• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

FAPee Dogs Use Schools Advance Career

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=msgtxt>Mar 27, 2010

TRADING AFFILIATION FOR TALENT: SJI'S CONUNDRUM
Don't put a school before its students

<!-- by line --><!-- end by line -->
<!-- end left side bar --><!-- story content : start -->
THE more I read about how some schools go out of their way to admit students with high entry grades, the more I am convinced of two trends: creeping elitism in these schools and their penchant for a glowing image. Wednesday's report, 'SJI to meet on its future and intake', is a case in point.
Some argued there is nothing wrong with elitism in education, pointing to Ivy League schools in other countries.
We have to ask ourselves, though, if we need to emulate them to move forward, bearing in mind we are concerned here with general education, not specialised fields of study that are the raison d'etre of universities for whom prestige counts for much.
Although St Joseph's Institution (SJI) has yet to decide whether to go elite, the board of governors has hinted as much, failing which, the board believes, the school will face a mediocre future.
One Josephian is even worried that restricting the intake of new talent, that is, students with high grades, might spell the end of the school.
Such sentiments are misplaced. What has the image of a school to do with providing a sound education? Why should bright students be used to boost its future status or ensure its survival? In prioritising the school ahead of the students, aren't we putting the cart before the horse?
Schools that spurn mediocre students for fear of their negative impact are sending them this message: You are not good enough for us; accepting you would spoil our image and jeopardise our future.
We do not need such schools; we need more that are willing to face the challenge - to accept students of varying abilities to draw out the best in each, and not let grades get in their way of experiencing the best education these schools can offer.
If SJI can formulate an admission policy on this basis, its prestige, let alone its survival, will be the least of its worries.
Lee Seck Kay

</TD></TR><TR><TD> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=msgtxt>Mar 27, 2010

Don't forsake legacy of excellence

<!-- by line --><!-- end by line -->
<!-- end left side bar --><!-- story content : start -->
I REFER to Wednesday's report, 'SJI to meet on its future and intake'. There is concern among some alumni that St Joseph's Institution (SJI) is becoming increasingly elitist.
They worry that many students, especially those from affiliated Christian Brothers schools, cannot qualify to study in SJI because of the high cut-off mark.
It is wrong for any school in Singapore to compromise on entrance standards, and even more so for an established institution like SJI.
I am a former Josephian from an affiliated primary school, and I think for SJI leadership to forsake a 158-year legacy of excellence in teaching and learning for the sake of sentimentality would be wrong.
Schools of similar quality such as Hwa Chong and Raffles do not settle for less on the quality of entrants.
They accept the best and brightest.
Allowing students of affiliated primary schools to compete with their peers from other schools will induce them to perform better and not cocoon them.
In a country where competition is the rule and not the exception, what are we saying to parents and students when we reserve places for students just because they belong to certain schools?
What SJI has tried to achieve, and has achieved so far, is to raise the calibre of the annual intake year by year instead of letting it stagnate.
This results in a more enriching learning environment experimenting in novel ways to stretch students' minds and challenge them to rethink boundaries. Most important, the shared experiences and camaraderie will inspire everyone to succeed, together.
The leadership should and must continue its process of positioning SJI as a school of choice, as it has always been. Let us come together to help SJI in this process as a united alumni, proud of our heritage, and even prouder of our alma mater's future.
Jason Salim

</TD></TR><TR><TD> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Back
Top