Confirm: China gonna to follow Singapore Style!

[Ash007]

We might be seeing GRCs system in China soon.

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/singapore-a-model-for-chinese-democracy-20121029-28fkc.html

Singapore a model for Chinese democracy
Date
October 30, 2012
Category
Opinion
Read later

Peter Hartcher
Sydney Morning Herald political and international editor
View more articles from Peter Hartcher

inShare
Pin ItEmail articlePrintReprints & permissions

Illustration: John Shakespeare
China's incoming president, Xi Jinping, will take power formally in three weeks, yet he's given no public hint of his plans. But he gave an intriguing glimpse to the Westerner he's spent more time with than any other.

After a total of 10 days together across a year or so, Xi left the US Vice-President, Joe Biden, with one clear impression. He does not think that China's political system can continue indefinitely, according to people Biden has briefed.

But while the inheritor of the one-party dictatorship does not think it will last in its current form, neither does he have a clear idea of what should replace it, Biden said.

If Xi (pronounced Shee) is thinking about a roadmap for China's political future, last week provided a clue of a possible destination - Singapore.

Advertisement
An article in a Chinese magazine called Study Times held up Singapore's system of pseudo-democracy as a possible model for China.

So what, you might reasonably ask, does that tell us about Xi's thoughts? The journal is published by the Communist Party's Central Party School, whose president is Xi himself. It's the party's leading policy journal.

''For several years, Xi has led a team investigating the Singapore model and envisaging how it might be applied to China,'' reports Jonathan Manthorpe of the Vancouver Sun.

His tyre-kicking included a 2010 meeting with the owner and builder of the Singapore model, Lee Kuan Yew, whose son has been entrusted with the keys and is now taking it for a drive as Prime Minister.

Exactly what is the attraction of a city-state that has been variously described as an illiberal democracy, a liberal authoritarian state and Disneyland with the death penalty?

The piece in Study Times explains the attraction for China's leaders. ''Since 1968, the People's Action Party has won consecutive elections and held state power for a long time, while ensuring that the party's high efficiency, incorruptibility and vitality leads Singapore in attaining an economic leap forward,'' writes Song Xiongwei, a lecturer at the Chinese Academy of Governance.

Lee deservedly gets credit for building a thrusting first-world economy from a malarial third-world swamp.

Xi might be looking at Singapore's past as China's possible future. A political scientist at China's Renmin University, Zhang Ming, says: ''The Singapore model has been admired by most Chinese leaders and Xi might see Singapore's success as the dreamed accomplishments of his rule in coming decade,'' according to the South China Morning Post.

Lee Kuan Yew is a shrewd character who created the appearance of a Western-style liberal democracy where, in theory, power is contestable but, in fact, one-party rule is protected. He's done this by altering a couple of key design details. When an opposition politician criticises a government minister, the minister commonly sues for defamation. Singapore's helpful courts award such crushing damages that the opposition politician is bankrupted and some have been forced into exile to avoid jail.

Singapore's media is closely guided by the government. Internet censorship and monitoring is highly developed. And the ruling party maintains a subtly coercive role in managing the value of the typical family's most valuable asset, the family home.

How? Most citizens buy flats in government-built and government-maintained apartment blocks. Blocks whose residents dare vote for the opposition live under explicit threat of having their essential upgrades put at the bottom of the work program.

Hey presto. A parliamentary democracy where no one is dragged away in the middle of the night by the secret police, yet one where few are brave enough to speak out and even fewer get away with it. Even today, the PAP holds an astonishing 81 out of the 87 seats in parliament.

A more charitable description of Singapore is that it's a Confucian democracy, with a benign all-knowing patriarch presiding over a meritocratic civil service and a successful government-led capitalist economy.

For China, it's a potential halfway house between authoritarianism and liberal democracy. Could the governance system of an extended shopping centre with a population of 5 million be successfully applied to a sprawling civilisation of 1.3 billion? It's an intriguing question.

Whether Xi has yet found an answer of how to reform China's political system, he is surely asking the right question. Problems are mounting in China and the political system allows the people neither satisfaction nor safety valve.

While the people recognise the rapid rise in national prosperity, they are increasingly dissatisfied with the side effects.

Eighty one per cent of Chinese people agree with the proposition that the ''rich just get richer while the poor get poorer'', according to a study published this month by the Pew Research Centre, a pollster in Washington.

Trust in the value of hard work is eroding. Forty-five per cent of middle-class Chinese disagree with the thought that ''most people can succeed if they are willing to work hard''.

Pew reports: ''In another sign that many do not see a level playing field in Chinese society, there are growing worries about corruption. Half now say corrupt officials are a very big problem, up 11 percentage points since 2008.''

Their concern, presumably, would grow if they were allowed to read the The New York Times investigation into the wealth of the family of the outgoing Premier, Wen Jiabao, whose close relatives are estimated to have controlled assets worth at least $US2.7 billion ($2.6 billion).

The story has been censored in China and denounced by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as a smear.

And the extended family of Xi himself is estimated by the US financial news service Bloomberg to have $US376 million in assets. Bloomberg says none of these is owned by Xi or his immediate family and says that there is no indication Xi is guilty of any wrongdoing. This story was censored too.

Winston Churchill said that dictators ride tigers they dare not dismount. How daring is Xi Jinping?

In last week's column I wrote that Paul Keating was central to the creation of APEC. A reader has pointed out that Bob Hawke created the institution of APEC and Keating was instrumental in later adding an annual leaders' summit.

Peter Hartcher is the international editor.



Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/polit...e-democracy-20121029-28fkc.html#ixzz2AkVXD9EP

 

[skponggol]

.....

Vichy WP style of Collaborationist “Opposition” is coming to China.


With its silent but obedient non-performance in parliament, WP is most probably the only Opposition Party in this world that can be approved and accepted by the Chinese communists. “不管白猫蓝猫，能乖巧听话就是好猫” (Whether White or Blue, as long as it is obedient and quiet, then it is a good Opposition Party)


Singapore's system of pseudo-Democracy and pseudo-Opposition is a possible model for China.

.....

 

[syed putra]

credit should be given to the malay people without whom, Lee Kuan yew would not have existed.

 

[Kinana]

Stupid article.
First of all, there is no logic in the author's assertion that Singapore can possibly be a model for China within 10 years.
The rich do get richer and so does the poor in Singapore.

 

[myo539]

Stupid article.
First of all, there is no logic in the author's assertion that Singapore can possibly be a model for China within 10 years.
The rich do get richer and so does the poor in Singapore.

Whether this Aussie has logic or not, it's immaterial - Singapore cannot be a model for China's governance - notwithstanding the fact that the USA, Britain and Australia love Singapore so much as to sat up factories and offices here and to allow the tiny island to buy their sophisticated weapons and troops to train on their soil.

China's model should be the USA, Britain and Australia. The USA model is the best. Only the angmoh model can survive in this world. The angmoh model allows the government to drop or threaten nuclear bombs in foreign countries, to send warplanes and ships to all corners of the world, and to wipe out any smaller government or rebel it dislikes. The angmoh governance has a long history of colonising weaker countries and bring civilisation to them.

The USA or angmoh governance is the best model. They are the only ones who can flood the world with genuine iphones, MacDonalds and Kentucky Fried Chicken in Disneyland. It's a real Universal Studio with no dealth penalty for mass murderers, drug traffickers and armed robbers.

 

[Dinosaur]

Their concern, presumably, would grow if they were allowed to read the The New York Times investigation into the wealth of the family of the outgoing Premier, Wen Jiabao, whose close relatives are estimated to have controlled assets worth at least $US2.7 billion ($2.6 billion).

The story has been censored in China and denounced by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as a smear.

And the extended family of Xi himself is estimated by the US financial news service Bloomberg to have $US376 million in assets. Bloomberg says none of these is owned by Xi or his immediate family and says that there is no indication Xi is guilty of any wrongdoing. This story was censored too.

Singaporeans would be concerned too if they learned that FamiLEE has net worth of about US$560 million and Ho Jinx has an annual compensation of about US$30 million. But we all know that the PAP regime does not allow such information to be made known to Singaporeans.

 

[god_zeus]

Singaporeans would be concerned too if they learned that FamiLEE has net worth of about US$560 million and Ho Jinx has an annual compensation of about US$30 million. But we all know that the PAP regime does not allow such information to be made known to Singaporeans.

if the info is not allowed to be known

then how come you know?

 

[Cruxx]

if the info is not allowed to be known

then how come you know?

Great question. If only you had asked yourself this every time you regurgitate the conspiracy theories you gleaned from the internet.

 

[Dinosaur]

if the info is not allowed to be known

then how come you know?

Questions for you:

* What do you think?
* Since the regime does not allow such information to be made known to Singaporeans, it must mean that it does exist, don't you think so?
* My sources are non Singaporeans. And are you sure I am Singaporean?
* It doesn't matter to me whether you guys believe it. I don't have to prove the veracity of the information to you. If I did, the regime will throw me into jail.

 

[Dreamer1]

The Giant Red Dragon(大紅龍) wants to replace CORRUPION with LEE-galised CORRUPTION,they will fail,by divine decree.