• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

ERM rather use plastic crown then a proper one unless designer buy tickets

R4g3

Alfrescian
Loyal
Crown and controversy

JUST when you thought Miss Singapore World’s woes were over, another controversy is brewing.

This time, it involves local jewellery designer Tan Yang Lay, who claims pageant organiser ERM World Marketing breached its contract with her.

Ms Tan, who is in her early 40s, told The New Paper last night: “The contract, which was inked last year, states that the crown I made will be worn by succeeding Miss Singapore World winners for the next five years, from 2008 to 2012. This has not been the case.”

Only last year’s winner Faraliza Tan has worn Ms Tan’s creation. Dethroned 2009 winner Ris Low and current title holder Pilar Carmelita Arlando have not, she said.

Ms Tan’s red and white crown was handmade and embellished with nearly 4,000 Swarovski crystals and cubic zirconia stones totalling more than 30 carats.

“Why put a cheap plastic crown on our representative? This is not Miss Bedok we’re talking about, she’s a national champion,” she said.

The New Paper has verified that the conditions are stated in the contract.

Organiser silent

The pageant finals took place in July.

In September, Ris stepped down after a conviction for credit card fraud came to light.

Ms Tan, who owns local jewellery company Beneath The Stars, and her lawyers, said they have called on ERM World Marketing about the matter.

But ERM World Marketing event director Tracy Lee said she has not been contacted by Ms Tan. She declined further comment.

Ms Tan, who also designed Miss Singapore Universe’s crown last year, said she had agreed to work with Miss Singapore World because she felt she could “do something for Singapore as a jewellery designer”.

“I wanted to contribute and make Singapore proud,” she said.

Not only did she create the crown, Ms Tan said she had also sponsored last year’s pageant, which meant partially financing the event.

In all, Ms Tan said she spent more than $10,000 on the crown and the event last year.

She had taken more than 360 hours to complete the handmade crown.

This year Ms Tan decided not to sponsor the beauty pageant.

Nevertheless, in an e-mail correspondence between April and July, Ms Lee assured Ms Tan that she would honour the contract, meaning, this year’s winner would wear her crown.

The New Paper has also verified this e-mail exchange.

Ms Tan added: “Besides, the contract states that the winners from 2008 to 2012 will wear my crown, regardless of my sponsoring the event.”

But three days before the finals of Miss Singapore World in July, Ms Tan received an e-mail from Ms Lee’s lawyer.

Yes, this year’s winner could wear her crown, she was told, but only if she bought tickets to the finals’ gala dinner.

Each ticket would cost her either $500 or $1,000.


Ms Tan declined.

Ris was subsequently spotted with a different tiara when she was crowned.

Ms Tan claimed she then called Ms Lee, who told her that a third party, not ERM, was the organiser and was not obligated to the standing contract.

However, Ms Lee did not name this “third party”, Ms Tan said.

Then Ris stepped down. Pilar, who has succeeded her, is still not wearing Ms Tan’s creation.

Ms Tan’s lawyers, Mr Michael Loh and Mr Nicholas Awof Clifford Law, told The New Paper they have sent a letter to ERM, requesting a statement which affirms that Ms Tan’s company Beneath The Stars is entitled to its rights as stated in the contract.

Ms Tan added: “I feel I’ve been unfairly treated and kept in the dark as to how the pageant is organised and run. I can’t reuse the crown since it’s already been featured last year.

“More importantly, my reputation has been hurt. I told all my business associates when the deal was made. Now they’re asking me why my design has not been used.”

http://divaasia.com/article/5894
 
Top