Everything sounds pretty well. Some reference to existing legislation will be even better and will no doubt put the ghost of dual citizenship to rest.
Everything sounds pretty well. Some reference to existing legislation will be even better and will no doubt put the ghost of dual citizenship to rest.
That the trouble with Singaporeans - must have everything in black and White. How to produce legislation when it does not exist. There is no legislation to flush your toilet after midnight. Better not flush to be on the safe side.
While the children of Ministers and MPs, senior civil servants, well educated people and wealthy businessmen hold on to dual and even multiple citizenship, the peasants wait for official press release from the Straits Times.
Scroobal, it's your word against the rest of Google.
I believe you have a point, but in order to put the ghost to rest something more has to be done. Those who say dual citizenship is not acceptable should now bear the burden of proof.
I am not a lawyer, so what I say is simply my understanding:
When one says "dual citizenship is not allowed", one can mean any of the following:
(1) There is a fine or jail time for being a dual citizen.
(2) You have to inform the SG authorities once you acquire any citizenship.
(3) If you have another citizenship, your SG is automatically revoked, whether or not the SG govt knows about it.
(4) If you acquire another citizenship, you have to surrender your SG citizenship.
(5) If you have another citizenship, the SG government MAY revoke your citizenship
(There may be other interpretations).
I know the old Australian nationality law was like (3) (before they allowed dual citizenship). India's law, I believe, is like (4). As far as I know, Singapore's law is in category (5), which leaves things effectively up to the SG govt's discretion.
Fuck! Pea brainer like me can't even spell Beging, dissaprove, awlays, feaces-brained, lowlifes, macdondalds, Girodano, accomodation, correctly and i got the audacity to tell people off here. Sigh..
Bunch of idiots don't even know how to check a simple regulation on the statutes. Full-on retarded cunts. Can't believe such a dumb shit question can go on for 5 pages lol.
Tying your shoelaces will need 1002 pages at least.
hahahahhahaha, you are the man!!!!!!
Bunch of idiots don't even know how to check a simple regulation on the statutes. Full-on retarded cunts. Can't believe such a dumb shit question can go on for 5 pages lol.
Tying your shoelaces will need 1002 pages at least.
HDB has one condition before you sell off your flat. You got to reside in it for 2 years. Those who migrated and bought a HDB flat before leaving or retained a HDB flat got stuck. Some however declared falsely that they were residing in their flat for the 2 years. Other have come back for the 2 years realising that they are caught in a bind.
HDB does not appear to go all out to verify your residence and your citizenship, they will ask you to sell your flat. You can appeal to sell it a little later and not immediately. I understand that they are not picking except for the 2 year reesidency part.
If however you are still retaining your singapore citizenship and have acquired a new country citizenship. You can hold on to your flat but the 2 years residency requirement is applies. This is still a very little known requirement.
what about a 6th option:
(6) Singapore does not recognise the new citizenship.
i.e. no recognition, no change in your current situation/status quo (from SG gov perspective, nothing has happened)
http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/non_version/cgi-bin/cgi_retrieve.pl?actno=REVED-const
Deprivation of citizenship on acquisition of foreign citizenship
134. —(1) The Government may, by order, deprive a citizen of Singapore of his citizenship if the Government is satisfied that —
(a) he has, while of or over the age of 18 years, at any time after 6th April 1960 acquired by registration, naturalisation or other voluntary and formal act (other than marriage) the citizenship of any country outside Singapore or having so acquired such citizenship before the age of 18 years continues to retain it after that age; or
(b) the citizen, being a woman who is a citizen of Singapore by registration under Article 123 (2), has acquired the citizenship of any country outside Singapore by virtue of her marriage to a person who is not a citizen of Singapore.
(2) Where the Government has made an order under this Article depriving a citizen of Singapore of his citizenship, he shall cease to be a citizen with effect from the date of the order.
That the trouble with Singaporeans - must have everything in black and White. How to produce legislation when it does not exist. There is no legislation to flush your toilet after midnight. Better not flush to be on the safe side.
While the children of Ministers and MPs, senior civil servants, well educated people and wealthy businessmen hold on to dual and even multiple citizenship, the peasants wait for official press release from the Straits Times.
The keyword here is MAY. According to the constitution, the SG govt can choose do nothing for some people who have foreign citizenships, and revoke the SG citizenship of others. Unfortunately this means there is no guarantee (at least according to the law) which way they will go in individual cases. I'm curious is there is anyone here whose SG citizenship was actually deprived when the SG govt found out about his/her foreign citizenship? Or do they simply not renew your SG passport but do not officially take away your SG citizenship?
however when you renew your SG passport you need to declare if you have another citizenship. by putting No in the renewal form is false declaration right?
then don't renew SG passport, use the other passport to travel.