To boo is rude but to badmouth is evil. And to fabricate lies about PAP Lite is malicious. If WP is PAP Lite, forget about being Opposition. 80% will be for PAP and PAP Lite. Non-WP opposition might as well pack up and go. See how ridiculous this fabrication is. This fabrication is done by the real pseudo opposition to destroy the real opposition that is threatening the PAP.
I saw a clip in which WP supporters were booing loudly. I said it was rude, the act of hooligans. Calling a spade a spade.
That's bad-mouthing? You want me to lie and say that booing is acceptable? It may be acceptable to you and other WP supporters, but not to me.
Like I told Melvin: if I saw SDP supporters booing in that clip, I'd still say it's rude. Am I badmouthing SDP then?
Or do WP supporters have a double standard: criticize WP, it's badmouthing. Criticize SDP, it's objective.
Sheez ... behaving just like the Nazis ...
And to fabricate lies about PAP Lite is malicious. If WP is PAP Lite, forget about being Opposition. 80% will be for PAP and PAP Lite. Non-WP opposition might as well pack up and go. See how ridiculous this fabrication is. This fabrication is done by the real pseudo opposition to destroy the real opposition that is threatening the PAP.
Hello, term 'PAP lite' was not my invention, nor did I fabricate it. I'm just voicing a common perception among many non-WP oppo supporters that WP is PAP lite. Pritam Singh's statement that WP might form a coalition with the PAP reinforced that opinion.
You don't think WP is PAP lite, that's fine by me. Many think they are. The world is big enough for many different perceptions, different analyses.
That's what democracy about. Don't force your opinions on others.