• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Enli's Solid Letter on China A vs China B

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
China team No. 1 v China team No. 2? Too true <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr></tr><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></tbody></table>
<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I CONGRATULATE Li Jiawei, Wang Yuegu and Feng Tianwei on their individual achievement in winning the women's table-tennis team silver medal - 'individual' because, in my opinion, the glory is theirs and not Singapore's.


As a small nation, Singapore undoubtedly needs foreign talent to supplement its talent pool. This is beyond doubt for business, scientific research, academia and many parts of the economy. However, I think using foreign talent in sports is a step too far.

Sports is not just about winning, moving up medal tables and statistics. In many ways, sports is the only arena where national passion, pride and achievement can be safely demonstrated. It defeats the point to make foreigners Singaporeans, just so they can represent Singapore and win medals for us.

It has been argued that Tan Howe Liang was also born overseas in China, but the difference is he moved here at the tender age of four. Our table-tennis players came much later in their lives - Wang became Singaporean in 2005, and our semi-final 'heroine' Feng was hurriedly made a Singaporean only early this year. Only Li has been in Singapore a significant amount of time.

This makes our silver medal victory ring hollow. The perception that the final was between China's first team and China's second team is not without justification. Holding pink identity cards may make these players technically Singaporean, but are they truly our own? On television, a refrain is played ad nauseam that after 48 years, 'we have done it'. But have we really done it? Sporting pride cannot be bought.

Finally, the argument that many other countries also adopt foreign sports talent to compete does not hold water. Just because everyone else does something, does not make it right. I think many Singaporeans would share my opinion that we would rather wait another 48 years for a medal, than celebrate a medal that was not truly won by Singaporeans.
Zheng Enli
 

nanana1

Alfrescian
Loyal
After all you've wrote, I say "Singapore has done it, we have done it !":biggrin:

The whole world agrees, ironically some own "Singaporeans" are the one who disagrees.:(
 

hughgrant

Alfrescian
Loyal
doesnt matter whether s'poreans feel proud or not. so long as the medal tally shows s'pore got silver, government happy
 

oli9

Alfrescian
Loyal
Zheng Enli is one unsinkified Singaporean. Hurray!!!!!

We should get capable foreigners into our government as cabinet ministers. Why havent we done it yet? Bush is retiring soon. Blair is already retired. Both of them displayed brilliant tactical warfare aptitude.
 

wizard

Alfrescian
Loyal
Actually for any events. There is always 2 more then 2 ways of looking at it. However in Spore Media.

2 letters, 1 polish the garmen and 1 expose the garment.

Obviously the 1 that polish will get publish or circulated.

If you read the LKY book. He know the important of media and has use it to his advantage for centuries. He has obvious train his boy boy. But internet has change all these. That is why he is getting worry for his son.
 
Top