articulate, technocratic and a much less polarizing figure than Chan Chun Sing.

The PAP’s Western Flank Blows Wide Open

The PAP has traditionally racked up commanding margins in the West. The East has always been under threat from the WP, but for many GEs the PAP has had no serious contenders in the West. Now, the West can no longer be taken for granted.

The PAP squeaked in with a whisker in West Coast GRC against Tan Cheng Bock, with 51.69%. This is remarkable when you consider, in GE 2015, the PAP scored 78.5% of the vote.

Also nipping at the PAP’s heels in the West is their arch-nemesis, the SDP. Chee Soon Juan turned in his highest electoral vote count of his political career, which dates back to his entry into politics in 1994. His showing of 45.2% in Bukit Batok SMC was within striking distance of victory. This is despite bearing the brunt of the PAP’s POFMA attacks.

Even more impressive than Dr Chee’s showing was Dr Paul Tambyah’s electoral result in Bukit Panjang SMC, the first time he’s contesting in the ward. At 46.26%, Paul’s result is one of the best SDP electoral margins in the SDP’s post-Chiam See Tong era.

Gutter Politics Backfiring

GE 2020 will also be remembered as a referendum on gutter politics.

Sengkang is the most spectacular example of the PAP hardliners’ gutter politics exploding in their face.

Although Jamus Lim had star appeal, the WP’s win in Sengkang can’t be attributed to him alone. The Sengkang result happened because of three factors.
First, the WP fielded a team that resonated with the demography in Sengkang GRC. As He Ting Ru said in her constituency broadcast, each of the WP GRC’s team members are young parents like most of the voters in Sengkang.

Second, Jamus Lim is everything that is right about the WP’s succession planning in the same way that Heng Swee Keat is everything that is wrong with the PAP’s. In the only televised English language deabte, Jamus went toe to toe with foreign minister Vivian Balakrishnan, and appeared to be his equal if not better.
But third and probably crucially, the Raeesah attacks probably gave the little push that got the Sengkang WP team over the 50% mark.

The Raeesah attacks ripped the mask off the “new PAP”, and reminded the electorate that the PAP was still, at its core, controlled by hardliner schooled in knuckle-duster politics.

The Raeesah attacks also had the unintended effect of putting her humanitarian and NGO work under the spotlight, and younger voters liked what they saw.

Raeesah conducted herself impeccably under fire. And it also gave Pritam Singh the opportunity to provide a blinding contrast in leadership to Heng Swee Keat’s disappearing act in the campaign.

In GE 2020, the voters of Aljunied made political history again. With a WP win at 59.9%, here’s what Aljunied told us.

The Aljunied GRC team in Parliament now comprises three minorities (Leon Perera, Pritam and Faisal Manap). The Aljunied team prevailed despite 5 years of slurs, smears and litigation. Who can forget Heng Swee Keat’s botched hatchet job (with alot of prodding by PM) against Sylvia Lim in Parliament? The WP prevailed despite not having Low Thia Kiang and Chen Show Mao on the ticket.

In the middle of the campaign, PAP partisans went out of their way to paint the WP as too “westernized” and made a meal out of the WP’s failure to attend the first televised Chinese debate. They questioned whether the party of Nantah graduates like Low had lost its way. Voters of Aljunied have told us that they want nothing to do with the racialized politics of these PAP partisans, and that such insinuations have no place in modern Singapore politics.

Finally, GE 2020 may also mark the beginning of a serious rethink of the GRC system.

In one fell swoop, the PAP lost three office holders in Sengkang. With West Coast GRC under threat by PSP, and WP coming increasingly closer to winning East Coast GRC, the PAP needs to see the abolition of the GRC scheme as a matter of survival. It needs to bite the bullet, unwind the GRC system, take the risk of losing more SMCs, or face the prospect of losing swathes of office holders at a go.

The Road Ahead

For now, the opposition has a lot of work to do to consolidate the gains made in this GE.

Those of us who support the opposition can’t let this good result get to our heads. Remember that every 2011 breakthrough will be followed by a 2015 downer. Punggol-East was narrowly lost in 2015 after a hard-won by-election in 2013. Now that the opposition has two GRCs to defend, it’s time to put skin in the game and start helping the opposition between elections to make sure they are able to serve their residents well.

Let’s please never, ever, take our elected opposition for granted. Tonight, their victories have helped us sleep easier. Tomorrow, we need to make sure we have their backs.
Indeed, there is a take away here. Not forgetting, SDP has scored major point by forcing PAP to clarify on their population target. There is much to see what PAP will do after making lots of promises on the job front and talked about caring for the citizens. The next 5 years could see more job losses and greying population not being able to retire gracefully or profit from their highly depreciated HDB old flat. Ng Chee Meng fucked up also serves as wake up call that people no longer trust NTUC Labour union will help to secure good jobs for them. PAP cannot ignore those two major issues confronting Singaporeans head on in the next 4 years. Any promises or plan such as VERs still not made known, despite opposition making suggestions on VERs scheme, PAP may have to prepare to lost more GRCs in 4 years time. Attacking opposition, using PFORMA regularly and punishing critiques have proved counter productive for PAP. The 4G leaders have only 4 years to improve the current situation concerNing aging population and aging housing AND lost of more jobs. Less pocket money for the voters mean less votes for PAP. If they still think they will have 10 or more years mandate to think about, PAP will be in deep trouble.
 

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The PAP squeaked in with a whisker in West Coast GRC against Dr Tan Cheng Bock, with 51.69%. This is remarkable when you consider, in GE 2015, the PAP scored 78.5% of the vote.
 

Kee Chew

Alfrescian
Loyal
The PAP squeaked in with a whisker in West Coast GRC against Dr Tan Cheng Bock, with 51.69%. This is remarkable when you consider, in GE 2015, the PAP scored 78.5% of the vote.


Hmm... , just do a simple Extrapolation , this time insert LHY into the team against PAP Team at AMK GRC - what do we get ? :biggrin:
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
In a nutshell, Loong has to resign or claim health problem and go into obvilion, within 2 years.

His fight is over. Cannot keep standing under his father ghost shadow anymore in GE....
 

Kee Chew

Alfrescian
Loyal
The GRC is a double-edged sword: on one hand, you can use it to sneak in backdoor MPs who could never get elected in a SMC (e.g. Dr Anus Koh). On the other hand, the entire GRC can be taken down by a single 猪队友 on your team. :biggrin:



what happened to those 6,000 plus voters in West Coast GRC ?


IMG_20200711_165124.jpg

IMG_20200711_165136.jpg
 

knowwhatyouwantinlife

Alfrescian
Loyal
what happened to those 6,000 plus voters in West Coast GRC ?


View attachment 85933
View attachment 85934
Some of them are stroke or chronic illness sufferers who are no longer mobile or lucid hence their family members did not bring them to vote...the others could be previous supporters of kj and rp (like me and laksa) hence decided not to vote for ah bock or white...many reasons but not all are bad or with bad intent
 

Robert Half

Alfrescian
Loyal
The GRC is a double-edged sword: on one hand, you can use it to sneak in backdoor MPs who could never get elected in a SMC (e.g. Dr Anus Koh). On the other hand, the entire GRC can be taken down by a single 猪队友 on your team. :biggrin:

GRC has since become a weakness :tongue:
 
Top