- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 28,076
- Points
- 113
I wonder why they like to go all around the world instead of staying in their own country.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Finland: Good Muslim migrant gets four years in prison for bringing his 13-year-old wife to the country. Anti child marriage is anti Perfect Islam!
- Thread starter duluxe
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2020
- Messages
- 714
- Points
- 43
Bcoz they are bad and can’t even stand their own kind. The foundation of this religion is so flawed, the only gd thing abt it is perfecting hypocrisy. As long as they remain in this faith, they will never be able to reach their own true potential, nor be a genuinely decent human being. It’s like living a lifetime of acting/pretension.
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2013
- Messages
- 5,352
- Points
- 113
Only 1 word to describe : Despicable!
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2014
- Messages
- 36,768
- Points
- 113
Not according to the moslem caliph uthman, it isn't. The caliph burned versions of the quran he didn't like.
Again, not true. There's at least 20 versions of the quran out there.
https://www.quora.com/How-many-versions-of-Quran-are-there-in-this-world
There's already 20 versions of the quran. Readers of each version are quite happy with their version. Nothing is upset. They are also free to start blasphemy riots if people do not agree in their 'one quran' bullshit.
In any case, the quran has already been proven to not be the final revelation of allah, even by mainstream moslems. All moslems agree that the hadith is the final religious revelation of the islamic religion.
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2013
- Messages
- 5,352
- Points
- 113
It's just a blady fake religion with blinded followers!
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2014
- Messages
- 36,768
- Points
- 113
Because their islamic laws fucked their own countries up. So they flee to western countries even though they say western troops are killing and raping them.
Most normal refugees tend to run away from their killers, not towards them. You don't see refugees running to seek shelter in the hometowns of Al Qaeda or Boko Haram soldiers.
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 76,071
- Points
- 113
That is nonsense. The true history of mohamed was eradicated and fabricated with untruths as an6 historians will verify.
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 76,071
- Points
- 113
The current muslims worship religion and do not believe in the omnipresent of God.
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2014
- Messages
- 36,768
- Points
- 113
The current moslem religion is also different from the islam in the 7th century. There was no hadith back in the 7th century AD. islam today depends on the hadith as its highest religious authority, not the quran.
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 76,071
- Points
- 113
Chinese used to have child brides too.
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2014
- Messages
- 36,768
- Points
- 113
self explanatory
Nice of you to come out of the closet for your fetish of keling penises.
So islam murdered tens of millions of hindus over the past 800 years to save hindus from running around like nudists?
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 76,071
- Points
- 113
Islaam left the hindus alone but eliminated the budhist. Much easier.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 6,840
- Points
- 113
quora is like sammyboy forum or any other forum
didn't even bother to read BS.
any forum can invite entry from any moron ignoramus fraudster or pretender
most of those are likely to be fraudulent
All Muslims read and learn same Quran
worldwide
show me the differences
quote the different verses, different surahs (chapters)
exactly. you can't. nobody else can either.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 6,840
- Points
- 113
??
How did you manage to link your fetish for taking it up the arse with me?
Wasn't it Eunuch Loong who had said the same about you?
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 6,840
- Points
- 113
stupid kuffar yankees crying and moaning and whining because their religious myths have been destroyed
they are crying and whining coz they've realized in no way they can defend the concept or notion of an unadulterated Bible in existence today
their utter stupidity in still trying to salvage some sort of pride for themselves out of this miserable situation may be better explained by psychologists
maybe a mechanism for coping with adversity?
however all their 'arguments' sound like the 'proofs' showing how 2=0 or 2=3 or some other nonsense.
utterly ridiculous and laughable
a good description of the modern era is that it is an era of mediocrity
there is no other explanation why dumbfucks like yanks would be strongest coutnry in most important measures
they are not a naturally gifted peoples
they are descendants of cowboys poor beggars riff raff rejects from gayrope and elsewhere to the land of red indians
moreover, there is no major invention or breakthrough that came out of europe in the last several decades either
it seems european era of industrial revolution is well and truly over
only due to that 'revolution' gayropeans took a leap forward and leapfrogged other advanced civilizations
otherwise it's mostly more populous countries that dictated terms to smaller countries, historically
this is true in the modern era as well, for the most part
we saw how yanks were sent back packing in their 'longest retreat in history' by tiongs when tiongs were a lot poorer and less technologically advanced than today
tiongs are the only country more populous than yanks that the yanks ever fought
we also saw how japs and germans were defeated and subjugated, they still remain occupied on their home turf when they are outnumbered by the coalition of yanks poms russkies tiongs and frog eaters
likewise, contrary to yankee propaganda, pakis lost convicingly to CECA while using yankee weaponry, against CECA who were using soviet weaponry
to save face, yankee propaganda for example from CIA tried to depict Pakis as winners, or at least having won some tactical battles, lest yankee propaganda about the superiority of their weapons be tarnished
sb might say zionists were outnumbered by their neighbours Egypt and Syria, but it was not quite the case when you consider that in most wars, either the poms/frog eaters or yanks were fully in support of zionists. meanwhile, soviets never wholeheartedly supported egyptians or syrians, after all, soviets were the first country in the world to recognize zionist regime
moreover, many immigrants to the zionist regime are actually eastern europeans, prominent among them being poles russkies ukrainians etc
we look at other conflicts
sinhalese beat hindutva LTTE terrorists quite comfortably once tiongkok+pakis openly sided with sinhalese, in effect, nullifying the edge provided to hindutva LTTE terrorists by saffron ceca terrorists
in fact, pakis also surrendered unconditionally to cecas only once - in 1971, and that was in their fight against bangla which they lost comfortably. at that time, in 1971, banglas outnumbered pakis unlike today where the situation is reversed. with ceca siding with bangla, the pakis were outnumbered heavily, the result followed
they are crying and whining coz they've realized in no way they can defend the concept or notion of an unadulterated Bible in existence today
their utter stupidity in still trying to salvage some sort of pride for themselves out of this miserable situation may be better explained by psychologists
maybe a mechanism for coping with adversity?
however all their 'arguments' sound like the 'proofs' showing how 2=0 or 2=3 or some other nonsense.
utterly ridiculous and laughable
a good description of the modern era is that it is an era of mediocrity
there is no other explanation why dumbfucks like yanks would be strongest coutnry in most important measures
they are not a naturally gifted peoples
they are descendants of cowboys poor beggars riff raff rejects from gayrope and elsewhere to the land of red indians
moreover, there is no major invention or breakthrough that came out of europe in the last several decades either
it seems european era of industrial revolution is well and truly over
only due to that 'revolution' gayropeans took a leap forward and leapfrogged other advanced civilizations
otherwise it's mostly more populous countries that dictated terms to smaller countries, historically
this is true in the modern era as well, for the most part
we saw how yanks were sent back packing in their 'longest retreat in history' by tiongs when tiongs were a lot poorer and less technologically advanced than today
tiongs are the only country more populous than yanks that the yanks ever fought
we also saw how japs and germans were defeated and subjugated, they still remain occupied on their home turf when they are outnumbered by the coalition of yanks poms russkies tiongs and frog eaters
likewise, contrary to yankee propaganda, pakis lost convicingly to CECA while using yankee weaponry, against CECA who were using soviet weaponry
to save face, yankee propaganda for example from CIA tried to depict Pakis as winners, or at least having won some tactical battles, lest yankee propaganda about the superiority of their weapons be tarnished
sb might say zionists were outnumbered by their neighbours Egypt and Syria, but it was not quite the case when you consider that in most wars, either the poms/frog eaters or yanks were fully in support of zionists. meanwhile, soviets never wholeheartedly supported egyptians or syrians, after all, soviets were the first country in the world to recognize zionist regime
moreover, many immigrants to the zionist regime are actually eastern europeans, prominent among them being poles russkies ukrainians etc
we look at other conflicts
sinhalese beat hindutva LTTE terrorists quite comfortably once tiongkok+pakis openly sided with sinhalese, in effect, nullifying the edge provided to hindutva LTTE terrorists by saffron ceca terrorists
in fact, pakis also surrendered unconditionally to cecas only once - in 1971, and that was in their fight against bangla which they lost comfortably. at that time, in 1971, banglas outnumbered pakis unlike today where the situation is reversed. with ceca siding with bangla, the pakis were outnumbered heavily, the result followed
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 6,840
- Points
- 113
we can't say slanties are talented
that's why slanties always come short
they are at best second rate
this is true worldwide
and has been true for centuries
there is no history of slanties ever ruling over, subjugating, colonizing, civilizing, educating the gayropeans on their home turf, for centuries at a stretch maybe over 1000 years
this is true largely for ceca niggaz latinos red indians or asean natives too
understandably after the fall of soviets, ang mohs would like to bring to the fore their long nurtured grudge against their various Muslim historical enemies or rivals, their former rulers, their former "civilizers", who enlightened them, brought them to the cusp of civilization over a 1000+ years
the deal is this:
today is the era of mediocrity
that is why the discussion is all about gdp, economics, money, or other mundane things
reason being - the peoples are largely mediocre
when you are used to excellence, or the very best of the best in the business, in the world, repeat the world, not merely in a teeny tiny neighbourhood, region, province, small country, region or your linguistic/cultural sphere, you tend to see things for what they are
i won't quote my personal examples since that would make it too easy to identify
instead i quoted a few examples from lousy coolie-gene slanty copy cat copy paste stinkypura
we have seen that stinkypura with a population not even among the top 100 in the world
was able to build, to deliver the world's largest SSCV (in history) at a mammoth 273700 tons, able to lift 20,000 tons at once, already set a world record by lifting 15300 tons, during testing a single crane lifted 11000 tons (110% of specified lift capacity), easy to believe that building a simple flat top carrier or a minor destroyer/cruiser displacing some joke 5k-15k tons is no big deal at all
what's worse is that sector is a dying one, not many new orders
in limbo
per capita simply impossible for tiongkok, or ceca, or yankees, or indon, or russkies, japs, gooks, ozzies, taiwanese, frog eaters, pommies etc to match stinkypura built SSCV
even if life expectancy is extended to 200 years, it's unlikely tiongkok or CECA would able to build an SSCV displacing more than 62 million tons at once during the lifetime of anybody reading this
this puts into perspective the sort of dominance that i am talking about
there are fields, disciplines, sectors, areas of interest where there are persons that I won't name hold that sort of edge, or greater edge over their lowly mediocre counterparts from the rest of the world.
not hard to see why such persons would say today is the age of mediocrity/era of mediocrity
that's why slanties always come short
they are at best second rate
this is true worldwide
and has been true for centuries
there is no history of slanties ever ruling over, subjugating, colonizing, civilizing, educating the gayropeans on their home turf, for centuries at a stretch maybe over 1000 years
this is true largely for ceca niggaz latinos red indians or asean natives too
understandably after the fall of soviets, ang mohs would like to bring to the fore their long nurtured grudge against their various Muslim historical enemies or rivals, their former rulers, their former "civilizers", who enlightened them, brought them to the cusp of civilization over a 1000+ years
the deal is this:
today is the era of mediocrity
that is why the discussion is all about gdp, economics, money, or other mundane things
reason being - the peoples are largely mediocre
when you are used to excellence, or the very best of the best in the business, in the world, repeat the world, not merely in a teeny tiny neighbourhood, region, province, small country, region or your linguistic/cultural sphere, you tend to see things for what they are
i won't quote my personal examples since that would make it too easy to identify
instead i quoted a few examples from lousy coolie-gene slanty copy cat copy paste stinkypura
we have seen that stinkypura with a population not even among the top 100 in the world
was able to build, to deliver the world's largest SSCV (in history) at a mammoth 273700 tons, able to lift 20,000 tons at once, already set a world record by lifting 15300 tons, during testing a single crane lifted 11000 tons (110% of specified lift capacity), easy to believe that building a simple flat top carrier or a minor destroyer/cruiser displacing some joke 5k-15k tons is no big deal at all
what's worse is that sector is a dying one, not many new orders
in limbo
per capita simply impossible for tiongkok, or ceca, or yankees, or indon, or russkies, japs, gooks, ozzies, taiwanese, frog eaters, pommies etc to match stinkypura built SSCV
even if life expectancy is extended to 200 years, it's unlikely tiongkok or CECA would able to build an SSCV displacing more than 62 million tons at once during the lifetime of anybody reading this
this puts into perspective the sort of dominance that i am talking about
there are fields, disciplines, sectors, areas of interest where there are persons that I won't name hold that sort of edge, or greater edge over their lowly mediocre counterparts from the rest of the world.
not hard to see why such persons would say today is the age of mediocrity/era of mediocrity
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 6,840
- Points
- 113
one good observation is that stinkypura is slightly less than 1% of ASEAN population
no stinky regular sh*ttyzen or policymaker incl Ah Loong or others ever considered stinkypura big or huge
never
they always knew, recognized the vulnerability of stinkypura as a teeny tiny dot sized pee sai
funnily enough, for some inexplicable reason, perhaps due to delusions, we see Iranians, not just random individuals but their govt their officials their policymakers advertise Iran as a "huge" country or market with a pathetically tiny 80 million ppl
which is what? slightly more than 1% of world population?
the same holds true for other so called "big" countries in the wider Middle East North Africa Central Asia Balkans region
Turkey with 80 million people is slightly more than 1% of world's 7.5b or more people
Egypt with 90 million or so people is also slightly more than 1% of world's 7.5 b or more people
the major difference is while stinkypura lacks an organic culture history heritage identity scenery legends or even hinterland, stinkypura can stake a claim to being the richest and also the most scientifically and technologically advanced country in ASEAN.
that's not saying much. as they say, "in the land of the blind, the one eyed man is the king"
while stinkypura both publicly and privately, at official and personal levels, recognize its inherent vulnerabilities and limitations (with slightly less than 1% of ASEAN population), for some inexplicable reasons, while none of Iran, Turkey or Egypt is the absolute world leader in any essential tech, any field of endeavour of particular interest to the entire world, or any field of intellectual enquiry, not only many of their individual citizens at private capacity but many of their leaders and decisionmakers at official capacity tend to indulge in the delusions that with barely 1% of the world's population, they are somehow "huge", "big" or "massive" countries that are highly important or hard to suppress or dominate
this contradiction is hard to explain and I have found no good explanations for such behaviour
maybe some psychologists might be able to explain, provide psychoanalysis or sth for such thinking?
no stinky regular sh*ttyzen or policymaker incl Ah Loong or others ever considered stinkypura big or huge
never
they always knew, recognized the vulnerability of stinkypura as a teeny tiny dot sized pee sai
funnily enough, for some inexplicable reason, perhaps due to delusions, we see Iranians, not just random individuals but their govt their officials their policymakers advertise Iran as a "huge" country or market with a pathetically tiny 80 million ppl
which is what? slightly more than 1% of world population?
the same holds true for other so called "big" countries in the wider Middle East North Africa Central Asia Balkans region
Turkey with 80 million people is slightly more than 1% of world's 7.5b or more people
Egypt with 90 million or so people is also slightly more than 1% of world's 7.5 b or more people
the major difference is while stinkypura lacks an organic culture history heritage identity scenery legends or even hinterland, stinkypura can stake a claim to being the richest and also the most scientifically and technologically advanced country in ASEAN.
that's not saying much. as they say, "in the land of the blind, the one eyed man is the king"
while stinkypura both publicly and privately, at official and personal levels, recognize its inherent vulnerabilities and limitations (with slightly less than 1% of ASEAN population), for some inexplicable reasons, while none of Iran, Turkey or Egypt is the absolute world leader in any essential tech, any field of endeavour of particular interest to the entire world, or any field of intellectual enquiry, not only many of their individual citizens at private capacity but many of their leaders and decisionmakers at official capacity tend to indulge in the delusions that with barely 1% of the world's population, they are somehow "huge", "big" or "massive" countries that are highly important or hard to suppress or dominate
this contradiction is hard to explain and I have found no good explanations for such behaviour
maybe some psychologists might be able to explain, provide psychoanalysis or sth for such thinking?
Similar threads
