• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Foreign talent's contributions to Singapore

How a celebrity CEO's rule of fear helped bring down hot Singapore start-up Zilingo​

ac_ankikibose_040822.jpg



Zilingo suspended its 30-year-old chief executive officer Ankiti Bose over complaints about alleged financial irregularities in March. ST PHOTO: FELINE LIM

Aug 4, 2022

SINGAPORE (BLOOMBERG) - At first glance, the implosion of vaunted fashion start-up Zilingo looked jarringly sudden.
When the Singapore tech darling suspended its 30-year-old chief executive officer Ankiti Bose over complaints about alleged financial irregularities, it was March. Within weeks, creditors were recalling loans, more than 100 employees had left, and Ms Bose found herself fired, though she denies any wrongdoing. The company's survival is now in question.
The Zilingo meltdown has rattled the tech industry in South-east Asia and beyond. The start-up had raised more than US$300 million (S$414 million) from some of the region's most prominent investors, including Singapore investment company Temasek and Sequoia Capital India, the regional arm of the Silicon Valley firm that backed Apple and Google. Ms Bose was a celebrity who criss-crossed the globe to speak at tech gatherings from Hong Kong to California.
Interviews with more than 60 people, including current and former staff, merchants, investors, entrepreneurs and friends of the key players, suggest that Zilingo struggled for years under Ms Bose's leadership. Her management style alienated employees and undermined the business, according to staff who worked under her.
The start-up veered from one strategy to another in pursuit of sales, including a US$1 million promotional trip in Morocco, loans to customers and a short-lived push into the United States. At one point, she became fixated on "crazy growth" to catch the attention of Japanese tech titan Masayoshi Son, according to two former employees with direct knowledge of the matter.
At the heart of the company's breakdown lies the soured relationship between Ms Bose and her long-time supporter, Mr Shailendra Singh, head of Sequoia India. Allies for years, they fell out as financial pressures mounted. Mr Singh lost faith in the management skills of the young founder he had championed, while Ms Bose believed Mr Singh betrayed her by pushing her out of her own company, according to people familiar with their relationship, who requested anonymity as the talks were private.
The clash grew so acrimonious that Sequoia's lawyers demanded in a May legal notice that Ms Bose stop making allegations that could tarnish Sequoia's reputation, the people said.

Zilingo's turmoil highlights an apparent lax internal corporate governance culture that is not uncommon in the start-up industry. For two years, the company failed to file annual financial statements, a basic requirement for all businesses of its size in Singapore. Auditor KPMG has yet to sign off on Zilingo's financial year 2020 results. While it is not unusual for start-ups to miss these deadlines, which can result in a fine of up to $600, it is typically a warning sign that firmer action may be needed by the board.
Yet, investors, including Temasek and the Economic Development Board's investment arm EDBI, put more funds into Zilingo at the end of 2020. Shareholders that together own a majority stake of the company only formally acted against Ms Bose after whistle-blower complaints were filed earlier this year.

Tech warning​

The saga has also become a warning for the region's tech community, which is assessing the fallout of global economic shocks from Covid-19, the war in Ukraine and global inflation.


"Whatever happened at Zilingo, there will be a lot more dramas in the next couple of years as the big worldwide recession impedes hot shots from raising money," said veteran investor Jim Rogers, chairman of Rogers Holdings in Singapore. "I have seen this rodeo before."
Bloomberg News reviewed dozens of internal documents, e-mails, texts and other media from Zilingo, and Ms Bose sat for two extensive interviews, one before and one after her dismissal from the company on May 20. The board's decision to fire her was not abrupt, but rather the culmination of years of tension, according to the documents and people with direct knowledge of the matter.
"Board members were concerned about the company's performance over the last few years and sought to share suggestions to address the company's performance including cash burn," Zilingo and its board said in a statement to Bloomberg News.
"In March 2022, investors received complaints about serious financial irregularities which appeared to require investigation. With the support of the majority investor shareholders, an independent forensic investigations consultancy was appointed to look into the said complaints. After a comprehensive process lasting almost two months, including numerous opportunities for Ms Bose to provide documents and information, the company subsequently terminated Ms Bose for cause based on the findings of that investigation."
SPH Brightcove Video

Ms Bose said the process to terminate her was an "unfair witch hunt" and denied that she was given numerous opportunities to respond to allegations. She said she has not seen the investigation report, which was not made public. On the board's suggestion to implement changes, she said the team cut the cash burn by 70 per cent between the end of 2019 and the end of 2021.
"It was not easy, we did not succeed at everything," she said in July. "It was chaotic and painful, but we did do it and we made the best effort we could."
Zilingo's origin story is part of South-east Asia's start-up lore. Ms Bose came up with the idea as she wandered through Bangkok's Chatuchak market, where 15,000 stalls offer goods from across Thailand. She and co-founder Dhruv Kapoor wanted to build a platform that would allow such small merchants to sell to consumers across South-east Asia.

Mr Singh was instrumental from the start. He and Ms Bose had worked together at Sequoia and he was happy to support one of the firm's own. Mr Singh had started his career in Sequoia's Silicon Valley office, learning at the side of veteran investors Michael Moritz and Doug Leone. Mr Singh had transformed Sequoia Capital India over 16 years into the region's biggest venture capital (VC) firm with some US$9 billion of assets under management and 36 unicorns on its score sheet across India and South-east Asia.
He invested in Zilingo's seed round in 2015, when Ms Bose was 23 years old, and in every fund raising since. "We think the world of her," he told a fellow venture capitalist in 2016, in an e-mail seen by Bloomberg News.
ac_DhruvK_040822.jpg



Mr Dhruv Kapoor, co-founder and chief technology officer of fashion e-commerce marketplace Zilingo. PHOTO: ZILINGO
But like many upstarts, Ms Bose and Mr Kapoor faced challenges almost from the beginning. Their consumer-focused fashion site struggled because of the thin margins and low average income in South-east Asia, a fragmented region with different languages and currencies. By late 2017, they decided to reposition Zilingo into a business-to-business platform, where small manufacturers and wholesalers could sell goods directly to small retailers in the region.
In 2018, Zilingo raised US$54 million from investors. The company decided to splurge US$1 million to whisk nine social media influencers to Morocco for a three-day extravaganza, complete with camel rides, a hot-air balloon trip, yoga lessons and gourmet dinners.
It was a massive flop, according to an early employee with direct knowledge of the event. The goal of #ZilingoEscape was to bring in one million new users, one for each US$1 spent. The final tally was about 10,000, the person said. Ms Bose declined to comment specifically on the campaign, but said it was part of the company's US$10 million annual marketing budget.
This appears to have become a pattern for Ms Bose. With cash in Zilingo's coffers, she would dive into new initiatives to supercharge growth even if the immediate financial benefits were questionable. In one example, Ms Bose suggested that Zilingo subsidise a 2 per cent to 4 per cent discount for transactions, effectively paying merchants to trade with one another. She cheered on the team as gross merchandise value hit US$1 million for the first two months, even though Zilingo was getting no fees from the merchants, said a person directly involved.
In 2018, Ms Bose came up with the idea of giving out loans to suppliers and vendors who needed capital. It took off, so in the coming months Ms Bose cranked up the pressure. She told the team to give out more loans each month on a running basis, the person said. But no one could have predicted the pandemic, or the toll it would take on start-ups like Zilingo, and much of the debt had to be written off.
Yet Ms Bose's star was rising in the industry. In early 2019, Zilingo raised US$226 million, lifting its valuation to US$970 million. The charismatic CEO wooed tech gatherings with her vision of how start-ups like hers were a new model for the emerging world.
"We are about to shake things up quite a bit," Ms Bose said at a panel discussion in Singapore, flashing a wide smile and drawing applause from the audience.
Inside the company, she drove staff relentlessly. In one instance, Ms Bose messaged a senior lieutenant early on a Sunday morning and called about a dozen times. When the employee did not pick up immediately, she told the lieutenant: "You obviously don't care about the company enough."

Publicly, the company seemed to be going from strength to strength. In July 2019, Mr James Perry, former managing director and Asia-Pacific head of technology investment banking for Citigroup, joined Zilingo as its first chief financial officer.
It was a coup for Ms Bose, some 20 years Mr Perry's junior. Ms Bose said in an interview with Bloomberg News in 2019 that Mr Perry's experience and respect in the financial world would complement her "young and crazy" self and give confidence to investors. "He's James Perry, he's a god in finance," she said.
In the investment world, her big target remained Mr Son, whose SoftBank Group had upended venture capital by making huge bets on unproven start-ups. Ms Bose told her deputies that Zilingo needed to achieve rapid growth to catch Mr Son's attention, one of the deputies said.
Ms Bose met Mr Son twice that year, once in Jakarta and a second time in Tokyo, according to people familiar with the matter. She explained her vision for Zilingo, but Mr Son never backed her. Neither did KKR & Co, which was considering investing in the start-up at the time, the people said.
In October 2019, Zilingo announced it would spend US$100 million to expand into the US, establishing offices in New York and Los Angeles. Ms Bose's idea was to take advantage of then President Donald Trump's trade war by offering American retailers a way to avoid tariffs by finding producers outside China. Less than a year later, the company shut its US operations.
By the end of 2019, Mr Singh and other directors had told Ms Bose several times to slow the cash burn. But Mr Singh was not getting regular financial reports from Ms Bose, and it was not till a board meeting in November that the directors learnt that the company was actually going through some US$7 million to US$8 million a month, more than they had expected. Mr Singh picked up the phone and had a tough conversation with Ms Bose, according to people with knowledge of the conversations.

Guzzling money​

It turns out that the company was guzzling money. The US$226 million Zilingo had raised from investors in early 2019 was gone in less than two years.
In 2020, the pandemic battered the business and Ms Bose saw an opportunity to supply personal protective equipment, inking a deal in April to supply 10 million KN-95 masks, valued at US$22.5 million, to India. Six months later, Zilingo was embroiled in a legal battle with the Indian government, which claimed the company had failed to deliver 3.2 million of the masks on time. The company did not comment on the lawsuit, which is still ongoing.
In September, Mr Perry left Zilingo to rejoin Citigroup.

Inside the company, former employees paint a picture of a boss who ruled by fear. She allegedly told some staff they would have no second chance in the start-up industry because of her powerful connections. She would publicly shame employees and declare that she had to do everything herself to save the company, one person said. Another described her as a narcissist who would throw anyone under the bus if it meant saving her own reputation.
Asked in an interview in Singapore before she was fired about the culture under her leadership, Ms Bose uncharacteristically paused and stared out of the window as the sun set over the city.
"I was 23 when I started the company," she said eventually. "I liked having control at the beginning. Of course, I made mistakes and learnt from them. By the time we got to the stage where we had all these senior people, I don't think I was a control freak."
In her most recent interview with Bloomberg in July, Ms Bose reiterated that she has not done anything wrong. "I'm going to be a lot calmer, a lot more empathetic and understanding of how people work together. That has been a big learning for me. Managing people, managing relationships, managing communications - I think all of this is coming down to that," she said.
By November 2020, Zilingo had barely enough cash to last a month. A group of existing investors, including Sequoia, EDBI, Sofina, Temasek and SIG, stepped in to rescue the company by purchasing US$25 million of convertible notes.
In January 2021, Mr Singh and Ms Bose met at the Four Seasons Hotel's alfresco cafe as they did from time to time to talk shop. Mr Singh suggested that Ms Bose consider stepping aside. He said Mr Ananth Narayanan, founder of brand-building service Mensa Brands and former CEO of fashion platform Myntra, could be a potential successor. The two men had met recently and, when Mr Narayanan said he was looking for a new opportunity, Mr Singh had thought of Zilingo.
Ms Bose was shocked. "Not yet," she said.
She went home and, that night, sent a series of emotional texts to Mr Singh, saying his suggestion was a gender-related issue and pouring her heart out. She said her departure would make her look bad, as though the firm needed to be saved by someone else. Mr Singh said it was just a preliminary idea and there was no need to discuss it again. He urged her instead to focus on improving metrics, finding a new CFO and fund raising, according to people familiar with the meeting and texts seen by Bloomberg.
Ms Bose ended the chat by saying they should work together towards the best possible outcome, and Mr Singh replied with two thumbs-up emojis. It was 2.29am.
The mounting pressure was also testing the relationship between Ms Bose and co-founder Mr Kapoor, the chief technology officer. They had clashed over the future of the company the previous month when the company was scrambling to stay afloat.
"I am scared honestly that we will not hit our goals," she texted Mr Kapoor several hours after the chat with Mr Singh. "When something is wrong, the blame falls on me, but everyone's there to take credit for the good," she wrote.
"I don't like being hated for busting my ass at all," she added.
Ms Bose spent most of the year trying to pull in more funds. In July 2021, the company took mezzanine debt of US$40 million from Indies Capital Partners and Varde Partners, but subsequent efforts to raise money from private equity and venture capital firms failed. One issue was a concern from potential investors that users were making fake transactions in key markets to bilk Zilingo's subsidies. Executives from two firms told Bloomberg News that they decided not to back Zilingo after they found evidence of merchant fraud in Indonesia, the country that accounted for more than half of Zilingo's gross merchandise volume in financial year 2021.
There was no suggestion that Zilingo was involved in the suspected fake transactions. Some existing investors, including Burda Principal Investments, Temasek and Sofina, questioned Ms Bose about the company's unaudited financial reports, according to people familiar with the matter. But Ms Bose was providing monthly financial updates to the board, and they were lenient as Zilingo was busy with fund raising at the time, one of the people said.
In March this year, Ms Bose received an ominous text on her phone: "Storm is coming your way."
A few days later, she was asked to join a meeting with investors at Burda's shophouse office in Singapore's Boat Quay, according to people familiar with the details of the meeting. There, Mr Singh and the two other shareholders dealt her a stunner. They said Zilingo's board had received complaints about alleged mismanagement and financial misrepresentation and they were suspending her during an investigation. Mr Singh urged her to be cooperative.
"We just want to save the company," he said, according to one of the people.

Ms Bose promised to help. As she left, she started running through the pouring rain.
"I think the tale is about what sometimes happens when you go into hyper-growth mode," said Ms Aliza Knox, senior adviser at Boston Consulting Group, who has held senior management positions at tech companies including Google and Twitter in Asia Pacific.
In these situations, start-ups need to think about adding independent board members beyond "founders and funders", she said. "Could some of the problems have been mitigated if there were a different kind of board a little bit earlier? That's an important question to ask."
Zilingo is not the only Sequoia-backed start-up embroiled in controversy. BharatPe's co-founder Ashneer Grover resigned from the fast-growing Indian fintech start-up in March after senior leadership accused him of misappropriation of funds. Mr Grover has denied the accusations against him, including that he stole company money to fund an extravagant lifestyle, which he said stem from "personal hatred and low thinking", he said on LinkedIn.
A forensic team from EY India has looked into Indian social commerce start-up Trell, another Sequoia-backed company, amid allegations of financial irregularities. Trell's three co-founders did not respond to requests for comment. Co-founder and CEO Pulkit Agrawal in March sent a note to investors, questioning the nature of the forensic audit, the Economic Times reported, citing its own review of the note.
Sequoia India and South-east Asia published a blog post in April, saying it would take "proactive steps" to drive corporate governance at start-ups it invests in.
Mr Singh is feeling the heat as he evolves from start-up cheerleader to champion of corporate governance. Increased scrutiny prompted some Sequoia-backed Indian founders to compare him to a forceful ruler from Indian history.
"There is art to setting up governance - the board, process and advisers - in such a way that brakes kick in automatically when something bad happens," said Mr Dmitry Levit, founder of Singapore-based VC firm Cento Ventures. He said many of Sequoia India's companies are like racing cars. "If somebody tries to run a Formula One car on off-road terrain in stormy weather, it cannot absorb the shocks."
Sequoia India said it has always cared about corporate governance.
"Building world-class companies requires first-rate governance," a Sequoia India spokesman said in a statement to Bloomberg. "There is always more we can do to work with founders so that their companies benefit from better, more robust standards of governance, such as stronger audit oversight, clear whistle-blower processes and the need to bring independent directors on board earlier."
ac_ABz_040822.jpg



Ankiti Bose was a celebrity who crisscrossed the globe to speak at tech gatherings from Hong Kong to California. PHOTO: ZILINGO

Salary questions​

The zeal for governance may have come too late for Zilingo. About a week after Ms Bose was suspended, a board director and an adviser to another shareholder questioned her about why she was drawing a monthly salary of $50,000. Her employment contract five years ago stated it as $8,500 and the adviser had just discovered she had been making considerably more since 2019, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Ms Bose said the numbers are inaccurate but did not provide her salary information.
Investigators hired by the board also questioned her about three sets of revenue numbers for financial year 2021 that Zilingo had shared with external parties: US$190 million, US$164 million and US$140 million. Ms Bose explained to them that the US$190 million had been circulated before the year closed and before the cancellation of masks and other orders. The US$140 million was used in a due diligence report for fund raising, while the US$164 million included uninvoiced revenue, according to a document seen by Bloomberg.
But another document the company shared with a potential investor, seen by Bloomberg News, showed that Zilingo's net revenue for the year was about US$40 million. A representative for Kroll, the firm that conducted the probe, declined to comment.
Ms Bose said in an interview with Bloomberg News in May that Zilingo has used aggressive methods for recognising revenue, but that the calculations are standard practice for the industry and that all of its investors were fully aware of them. "These matters are well understood by all investors," Ms Bose said in the interview.

Zilingo "went through a tough time during Covid-19", said Mr Rohit Sipahimalani, Temasek's chief investment officer. "There were clearly some things the board was unaware of, and when there were complaints made, they investigated into it and actions have been taken subsequently."
Now, the company is in turmoil and some employees say they are worried about their future. The board in June was considering liquidating the company. After her suspension in March, Ms Bose herself filed a formal complaint to the board, asking it to also suspend Mr Kapoor and then chief operating officer Aadi Vaidya, a friend from college, for their poor work performance and lack of leadership. A representative of the company, Mr Kapoor and Mr Vaidya declined to comment. Mr Vaidya resigned last week after seven years with Zilingo, explaining "now is the time to move on, clear my head and reset priorities".
It is a steep fall for Zilingo from just five months ago, when Ms Bose's fund-raising efforts valued the company at US$1.2 billion.
 

YouTuber Dee Kosh jailed 32 weeks for sexual offences against young people​

md_kosh_05082022.jpg

YouTuber Darryl Ian Koshy, better known as Dee Kosh arriving at the State Courts, on Aug 3 2022. ST PHOTO: KUA CHEE SIONG
Samuel Devaraj

Aug 5, 2022

SINGAPORE - YouTuber Darryl Ian Koshy, who committed various sexual offences, including offering cash to a boy below 18 for sexual services, was jailed for 32 weeks on Friday (Aug 5).
Better known as Dee Kosh, the 33-year-old will begin serving his sentence on Friday.
Koshy had pleaded guilty in May to one charge of offering cash to a minor for sexual services.
And to another charge under the Children and Young Persons Act for the attempted sexual exploitation of a young person.
He had also pleaded guilty to a charge under the Films Act after filming himself in 2016 or 2017 engaging in sex acts with a man aged between 23 and 25.
Four other charges were taken into consideration during his sentencing.

On Wednesday (Aug 3),Deputy Public Prosecutor Lim Ying Min had sought a sentence of five to eight months' jail, saying Koshy's offences were highly premeditated as he had deliberately and persistently sought out minors.

She said Koshy had used and capitalised on his status as a radio presenter and influencer to lure his victims.
Koshy's lawyer Johannes Hadi had argued for his client to get a sentence of two-and-a-half months' jail, highlighting his client's remorse with low prospects of re-offending.
For offering cash to a youngster below 18 in exchange for sexual services, Koshy could have been jailed for up to two years and fined.
For the attempted sexual exploitation of a young person, he could have been jailed for up to five years, fined up to $10,000, or both under the Children and Young Persons Act.
 

Woman kicked cop in groin during arrest after creating ruckus in Sembawang​

sv_Odonchimeg_080822.jpg

Boldbaatar Odonchimeg was sentenced to 12 weeks' jail and fined $3,000. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
Samuel Devaraj

Aug 9, 2022

SINGAPORE - A woman who was arrested for causing a ruckus and harassing customers at a coffee shop later kicked a policeman in the groin, causing him to suffer a bruise.
Boldbaatar Odonchimeg, a 35-year-old Mongolian, was sentenced to 12 weeks' jail and fined $3,000 on Monday (Aug 8) after pleading guilty to voluntarily causing hurt to a public servant and another charge under the Protection from Harassment Act.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Andrew Chia said in court documents that a worker at a Sembawang Road coffee shop told the police at about 8.45pm on Dec 6 last year that a woman was harassing its customers.
When police officers arrived, Boldbaatar was in a drunken state and behaving in a rowdy manner.
After managing to get her to leave the coffee shop, the officers handcuffed her when she continued to behave aggressively towards passers-by.
Senior Staff Sergeant Dhanaletchmi Kuppusamy and her colleague, Corporal Muhammad Islam Angullia Yussoff, later arrived to take Boldbaatar to the regional lock-up at Woodlands Division Police Headquarters.
During the journey, Boldbaatar struggled and behaved aggressively towards the two officers. When they arrived at the police complex, she initially refused to exit the vehicle.

After she was eventually taken to the Covid-19 testing area, Boldbaatar started sobbing uncontrollably and refused to sign a consent form. No test was conducted on her.
She continued to resist and shout, and when Senior Staff Sgt Dhana and another officer tried to make her sit, Boldbaatar directed vulgarities at her.
After Boldbaatar was taken to the lock-up premises, Senior Staff Sgt Dhana released one of her hands so it could be handcuffed to a metal bar attached to a wall.
When Boldbaatar kept resisting, Cpl Islam and other officers went to restrain her, but she kicked Cpl Islam in the groin. Despite the pain, he continued to help restrain Boldbaatar, who was eventually placed in a wheelchair.
Cpl Islam sought medical treatment at a hospital and was given two days of medical leave.


Speaking via a translator on Monday, Boldbaatar said she had become depressed after being away from her family since the start of the pandemic. She said she regretted her actions and has sought counselling help.
She also indicated her intention to appeal against the sentence.
Court papers did not indicate her occupation or say why she was in Singapore.
For voluntarily causing hurt to a public servant, she could have been jailed for up to seven years, fined or both.
For harassment, she could have been fined up to $5,000, jailed for up to 12 months or both.
 

Jail, fine for woman caught in illegal CNY gathering and who tried to bribe police with $100​

court.jpg

osmondchia.png


Osmond Chia

Aug 11, 2022

SINGAPORE - A woman, caught being part of an illegal gathering, repeatedly tried to bribe a police officer $100 so that she would be let off.
The officer refused to accept the money.
Chinese national Chen Yuanyuan, 28, was one of 15 people at a Chinese New Year gathering held illegally in spite of pandemic restrictions last year.
On Thursday (Aug 11), Chen was jailed for 10 weeks and fined $3,000 after she pleaded guilty to offences including bribery and flouting Covid-19 measures.
She was also convicted of kicking a police officer in a separate offence, while four other charges were taken into consideration during sentencing.
The court heard that the police responded to a report of an illegal party being held at a unit at 1 Pemimpin Drive, an industrial area, on Feb 25 last year at around 2am.
When they arrived, the officers found 15 partygoers, aged 26 to 40. Covid-19 restrictions at the time allowed only up to eight people at any social gathering.

Chen and her fellow partygoers drank alcohol, played games and sang songs.
Deputy Public Prosecutors Ben Tan and Tessa Tan said: "There were no measures taken to reduce the risk of infection among the attendees of the social gathering."
As the police officers searched Chen and her belongings, Chen took out a stack of cash and offered it to an officer.

She did so again when the officer refused. She then took a $100 note and offered it to the officer, insisting she could not take it back.
The officer warned Chen that it was bribery and reported the matter to her superior.
Most of the other partygoers have been dealt with in court and fined, court documents stated.

In a separate incident in January last year, Chen kicked two police officers while she was drunk at night. The officers were responding to a report that she was creating a ruckus in Tanjong Pagar.
The police found Chen on the floor and asked her to unlock her phone to arrange for a friend to pick her up.
She gave them the wrong passcode several times and became agitated, turning aggressive and kicking one of the officers several times on his leg.
She was arrested and put in the backseat of a police car, but continued to kick another officer's legs, causing the officer to suffer a minor abrasion, noted the prosecutors.
The prosecutors sought a sentence of 11 to 12 weeks' jail and a $3,000 fine.
Seeking no more than six weeks' jail, Chen's lawyer noted that her actions were spur-of-the-moment and that a psychiatric report showed that she had depressive disorder and a history of anxiety attacks.
In response, the prosecutors argued that little weight should be given to the psychiatric report as no contributory link had been established.
Those found guilty of corruptly offering gratification can be jailed for up to five years and fined up to $100,000.
For using criminal force to deter a public servant from doing his duty, an offender can be jailed for up to four years and fined.
 

Football: Lion City Sailors part ways with coach Kim Do-hoon after headbutt suspension​

ads-kimdohoon-110822.jpg

Kim Do-hoon was handed a three-match suspension and $2,000 fine for violent conduct in a SPL game on July 24. PHOTO: ST FILE
saa2.png


Sazali Abdul Aziz
Correspondent

Aug 11, 2022

SINGAPORE - Singapore Premier League (SPL) leaders Lion City Sailors made the shock announcement on Thursday (Aug 11) that they have reached a "mutual agreement" to part ways with head coach Kim Do-hoon.
The news comes less than 24 hours after Kim was handed a three-match suspension and $2,000 fine for violent conduct in a SPL game on July 24.
He had headbutted Tampines Rovers assistant coach Mustafic Fahrudin near the end of the match, which led to further incidents between the two after the full-time whistle.
Mustafic was also handed a three-match suspension, as well as a $3,000 fine. The punishments would bar the duo from the teams' dressing rooms and benches for their next three SPL games.
Sources told The Straits Times that the club held a staff meeting on Thursday afternoon to consider Kim's position, before arriving at their decision.
Two of Kim’s compatriots on the coaching staff have also left the Sailors. They are assistant coach Myung Jae-yong and performance analyst Kim Young-kwang.
Kim’s departure was abrupt and players, who asked not to be named, shared that he had overseen a training session on Thursday morning as the team went through tactics and video analysis to prepare for their next SPL match, against the Young Lions on Saturday.

The coach had also apologised to his players for his conduct during the Tampines match right after the game, and apologised again on Thursday morning, after punishments were meted out the night before.
The club delivered the news to their players shortly before releasing the 66-word media statement.
"Lion City Sailors and head coach Kim Do-hoon have reached a mutual agreement to part ways," read the statement.


"We thank him for his service, and we wish him the best in his future endeavours."
The club added that their academy technical director Luka Lalic will lead the first team in the interim, starting with the game against the Young Lions.
Sailors captain Hariss Harun told ST: “It’s sad to see Kim go because we had some good moments under him.
“We won the SPL title and did well in the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) Champions League, considering it was our first campaign.
“We as players have to be grateful for his guidance and mentorship... but the decision has been made by the club, and we wish him all the best.”
Former South Korea striker Kim was the second coach to helm the Sailors full-time since they became Singapore's first privatised football club in Feb 2020. Australian Aurelio Vidmar had been coach then, and left in April 2021.
Kim, who had won the 2017 Korean FA Cup and 2020 Asian Football Confederation (AFC) Champions League with Ulsan Hyundai, was appointed in June 2021 on a two-and-a-half year contract and steered the Sailors to the SPL title last season.
With nine games left this season, the Sailors are top of the table, one point ahead of Albirex Niigata.
Under Kim this year, they also achieved the best showing by a Singapore side in the AFC Champions League, finishing with seven points.
 

Youth who raped 16-year-old he met at birthday gathering gets 8 years' jail, caning​

court_0.jpg


selinalum.png



Selina Lum
Senior Law Correspondent

Aug 15, 2022

SINGAPORE - A 20-year-old youth who raped a drunk 16-year-old girl he met at a birthday gathering was sentenced to eight years' jail and six strokes of the cane on Monday (Aug 15).
Rajama Samuel Doctorian Purba, an Indonesian who was then taking a diploma course at a private school here, pleaded to a charge of raping the victim at his rented apartment in November 2020.
Two other charges, one for molesting the victim and one for possession of obscene films, were taken into consideration.
The High Court heard that Rajama shared the condominium unit with another Indonesian, Mr Anthony Aditya Tedjawisastra, 19, who was also studying at a private school here.
On the afternoon of Nov 6, 2020, the victim was invited by her friend to a gathering at the apartment to celebrate his birthday.
The friend was a course mate of Mr Anthony, who organised the gathering.
She was initially hesitant to attend the gathering as she did not know anyone but eventually decided to go as it was to celebrate her friend's birthday.

At the apartment that night, after some introductions, the victim, her friend, Rajama and Mr Anthony sat in the living room, playing card games and having alcoholic drinks.
After a few rounds of games, the victim became dizzy and wanted to vomit.
Rajama supported her and led her to the toilet in his bedroom, while the other two people remained in the living room.

Once in his room, Rajama locked the door and took the girl to the toilet.
After she was done vomiting, he cleaned up after her and realised that she was unconscious.
Rajama then placed her on his bed, lifted her shirt and bra and groped her. When she did not react, he raped her.
The victim felt the accused raping her but could not resist or move her body as she was intoxicated.
After Rajama stopped, he dressed the victim up, helped her to the toilet, where she vomited again, and left her there.

Later, when Mr Anthony entered the room, he told Rajama off for leaving her on the toilet floor.
Rajama then confessed that he had sex with the victim.
The victim left the unit at about 4am, supported by her friend. She later told him what Rajama had done to her.
She made a police report that night.
 

Briton fined $8,000 for refusing to wear mask in City Square Mall​

sv_Mockridge_180822.jpg

Mockridge Philip Richard had refused to wear a mask in City Square Mall on May 16 last year. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
wong_shiying.png


Wong Shiying

Aug 18, 2022

SINGAPORE - A 55-year-old Briton who repeatedly refused to wear a mask in public when it was mandatory to do so has been fined $8,000 after pleading guilty to one count of breaching Covid-19 regulations.
Mockridge Philip Richard, a Singapore permanent resident, had refused to wear a mask in City Square Mall on May 16 last year.
Two similar charges involving him not wearing a mask on two separate occasions - in Sengkang MRT station in November 2020 and Serangoon MRT station in December that year - were taken into consideration on Thursday (Aug 18) for his sentencing.
The court heard that Mockridge was defiant when police officers approached him in MOS Burger in City Square Mall.
He had his mask pulled down over his chin, even though he was not eating or drinking.
When told to mask up, Mockridge said: "Are you sure about that? I'm not so sure", and asked to see their identification.
He then walked away from the officers, still unmasked, to collect his packed food from the restaurant counter.

One of the officers, Sergeant Shawn Ang Yi Xiang asked if he had an issue with wearing a mask to which Mockridge replied: "Which law are you referring to?"
He then took his mobile phone out and began recording the exchange.
After Sgt Ang read out the law, Mockridge said: "And if I don't, what will you do?"
Sgt Ang then informed him that composition fines were usually given to first- and second-time offenders, while subsequent repeat offenders will be prosecuted in court.
Mockridge then said: "So you're threatening to put me in a cage?"
He maintained that the officer was threatening him and remained unmasked throughout the exchange.

Seeking a $10,000 fine, Deputy Public Prosecutor Wu Yu Jie said Mockridge was unmasked for at least 15 minutes at the mall and had no reason for not wearing one.
"The accused was already being investigated for the two incidents (in 2020). Despite having encountered the police twice for failing to wear a mask, he remained defiant and committed this third breach," he said.
Mockridge said in mitigation that he "was not entirely sure of what the law was".
For each offence of flouting Covid-19 rules, he could have been fined up to $10,000 and jailed for up to six months.
 

Pub owner jailed over use of blue light to warn performers of police presence​

court_0.jpg

Samuel Devaraj

Aug 24, 2022

SINGAPORE - A blue light was installed in a Circular Road pub to warn performers engaging in illicit activity of the presence of police nearby.
When it was switched on, performers had to stop all activities and move away from their customers towards a table near the entrance.
The pub's owner, Lee Seet Khiang, 50, who had instructed his staff on the use of the light, was sentenced to six weeks' jail on Monday (Aug 22) after pleading guilty to two charges of obstruction of justice.
Another similar charge was taken into consideration during the Malaysian's sentencing.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Tin Shu Min said in court documents that Lee, a Singaporean permanent resident, took over as the registered owner and licensee of Club Para Para in September 2019.
Lee was in charge of hiring and managing the performers at Club Para Para and another pub, Beer Inn, at nearby Lorong Telok, where he had been employed since 2012 or 2013.
On March 22, 2020, a former performer at another Circular Road pub called T.G.I.F. e-mailed the Ministry of Manpower to allege that its performers were providing sexual services to encourage customers to spend more on drinks.

Investigations into T.G.I.F. revealed that Beer Inn and Club Para Para were affiliated to it, and performers were cross-deployed across the three pubs.
Performers at Beer Inn and Club Para Para sat with or mingled with customers, with at least four at each pub providing sexual services to customers in the premises, said DPP Tin.
"The performers were motivated to do so as they would earn a commission from the drinks purchased by customers," said the DPP, adding that they needed to earn extra commission to pay off their debts, which were incurred when they came to Singapore to work.


She also said that Lee was aware that performers in Club Para Para were sitting with or mingling with the customers, which was a breach of its public entertainment licence conditions.
In April 2019, Lee told Noraida Ghani, who had started working there as a manager, about the blue light and its purpose. She then briefed performers on what they should do when they see the blue light.
"These were acts she had done on the (Lee's) instigation," said DPP Tin.
Between April 2019 and March 2020, Noraida briefed at least seven performers about the blue light, and recalled seeing the light switched on about seven to eight times.
Lee also briefed Zainabbun Abdul Jalil when she started working in the pub in mid-2019. She was stationed outside to welcome customers and also to switch on the blue light if she saw the police nearby.

Between mid-2019 and March 2020, Zainabbun switched on the blue light using a remote control about four to five times a week.
For their role in the offences, Noraida received a 12-month conditional warning while Zainabbun received a stern warning.
For each charge, Lee could have been jailed for up to seven years, fined or both.
Last Wednesday (Aug 17), a bouncer pleaded guilty to six charges of obstructing the course of justice after he tipped off other outlets when the police raided nightspots where he worked or when he saw police vehicles in the area.
The 26-year-old man, who also faced a charge each of affray and causing hurt by a rash act, was sentenced to 17 weeks' jail and fined $3,000.
Eight others who were part of one of the WhatsApp chat groups that he sent tip-offs to were sentenced last Friday.
 

Ex-director fined $558,000 for falsifying statements on export certificates: Customs​

ads_court_0.jpg


Wallace Woon

Aug 31, 2022

SINGAPORE - A 41-year-old former director was slapped with a $558,000 fine for faking statements on the export of some $9.72 million worth of goods, in order to benefit from preferential tariff treatment.
In a statement on Tuesday, the Singapore Customs said Solaiyappan Ramanathan pleaded guilty to two charges under the Regulation of Imports and Exports Regulations on Monday.
Another six charges were taken into consideration during sentencing.
Solaiyappan, a Singapore permanent resident, held a directorship at Feccuni Singapore and was the sole proprietor of Shakambri Overseas.
He set up these companies to trade in scrap metals and other metal products sourced from local and overseas suppliers.
From August 2017 to April 2019, he imported scrap metals from China and re-exported them from Singapore to India.
He applied for 137 preferential certificates of origin (PCOs) for the export of the goods to India.

These certificates offer preferential tariff treatment under the India-Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement and Asean-India free trade in goods agreement.
Singapore Customs began investigating Solaiyappan after it received information alleging that Feccuni had issued false statements about the country of origin of the scrap metals in the PCOs.
The statement added that the scrap metal was from China, but Solaiyappan had falsely stated on the PCOs that they were from Singapore, knowing that the preferential tariff would apply only for goods manufactured or wholly obtained in Singapore.
Customs also revealed that Solaiyappan had been approached by a Malaysian to use Feccuni as an exporter for shipping scrap metals to India.
In return, Feccuni would earn commission for every PCO applied.
This was done as buyers in India had expressed interest in the preferential tariff treatment.
While his company was not involved in any transaction between the Malaysian and the Indian buyers, Solaiyappan created invoices bearing Feccuni's name and submitted them for PCO applications.
This, the statement said, was done to give the impression that the scrap metals sold by Feccuni were of Singapore origin instead of China.
Under the Regulation of Imports and Exports Regulations, any person found guilty of providing false statements to the issuing authority to obtain preferential tariff treatments can be jailed for two years, or be fined the higher of a sum of up to $100,000, or three times the value of the goods involved, or both.
 

Former maths teacher at international school jailed for sex acts with student, 14​

court.jpg

wong_shiying.png

Wong Shiying

Sep 5, 2022

SINGAPORE - A mathematics teacher at an international school in Singapore had a sexual relationship with a 14-year-old student and manipulated her into keeping it a secret.
They engaged in sex acts on four occasions, and on two such instances, he instructed her to consume contraceptive pills afterwards.
The Singapore permanent resident from China, 29, who cannot be named due to a gag order protecting the victim's identity, was on Monday sentenced to five years' jail.
He pleaded guilty to three charges of sexual penetration of a minor, with two similar charges taken into consideration for his sentencing.
The court heard that the victim, now 17, is a Chinese national who came to Singapore in February 2019 to pursue an education.
The accused started teaching mathematics at the school in January that year. They became acquainted around March as he taught her class, and the victim would ask him for study materials.
They subsequently exchanged contact details and the victim would confide in him on issues she faced as a newly arrived foreign student.

On April 6 that year, the accused invited the victim and her friend, a 20-year-old man, to his house for lunch. Prior to her friend's arrival, the teacher hugged and kissed her on the face.
As she was leaving, the accused asked her to be his girlfriend, and she agreed as she thought it would be good to have a teacher to care for her.
During their relationship, they kissed in school when no one else was around. They also had sex on four occasions at his home over a period of two months.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Colin Ng told the court: "The accused told the victim that it was a 'natural thing' for couples to engage in sexual intercourse.
"He also told the victim not to tell anyone about their sexual activities as this would harm her reputation and it would be 'terrible' for her if her parents found out about it."
They broke up in mid-June that year, after the victim informed him that she had plans to transfer to another school. It was also the end of the school term and the end of the teacher's employment with the school.
The girl later confided in a friend about the break-up and revealed that she had engaged in sex acts with the accused.
Furious, her friend took her to school to confront the accused, who persuaded the victim not to report the matter to the police.

The victim went back to China in July 2019 and told her mother what had happened. The older woman called the girl's guardian in Singapore and a police report was lodged.
The teacher was abroad at the time but was arrested when he returned to Singapore.
The victim's psychiatric report stated that she felt sad, angry and fearful since her involvement with the accused. She is also fearful of men and has difficulty trusting others.
Seeking five to six years' jail, DPP Ng said the accused had abused the trust accorded to him as a teacher. "He knew it was inappropriate for a teacher to enter into a relationship with his student but (did so) nonetheless."
He added that the contraceptive pills were obtained from a dubious source - a contact the accused obtained from an online forum - and had put the victim's health at risk.
The lawyer of the accused, Mr Shashi Nathan from Withers KhattarWong, said in mitigation that shortly into the relationship, the accused deeply regretted it and sought to distance himself from the victim.
"However, the moment (the victim) felt he was distant, she would repeatedly tell him how much she missed and loved him," said Mr Nathan.
The lawyer added that his client acknowledges the gravity of the situation and should never have got involved with a minor.
 

Drunk woman who punched SCDF paramedic jailed one week​

court.jpg

wong_shiying.png

Wong Shiying

Sep 6, 2022

SINGAPORE - Intoxicated after a night of drinking, a 32-year-old woman slapped and punched a Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) paramedic who told her not to touch ambulance equipment.
The paramedic had woken her up after the accused was found passed out in front of a parked taxi. Retana Rose Gracielle De Gracia then tried to pull a stretcher out from the ambulance.
The Filipina was on Tuesday sentenced to one-week jail after pleading guilty to a charge of using criminal force on a public servant.
Another count of being an annoyance in a public place while drunk was taken into consideration for her sentencing.
The court heard that De Gracia was out drinking with her friends at around 8pm on Nov 18 last year.
A taxi driver found her lying on the ground in front of his vehicle at around 5.30am the next day. He noticed she smelled strongly of alcohol and called the police for help.
Mr Muhammad Izzuddin Mohamad Sapri, an SCDF paramedic, arrived soon after with two of his colleagues.

He squeezed her shoulder to wake her up when she did not respond to his verbal commands.
De Gracia then walked unsteadily towards the ambulance with Mr Izzuddin, 30, supporting her to prevent her from falling.
She opened the side door of the ambulance after fumbling with the door handle and started pulling one of the stretchers.

When the paramedic told her firmly not to touch ambulance equipment, she mumbled incoherently and slapped his right thigh.
She also punched him on his right shoulder before walking away quickly towards Block 120 Yishun Ring Road.
Mr Izzuddin reported feeling pain in his shoulder after that but continued working as his shift was ending.
De Gracia was caught at around 7am after police searched the area.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Nicolle Ng said a short jail term is appropriate to deter others from committing such offences.
She noted, however, that the harm caused to the victim was low and De Gracia did not attract public disquiet.
In mitigation, the accused's lawyer, Ms Audrey Koo from Populus Law Corporation, said De Gracia's boss had invited her to a birthday celebration the night before the incident.
"My client is not a heavy drinker and it was difficult for her to reject her boss' kind gesture. She did not know her limits at the time and did not decline additional drinks,' she said.
Ms Koo added that De Gracia had no recollection of what she was doing at the time but acknowledged that it was "wrong for her to even touch the ambulance staff".
For using criminal force on a public servant, an offender can be jailed for up to four years and fined.
 

Man stopped by police for behaving suspiciously at train station jailed for having sex videos​

Man stopped by police for behaving suspiciously at train station jailed for having sex videos

File photo of the State Courts in Singapore. (Photo: CNA/Jeremy Long)

Lydia Lam

@LydiaLamCNA
06 Sep 2022


SINGAPORE: A man stopped by police officers for behaving suspiciously at a train platform was later revealed to possess illegally obtained videos of himself having sex with women.
Malaysian Khoo Ee Seong, 29, was sentenced on Tuesday (Sep 6) to 20 weeks' jail and a fine of S$4,000.
He pleaded guilty to four counts of intruding on a woman's privacy with intention to insult her modesty and one charge of possessing obscene films. Another 10 charges were considered in sentencing.
The court heard that Khoo was at the platform of Paya Lebar MRT Station on the afternoon of Feb 10, 2019, when officers attached to the Transcom Patrol Unit spotted him behaving suspiciously.
They approached Khoo and checked his belongings. They found videos of Khoo having sex with an unknown woman in his two phones, and they also found three thumb drives on Khoo.
Khoo admitted that there were obscene films stored in the drives, and he was arrested and his devices seized.
Forensic examination of Khoo's first phone uncovered five videos of him having sex with different women. He had paid a woman for sex with him at his flat at about 2.45am on Jul 12, 2017.
He placed his phone in a corner of the room with the video-recording mode on before the woman arrived and filmed her having sex with him without her knowledge.
Another video of Khoo having sex with a woman was found on his other phone. He paid this woman for sex with him at her flat at about 5.30pm on Jan 2, 2019, and again set up his phone to record the encounter without her knowledge.
The first of Khoo's thumb drives contained videos of him having sex with two other women in the same manner, while the remaining three thumb drives contained eight obscene films.
He had downloaded these films from pornography websites and saved them for personal viewing. One of them was more than 46 minutes long.
For intruding on a woman's privacy with intention to insult her modesty, he could have been jailed up to a year and fined per charge. For possessing obscene films, he could have been fined S$500 per film with a cap of S$20,000, jailed up to six months, or both.
 

4 weeks' jail for man who used co-worker's TraceTogether token, tried to bribe him to flee Singapore​

ads-token-090922.jpg

The man received the Sinovac vaccine but his TraceTogether token did not reflect his vaccination status. PHOTO ILLUSTRATION: ST FILE
wong_shiying.png

Wong Shiying

Sep 9, 2022

SINGAPORE - A man used his co-worker's TraceTogether token to gain access to malls as he was vaccinated against Covid-19 in China and his own token did not reflect his status.
But when the accused stopped returning his co-worker's calls about the token, the co-worker reported him to the police.
Yang Fei, 27, then tried to bribe his co-worker with $100 in cash and a pack of cigarettes to flee to Malaysia so as to hamper investigations.
Yang, a Chinese national, was sentenced on Friday to four weeks' jail after he pleaded guilty to a charge of committing an act that has a tendency to obstruct the course of justice.
The court heard that Yang, who is currently unemployed, came to Singapore on a work permit on Sept 24 last year and worked at semiconductor supplier Fuxiang Technology.
He was inoculated with the Sinovac vaccine before arriving here, but his TraceTogether token did not reflect his vaccination status.
This was because he did not go to a healthcare provider to take a serology test and update his vaccination records in the National Immunisation Registry.

As a result, Yang was not allowed to enter any premises where vaccination-differentiated safe management measures were in place.
On Dec 14 last year, Yang met his co-worker Wan Meng, a 19-year-old Chinese national.
They wanted to enter the shopping area of Marina Bay Sands so Yang used Wan's TraceTogether token while Wan used the TraceTogether app on his phone.

On multiple occasions in December last year, Yang also used Wan's token to enter Hougang One shopping mall to get his meals.
When Yang stopped returning his calls, Wan lodged a police report saying that his co-worker had taken his token.
Yang was interviewed by the police on Dec 24 last year. He was told that he was being investigated for possible offences of cheating by personation.
Shortly after, Wan suggested to Yang that they both run away and the duo met in Hougang.
There, Yang tried to bribe Wan with $100 in cash and a pack of cigarettes to escape to Malaysia, saying, "Singapore authorities have no authority over you once you exit Singapore, you get to Malaysia right, two governments".
Yang lamented that he had brought his passport to the police station for his interview and his passport had been impounded. He also said he "pretended to be pitiful" when his statement was recorded.
Wan refused to escape as he believed he had not broken the law. He said Yang was the one who had falsely used the TraceTogether token and "if anyone should run to Malaysia, it should be Yang".
Yang then foisted the money and cigarettes onto Wan and told him that if one of them was missing, investigations could not proceed.
Yang also said that if the police found him again, he would tell them that he could not contact Wan.
But without Yang realising, Wan had recorded their conversation on his phone and immediately went to the police station to report the matter.
On Jan 11 this year, Yang lied to the police that the $100 was given as a loan. He added that he gave Wan the cigarettes as Wan needed to smoke.
He even claimed that his grandmother was ill and in critical condition in a hospital in Jiangsu.
In sentencing him, District Judge Lim Sze Haw said though the harm intended by the accused did not materialise, it was not due to Yang withdrawing the offer but because Wan had refused to accept it.
Wan will be dealt with at a later date.
For committing an act that has a tendency to obstruct the course of justice, an offender can be jailed for up to seven years and fined.
 

Russian man jailed four months for forging document to delay repaying $1.7m loan​

court.jpg

wong_shiying.png

Wong Shiying

Sep 9, 2022

SINGAPORE - To buy himself more time to repay $1.71 million he had borrowed from his friend in 2015, a Singapore permanent resident from Russia forged a document to show that he had sold his condominium unit and had money to pay her.
Dmitriy Shport, 54, forged an option to purchase (OTP) to cheat the victim into believing that he had sold his property on Dec 21 last year when in fact the sale was made on April 18, 2017.
He had used the $1.75 million he earned from the 2017 sale to pay off other debts and finance his company.
Shport was on Friday sentenced to four months' jail after he pleaded guilty to a charge of committing forgery for the purpose of cheating.
The court heard that in early 2015, the accused wanted to buy a private property in Singapore.
He approached his friend, Ms Irina Sergeva, whose age is not known, and she agreed to lend him $1.71 million.
According to the loan agreement, Shport was to pay her back by March 31, 2016, at an interest rate of 8 per cent per year.

On April 1, 2016, both parties agreed to extend the repayment date to Dec 31, 2018.
The accused, however, failed to make any payment to Ms Sergeva even at the end of 2021.
On Dec 21 last year, Shport deceived Ms Sergeva into believing that he had just sold the property that day and had money to pay her.

He did so to stop her from taking action against him for failing to repay the loan, the court heard.
To convince her of the legitimacy of the sale, he sent her screenshots of an OTP exercising the sale of the property for $2.4 million.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Hidayat Amir said Shport had altered the dates in the original OTP for the condo unit's sale in 2017, and sent the falsified document to the victim.
Through her solicitors, the victim eventually found out that the sale took place in 2017 and she lodged a police report.
Shport was arrested on July 25 this year. He has not repaid his loan.
Seeking six to eight months' jail, DPP Hidayat said the accused had maintained the pretence that he owned the property for more than four years before committing the offence.
In mitigation, Shport said he accepted full responsibility for the foolish act. He said: "It was very difficult for me to reveal the truth to my friend and I want to rectify my wrongdoing."
For committing forgery for the purpose of cheating, an offender can be jailed for up to 10 years and fined.
 

1662964110684.png

Jail for 2 ex-directors who pocketed more than $1.2m in their firm's gold investment Ponzi scheme​

shaffiq_alkhatib.png

Shaffiq Alkhatib
Court Correspondent

Sep 12, 2022

SINGAPORE - Two former directors who pocketed a total of more than $1.2 million in their firm's Ponzi scheme were each sentenced to three years and 10 months' jail on Monday.
At the time of the offences between December 2009 and October 2010, Singaporean Iseli Rudolf James Maitland, now 63, and Malaysian How Soo Feng, now 48, were directors of The Gold Label (TGL), which sold gold to more than 2,000 customers.
The company had promised its customers a return on their investments and high payouts.
TGL, which has since wound up, took in more than $120 million under this so-called "buyback" scheme.
The scheme, however, was not backed by any real investments. Instead, the company depended on the money from new gold sales to satisfy the payment obligations to its older customers, the court heard.
Following a trial, the pair were each convicted of an offence under the Companies Act on Sept 1.
Maitland and How were directors and shareholders of TGL from July 7, 2009, to Nov 15, 2010. It was not stated how much money they pocketed individually.

In January this year, a third former director Wong Kwan Sing, 50, was sentenced to two years and 10 months' jail after pleading guilty to an offence under the Act.
The Straits Times reported in January that Wong, a Malaysian, who is also known as "Gary", pocketed at least $598,000 from the scheme.
TGL sold gold bars to its customers at a premium of more than 20 per cent above prevailing gold market prices in contracts lasting three or six months, the police said in a statement on Monday.

In exchange, the customers were promised guaranteed returns as high as 24 per cent per annum.
The police said that at the end of the contract period, customers had the option to sell the gold bars back to TGL at the same price that they were bought.
"This effectively allowed the customers to recoup their initial investment amount in full, while still making guaranteed returns, creating a semblance of a risk-free investment with attractive returns," said the police.
Deputy Public Prosecutors Kevin Yong, Edwin Soh and Ong Xin Jie said in their submissions: "Behind the scenes, TGL... had no investments or profit-generating business to sustain the payouts... (Maitland and How) were fully aware that TGL's business was carried out with this fraudulent purpose. They handsomely enriched themselves in the process, with reckless disregard for the potential losses to TGL's... clients."
Over time, TGL was unable to sell new contracts and the business broke down.
Its payout and buyback obligations to clients totalled more than $85 million, but the company had just over $450,000 in its bank accounts as at Oct 7, 2010.
The prosecution urged District Judge Ng Peng Hong to sentence Maitland and How to at least three years and 10 months in jail each, stressing that the pair had reaped greater profits than Wong.
Maitland was represented by lawyers Adrian Wee and Lynette Chang from Characterist law firm.
Lawyers from Withers KhattarWong - Mr Shashi Nathan, Mr Jeremy Mark Pereira and Ms J. Jayaletchmi - represented How.
The lawyers pleaded for shorter jail terms than the ones the prosecution proposed.
Mr Nathan told the court that unlike How, Wong had absconded to Malaysia before he was caught and sent back to Singapore, where he decided to plead guilty.
How's bail was set at $120,000 on Monday and the court heard that she intends to appeal against her conviction and sentence.
Meanwhile, Mr Wee told the court that Maitland had the least involvement in the day-to-day operations of TGL.
He was offered bail of $80,000 on Monday and was ordered to surrender himself at the State Courts on Sept 29 to begin serving his sentence.
 

Jail for 2 ex-directors who pocketed over $1.2m in their firm's gold investment Ponzi scheme​

ac_colact_120922.jpg

Iseli Rudolf James Maitland (left) and How Soo Feng were each convicted of an offence under the Companies Act on Sept 1. ST PHOTOS: KELVIN CHNG
shaffiq_alkhatib.png

Shaffiq Alkhatib
Court Correspondent


SEP 12, 2022

SINGAPORE - Two former directors who pocketed a total of more than $1.2 million in their firm's Ponzi scheme were each sentenced to three years and 10 months' jail on Monday.
At the time of the offences between December 2009 and October 2010, Singaporean Iseli Rudolf James Maitland, now 63, and Malaysian How Soo Feng, now 48, were directors of The Gold Label (TGL), which sold gold to more than 2,000 customers.
The company had promised its customers a return on their investments and high payouts.
TGL, which has since wound up, took in more than $120 million under a so-called "buyback" scheme.
The scheme, however, was not backed by any real investments. Instead, the company depended on the money from new gold sales to satisfy the payment obligations to its older customers, the court heard.
Following a trial, the pair were each convicted on Sept 1 of carrying on a fraudulent business, an offence under the Companies Act.
Maitland and How were directors and shareholders of TGL from July 7, 2009, to Nov 15, 2010. It was not stated how much money they pocketed individually.

In January this year, a third former director, Wong Kwan Sing, 50, was sentenced to two years and 10 months' jail after pleading guilty to an offence under the Act.
The Straits Times reported in January that Wong, a Malaysian, who is also known as "Gary", pocketed at least $598,000 from the scheme.
TGL sold gold bars to its customers at a premium of more than 20 per cent above prevailing gold market prices in contracts lasting three or six months, the police said in a statement on Monday.

In exchange, the customers were promised guaranteed returns as high as 24 per cent per annum.
The police said that at the end of the contract period, customers had the option to sell the gold bars back to TGL at the same price that they were bought.
"This effectively allowed the customers to recoup their initial investment amount in full, while still making guaranteed returns, creating a semblance of a risk-free investment with attractive returns," said the police.

Deputy Public Prosecutors Kevin Yong, Edwin Soh and Ong Xin Jie said in their submissions: "Behind the scenes, TGL... had no investments or profit-generating business to sustain the payouts... (Maitland and How) were fully aware that TGL's business was carried out with this fraudulent purpose. They handsomely enriched themselves in the process, with reckless disregard for the potential losses to TGL's... clients."
Over time, TGL was unable to sell new contracts and the business broke down.
Its payout and buyback obligations to clients totalled more than $85 million, but the company had just over $450,000 in its bank accounts as at Oct 7, 2010.
The prosecution urged District Judge Ng Peng Hong to sentence Maitland and How to at least three years and 10 months in jail each, stressing that the pair had reaped greater profits than Wong.
Maitland was represented by lawyers Adrian Wee and Lynette Chang from Characterist law firm.
Lawyers from Withers KhattarWong - Mr Shashi Nathan, Mr Jeremy Pereira and Ms J. Jayaletchmi - represented How.
The lawyers pleaded for shorter jail terms than the ones the prosecution proposed.
Mr Nathan told the court that unlike How, Wong had absconded to Malaysia before he was caught and sent back to Singapore, where he decided to plead guilty.
How's bail was set at $120,000 on Monday and the court heard that she intends to appeal against her conviction and sentence.
Meanwhile, Mr Wee told the court that Maitland had the least involvement in the day-to-day operations of TGL.
Maitland was offered bail of $80,000 on Monday and was ordered to surrender himself at the State Courts on Sept 29 to begin serving his sentence.
 

12 years' jail for man who fatally stabbed ex-girlfriend in Jurong East​

ac_cleaning_210922.jpg

Zheng Xianfeng pleaded guilty to a charge of culpable homicide for fatally stabbing Ms Tham on Feb 16, 2021. PHOTOS: TIMOTHY DAVID, LIANHE ZAOBAO
selinalum.png

Selina Lum
Senior Law Correspondent

Sep 21, 2022

SINGAPORE - After a few failed attempts to salvage his relationship with his former girlfriend, an intoxicated man armed himself with a knife and waited for her near her home.
When he spotted the woman, Zheng Xianfeng confronted her in anger and repeatedly stabbed her in the chest and abdomen.
He did not stop even after a passer-by riding a personal mobility device rammed him.
The victim, Ms Tham Mee Yoke, 34, suffered at least 29 stab and slash wounds as well as three rib fractures. She died from her injuries.
On Wednesday, Zheng, 37, was sentenced to 12 years' jail by the High Court after he pleaded guilty to a charge of culpable homicide for fatally stabbing Ms Tham just before midnight on Feb 16, 2021, near the void deck of Block 308 Jurong East Street 32.
The Chinese national was originally charged with murder, but the charge was reduced as he was assessed to be suffering from major depressive disorder, which diminished his responsibility for his actions.
Four other charges were taken into consideration: One for hurting Ms Tham with a penknife three months prior to the killing, two for hurting his brother, and one for causing annoyance when drunk.

The court heard that Zheng met Ms Tham, a Malaysian, in December 2018 as they rented separate rooms in the same unit and entered into a relationship with her.
Zheng, who was married at the time, was also in a relationship with another woman. Ms Tham was separated from her husband and had four children living in Malaysia.
Zheng eventually divorced his wife and ended the other relationship. He shared a room with Ms Tham from September 2019 to November 2020.

On Nov 17, 2020, they quarrelled at an open-air carpark in Jurong East Avenue 1 as Ms Tham wanted to end the relationship.
During the argument, Zheng stabbed himself in the thigh with a penknife, before pinning her on the ground and cutting her. Zheng was arrested and put on bail after he was charged over the assault.
He then made several attempts to patch up the relationship.

Once, he smashed Ms Tham's phone and slapped her arm after discovering that she had exchanged messages with a man.
On another occasion, he went to her workplace reeking of alcohol but her manager warned Zheng not to harass her.
On Feb 16, 2021, he thought about about his ongoing court cases and about his relationship issues with the victim and started drinking beer.
When he received a text message from the victim telling him not to harass her again, he became upset and replied saying he felt unhappy and lonely.
Zheng then left home with a knife tucked behind his back and bought snacks and alcohol. At about 10pm, he went to the void deck of Ms Tham's block and waited for her while continuing to drink.
Close to midnight, Zheng saw her near Block 308 and quickly walked towards her.
A youth, who was hanging out at the void deck of Block 309, alerted two of his friends and called the police after he saw Zheng approaching the woman.
As Zheng approached Ms Tham, she backed away from him until she reached the basketball court near Block 308.
Recalling the unhappy moments in their relationship, Zheng took the knife from his back and started stabbing the victim, who fell to the ground in shock.
One of the youths rammed his PMD into Zheng, but he continued stabbing the victim.

The victim's screams attracted the attention of residents, and at least five other calls were made to the police.
As Zheng fled from the scene, he cut himself twice on his left forearm and passed out on a grass patch near Block 307 .
One of the youths applied pressure to the victim's neck while waiting for the paramedics to arrive.
The victim did not have a pulse when she was taken to Ng Teng Fong General Hospital and resuscitation efforts failed.
Police officers at the scene followed a blood trail that led them to Zheng lying on the ground.
On Wednesday, Deputy Public Prosecutor Teo Lu Jia sought 10 to 12 years' jail, given the accused's intent to kill the deceased, and the nature and gravity of the offence which caused significant public disquiet.
She noted that the attack was vicious and unrelenting, that Zheng has violence-related charges, and that Zheng had reoffended while on bail.
Defence counsel Leo Cheng Suan asked for eight to 10 years' jail.
He said his client would like to apologise to the victim's family and intends to pay respects to her remains after his release from prison.
 

Ex-ship management company director pleads guilty to 5 corruption charges​

wgt-Ananthakrishnan-220922.jpg


Ananthakrishnan Nanda pleaded guilty to seven charges on Sept 22. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
Samuel Devaraj

Sep 22, 2022

SINGAPORE - He was a director at a ship management company who controlled other businesses when he entered into an arrangement to obtain money corruptly.
On Thursday, Ananthakrishnan Nanda, 51, was convicted of five corruption charges and two under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act after he pleaded guilty to them.
In court documents, Deputy Public Prosecutors Victoria Ting and David Menon said that Ananthakrishnan, an Indian national, was the managing director of Aoxing Ship Management Singapore, a department of Sinochem Shipping Singapore whichcharters andoperates ships.
His responsibilities included liaising with other companies for goods and services to be supplied to the Sinochem vessels.
At the time, Ananthakrishnan also controlled other companies not affiliated with Aoxing and Sinochem, including Sakura Ship Management, Master Supplies & Logistics and Master Manning Services & Logistics.
In November 2015, he was introduced to Mr Kunal Chadha, the director and general manager of Marine Care Singapore, which supplies marine chemicals and equipment for the cleaning and maintenance of ships.
At that time, Aoxing was planning to start a tank cleaning and optimisation programme to increase the cleanliness and efficiency of Sinochem vessels.

On Dec 3, 2015, Ananthakrishnan met Mr Kunal to discuss engaging Marine Care as a vendor for Aoxing. The menagreed that in return for deals from Aoxing and Sinochem, Marine Care would pay Ananthakrishnan's company Sakura 10 per cent of the money it received from Aoxing and Sinochem.
"This was a reward paid to the accused for advancing Marine Care's business interests with Aoxing," said the prosecution.
Shortly after the meeting, Ananthakrishnan recommended Marine Care to his immediate supervisor, and on Dec 18, 2015, Marine Care was registered as an approved Sinochem vendor.

Ananthakrishna then directed his subordinates to use Marine Care as a preferred chemical supplier.
As proposed by Mr Kunal, every quarter, Marine Care would collate a list of all invoices it issued to Aoxing, and inform Ananthakrishnan and a Sakura director what was 10 per cent of the total amount invoiced.
While Ananthakrishnan had initially agreed on the 10 per cent payout to Sakura, he eventually arranged for his other company, Master Supplies & Logistics, to issue invoices corresponding to that amount.
The invoices bore the letterhead of Master Supplies & Logistics but stipulated that payment should be made to the bank accounts of Master Manning.
While the invoices stated that the 10 per cent was for technical services rendered to Marine Care, the latter never received such services, said DPP Menon.
After ensuring that Aoxing fully paid Marine Care the amount shown on the vendor's invoices, Marine Care would pay Master Manning 10 per cent of that amount, as reflected in Master Manning's invoices.

Marine Care would not pay Master Manning until Aoxing had completed payment.
Among the amount Marine Care transferred to Master Manning totalled US$9,416.68 (S$13,324).
Ananthakrishna is due to appear next in court in February 2023 for his mitigation and the prosecution's sentencing submissions to be heard.
Court documents do not say if there are cases against others involved in this case.
For each corruption charge, he can be jailed for up to five years, fined up to $100,000 or both.
He can be jailed for up to 10 years, fined up to $500,000 or both for each offence under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act.
 

Jail for man who paid $500 for an impostor to take his basic theory test​

wgt-gohahhock-220922.jpg

Goh Ah Hock pleaded guilty to a charge of engaging in a conspiracy to cheat by personation. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
Samuel Devaraj

Sep 22, 2022

SINGAPORE - A man wanted to convert his Malaysian driving licence to a Singaporean one but was not confident he could pass the basic theory test.
So he engaged an agent to get someone to impersonate him and do the test on his behalf. But the impostor was caught after the tester became suspicious.
Goh Ah Hock, 52, was sentenced to two months' jail on Thursday after he pleaded guilty to a charge of engaging in a conspiracy to cheat by personation.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Yeo Zhen Xiong told the court that the Malaysian had heard that a law would purportedly be introduced in July 2022 banning the usage of foreign vehicles in Singapore.
From July 1, Singapore reverted to its pre-pandemic policy that work pass holders living in Singapore must ensure their foreign-registered vehicles are kept or used outside Singapore for at least six hours every day.
Goh, who was using a Malaysian-registered motorcycle in Singapore for his daily transportation and work, decided to buy a motorcycle in Singapore, as he was going to be working here long-term.
But he needed to pass the basic theory test to convert his Malaysian licence to a Singaporean version so he can ride the motorbike here. As he was worried about failing the test, he agreed to pay an agent $500 to help him.

On June 28, Goh met the agent outside the Singapore Safety Driving Centre in 2 Woodlands Industrial Park E4, and was told to hand over his work permit as another man would take the test on his behalf. He then waited at a nearby coffee shop for his new licence.
Meanwhile, Chinese national Zhang Zhongliang, 28, who had responded to an advertisement on WeChat to take the basic theory test for others in exchange for $200, met the agent outside the driving centre.
The agent handed Goh's work permit to Zhang, who was supposed to meet the agent after the test to receive his payment.
When a Traffic Police tester called out Goh's name at the centre, Zhang went up and presented Goh's work permit. The tester noticed Zhang looked different from the photograph on the permit after instructing him to remove his mask.
When he asked Zhang for Goh's FIN number, he could not provide it. The suspicious tester then asked Zhang to provide other documents to confirm his identity, but Zhang left and returned with Goh.
Another tester called the police and the two men were later arrested.
Zhang was sentenced to two months' jail on July 21.
DPP Yeo, who had asked for Goh to be sentenced to jail for two months, said in his written sentencing submissions: "Goh's lack of confidence in passing the basic theory test is a reflection of the hazard that he would have posed to other road users and would be no different from a driver driving under disqualification.
"In the circumstances, a deterrent sentence is warranted."
Goh could have been jailed for up to five years, fined, or both.
 

Man who stabbed roommate in Bedok flat and left him bleeding overnight gets life term for murder​

ads_bedok_220922.jpg

Naing Lin was sentenced to life imprisonment after he was convicted of murder in their flat at about 6pm on April 2, 2021. PHOTO: LIANHE ZAOBAO
selinalum.png

Selina Lum
Senior Law Correspondent

Sep 22, 2022

SINGAPORE - After stabbing his roommate five times during an argument, a cleaner left their Bedok Reservoir flat without checking on him but contacted mutual friends, asking them to call the victim.
The next morning, Myanmar national Naing Lin returned to the flat with a friend, saw the victim motionless on the floor through the window, and decided to surrender himself to the police.
On Thursday, Naing Lin, 51, was sentenced to life imprisonment after he was convicted of murder for fatally stabbing compatriot Myo Kyaw Thu, 49, in their flat at about 6pm on April 2, 2021.
The charge of murder with the intention to cause fatal injury carries the death sentence, or life imprisonment and caning.
Prosecutors did not object to the life sentence.
Citing the legal test for when the death penalty is justified, Deputy Public Prosecutor Teo Lu Jia said the accused did not exhibit viciousness or a blatant disregard for human life in committing the offence.
Justice Valerie Thean agreed that the unique circumstances of the case did not warrant the death penalty.

Naing Lin cannot be caned as he is older than 50.
The court heard that Mr Myo Kyaw Thu, who last worked in Singapore as a senior technician, was in Singapore on a short-term visit pass and shared a room with Naing Lin.
On April 2, 2021, Naing Lin went drinking with some friends after work.

When he returned home, he got into an argument with Mr Myo Kyaw Thu over the latter's spending habits.
Naing Lin told him that it was shameful that he borrowed money from others despite being an engineer.
Upset, the victim replied that he would not ask the accused for money in future.
Naing Lin then went to the kitchen and took out a knife as he wanted to fry some eggs and onions.
Still holding the knife, he went back to the room to get his phone.

But when Mr Myo Kyaw Thu saw him with the knife, he uttered an expletive.
Naing Lin then slashed the victim's face and stabbed him four times in the chest and abdomen and once in the left arm.
As Mr Myo Kyaw Thu lay bleeding on his bed, Naing Lin left the flat.
He made six phone calls to a female friend, telling her that he was waiting for the police to arrest him, and asked her to call the victim.
The next morning, he asked another friend to call the victim.
Naing Lin himself also called and texted the victim, but received no response.
He then contacted other flatmates, who said they did not see the victim in the morning.
He eventually asked a friend to go with him to check on Mr Myo Kyaw Thu.
Seeing the victim bloodied and motionless through the window, they left without entering the flat and agreed that Naing Lin should surrender himself.
Defence counsel Sanjiv Rajan said that Naing Lin's voluntary surrender to the police showed that he was remorseful.
The lawyer highlighted that in a police statement recorded one day after his surrender, Naing Lin said: "I should have called for the ambulance, then my friend would not have died. In my moment of drunk state (sic) and confusion, I left the house and drove away. I am very sad about what happened."
 
Back
Top