- Joined
- Jan 5, 2010
- Messages
- 12,289
- Points
- 113
I'd love all kind attention, even watching me shit. I'm a megalomaniac, remember?
well said. ////
I'd love all kind attention, even watching me shit. I'm a megalomaniac, remember?
I opine our neighbours up north are our number one threat. Followed closely by neighbours down south. Ramseth, tiok bo? Historical and geopolitical factors are cardinal considerations.
Singapore is an important support base to allow fleets from the other side (including Australian support) of the globe to pass through and form the basis of reinforcement after the Pacific fleets have been expanded. If you are Chinese generals, you would definitely want to destroy the possibility of further reinforcement to enemy's fleets early, before your capabilities of doing so diminished.
Singapore may be far away but it is too strategic as it has no replacement, unlike those bases in Japan or Korea. US won't trust Muslim countries to be alternative support base. Once the base of reinforcement is destroyed, the war is half won by Chinese.
Goh Meng Seng
Geographically Indonesia can threaten us via the seas. You are right about history being important though. Sometimes history can be the decisive factor, in ways i myself don't understand. The balance of power is very delicate.
Indonesia is the greater threat. Malaysia and Singapore can just scold each other like couples bickering but has never really bombed each other. But Indonesia has bombed Singapore before, fought Singapore in Brunei jungles etc.
Goh Meng Seng
Wikileaks says the Isrealis don't think highly of SG security capabilities and in reforming extremists. No real reason for Isrealis to be untruthful here. Hope things have since improved.
Geographically Indonesia can threaten us via the seas. You are right about history being important though. Sometimes history can be the decisive factor, in ways i myself don't understand. The balance of power is very delicate.
From what is visible to the naked eye, we appease the Indons more than our closest neighbours. For instance, when the big shots from Indon arrived as our official guests, MINDEF pays the bill for all their shopping. We are talking about 6 figures here. They take and walk out after packing. MINDEF staff collects the bills and pay either on the spot or at later date.
Agree with you on balance of power. We cannot antagonise our two closest neighbours. If ever they do unite as one to take us on, we will be in deep shit. LKY appeased Suharto in the past. Never Dr M.
From what is visible to the naked eye, we appease the Indons more than our closest neighbours. For instance, when the big shots from Indon arrived as our official guests, MINDEF pays the bill for all their shopping. We are talking about 6 figures here. They take and walk out after packing. MINDEF staff collects the bills and pay either on the spot or at later date.
Agree with you on balance of power. We cannot antagonise our two closest neighbours. If ever they do unite as one to take us on, we will be in deep shit. LKY appeased Suharto in the past. Never Dr M.
Wow that's nice huh. 6 figure bills which is of course chicken feet money to mindef.
In most places, no need to pay immediately coz shopowners trust MINDEF (long time relationship) even though we, the citizens of Singapore, don't. How to when privileged few can 'siam' NS? Then come out with justifications. Can also be elected president. What a joke!
We will agree to disagree then.
You rest your case simply coz of bombs and fighting in Brunei jungles? I rest mine on historical baggage, proximity, racial issues, conflict of interests etc.
If based on bombs, surely US is Japan's greatest threat?
GMS,
While I appreciate your candor, perhaps it's may be wiser that you comment less on matters relating to our neighbouring countries particularly with regards to defence. As someone aspiring for political office (assuming that you are still coming back in 2016) and also an officer in the SAF, it would not be good that you get quoted or mis-quoted on such matters. You don't have the luxury of anonymity enjoyed by the many users of this forum.
GMS,
While I appreciate your candor, perhaps it's may be wiser that you comment less on matters relating to our neighbouring countries particularly with regards to defence. As someone aspiring for political office (assuming that you are still coming back in 2016) and also an officer in the SAF, it would not be good that you get quoted or mis-quoted on such matters. You don't have the luxury of anonymity enjoyed by the many users of this forum.
Singapore poses a problem to Malaysia only if Malaysia annexed Singapore with all the political, racial and religious differences. Give it them free, also they don't want. Singapore poses no threat to Malaysia at least. All those folklores about turning off water taps and invading for water taps are just urban legends to pacify NSmen.
There is intense jealousy by the Malaysians but that will never translate into open hostility. It simply means the malaysian political elite has to engage in posturing and hot air in order to pacify their own electorate. We have been playing this game for decades. As long as there is mutual benefit, no one wants to upset the status quo. Water supply, palm trees, Johor Bahru, are all distractions for lesser mortals to consume.
The real threat is indonesia because of their inherent instability and the islamist entrenchment.
hate to chime in here on subjects of such sheer stupidity. traditionally, the malay peninsula is a direct threat to sg due to geography and the "terrain" factor. it doesn't matter who is in charge in malaysia, madhatter, madmansg, madmanml, nutjob, taliban, al qaida, or a chin peng wannabe. even if ml is run by a friend of sg, it is still a perceived critical threat. this is going along with fundamental principles of geopolitics, "buffer" defense and diplomacy, and history. historically, the ml peninsula gave sg more pain than the archipelago of in. ww2 is a perfect example. any major hostile invader or hegemon would identify the peninsula as critical ground for staging, springboard, and strategic choke. sg is just the tip of such a critical area. the emergency after the war also offered theories on why the peninsula was critical to global commie expansion, north to south. after the vietnam war, threat scenarios by all 3 countries in the "path" (thighland, malaise-sia, and stickysore) also point to a north-south hostile route by an "expansionist" commie vietnam. sg, by design, has to have contingency plans in place to handle multiple north-south threats, no so much by malaysia, but by "others" who view ml as the natural bowel movement getting to the shithole at the end of a bloated rectum.
You are mixing things up. An easy hinterland becoming easy prey to advancing occupying forces does not mean it is a threat to Singapore in geopolitical sense. It will be a soft buffer which in SIN's interest good to exploit by occupation and forward defence.
Malaysia and SIN share much history under the Brits. Indonesia is the real threat in terms of political stability from rogue govts.
i looked at everything from a purely food consumption, digestion and shitty perspective: how food become shit, how shit flows and what happens when shit hits the fan. indochina is the stomach in which thighland is the lower stomach controlling entry into the small intestine. vietnam is the esophagus where heartburn occurs. the isthmus of kra is the small intestine. malaysia is the rectum or big intestine. sg is the anus. indonesia is the shit that hits the fan, spread all over the entire room. cleaning the shit after it hits the fan is pointless and waste of time. best thing is to ensure there is no fan at the shithole or shit stays firm and manageable where the rectum is.