I do, put up the same standards for both PAP and opposition, and stop being an apologist for WP. Wrong means wrong. Bad management of crisis means bad. Continue to defend them will only make them weaker, not stronger.
Goh Meng Seng
I am not sure whether we should compare WP with PAP on equal footing and expect both to maintain highest standard when one party is having less resources than the other to cover their backside and thanks to this maturing forum for the added "insult to injury". PAP has enough resources to hide their ill moral ground in circumstances that tax monies were exploited, corruption made legal and Mas Selamat escaped to endanger the citizens’ life. It has also been rumored that Shanmugam has his dose of ex-marital “fetish” too. Whatever that is, one instruction from PAP, the whole SPH team will clean up their dirty pants instantly without needing much effort and wholesale their image cleaner than white thru publishing books after books. No head was rolled but the culprit shielded at all cost by PAP gang making up a large group of orchestral that none is guilty of.
It is only human to err in different gravity. However, in this days and age, it might not always be the man's fault when woman could be the cause and seducer of the whole affair. In PAP chauvinist world, man is likely to be forgiven and we will know it when the two SCDF chief fellows’ affairs unfold (or not) in due course. To stir storm out of Yaw's teacup and calling it tsunami (or crisis) might seemed aggravated compared to what PAP has done to the people. Than I would say under PAP, end of the world is near, better run for your life.
Talking about WP, we cannot deny they are the strongest opposition to date and provided at least 40% population with the greatest ammunition history has witnessed. Without WP, we can't even use the word "watershed" to describe the whole election and put LHL on his knees to beg for forgiveness.
Call me bias, do we still have a choice if other oppositions are not pacing up and putting more effort to keep up with WP’s level of support base, so that we can at least have more option to cry foul about high moral ground – which send LKY laughing on his toe and calling it highfalutin openly without bating his eyelids. Yes, SPP, NSP, RP, SDP are clean with good moral regard, if the voters have bought it long ago, at least one or two of these parties (other than SPP and WP) would have gained some sitting in parliament even if it is just an NCMP role. Probably some forumners here are right; voters are forgetting people and they forgave PAP easily.
As such, on the bigger scheme of things, how could we not forgive WP and be magnanimous with them instead of resorting to Pap’s guttering style to kill at no mercy for the "greater good" when WP has already given to its people? Even a high moral standing person would give the victim a chance to breath before his death, so what is all the bickering no ends in this forum? I couldn’t reconcile all anti-WP postings with the exception of PRO-PAP supporters.
Every party has their own household politics and I would advocate whatever grievances it has caused to the ex-colleagues be kept personal. As the saying goes, don't bring personal feelings into the office or when one is out he should just bring with them only happy memory and leave the grief behind to let the stayed do the tough job, or am I being too high morally to think the morally high will think likewise. I don’t know, really.
Every story has to come to its end, and I have no question that if WP were to lose, the greater loser will be all the anti-PAP populace in this society. It is no wonder other opposition parties are largely kept silent about WP internal matters, at least for now.