• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Daphne Iking's enticement case sent back for trial

G

Guan Ping

Guest

Daphne Iking's enticement case sent back for trial

Bernama
Published Nov 8 2010


The Federal Court on Monday sent the "enticement case" involving celebrity TV presenter Daphne Iking back to the magistrate's court for trial. A three-man panel led by Chief Justice Tun Zaki Azmi made the order after striking out a referral application to the Federal Court for determination of constitutional questions, with liberty of parties to refile the application after the completion of the trial.

Zaki said the magistrate has to decide on the facts of the matter before parties can apply to refer to the Federal Court for determination of constitutional questions.
"We don't answer question of law without facts. We do not answer hypothetical questions," said Zaki, who sat in the panel with Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Arifin Zakaria and Federal Court judge Datuk Seri Md Raus Sharif.

daphne%20iking2.jpg


Daphne Iking and her daughter, Isobel Chong

He then directed the case be set for early trial at the Kuala Lumpur magistrate's court on Nov 29. On Aug 25 last year, the High Court referred the case to the Federal Court after finding that there were merits to the application by Darren Choy Khin Ming, the man accused of enticing Iking, for constitutional issues to be determined by the Federal Court.

Among the questions was the constitutional validity of Section 498 of the Penal Code in which the case was based upon. Iking's former husband, Ryan Chong Yiing Yih, 32, had initiated a private summons against Choy, 45, under Section 498 of the Penal Code for enticing or taking away or detaining with criminal intent a married woman.

Choy was charged with enticing Iking, 31, knowing that she was a married woman, with the intention of having sexual intercourse. He allegedly committed the offence at a condominium unit in Taman Tun Dr Ismail between July 2007 and September last year. If found guilty, he can be jailed up to two years, fined or both. Iking married Chong on Jan 27, 2007 in Bali, Indonesia. The couple have a daughter.

 
G

Guan Ping

Guest
Iking enticement case to go to trial


Tuesday November 9, 2010


Iking enticement case to go to trial

PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court here has sent the “enticement case” involving celebrity TV presenter Daphne Iking back to the magistrate’s court for trial. A three-man panel led by Chief Justice Tun Zaki Azmi made the order after striking out a referral application to the Federal Court for determination of constitutional questions, with liberty of parties to refile the application after the completion of the trial.

Zaki said the magistrate had to decide on the facts of the matter before parties could apply to refer to the Federal Court for determination of constitutional questions. “We don’t answer question of law without facts. We do not answer hypothetical questions,” said Zaki who sat on the panel with Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Arifin Zakaria and Federal Court judge Datuk Seri Md Raus Sharif.

n_8iking.jpg


Celebrity case: Iking’s former husband is embroiled in a legal battle with a corporate figure over her.


He directed the case be set for early trial at the Kuala Lumpur magistrate’s court on Nov 29. On Aug 25 last year, the High Court referred the case to the Federal Court after finding that there were merits to the application by Darren Choy Khin Ming, the man accused of enticing Iking, for constitutional issues to be determined by the Federal Court.

Among the questions was the constitutional validity of Section 498 of the Penal Code upon which the case was based. Iking’s former husband, Ryan Chong Yiing Yih, 32, had initiated a private summons against Choy, 45, under the section for enticing or taking away or detaining with criminal intent a married woman. Choy was charged with enticing Iking, 31, knowing that she was a married woman, with the intention of having sexual intercourse.

He allegedly committed the offence at a condominium in Taman Tun Dr Ismail between July 2007 and September last year. If found guilty, he can be jailed up to two years, fined or both. Iking married Chong on Jan 27, 2007 in Bali, Indonesia. The couple has a daughter, Isobel Daniella Iking-Chong. Datuk Jagjit Singh and Akberdin Abdul Kader represented Choy while Wong Kian Kheong represented Chong. — Bernama

 
Top