• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Concept of GRC under strain

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
25,132
Points
83
The Tin / Foo debacle within the PAP camp is putting the our model of parliament and the original argument put forth by the PAP under tremendous strain.

What was conceived to protect minorities and ensure their representation is now turning out to be an abuse of the process. Foo and Tin are Chinese the last time I looked and both have little in terms of favourable attributes whether political or otherwise to be elected on their own or even within the protective fabric of PAP. They are definately riding on the coat tails of their running mates including ironically the supposedly unelectable minority candidates

This is now about being women or being young as in the case of Tin. Surely there must be some modicum of capability and capacity to carry out the function and provide some sense of confidence in doing so.

The PAP argued that remuneration has to be the cornerstone for performance and to attract the best. We are clearly in the top tier around when it comes to MP remuneration package. Surely there are more capable people than Tin or Foo. This is not even a boundary issue. Both are clearly outliers.

Ask anyone in Stand Chart and they were tell you that both her boss and her did not carry out their conduct in a covert manner. They always spent their time together including lunch and breaks. In this day and age, nobody gives a damn if the superiors condone such things. But representing constituent in Parliament is another thing. This lady was banged by her boss and its same guy who did her appraisal.

If the PAP despite this coming out in the open is still prepared to nominate her, it tells Singaporeans how they are prepared to treat us all.

If the SPH takes the trouble to clarify that her husband's bankruptcy order was withdrawn by her employers, they should also seek out from the management if unfavour consideration was given. How was this matter treated and did her boss who also oversaw the collections function step in. These are all unanswered questions crying out for answers.

I have no trouble if an MP gets banged out of his or her brains out of wedlock in this day and age. After all our Minister of Home Affairs was banging his subordinate during his legal days and whilst an MP so this should not raise any eyebrows. This however is different. This lady allowed her boss to bang her and climbed the corporate ladder.

Good luck to the PAP and Singapore.
 
Ask anyone in Stand Chart and they were tell you that both her boss and her did not carry out their conduct in a covert manner. They always spent their time together including lunch and breaks. In this day and age, nobody gives a damn if the superiors condone such things. But representing constituent in Parliament is another thing. This lady was banged by her boss and its same guy who did her appraisal.

Asked already. Your info is 100% accurate. I didn't even bother to ask my 2 friends for the identity of FMH's boss. They both provided me the full name and it matches the initials you gave in an earlier thread.
 
She was not given the epithet "Fuck Me Hard" for nothing!
 
Here is the irony. Her ex-boss WC is actually very capable and certainly a better candidate than her by miles. Unfortunately he too would not have made it pre-Shanmugam era.


Asked already. Your info is 100% accurate. I didn't even bother to ask my 2 friends for the identity of FMH's boss. They both provided me the full name and it matches the initials you gave in an earlier thread.
 
Take it on the chin you Blatherskites. It's all about money and how much you have to promote bullshite that every one wants to hear. Please Note that I'm pissed as a fart and I'm not making too much sense as per usual. Phanr Phanar - Oh I've had an excellent night, I give in , let me out of here.
 
I wish that we had enough money to make honest changes to the country. But alas, due to greed, I believe that we all have our own agendas and would renege on our promises. Sad but true?
 
Last edited:
Some times such rumors spread on the grape vine is enough to do damage. Especially when voters now a days are quite tech savvy.
 
Internet is the down faLL OF PAP. LKY cannot control it any more as Strait Time is no longer the main media.

They cannot fuck up something then show PAP MP carrying baby during their walk about and get over it any more?
 
How many of you think that PAP will withdraw one, if not, both candidates from the hot kitchen ?

I believe things might not have come to this stage if Dowager was still around.
 
If the PAP is a serious and responsible party they would not have allowed this in the first place. Having come this far, human nature is to bury one's head in the sand and hope this blows away unless responsibility and accountability is taken at full value. Lets watch what PAP is going to do. Are they going to look into this or are they going to treat us like fools.

The PAP and even other parties have approached good candidates in the past and a few have turned them down because of baggage they carried and did not want to tarnish anyone else. This lady is shameless. Imagine trying to play chicken with the collections department with her husband's bankruptcy and thinking that hey would not sue the guy knowing her link to th same boss. The hats off to the collections head.

Let all remember what Khaw said recently about people being matured and therefore able to differentiate between the truth and lies. Lets see how matured he and his cabinet colleagues are with finding out the facts. And I will make it simple for him and his cabinet colleagues

1) FMH signs a stat deck about not banging her boss and publishing in the straits times
2) Stand Chart makes media statement that her husband's bankruptcy was handled in an appropriate manner.

I am the majority will accept this.

By the way, what is she bringing to the table?
 
1) FMH signs a stat deck about not banging her boss and publishing in the straits times
2) Stand Chart makes media statement that her husband's bankruptcy was handled in an appropriate manner.

Knowing how 'kelong' the system is, I suggest these:
3) After SD from FHM about not banging WC and publishing in the ST, subject both FMH and WC to a lie detector test conducted by a neutral polygraph examiner with no ties with our authorities;
4) Subject the individuals involved in her husband's bankruptcy case to a lie detector test to ensure it was handled in an appropriate manner with no 'outside' or 'inside' interference. FMH and her husband should also go through his test. WC too.
 
No need to worry if it is the truth. If you know my track record, you will know these things are not treated lightly. One must be fair to all parties.

We are talking about private lives. We are talking about someone with such a background taking on public office with tax payers paying the bills. Surely our society has not gone down the gutter that we can't find a few good men to help run the country.


Screwball, "Strong VPN" really so strong ah? :eek:
 
Nomination Day and Election Day hasn't even been announced, but the internet has really gone viral.

Something which title hopefuls are not expecting and how much dent can it cause their title hopes? Let's wait and see:o
 
Nomination Day and Election Day hasn't even been announced, but the internet has really gone viral.

haven't announced the nomination date ah? :eek::eek::eek:

i had a bet with my friend: GE latest by 28th May :D:D:D
 
Back
Top