• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

City Harvest takes a $45 million loan.

bushtucker

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
5,452
Points
113
City Harvest Church (CHC) have defended its decision to take out a new $45million loan, saying that the loan would buy the church extra time in repaying an earlier $50 million loan amid a drop in donations from its members.

The church has taken out a 10-year loan from Freight Links Express Holdings with an average of $5.77 million in interest and other charges every year, which means the church will have to pay back nearly $80 million in total, reported The Straits Times.

In a special edition of the church's in-house newsletter, City News Weekly, it explained that the $50m loan -- which was from construction company Galaxy Capital and taken out in 2011 to nearly double its 20 per cent stake in Suntec Singapore Suntec Singapore International Convention and Exhibition Centre -- was due next year.

An inability to extend the repayment period of that loan beyond Aug 2014 meant the church had to either "put out a capital outlay of $40 million in less than 11 months" or find another way, the newsletter wrote.

That repayment method would not have been realistic as donations to the church's Building Fund have fallen since its founder Kong Hee and his five depouties were brought to court on charges of misappropriating church funds.

In its latest collection which ended in April this year, the church took in just $15 million. Previous collections brought in between $21 million and $24 million each, members said they were told.

The church had approached banks for a loan but they were either unwilling to deal with religious organisations or were put off by the trial. They church's board also considered selling off part of its Suntec stake but decided against it as offer prices were "way below market value".

:rolleyes:

...and some of that money goes to paying the lawyers' fees after the court battle.
 
First off, why does the church needs so much money

2ndly why is it even allowed to freaking use that money to invest in property

3rd why in the world are we still not imposing tax on these organisations
 
Last edited:
30% tax on religious bodies is about right. Then no need to raise GST. Mega churches should be treated like alcohol and cigarette.

Pinky, what are you waiting for?
 
First off, why does the church needs so much money

2ndly why is it even allowed to freaking use that money to invest in property

3rd why in the world are we still not imposing tax on these organisations

The biggest question of all is why should any pastor or priest can afford to have millions and stay in houses like Sentosa Cove??
 
Speaker of Parliament stayed in a HDB.KH stay Sentosa Cove leh
 
I thought the pastor and priest's duty is to help the poor, so where they got the millions to buy houses like sentosa cove.. Really fishy lol...
 
Why take a loan when God was supposed to bless them from above ?
 
Don't need to talk about church, when someone or some entity need to take up a loan to cover another loan its called -

I'm Fucked!
 
It's time for that church to declare bankrupt...!!!!
 
Why, why why....Why are there so many questions and no answers?
 
Back
Top