Did mudland Cantonese and Hakka ever protest on 513 incident in KL?

[ginfreely]

It's called CNN. Back in 1969, news was just plain old news. In 1989, news is big business. Any issue that could generate contention was thus very valuable to generate viewership. News channels therefore started to quietly seek provocative and polarized events to generate media revenue.

Tiananmen generated no shortage of news, talking points and references. See tank man :



a better comparison would be rohingya vs tiananmen, because they both occurred during the era of news media as big business.

Don’t give lame excuses to blame on CNN, I am talking about those yearly protest on Tiananmen anniversary. m&d Cantonese no protest on 513 incident how can blame CNN for not reporting?

 

[ginfreely]

neither were good.

Obviously neither is good. The point is Cantonese no protest on one but protest strongly on the other. Very hypocrite.

 

[ginfreely]

It was said, one of the perpetrstors of may 13th was najib's father as he planned to overthrow tunku abdul rahman, and dr m. And they were successful. Tunku forced to resign 18 months later.

So why is dr m one of the perpetuators but m&d chinese still supporting him?

 

[nightsafari]

Don’t give lame excuses to blame on CNN, I am talking about those yearly protest on Tiananmen anniversary. m&d Cantonese no protest on 513 incident how can blame CNN for not reporting?

it's not a lame excuse. You asked a question, I provided an answer based on my opinion. I provide the question below as reference :

One is 1989 one is 1969 incident. Only twenty years apart. Why so biased only protest on Tiananmen incident?

simple no? Do you have a better explanation? If so, I'm interested in hearing it. You did ask the same question many times in this thread, so I thought you really wanted to know. If you don't wish to hear an answer to a question you ask many times, that is your prerogative and I will accede to your wishes. After all it is your thread.

But if you want people to read and discuss the legitimate information you provide, it would serve you to have a proper conversation with people trying to properly converse with you. If on the other hand, you just wish to start telling people off and swearing at people and go on a power trip, you certainly are free to do so, but you are only going to attract like-minded people to your posts.

have a nice day.

 

[nightsafari]

Obviously neither is good. The point is Cantonese no protest on one but protest strongly on the other. Very hypocrite.

what if nobody knows anything about it? is it then hypocrite or ignorant or bo chap? You can show tank man to people all over the world and a surprising number will straight away tell you where and why. May 13th where's the info? Buried in some obscure library?

If you want more people to protest, you should either lead the protest or provide information that would generate a protest. Right now, there are plenty of people doing both for Tiananmen. See youtube alone. You can do the same for may 13th because no one else is doing it.

 

[ginfreely]

it's not a lame excuse. You asked a question, I provided an answer based on my opinion. I provide the question below as reference :



simple no? Do you have a better explanation? If so, I'm interested in hearing it. You did ask the same question many times in this thread, so I thought you really wanted to know. If you don't wish to hear an answer to a question you ask many times, that is your prerogative and I will accede to your wishes. After all it is your thread.

But if you want people to read and discuss the legitimate information you provide, it would serve you to have a proper conversation with people trying to properly converse with you. If on the other hand, you just wish to start telling people off and swearing at people and go on a power trip, you certainly are free to do so, but you are only going to attract like-minded people to your posts.

have a nice day.

Not the first time but obviously you are not answering my question why Chinese protest on one but not the other. Instead you twist the answer to CNN not involved in 1969, which is a lame excuse as there is no protest on 513 incident since then for CNN to be involved while there is plenty protest on Tiananmen since 1989 for CNN to be involved.

 

[ginfreely]

what if nobody knows anything about it? is it then hypocrite or ignorant or bo chap? You can show tank man to people all over the world and a surprising number will straight away tell you where and why. May 13th where's the info? Buried in some obscure library?

If you want more people to protest, you should either lead the protest or provide information that would generate a protest. Right now, there are plenty of people doing both for Tiananmen. See youtube alone. You can do the same for may 13th because no one else is doing it.

Excuse me why should I protest when I am not m&d chinese. It’s you m&d chinese that is coward bully viciously bullying me while no guts to protest against m&ds for killing you. And another lame excuse when you m&d Cantonese Hakkas in KL are not even protesting for the release of info on 513 incident. At least the Hokkiens in Taiwan are now not just protesting but already in the stage of making claims for 228 incident deaths.

 

[ginfreely]

Obviously neither is good. The point is Cantonese no protest on one but protest strongly on the other. Very hypocrite.

No m&d Cantonese killed in KL meh?

 

[nightsafari]

Not the first time but obviously you are not answering my question why Chinese protest on one but not the other. Instead you twist the answer to CNN not involved in 1969, which is a lame excuse as there is no protest on 513 incident since then for CNN to be involved while there is plenty protest on Tiananmen since 1989 for CNN to be involved.

You asked multiple times. I answered once. If you don't understand or agree that's fine.

If you read what you wrote above, all the twisting is in there. In any case, the evidence is plain for all to see in your own thread. Enjoy your verbal gymnastics.

 

[ginfreely]

You asked multiple times. I answered once. If you don't understand or agree that's fine.

If you read what you wrote above, all the twisting is in there. In any case, the evidence is plain for all to see in your own thread. Enjoy your verbal gymnastics.

No you are the one obviously creating an issue out of no issue AGAIN. I asked a rhetorical question to make a point I.e the real question. The point is obviously not which is worse or both are not good. The point is why obviously one is worse or both no good but no Cantonese complaining on 513 while they are complaining China on Tiananmen and everything.

 

[ginfreely]

No you are the one obviously creating an issue out of no issue AGAIN. I asked a rhetorical question to make a point I.e the real question. The point is obviously not which is worse or both are not good. The point is why obviously one is worse or both no good but no Cantonese complaining on 513 while they are complaining China on Tiananmen and everything.

 

[nightsafari]

No you are the one obviously creating an issue out of no issue AGAIN. I asked a rhetorical question to make a point I.e the real question. The point is obviously not which is worse or both are not good. The point is why obviously one is worse or both no good but no Cantonese complaining on 513 while they are complaining China on Tiananmen and everything.

I have no patience for mental or verbal gymnastics. You ask a question, I answered. simple as that.

If on the other hand you are asking rhetorical questions instead of making points straight up, who's at fault? you for not making your points simply and straight forward or me for reading this as a genuine question? In whatever case, if you intended it to be a rhetorical question, the appropriate response to my post would be, "I was merely asking a rhetorical question" NOT "you bullying, lying, slandering Malaysian, Cantonese, Hakka dog, son of whore twisting everything from India to Iran and back to Xinjiang where everyone has pictures of my begonias mixed in with other petunias"

I will also take this opportunity to point out that if I only posted a singular answer without variation to a post, it would be factually impossible for me to twist anything because there is no variation to my answers. I now understand why you think people are disturbing you. You are only interested in hearing yourself speak without input from anyone else. The conclusion therefore is that you are simply here for a power trip rather than an intellectual exchange. I hope you find satisfaction in your life because I think power trips are a poor substitute for happiness. Good day.

 

[ginfreely]

I have no patience for mental or verbal gymnastics. You ask a question, I answered. simple as that.

If on the other hand you are asking rhetorical questions instead of making points straight up, who's at fault? you for not making your points simply and straight forward or me for reading this as a genuine question? In whatever case, if you intended it to be a rhetorical question, the appropriate response to my post would be, "I was merely asking a rhetorical question" NOT "you bullying, lying, slandering Malaysian, Cantonese, Hakka dog, son of whore twisting everything from India to Iran and back to Xinjiang where everyone has pictures of my begonias mixed in with other petunias"

I will also take this opportunity to point out that if I only posted a singular answer without variation to a post, it would be factually impossible for me to twist anything because there is no variation to my answers. I now understand why you think people are disturbing you. You are only interested in hearing yourself speak without input from anyone else. The conclusion therefore is that you are simply here for a power trip rather than an intellectual exchange. I hope you find satisfaction in your life because I think power trips are a poor substitute for happiness. Good day.

Why should I answer the way you dictate? Obviously I am asking a rhetorical question. You are obviously a Cantonese snake creating issue out of no issue AGAIN.

 

[ginfreely]

No m&d Cantonese killed in KL meh?

ANOTHER rhetorical question.

 

[ginfreely]

ANOTHER rhetorical question.

And the point is it’s such a big irony that Cantonese are getting upset and violent with extradition bill OF CRIMINALS TO CHINA but not upset with being killed by OTHERS in 513 incident.

 

[nightsafari]

Why should I answer the way you dictate? Obviously I am asking a rhetorical question. You are obviously a Cantonese snake creating issue out of no issue AGAIN.

you don't have to. please, I highly encourage you to keep name-calling and attacking people who sincerely are trying to give you good advice. I'm so glad this is a public forum.

all the best.

 

[ginfreely]

you don't have to. please, I highly encourage you to keep name-calling and attacking people who sincerely are trying to give you good advice. I'm so glad this is a public forum.

all the best.

You are creating an issue out of no issue is called giving me advice only proves that you are a snake.

 

[ginfreely]

The point is why obviously one is worse or both no good but no Cantonese complaining on 513 while they are complaining China on Tiananmen and everything.

The reason is simple because Cantonese love ganging up with OTHERS to harm chinese. When it’s OTHERS that killed them they diam diam no complain no protest no nothing.

 

[ginfreely]

The reason is simple because Cantonese love ganging up with OTHERS to harm chinese. When it’s OTHERS that killed them they diam diam no complain no protest no nothing.

Be it ganging up with filthy Indian SLUT kt latha to harm me or ganging up with UK USA whatever to harm China.

 

[AhMeng]

how are you today ginger?