• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Confirmation that SG citizens loses out to FTs for the top jobs

Patlee2

New Member
I am shocked about some of the comments and this article in general. That's simply racism. People complain Temasek has too many Indians in their Indian subsidiary? So how about the foreign banks in Singapore?

Mr Menon is Indian born but does a good job for this country, he is a Singaporean. That's just racism to point out he's not born here, totally out of context. Mr Koh is probably just frustrated that he never made it to the top as he wasn't good enough. It is unprofessional to attack permanent residents.

A lot of money is made from foreign customers, we need the foreigners to attract and keep such money. Let us think long term and not populistic.
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Only now did MAS decide to reach out to retired banker to get his views on growing SG core - The Online Citizen
Correspondent

Ravi Menon
Last Saturday (15 Aug), retired Singaporean banker Raymond Koh Bock Swi wrote to ST Forum urging the government to examine the workforce composition in banks operating in Singapore (‘Retired banker: Common market knowledge that some banks sideline SG talents‘).
He wrote to ST Forum in the midst of a public uproar over a recent finding by the Manpower Ministry (MOM) that 30 of the 47 companies put on watchlist for suspected discriminatory hiring practices, came from the financial and professional services sectors. One is a financial institution with almost three-quarters of their PMETs coming from the “same nationality” and another, a bank with two-thirds of its PMETs also of the “same nationality”
Defending the interests of Singaporeans, Mr Koh wrote, “As a retired senior banker, I can say categorically that in the past two decades, many foreigners hired in Singapore’s finance sector have been for upper-middle to senior management positions.”
“It has been common market knowledge that certain big, long established foreign banks have been sidelining Singaporean talent in favour of foreign hires, and I strongly urge the authorities to more closely scrutinise the situation in our finance industry,” he added.
Mr Koh’s forum letter was widely circulated on social media prompting the Managing Director of Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), Ravi Menon, to reply. In his reply, Menon finally acknowledged publicly that majority (57%) of senior management positions in the banking industry are now held by foreigners, a common market knowledge which Mr Koh has mentioned (‘MAS: 57% of senior management positions in banking industry held by foreigners‘).
Nevertheless, Menon assured, “My colleagues and I are committed to growing the Singaporean core in the financial sector.”
Menon even said he has asked his team to reach out to the retired Singaporean banker, Mr Koh, for his views and suggestions, in an attempt to show MAS’ commitment to grow the Singaporean core.
Not the first time Mr Koh writes to defend interests of Singaporeans
In fact, this is not the first time Mr Koh has written to the media advocating for more representations of Singaporeans in senior management in banks and thereby, protecting the interests of Singaporeans.
As far back as 2013, he has already written to ST Forum talking about having a Singaporean first policy in the Singapore’s financial industry. On 27 Jun 2013, he wrote in to propose ways to strengthen the Singaporean core in the banking sector.
Unfortunately, not long after Mr Koh wrote his piece, he earned a sharp rebuke from former senior managing director of Temasek Holdings, Michael Dee, saying that nationality-based hiring goes against meritocracy as practised in Singapore.
Luckily, Worker’s Party MP Pritam Singh came to defend Mr Koh (‘“Singaporean-first” not about rejecting meritocracy: Pritam Singh‘, 7 Jul 2013).
Replying to Mr Dee, Mr Singh said that the significant number of foreigners – their economic contributions notwithstanding – in senior-level and middle-management positions in Singapore across various industries, such as banking, has led to a perceptible feeling of a glass ceiling and insecurity among the many Singaporeans over their job and career prospects.
“Mr Koh’s letter does not evince a rejection of meritocracy, but reflects what Singaporeans of all political hues recognise – that Singapore’s pro-business and foreign-talent-friendly policies must not come at the cost of capable and deserving Singaporeans facing lackluster career and job opportunities in their own country,” Mr Singh pointed out.
“Foreign businesses should look towards tailoring their human resource policies to fit the local socio-political realities of today, not yesteryear. This can be done without alienating foreign employees or giving Singaporeans an unfair advantage that would ultimately be to their detriment.”
Mr Singh also advocated a “Singaporean-first” hiring policy. That is, to consider Singaporean job applicants first before considering foreign ones. In fact, Mr Singh mentioned this even before the Fair Consideration Framework was announced by MOM on 23 Sep 2013.
“Career advancement options that can assure qualified Singaporeans of jobs at the upper management levels, and training opportunities for locals to improve their career prospects, must be introduced,” Mr Singh further added.
“Foreign businesses that adopt such practices are likely to earn considerable goodwill from Singaporeans, attract better-qualified Singaporean applicants, and be seen to be among the better employers in Singapore.”
In any case, over the years, Mr Koh continues to write to the media championing the interests of Singaporeans in Singapore:
Mr Koh, whose last position before his retirement was Vice President and Vice Chairman of the Credit Committee in Arab Bank, is a living proof that Singapore does have its own talents and that Singaporean talents are more than capable to hold senior management positions in the banks in Singapore.
It’s interesting to note that in spite of Mr Koh’s earlier writings to the media 7 years ago, only now did MAS finally decide to “reach out” to him to solicit his views and suggestions on growing the Singaporean core. Perhaps it has something to do with the PAP government losing 2 GRCs in the recent GE?
Share this:
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
What is core Singaporean? Read our history, we are a multicultural society. If Indian or Chinese or something else shouldn't count.
Bro, some people say pledge is aspiration wor. PAP already tell you, President must be what race cannot be poor, PM cannot be what race cannot be liberal.

Face the hard tooth, here not different from Msia. You connected you get rich you call shots. You disconnect you stay poor you get shot. :unsure:
 

Thick Face Black Heart

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Percent of PRs in total population tells you literally NOTHING about the true state of affairs.

PRs won't be displacing blue collar workers. They displace white collar workers, especially those working in larger firms and MNCs. In these situations, you find that the ratio of PRs to SIngaporeans is much HIGHER than the ratio of PR to Singaporeans in the population itself.

That's why the G always lumps Singaporeans and PRs as one unit - to obscure the truth of employment levels of real Singaporeans!
 

knnb40

Alfrescian
Loyal
What is core Singaporean? Read our history, we are a multicultural society. If Indian or Chinese or something else shouldn't count.
then why only Singaporean qualified to run for GE and president ?
shouldn't it be any one living here more than 10 / 15 / 20-years should be qualified ?
 

Kuailan

Alfrescian
Loyal
Trump, Putin and Xi were arguing on Who’s in charge of the world?... US, Russia or China?
Without any conclusion, they turned to Modi CECA and asked him Who’s in charge of the world?...
Modi's replied 'All I know is':-
1. Google CEO is an Indian
2. Microsoft CEO is an Indian
3. Citigroup CEO was an Indian
4. SoftBank Vision Fund CEO is an Indian
5. Adobe CEO is an Indian
6. NetApp CEO is an Indian
7. PepsiCo CEO was an Indian
8. Nokia CEO is an Indian
9. MasterCard CEO is an Indian
10. DBS CEO is an Indian
11. Cognizant CEO was an Indian
12. Novartis CEO is an Indian
13. Conduent CEO was an Indian
14. Diageo CEO is an Indian
15. SanDisk CEO was an Indian
16. Motorola CEO was an Indian
17. Harman CEO is an Indian
18. Micron CEO is an Indian
19. Palo Alto Networks CEO is an Indian
20. Reckitt Benckiser CEO is an Indian
21. Now IBM CEO is also an Indian origin guy

So who's running the world?...
 

Singapore Dancing Spirit

Alfrescian
Loyal
Trump, Putin and Xi were arguing on Who’s in charge of the world?... US, Russia or China?
Without any conclusion, they turned to Modi CECA and asked him Who’s in charge of the world?...
Modi's replied 'All I know is':-
1. Google CEO is an Indian
2. Microsoft CEO is an Indian
3. Citigroup CEO was an Indian
4. SoftBank Vision Fund CEO is an Indian
5. Adobe CEO is an Indian
6. NetApp CEO is an Indian
7. PepsiCo CEO was an Indian
8. Nokia CEO is an Indian
9. MasterCard CEO is an Indian
10. DBS CEO is an Indian
11. Cognizant CEO was an Indian
12. Novartis CEO is an Indian
13. Conduent CEO was an Indian
14. Diageo CEO is an Indian
15. SanDisk CEO was an Indian
16. Motorola CEO was an Indian
17. Harman CEO is an Indian
18. Micron CEO is an Indian
19. Palo Alto Networks CEO is an Indian
20. Reckitt Benckiser CEO is an Indian
21. Now IBM CEO is also an Indian origin guy

So who's running the world?...
Well said...

you forgot to add DBS CEO (highest paid in Singapore) is an INDIA too
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
Trump, Putin and Xi were arguing on Who’s in charge of the world?... US, Russia or China?
Without any conclusion, they turned to Modi CECA and asked him Who’s in charge of the world?...
Modi's replied 'All I know is':-
1. Google CEO is an Indian
2. Microsoft CEO is an Indian
3. Citigroup CEO was an Indian
4. SoftBank Vision Fund CEO is an Indian
5. Adobe CEO is an Indian
6. NetApp CEO is an Indian
7. PepsiCo CEO was an Indian
8. Nokia CEO is an Indian
9. MasterCard CEO is an Indian
10. DBS CEO is an Indian
11. Cognizant CEO was an Indian
12. Novartis CEO is an Indian
13. Conduent CEO was an Indian
14. Diageo CEO is an Indian
15. SanDisk CEO was an Indian
16. Motorola CEO was an Indian
17. Harman CEO is an Indian
18. Micron CEO is an Indian
19. Palo Alto Networks CEO is an Indian
20. Reckitt Benckiser CEO is an Indian
21. Now IBM CEO is also an Indian origin guy

So who's running the world?...
Dr m and president
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Bro, some people say pledge is aspiration wor. PAP already tell you, President must be what race cannot be poor, PM cannot be what race cannot be liberal.

Face the hard tooth, here not different from Msia. You connected you get rich you call shots. You disconnect you stay poor you get shot. :unsure:

IV never seen Malaysia siding Chinese or foreigners the way Singapore does.
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
U talk lanjiao... A racist... Cheaper to hire Indians say so cut the crap...

I am shocked about some of the comments and this article in general. That's simply racism. People complain Temasek has too many Indians in their Indian subsidiary? So how about the foreign banks in Singapore?

Mr Menon is Indian born but does a good job for this country, he is a Singaporean. That's just racism to point out he's not born here, totally out of context. Mr Koh is probably just frustrated that he never made it to the top as he wasn't good enough. It is unprofessional to attack permanent residents.

A lot of money is made from foreign customers, we need the foreigners to attract and keep such money. Let us think long term and not populistic.
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sinkieland is fucked deep deep with CECA agreement

Well deserved and self inflicted.

Inevitably Stinkypura will fold.

Sucking yankee or tiong or ceca c*cks won't be of any use.

Better learn to grovel, beg, kneel before Melayu overlords. Ketuanan Melayu in Nusantara.
 
Top