• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

FAP's DEAFENING Silence on PRC Ma Chi Murdering of SG Cab Driver

I think so far only Seng Han Thong attended the wake.

The rest are wondering what to write/say:

Maybe some folks will say that Singaporeans must:
(1) reflect/repent
(2) move on
(3) accept the unavoidable
(4) help integrate new citizens to help them understand our traffic rules better
(5) realise that this is an isolated incident
(6) tolerate for the sake of increasing productivity
(7) all of the above

Let's wait and see.
 
Are they also quiet because the authorities forgot to do background check of the hell-driver and his links to the mafia?

Read this: http://www.tremeritus.com/2012/05/1...ver-the-brother-of-a-fugitive-mafia-in-china/

And this stupid guy's bro claims he started work at 18 and came to Singapore earning tonnes of money enough to buy penthouse/BMW/Ferrari within 2 years. Non-graduate. Applied for PR.

WOW... can the immigration department look into this check with the China Embassy/Central Govnt? Such miracle talents chose to live in Singapore. Should we feel immense pride???

Puke.
 
Last edited:
Unless there was obvious evidence of intent to kill, it would be very difficult to get the murder charge to stick.

Negligent homicide will likely hold, facts and circumstances apparently is looking that way. A critical witness, the female passenger that survived may shed some light but to come clean or not remains to be seen.
 
Car crash is very common in Sichuan so the fact that this guy was from Sichuan didn't surprised me at all. The driver needs to be cut into 100 pieces for his unforgivable carelessness.
 
Last edited:
To digress, I can never understand why a car made for racing can crash and fail to protect the driver. Assuming it is of similar build as the ones used in races.

The $2 million car was not money well-spent.
 
Last edited:
To digress, I can never understand why a car made for racing can crash and fail to protect the driver. Assuming it is of similar build as the ones used in races.

The $2 million car was not money well-spent.

could it be a fake $2million ferrari? heheheh knowing his from china, maybe he kena conned....hence that car fialed to provide enough protection...*just a thought...
 
Negligent homicide will likely hold, facts and circumstances apparently is looking that way. A critical witness, the female passenger that survived may shed some light but to come clean or not remains to be seen.


she is the most important witness alive.


and she can help the Ferari insurance company

and Ma Chs Estate save a Hell lots of money
 
To digress, I can never understand why a car made for racing can crash and fail to protect the driver. Assuming it is of similar build as the ones used in races.

The $2 million car was not money well-spent.

He was obviously not wearing his seat belt. I've seen stock Ferraris crash full speed into the armco barriers at the local race track at Pukekoe and the driver simply gets out and goes to have a beer.
 
she is the most important witness alive.


and she can help the Ferari insurance company

and Ma Chs Estate save a Hell lots of money

Perhaps but I think it's a liability the insurance company and the ma's will have to challenge.
 
If he saw the lights turn red and the taxi accelerating towards his path and he told himself "right... I'm going to plough into this fucking taxi even if it kills me and everyone else!", then it's not an accident.

If he didn't smash into the taxi driver intentionally, then the term "accident" is used.

However, that doesn't absolve him from criminal liability. The charge of manslaughter is still applicable. However, he's not around to defend himself.

Who knows.. perhaps the Ferrari was faulty and the accelerator pedal got stuck! It's always a possibility even if it's a remote one.




Maybe the interval between
"Amber" Light to "Red Light"
needed to be fine tuned.


The little "interval" , a few seconds,
in-between is Not Standardised
across all Traffic Light !!!


Any bros / Sis noticed this
adnormal "interval" ???

please share ...
 
The video suggests that the interval between the amber and red lights is not abnormal - it can be quite clearly seen.

The more relevant point is that there is actually a gap between the light turning red for the Ferrari and that turning green for the taxi. This means that even if the Ferrari had shot the red by up to two seconds, that collision would not have occurred. In this case, the Ferrari shot the red by nearly 5 seconds. Unforgivable really.

Maybe the interval between
"Amber" Light to "Red Light"
needed to be fine tuned.


The little "interval" , a few seconds,
in-between is Not Standardised
across all Traffic Light !!!


Any bros / Sis noticed this
adnormal "interval" ???

please share ...
 
.... Who knows.. perhaps the Ferrari was faulty and the accelerator pedal got stuck! It's always a possibility even if it's a remote one.

Good try, but not so convincing for a one-year old exclusive fast and expensive car! There are other more damning evidence the IOs must consider :

1. The Ferrari was undoubtedly moving at a very high speed - the impact literally lifted the taxi as well as the Ferrari off the ground. The taxi 2000cc engine got ripped off and flung 30 metres away. Even the passengers from the videoing taxi screaming a fright out of their life - and the driver stunned as evident from his reflex-stop by the roadside!

2. To the left of the taxi where the Ferrari comes from, there was a person crossing the pedestrian-crossing even though it was not in his/her favour - the pedestrian-light was flashing red. If the Ferrari was nearby he could have clearly seen it coming in his direction - and clearly heard the roar or scream of the engire in the wee hours of the [quiet] night - and surely would avoid risking the crossing.

3. The Ferrari could have exited the East Coast Parkway (ECP) - an excellent expressway for taking a fast car for a joyride and a speed test - and coming down the steep slope a moment ago. It would take just a few seconds for it to reach the flat-surfaced road at the Rochor-Victoria Street junction. The acceleration would be fantastic for an already accelerating fast car in the hands of an allegedly intoxicated driver (ok, discounting the possibility of eye-witnesses' mistakening petrol smell for liquor smell).

4. All said and done at this juncture, the PRC passenger of the Ferrari holds one of the key keys to the incident. As a front passenger she would have seen the incident rolling right before her very eyes - she could hardly been sleeping going through the thrill of a rare Ferrari ride - or rather flight. The IOs must get to her first before she rewrites the script - notwithstanding the damning video.

You'll never know what the ultra rich from PRCs in a moral-less and get-rich-quick society are capable of - after all it's kah ki lang (similar or own people) and wai lang (foreigner) at the same time.

So far they have not bothered to publicly express feeling of sympathy - much less remorse - for the two deceased or the injured and their families - just some self-presevation statements and disgust for [local] netizen's uproar.
 
Last edited:
Good try, but not so convincing for a one-year old exclusive fast and expensive car! There are other more damning evidence the IOs must consider :

1. The Ferrari was undoubtedly moving at a very high speed - the impact literally lifted the taxi as well as the Ferrari off the ground. The taxi 2000cc engine got ripped off and flung 30 metres away. Even the passengers from the videoing taxi screaming a fright out of their life - and the driver stunned as evident from his reflex-stop by the roadside!

2. To the left of the taxi where the Ferrari comes from, there was a person crossing the pedestrian-crossing even though it was not in his/her favour - the pedestrian-light was flashing red. If the Ferrari was nearby he could have clearly seen it coming in his direction - and clearly heard the roar or scream of the engire in the wee hours of the [quiet] night - and surely would avoid risking the crossing.

3. The Ferrari could have exited the East Coast Parkway (ECP) - an excellent expressway for taking a fast car for a joyride and a speed test - and coming down the steep slope a moment ago. It would take just a few seconds for it to reach the flat-surfaced road at the Rochor-Victoria Street junction. The acceleration would be fantastic for an already accelerating fast car in the hands of an allegedly intoxicated driver (ok, discounting the possibility of eye-witnesses' mistakening petrol smell for liquor smell).

4. All said and done at this juncture, the PRC passenger of the Ferrari holds one of the key keys to the incident. As a front passenger she would have seen the incident rolling right before her very eyes - she could hardly been sleeping going through the thrill of a rare Ferrari ride - or rather flight. The IOs must get to her first before she rewrites the script - notwithstanding the damning video.

You'll never know what the ultra rich from PRCs in a moral-less and get-rich-quick society are capable of - after all it's kah ki lang (similar or own people) and wai lang (foreigner) at the same time.

So far they have not bothered to publicly express feeling of sympathy - much less remorse - for the two deceased or the injured and their families - just some self-presevation statements and disgust for [local] netizen's uproar.

Shrewd observations! Understand the lady passenger obtained injuries on the head plus it happened so fast She might not be able to recall the moments before the crash. Wonder if she can provide a truthful testimonial even if she a upright person. The driver who stopped by the side was probably trying to help, of cos he must be shocked too. Don't they have street cameras along Bugis area? Anyway this model has yet to have any complains on the braking system, Ah Leong's argument is totally groundless. :oIo:
 
Good try, but not so convincing for a one-year old exclusive fast and expensive car! There are other more damning evidence the IOs must consider :.

1. The Ferrari was undoubtedly moving at a very high speed - the impact literally lifted the taxi as well as the Ferrari off the ground. The taxi 2000cc engine got ripped off and flung 30 metres away. Even the passengers from the videoing taxi screaming a fright out of their life - and the driver stunned as evident from his reflex-stop by the roadside!

I agree.

2. To the left of the taxi where the Ferrari comes from, there was a person crossing the pedestrian-crossing even though it was not in his/her favour - the pedestrian-light was flashing red. If the Ferrari was nearby he could have clearly seen it coming in his direction - and clearly heard the roar or scream of the engire in the wee hours of the [quiet] night - and surely would avoid risking the crossing.

Observe the speed and demeanour of the pedestrian as he was crossing the road. He did not turn his head towards the direction from where the Ferrari was coming. That means there was no screaming roar of a high end sports car approaching. Unless he was stoned of course. It goes against normal human reaction. There will be witnesses from Middle Road junction to the accident location who will testify on where the Ferrari started accelerating from. I hope.

3. The Ferrari could have exited the East Coast Parkway (ECP) - an excellent expressway for taking a fast car for a joyride and a speed test - and coming down the steep slope a moment ago. It would take just a few seconds for it to reach the flat-surfaced road at the Rochor-Victoria Street junction. The acceleration would be fantastic for an already accelerating fast car in the hands of an allegedly intoxicated driver (ok, discounting the possibility of eye-witnesses' mistakening petrol smell for liquor smell).

Wrong hypothesis. the route you described was the direction in which the taxi victim and the camera mounted taxi came from. And no sports car with low ground clearance will speed from the Nichol Highway flyover towards Rochor Road because of an immediate dip on Beach Road. They will lose their front fairing and cause damage to their undercarriage.

4. All said and done at this juncture, the PRC passenger of the Ferrari holds one of the key keys to the incident. As a front passenger she would have seen the incident rolling right before her very eyes - she could hardly been sleeping going through the thrill of a rare Ferrari ride - or rather flight. The IOs must get to her first before she rewrites the script - notwithstanding the damning video.

Too late. Money enough to cover 1000 blowjobs would had been given by then.

You'll never know what the ultra rich from PRCs in a moral-less and get-rich-quick society are capable of - after all it's kah ki lang (similar or own people) and wai lang (foreigner) at the same time.

PAP talks money only. The PRCs speaka the same language.

So far they have not bothered to publicly express feeling of sympathy - much less remorse - for the two deceased or the injured and their families - just some self-presevation statements and disgust for [local] netizen's uproar.

They (the victims) are Sinkie peasants only. They know it. The PAP made it so. And we know it.
 
Last edited:
... The more relevant point is that there is actually a gap between the light turning red for the Ferrari and that turning green for the taxi ...
iz all-red time ...
 
Back
Top