• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Corruption in SCDF and CNB

.


Woman at centre of Ng Boon Gay corruption trial: Love or just business?


Yahoo! Newsroom – 19 hours ago.



The woman at the centre of the high-profile corruption trial involving a former top Singapore civil servant is "clinically depressed" and has been seeking medical treatment since news of the scandal broke.

But questions of whether she was really in love with the accused also surfaced.

On the opening day of the trial of former Central Narcotics Bureau chief Ng Boon Gay on Tuesday, the court heard how Cecilia Sue Siew Nang, 36, has "not been coping well with the situation she's found herself in".

Lawyers said she has been seeing a psychiatrist from the Institute of Mental Health (IMH) for the past three months due to the unprecedented publicity arising from the case.



The former IT executive, a sales manager of Hitachi Data Systems who then moved to Oracle during the time of the offence, is alleged to have had sex with Ng in order to win favour for contracts with CNB.

Ng's sexual trysts -- all in the form of fellatio -- with Sue occurred on four different occasions between June and December last year. At the time, both her companies had no existing relationship with CNB.

The court also heard how the pair were first introduced by a mutual friend at a pub in Tanjong Pagar in early 2009. Sue at the time had been assigned by her company to market IT products to the Ministry of Home Affairs, of which CNB was one of the agencies under her charge.

Final say in contracts

In its opening statement, the prosecution acknowledged that while Ng had at no time influenced or was directly involved in the process of awarding two separate IT contracts worth S$320,000 related to a project Sue was working on, Ng nevertheless had ultimate sign-off approval on any vendor deals worth up to S$1 million.

Prosecution lawyer Tan Ken Hwee thus claimed Ng "pressured" Sue into performing fellatio on four occasions knowing his final approval was necessary and that she had to maintain a cordial relationship with the government agencies under her purview.

In one specific instance, court documents related how one of the fellatio acts was performed on the same day CNB had officially contracted to buy certain products Sue was marketing.

Meanwhile, Ng's defence lawyer, Tan Chee Meng said Sue had changed her statement several times during an 8.5-hour interrogation.

He claimed her statements swung from "she loves him and wants to leave her hubby for Ng" to saying it was purely a business case. Sue, who is married and has a two-year-old child, also said in her initial statement that "Boon Gay did not help me in any form to secure business with CNB".

Tan said the pair were involved in an "intimate relationship" since 2009 but only when Ng became director at CNB in 2011 was their relationship called into question.

Senior executives from both companies are due to be called to testify during the trial later this week. Cecilia Sue is also expected to testify in court at some time.

Although she herself did not make a court appearance, Sue dominated Tuesday morning's proceedings, with prosecution lawyers arguing that her identity should remain anonymous and that her name should not be published in media.

The gag order was turned down by judge Siva Shanmugam who ruled that, "The court is not convinced... the prosecution order is turned down."

The defence counsel also appealed the court to order a discharge amounting to an acquittal (DATA) based on the “inherent contradictions” in the prosecution’s case”.

But this was later thrown out by Shanmugam who said that the charges have been “reasonably sufficient to give the accused notice of what he’s charged with”.

Ng’s wife, who sat through the Tuesday court session while her husband stood trial, declined comment.

First witness

The court on Tuesday also heard the first witness’s account in the late afternoon from Leslie Ong Yew San, managing director of American firm Oracle Corporation Singapore Pte Ltd.

Ong revealed that part of the reason Sue was successfully hired by his firm because of her “background having covered accounts like the Ministry of Home Affairs”.

He also said that he was aware of the rumours that was spreading on social media at that time about his then-employee in January 2012, but nothing was confirmed. It was also in January that he was called for investigations at CPIB.

After Ng was charged later in June, an internal company investigation ensued. Ong clarified that Sue’s resignation from the company shortly after the internal investigations were not because of the case, but because she failed to achieve her sales performance target.
 
ivy_yi_k.jpg



Cecilia Su:

Advisory Sales Specialist
IBM Singapore Pte Ltd

Education:

Curtin University of Technology, WA
BCOM, Marketing and Management


Why does this pic look like that of a celebrity?
 
.
But questions of whether she was really in love with the accused also surfaced.

Ng’s wife, who sat through the Tuesday court session while her husband stood trial, declined comment.

The previous time Ng's wife was asked by the press for a comment, she claimed that "she believed in his professional integrity".
Maybe the next time she will tell us whether she thinks they are in love. :rolleyes:
 
I find it strange why all his charges specifically relate to oral sex only. Normal?
 
I find it strange why all his charges specifically relate to oral sex only. Normal?

new law, oral sex is only legal if sexual intercourse take place after that.

if corruption cannot masuk can whack them on kum lan jiao bo sio kang.
 
Personally, I feel sorry for Mr Ng Boon Gay and his family, though I have not known him personally.

His good service in the past should have been taken into account. He did a lot in SPF and CNB

Why drag him to court on charges of fellatio? I feel sorry for him as a human being and as a husband and father.

To all those that think that they have not wronged even once in the past at any point of their lives, I wish to ask.

Is it right for that poor NBG to go through all these? If it was you, how would you feel..?

The trouble with us humans is that many of us (not all) refuse to empathise.

Hope the case ends fast and NBG can go about carving a new life for his family and him.

No one is Perfect. It could be me............
 
Personally, I feel sorry for Mr Ng Boon Gay and his family, though I have not known him personally.

His good service in the past should have been taken into account. He did a lot in SPF and CNB

He is known to be a humble and caring officer. One who is apolitical. What surprises me is this, why charge him in court for PCA offences when it looks more like misconduct which can be dealt with by PSC. You can get him to retire or retire him in public interest.

Being Dir Manpower previously, NBG will be familiar with past cases of very senior police officers (Supt and above). Some of these cases are more jialak in nature, compared to his and these chaps weren't even charged in court. Why the inconsistency? Did NBG step on the wrong toes?
 
He is known to be a humble and caring officer. One who is apolitical. What surprises me is this, why charge him in court for PCA offences when it looks more like misconduct which can be dealt with by PSC. You can get him to retire or retire him in public interest.

Being Dir Manpower previously, NBG will be familiar with past cases of very senior police officers (Supt and above). Some of these cases are more jialak in nature, compared to his and these chaps weren't even charged in court. Why the inconsistency? Did NBG step on the wrong toes?
Seems very LikeLy to me..:cool:
 
He is known to be a humble and caring officer. One who is apolitical. What surprises me is this, why charge him in court for PCA offences when it looks more like misconduct which can be dealt with by PSC. You can get him to retire or retire him in public interest.

Being Dir Manpower previously, NBG will be familiar with past cases of very senior police officers (Supt and above). Some of these cases are more jialak in nature, compared to his and these chaps weren't even charged in court. Why the inconsistency? Did NBG step on the wrong toes?

Yes it should have been a case for the PSC to decide.

Bring my memories back to the days when Ong Seng Chye, a DAC or AC was allowed to walk away into early retirement.
 


Yes it should have been a case for the PSC to decide.

Bring my memories back to the days when Ong Seng Chye, a DAC or AC was allowed to walk away into early retirement.


He was SAC when retired in public interest. If LKY did not intervene, OSC would have masuk Changi. Pays to be obedient.
 
He is known to be a humble and caring officer. One who is apolitical. What surprises me is this, why charge him in court for PCA offences when it looks more like misconduct which can be dealt with by PSC. You can get him to retire or retire him in public interest.

Being Dir Manpower previously, NBG will be familiar with past cases of very senior police officers (Supt and above). Some of these cases are more jialak in nature, compared to his and these chaps weren't even charged in court. Why the inconsistency? Did NBG step on the wrong toes?



Day 2


the score still stands at



CS = 2 : 0 = NBG
 
Back
Top