- Joined
- Jan 18, 2012
- Messages
- 1,577
- Points
- 48
no filter is able to do it as ions are in the size of angstrom, the only possible way to do it is via ions-exchange resin or reverse osmosis. and i do not think diamond energy filter remove chlorine ions as well, most likely ClO3- (common form of chlorine normally appears in our water). this is simple common sense to me, normal physical filter pore size are TOO BIG, even commercial ones for specialised instruments are in the range of nm. only via reverse osmosis i think its possible. but i must admit i am not an expert in this area, its merely from my personal experience handling lab scale instruments (which i believe is more delicated than your drinking water system)
Since you admit that you are not an expert as well, so i should not take your words seriously too.
i believe you have some serious ego problems that need dealt with. Most likely it is stemmed from your personal history that cause you to behave like that (from the way you post).
If you think that the article is so full of error and mistake based on your so called professional judgement, then don't read it, even the first few words of it.
There are many people here ( whom i believe) do not need your so called professional advice here which does not serve much purpose at all.
There are filters in the market that remove fluoride, i just want to ask any bros here if any of them use it.
This article is pretty useful and let us aware of the danger of fluoride. If that addition of fluoride in toothpaste is so helpful, why are there market for fluoride-free toothpaste? This is common sense too.
The Singapore government likes to copy whatever method, policies and style from the USA without giving much thought.
USA add fluoride in water, sg government follows.
USA uses 4G technology, Sg government follows.
USA print more money, Sg government follows.
Do we need a government whose only capability is to just copy from others? Even a monkey can do that.