• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat CST and HSK: different stroke

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
LETTER: No Minister jumped to Chiam’s defense when he was recovering from stroke
By The Independent -
May 13, 2016
52
24030
Share on Facebook
Tweet on Twitter

The following is a letter by one of our readers, Cheong T L.


Mr Shanmugam said that he felt sick because a Facebook user asked him if there will be a by-election if something untoward were to happen to Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat. I would have better appreciated such moralising if PAP leaders were as quick to jump to the defense of an opposition leader when such misfortune befalls them.

In February 2009, the Sunday Times published a report about Potong Pasir MP Chiam See Tong, “Recovering from stroke but Chiam is sharp and lucid”. In the article Mr. Zainudin Nordin, Mayor of Central Singapore District, was quoted as saying, “his (Chiam’s) condition does not seem to have improved. He looks like he is struggling. But I’m sure he is doing his job at his own pace.’

A few days later, Today published a letter in response to the Sunday Times article, titled “Chiam See Tong should call it a day”. In it, the writer wrote:

“History is awash with leaders who do not know when to quit, and I hope Mr Chiam will not go this way. This also raises the question of whether there is any parliamentary rule to retire an MP who has suffered a stroke. The issue is not whether an MP wants to carry on working. That is for Parliament to decide.”

Never mind the newspaper chose to publish that letter with a such a title. We are ranked 154th at press freedom index for a reason. But I also don’t recall any PAP members or Ministers criticising the letter writer for his views.

The Minister’s moralising rings hollow considering how he kept quiet when a letter writer suggested that Chiam should resign because of his medical condition. His letter in a mainstream media would have a far wider reach than a comment in a Facebook.

http://theindependent.sg/letter-no-...s-defense-when-he-was-recovering-from-stroke/
 
Top