• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Fascinating stories of the Ultra Rich in Singapore

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Please only compare apples with apples.


1) We are much more viable as a nation than Monaco. To wit, we have about 500 times the land area and more than 80 times the population (only counting the "natives" of about 3 million).

2) Compare with Monaco only if Singaporeans do not mind being a protectorate of Malaysia or Indonesia, just like that little rock is a protectorate of France.

And National Service is for what?

it makes no difference whatsoever. It's not about comparing the political systems. It's about attracting the rich. Since Singapore has more space, it has the capacity to attract more rich pricks.

Monaco is full. I tried to get residency there a few years ago but prices were simply out of my reach and I realised I'm not rich enough. The fall of the Euro has helped somewhat but I'm still about $25 million short.
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
The stories must have sex, otherwise cannot be considered fascinating.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
dun estimate the luck element in every thing you set upon in doing. i can assure you a lot of things in life is based on certain percentage of luck.

for example, i have seen this and think it's a very good idea but it's not taking off...

http://www.split-it.sg/

maybe not now but later.

Spotting a niche is not about luck. It's about foresight. Some ideas look good on paper but aren't practical in real life. However, very few hit the jackpot with just one attempt. In my case, I wasted both time and money on dumb schemes before I got smarter through making mistakes.

I would also like to point out that "rich" is relative. While only a handful can become billionaires, anyone with above average intelligence can make a couple of million dollars if they try. I should know. I've seen it happen many times over and those who succeeded weren't Pappy dogs or children of rich pricks. They were technicians who were earning $900 a month who learned their trade while being employed and then went out and set up their own little workshops.

It is possible to turn over $5 to 10 million a year from a small JTC unit. These guys didn't become as rich as Bill Gates but 5 years after they started their businesses, they were worth at least $5 million. Some went on to become a lot richer.

Had they just carried on earning a salary, they'd be driving taxis now instead of being contented retirees.

Here's an example of the sort of person I'm referring to....

http://www.marshallcavendish.com/ma...Poor--The-Boyd-Au-Succe_B24377_Singapore.aspx
 

Attachments

  • 9789814398107.jpg
    9789814398107.jpg
    729.8 KB · Views: 239

watchman8

Alfrescian
Loyal
it makes no difference whatsoever. It's not about comparing the political systems. It's about attracting the rich. Since Singapore has more space, it has the capacity to attract more rich pricks.

Monaco is full. I tried to get residency there a few years ago but prices were simply out of my reach and I realised I'm not rich enough. The fall of the Euro has helped somewhat but I'm still about $25 million short.
So why is pap giving out residency for free? Ah nehs and ah tiongs come here to fight for mid and low end jobs.

If attracting the rich is such a great idea, then pap should have closed off the gates to poor foreigners and let the locals enjoy the fruits of serving the super rich.
 

Asterix

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
it makes no difference whatsoever. It's not about comparing the political systems. It's about attracting the rich. Since Singapore has more space, it has the capacity to attract more rich pricks.

Monaco is full. I tried to get residency there a few years ago but prices were simply out of my reach and I realised I'm not rich enough. The fall of the Euro has helped somewhat but I'm still about $25 million short.

It's also about finding the right balance. Attracting the rich to park their money in SG is fine. That's what the Swiss have been doing for centuries. Attracting the rich to actually come and drive up property prices, car prices, etc is another matter. As you said, even Monaco is too pricey for you.

In fact, attracting the rich Chinese from Malaysia and Indonesia to park their spare billions in Sinkie banks is the best form of defence. Those rich pricks will use their influence back home to ensure that those Bumi politicians do not harm Singapore's interest (and indirectly their parked spare billions). Letting them come in to Sinkieland and bump up home and car prices is another kettle of fish. It seems the grossly overpaid Sinkie Ministers do not understand the difference.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
i think i will go read his book n life goes on as per normal, it's easier that way...tsk..tsk...:p

He and I actually worked together. We both agreed that we wouldn't remain employees forever and quit within 6 months of each other in order to turn ideas into money.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
So why is pap giving out residency for free? Ah nehs and ah tiongs come here to fight for mid and low end jobs.

If attracting the rich is such a great idea, then pap should have closed off the gates to poor foreigners and let the locals enjoy the fruits of serving the super rich.

You need both ends of the spectrum. Monaco is full of poor people too. Someone has to do the dirty work.
 

I_Hate_Pappies

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Spotting a niche is not about luck. It's about foresight. Some ideas look good on paper but aren't practical in real life. However, very few hit the jackpot with just one attempt. In my case, I wasted both time and money on dumb schemes before I got smarter through making mistakes.

Excessive use of graphics/huge fonts/images. :mad::mad::mad:
 

Asterix

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
While only a handful can become billionaires, anyone with above average intelligence can make a couple of million dollars if they try.

This I definitely agree.

Which also means, there are many many rich pricks with only above average intelligence. Those who inherited their wealth may even have BELOW average intelligence. That I should know, I deal with these dumb rich pricks as my clients quite often. Of course, what I say to them ("You are so nice, blah, blah, blah ...") is 100% different from what I actually think of them ("You dumb TWIT, blah, blah, blah ...").

Attracting the rich indiscriminately will not work for a small island of only about 600 sq km. It works fine for mega large countries like Canada. Should one not be able to afford apartments in New York due to wealthy immigrants driving up prices, one can always live in the countryside. In fact, if one is an above average country boy, one can go to New York, make a couple of millions, and then retire back to same or different country town, visiting New York occasionally to enjoy the delights of city life.

The dynamics are different for a city state. Ministers who are paid out-of-this-world salaries should appreciate the difference. If not, they are NOT worth the money.
 
Last edited:

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
As you said, even Monaco is too pricey for you.

Monaco is too pricey for me because I didn't aim high enough when I set out towards financial independence. However, there are plenty of people who can afford a 10 million euro apartment and I congratulate them for having more spending power than I have.

I don't resent them. I don't curse them for driving up property prices in Monaco to the point where they are unaffordable. If I was determined enough, I'd set about tripling my net worth so I could afford Ocean view Monaco property. However, I've grown lazy and too content with my current life and that's nobody's fault but my own.

There is no point blaming the rest of the world when you can't afford something. It's entirely your own fault.
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
This I definitely agree.

Which also means, there are many many rich pricks with only above average intelligence. Those who inherited their wealth may even have BELOW average intelligence. That I should know, I deal with these dumb rich pricks as my clients quite often. Of course, what I say to them ("You are so nice, blah, blah, blah ...") is 100% different from what I actually think of them ("You dumb TWIT, blah, blah, blah ..."). Attracting the rich indiscriminately will not work in a small island of only about 600 sq km. It works fine for mega large countries like Canada. Should one not be able to afford apartments in New York due to wealth immigrants driving up their prices, one can always live in the countryside. In fact, if one is an above average country boy, one can go to New York, make a couple of millions, and then retire back to same or different country town, visiting New York occasionally to enjoy the delights of city life.

The dynamics are different for a city state. Ministers who are paid out-of-this-world salaries should appreciate the difference. If not, they are worth the money.

Rich doesn't mean clever.
Clever doesn't mean rich.
Poor doesn't mean stupid.
But stupid usually means poor.
 

Asterix

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Monaco is too pricey for me .....

I don't resent them. I don't curse them for driving up property prices in Monaco to the point where they are unaffordable. ....

You don't curse them for driving up property prices in Monaco because you are not a native of Monaco.

The more pertinent question to ask is what does the typical native of Monaco who is not rich feel about such a situation.

I dont' curse the property developers in Hong Kong either. Their oligopoly and other factors and my taking that one decision at the right time has been financially good for me.

On the other hand, some natives of Hong Kong (usually those born after 1980), are cursing. The Hongkie retirees who bought their flats decades ago are even happier than me. However, they also appreciate that social disharmony is not good - it makes their wealth less secure, a hungry man is an angry man, blah, blah, blah. Two property developers, Henderson Land and New World Development, have already offered to use their hoard of agricultural land to build public flats, under "mutually beneficial" conditions of course.
 
Last edited:

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
You don't curse them for driving up property prices in Monaco because you are not a native of Monaco.

The more pertinent question to ask is what does the typical native of Monaco who is not rich feel about such a situation.

The poor who resent the rich will remain poor especially if they blame everyone but themselves for their predicament.

The poor who admire the rich have a good chance of joining their ranks.
 

Asterix

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The poor who resent the rich will remain poor especially if they blame everyone but themselves for their predicament.

The poor who admire the rich have a good chance of joining their ranks.

Those motherhood statements are only PARTIALLY true.

Admire the rich is different from learning the ropes of the trade. If by admiring the rich you mean watching "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous", it is of absolutely no use.

On the other hand, if Sinkies do not like the effects, collateral damage, etc of uncalibrated and unco-ordinated immigration policies (if in fact they have any other than to buy votes for the PAPzis) on their lives, including but not limited to sky high prices for a roof over their heads, then they should grow some balls and do what is necessary. Otherwise, the first sentence is true - they only have themselves to blame for their predicament.
 
Last edited:

king_of_abalone

Alfrescian
Loyal
Wealth Over the Edge: Singapore

Wealth Over the Edge: Singapore

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...34330162556670?mg=reno64-wsj.html?dsk=y&dsk=y

$26,000 cocktails. Traffic jams freckled with Ferraris. The world's sternest city is now the richest. Why?
By Shibani Mahtani

It's midnight on a Saturday night at the Marina Bay Sands resort near the sparkling Singapore River, and all the boutiques are shut. But past a cosmetic-surgery clinic and a Ferrari accessories store close by, a large crowd is getting increasingly agitated. Dozens of hopefuls are clamoring to get in to what is billed as the world's most expensive club, Pangaea.

Tight-fitting Herve Leger bandage dresses are practically a uniform here, often paired with Christian Louboutin heels and Chanel 2.55 bags, as women try to befriend club goers who are lucky enough to get past the red-velvet barrier and bouncers. It is frequently the leggy models, part of the club's core demographic, who succeed. Out-of-town visitors who negotiated their way onto the guest list weeks earlier are turned away, even after offering to pay more than $3,000 for a table. The nightclub is completely full.

Past the bouncers, a walk through a long tunnel with blue ultraviolet lights and a ride up an elevator reveal one of the world's most exclusive parties.

Michael Ault, Pangaea's founder, sits at the club's most prestigious table by the bar, on cushions covered in exotic African ostrich skins. His table is covered with bottles of Belvedere vodka, Cristal champagne, buckets of ice and dozens of glasses for his friends. His wife, Sabrina Ault, a former fashion model and now his business partner, wears a fake shark's head and wields a plastic gun while dancing on a table top. At Pangaea, all surfaces are made for dancing—even tables made from the trunks of 1,000-year-old trees and the crocodile-skinned couches.

It may seem counterintuitive, but a dance club does not need a dance floor if you are Michael Ault. A veteran of Manhattan nightlife and descendant of blue-blooded socialites—he is the son of a Van Cleef from the Van Cleef & Arpels jewelry family and the stepson of Wall Street's famed Dean Witter—Ault, 49, prides himself on one thing above all others: the ability to throw a good party. And he has done just that over the years at more than 25 clubs from New York to Miami Beach and São Paulo to London. He is credited with being one of the first nightclub impresarios to introduce bottle service—now commonplace globally—at the legendary New York Spy Bar in the 1990s, where even Kate Moss was turned away on exceptionally packed nights.

The Pangaea experience, he says, replicates the feeling of being at a house party—one that just happens to offer African tribal masks from Ault's personal collection, throbbing music, a $26,000 cocktail that contains a diamond inside and is served by waitresses in black dresses, and the knowledge that many of the people around you are worth billions.

Pangaea, though just over a year old, is now considered the most profitable club in the world with revenues of more than $100,000 per night in recent months, Ault says. It's also one of the most expensive clubs, with tables costing as much as $15,000, and the uber-rich regularly chalking up six-figure bills. He could have brought this extravagance to just about anywhere in the world. London, with its collection of royals and a party scene that attracts Europe's glitterati. Dubai, too, the land of if-you-want-an-island-you-just-build-one. And of course, his hometown and former playground, Manhattan.

But Ault, who moved to Singapore three years ago, says he "no longer feels the magic" in Gotham, which still bears the scars of a financial crisis that knocked the wind out of much of its most extravagant party culture.

Singapore, he says, is another matter. This is where he says the rich feel, well, rich, and unusually secure. And where they seem to know only one common language, the language of excess—all too shamelessly displayed in his club.

"One night, there were these kids here—literally kids in their 20s—who all had their own private jets," Ault recalls during another meeting, on a Thursday morning, leaning back on a leather couch in his club wearing bright-blue fuzzy slippers embroidered with a pink skull. "Serious jets, too. There was an A380 which was converted to include a pool and basketball court—it was ridiculous."

"What I see here is what I imagined must have happened in the U.S. in the 1880s, in the Gilded Age, when it first took over England in terms of wealth," he says. "It is truly shocking how much wealth there is—and how willing people are to spend it."

Welcome to the world's newest Monaco, a haven for the ultra-rich in what until recently was mocked as one of the most straight-laced, boring cities in the world. When most people think of Singapore, if they do at all, they think of an order-obsessed Asian version of Wall Street or London's Canary Wharf, only with implausibly clean, sterile streets and no crime. The southeast Asian city-state of five million people is perhaps best known for banning the sale of chewing gum or caning vandals, including American Michael Fay in 1994 for spray-painting cars. Drug traffickers face the death penalty, and even Ault complains the authorities won't let him import his prized gun collection, which now sits in his other homes in Palm Beach and Manhattan.

But over the past decade, Singapore has undergone a dramatic makeover, as the rich and famous from Asia and beyond debark on its shores in search of a glamorous new home—and one of the safest places to park their wealth. Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin gave up his American citizenship in favor of permanent residence there, choosing to live on and invest from the island while squiring around town in a Bentley. Australian mining tycoon Nathan Tinkler, that country's second wealthiest man under 40, whose fortune is pegged at $825 million by Forbes, also chose to move to Singapore last year. They join Bhupendra Kumar Modi, one of India's biggest telecom tycoons who gained Singapore citizenship in 2011, as well as New Zealand billionaire Richard Chandler, who relocated in 2008, and famed U.S. investor Jim Rogers, who set up shop there in 2007. Gina Rinehart, one of the world's richest women, slapped down $46.3 million for a pair of Singapore condominium units last year.

And then there are, of course, your average millionaires—more of whom can be found among Singapore's resident population than anywhere in the world.

According to Boston Consulting Group, the island had 188,000 millionaire households in 2011—slightly more than 17 percent of its resident households—which effectively means one in six homes has disposable private wealth of at least $1 million, excluding property, business and luxury goods. Add in property, with Singapore real estate among the most expensive in the world, and this number would be even higher. Singapore also now has the highest gross domestic product per capita in the world at $56,532, having overtaken Norway, the U.S., Hong Kong and Switzerland, according to a 2012 wealth report by Knight Frank and Citi Private Bank.

The toys of all these millionaires and billionaires are visible across the city-state. A country roughly the size of San Francisco, it now has 449 Ferraris, up from 142 in 2001, while its Maserati fleet has grown from 24 to 469. Yacht clubs are popping up along with super-luxurious shops, like the Louis Vuitton Island Maison, a flagship boutique of the ubiquitous luxury brand housed in its own floating pavilion. Nightclubs like Pangaea and Filter, which are frequented by the young Saverin and his crew of millionaire party boys, have turned into havens for the wealthy to mingle. Rich out-of-towners play at Singapore's two glamorous new casino resorts, opened in 2010, including the Marina Bay Sands complex with its celebrity chef restaurants and an infinity pool on the 57th floor with palm trees overlooking the skyline. In 2007, Bernie Ecclestone decided that the city-state would be added to the illustrious Formula One World Championship calendar. The race—which is the only Formula One night race in the world and is set to continue annually until at least 2017—has emerged as one of the most glamorous Formula One events, broadcasting the impressive Singapore night skyline to millions globally.

Singapore has long been a magnet for rich expatriates and multinational corporate executives. They are attracted to the city-state's low taxes, virtually crime-free streets, pro-business policies and predictable government, with one political party in power since it gained independence in 1965. But the onetime British trading post's ascent into the stratosphere of the world's ultra-wealthy cities in recent years reflects a momentous shift in the global economy, as wealth settles in Asia after more than a decade of booming emerging-market growth. Asia now has more millionaires than anywhere else, according to consultancy Capgemini and RBC Wealth Management. While the rich lick their wounds in Europe and North America, the net worth of individuals in countries like China and Indonesia are up 6 to 7 percent annually.

Danny Quah, professor of economics and international development at the London School of Economics, has calculated that the world's economic center of gravity—measured by looking at income averages across more than 700 places worldwide—has shifted east over the past 30 years, from the Transatlantic Axis to somewhere across the Arabian Peninsula. If current growth trends continue, this center will move in another three decades to a resting point between India and China—just about where Singapore is, meaning its potential as the world's economic center may not even be fully realized.

Unlike the West or even places like the Middle East, though, much of the new wealth being created in Asia is emerging in countries where rich people see their assets at risk, either because of unreliable governments or unloved ones. The Chinese alone are reportedly exporting billions of dollars, saying they no longer trust their government and want to put their money elsewhere. Indians and Indonesians have likewise been looking for a place where they can stash cash to avoid high taxes or work with international-class wealth managers, while steering clear of the unpredictable policy shifts in their rambunctious—and some say, corrupt—democracies. Many Americans and Europeans just want a place where their investments can keep growing—hardly a problem in Singapore, smack in the middle of the fast-growing Asia.

"This kind of sharp change [in the global economy] brings with it an emergence of the very rich, who seek security and stability and a pronounced need for financial services in wealth management, investment, and facilitating and guiding decisions," Quah says. "A place like Singapore has developed both the reputation and the expertise along every single one of these dimensions."

But what really checks all the right boxes for many of the world's ultra-rich is Singapore's obsession with order, predictability and control, all of which give comfort to individuals whose fortunes have recently gone down the drain in many parts of the world. It doesn't hurt that Singapore has some of the lowest taxes in the world, including none on capital gains and most foreign dividends. But it also has relatively secretive private banking laws and zero harassment from paparazzi or protestors, whose activities are narrowly proscribed by Singaporean authorities, further creating an aura of order and stability. Ronen Palan, a professor of international political economy and an expert on offshore wealth and tax havens at City University in London, believes that while Switzerland is "clearly suffering" from the pressure put on its private-wealth sector from the European Union and the U.S., Singapore is a "very secretive location" where many—Asians in particular—believe their wealth will be spared scrutiny from Western regulators.

"For all the flack that Singapore has gotten for chewing gum and caning, it shows that things are orderly here. Corporate governance is in order, the ruling party is stable and is not going anywhere, things actually function—everything works," says Indonesian-born millionaire Frank Cintamani, as he sits in front of gold-embellished couture dresses, wearing a three-piece grey Lanvin suit paired with black brogue shoes. It is Haute Couture Week in Singapore, an event he leads after luring it away from Paris. A Singaporean citizen who has spent a large part of his life living in hotels and who frequently dons diamond brooches, he also leads Men's Fashion Week and Women's Fashion Week, and has a host of other interests and investments, including in publishing.

"Rich people can have fun anywhere," he says, as the sound of a Ferrari zooming past distracts his train of thought, while he directs a stream of models, designers and fashion writers coursing through a tent next to the Marina Bay Sands, where his fashion show is being held. Though sitting down, he constantly has to stand up briefly to greet the ultra-wealthy fashion aficionados who recognize him. "But over here they know they will always be safe, their privacy respected and their investments solid," he says.

Cintamani, 36, interrupts the discussion on Singapore's economic environment, drawing attention to two men—one in a three-piece black suit, and another in a futuristic-looking white top embellished with silver at its collar and reaching past his knees over skinny white pants with platform shoes—and a woman in a white two-piece, loose-fitting suit with silver heels.

"See those guys over there? The three people in the corner? Their combined worth is between six to seven billion U.S. dollars—and I know this for a fact," he says. "This is why we need to do this here," referring to his fashion ventures. He then points out that one of Mongolia's richest men, with wide interests in property and a keen investor in Singapore's real estate, is also in attendance at the couture show. Cintamani, whose business card carries several logos from ventures in magazine publishing to fashion shows, declines to say where his family's wealth comes from, describing it as "sensitive." (His spokesperson says much of it comes from the oil and gas business.)

The irony, as with other earlier boomtowns, is that the very sources of Singapore's success may ultimately prove its undoing. The gushers of cash that have flooded Singapore in recent years have put relentless upward pressure on property prices, with private-home prices rocketing 59 percent higher since the second quarter of 2009, even as real-estate prices have tumbled or gone sideways in much of the rest of the world. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong was only admitting the obvious, some analysts say, when in a recent interview he said that the country's property boom is "almost a bubble."

Singapore's "Gini coefficient"—the best-known economic measure of income disparity—is the second highest in the developed world. Wealth-X, a private consultancy that provides intelligence on the world's uber-rich, estimates some 1,400 ultra-high-net-worth individuals now hold more than $160 billion of wealth in Singapore. Even upper-middle-class natives find themselves unable to afford houses in some parts of the city-state, such as Sentosa Cove, where more than 60 percent of the houses are owned by foreigners. Some are put off by flashy displays of wealth, particularly when it is the wealth of foreign nationals.

The dazzling party scene, meanwhile, has brought a new kind of anything-goes culture to Singapore that is threatening the sense of order that helped make it so alluring in the first place. One of the more disturbing examples came in May 2011, when a Ferrari driver from mainland China, traveling at more than 110 miles per hour, crashed into a taxi after running a red light and killed himself, the taxi driver and a passenger. The accident triggered an outburst of anti-foreigner sentiment online, with some Facebook users creating a fake profile for the dead Ferrari driver with derisive comments against mainland Chinese. Although authorities have largely succeeded in keeping out the kinds of criminal elements that populate the shadows of casino capitals like Las Vegas and Macau, local papers don't shy away from reports of problem gambling in Singapore's two new casinos, with one local middle manager reportedly losing $400,000 in a single bet. On a recent Saturday night near Pangaea, seven police officers were seen arresting a topless Caucasian male for alleged drunken and disorderly behavior.

Public expressions of anger or dissatisfaction with Singapore's transformations are limited, since protests for the most part are prohibited.

Yet signs of unhappiness are multiplying. The city-state's ruling party retained power with its lowest percentage of votes in Singaporean history in 2011, and a thriving blog culture is prodding officials to consider some changes to the country's economic model, including the creation of a bigger social safety net for the poor, which likely would require higher taxes.

Indeed, several of the country's leaders—who for decades staunchly defended long-standing policies of prioritizing economic growth above personal freedoms and welfare—seem to be doing some soul-searching. In his New Year's Day message, Prime Minister Lee called on the nation to balance material goals with its "ideals and values. We are not impersonal, calculating robots, mindlessly pursuing economic growth and material wealth," he said.

The rich in Singapore now find themselves with "new avenues to display their wealth," according to Garry Rodan, a fellow at the Asia Research Center at Murdoch University, while "aged Singaporeans with grossly inadequate savings can be seen on the streets collecting plastic bottles for recycling." Opportunities to move up the ladder, he says, are shrinking.

On the real-estate front, meanwhile, lawmakers have tried to deal with sky-high prices by introducing a 15 percent stamp duty on foreign purchases of private residential homes. Last year, the government also removed a program that allowed wealthy foreigners to "fast track" their permanent residency if they kept at least $8.1 million in assets in the city-state for five years, though investors who plan to dedicate a few million to help companies in Singapore grow are still welcomed. Authorities have repeatedly tightened the city-state's tight casino-control laws, already among the strictest in the world, to restrict some locals from patronizing gaming floors and to punish casinos if they fail to keep problem gamblers away.

Optimists say those steps may, in the long run, prevent Singapore from going down the same road as earlier cities-of-the-moment that burned bright and then flamed out, like Dubai. "The writing was on the wall in Dubai in 2007—we had made our money and it was time to move on," says Chris Comer, a property developer who is bringing the exclusive Nikki Beach franchise—a global chain of beach party clubs in St. Tropez, Miami and St. Barts, with girls in elaborate bikinis and patrons who show up in Caribbean pirate outfits or zebra body paint—to Singapore. Having lived in and out of Singapore for 17 years, Comer now resides in an oceanfront condominium in Sentosa Cove, a gated enclave of ultra-wealthy residents on an island 20 minutes from Singapore's city-center. His beach club venture—one that he insists is "recession-proof"—is particularly well-matched for the city-state, he says, nodding at the seven pages of used Lamborghini listings in the online auto classifieds.

"Singapore is my home, this is my base, this is where I feel safe," says Comer, speaking in the loft of his four-story office in a shophouse on Singapore's Ann Siang Hill precinct, a preserved historic area just off Chinatown.

Others aren't so sure about the future. They see youths burning through cash, and rich people who are totally oblivious to the sacrifices made by earlier generations that helped places like Singapore climb from Third World to First World status in just a few decades. "You see this happening often, one generation would make the wealth, and the next two or three will lose it," Ault says. Moreover, "there is a mathematical certainty that there is going to be an economic tsunami" at some point, adds Ault, who trained as an economist with degrees from Oxford and the London School of Economics and worked on Wall Street before becoming a nightclub owner.

Others are worried secretive Singapore won't be able to stay that way. The city-state, defiant against the label "tax haven," has taken steps to ensure its tax treaties allow for more information exchange on tax dodgers, most recently firming a double-taxation agreement with Germany. (A spokesperson from the Monetary Authority of Singapore says it works hard to report any "suspicious transactions.") Singapore is also forced to comply with new financial regulations—including the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, a way for the U.S. to ensure its taxpayers do not shirk payments through offshore holdings. This, Palan says, is a "game changer" for the private-wealth industry and will be used as a model by other countries.

Still, in the nightclub business—in which there's always another night, and more models and rich kids waiting in line for an exclusive party—it pays to be positive. At least that's how Ault, the highflying owner of Pangaea sees it. He figures that even if things do go awry, "Asia is better positioned." Singapore, his city of choice, he says, is "doing all the right stuff to stay on top."

-Sam Holmes contributed to this article.
 

king_of_abalone

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Wealth Over the Edge: Singapore

Luxury nightclub Pangaea unveils Asia's most expensive cocktail

20120924.180952_rotator_v7.jpg


Singapore - You could probably buy a lot of things with $32,000, but how about spending it a cocktail? Local luxury nightclub Pangaea and luxury jeweller Mouawad unveiled Asia's most expensive cocktail, The Jewel of Pangaea, at a launch event on Friday night.

Created by Singapore's award-winning mixologist Ethan Leslie Leong, the extravagant cocktail is concocted using some of the most expensive ingredients in the world.

The drink is made using a gold-flecked Richard Hennessy cognac, a smoke-infused raw sugar cube with Jerry Bitters, topped with 1985 vintage Krug champagne and lastly garnished with a Mouawad Triple X 1-carat diamond attached to a chain.

Founder of Pangaea, Michael Ault says, "The price isn't about what's in the drink, but rather the experience that is created around the serving of the cocktail. When a guest decides to buy The Jewel of Pangaea, the entire club stops and the recipient becomes the focal point of the room."

The Jewel of Pangaea was prepared by Leong for the first time with much fanfare at the launch event. He was accompanied by an entourage of Pangaea girls, one of whom carried a ring with the Mouawad diamond on her finger. The drink was mixed in front of guests and presented in a silver and crystal champagne flute to Ms Sabrina Ault, the owner and Creative Director of Pangaea.

"The Jewel of Pangaea was custom-designed to actually taste great. Most of the expensive cocktails around the world simply throw a precious diamond into a martini, but in this case I wanted to use the most premium products available, and ones that would perfectly complement the stunning Mouawad 1-carat diamond," said Leong.

With the finest ingredients money can buy and a ceremonial presentation to boot, this drink gives new meaning to the phrase "on the rocks".
 

Attachments

  • 20120924.180952_rotator_v7.jpg
    20120924.180952_rotator_v7.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 221
Top