Chiu Cheng wants to ban all unvac from supermarket and crowded place

[Cottonmouth]

The 80/20 rule is also known as the Law Of The Vital Few.
It says that 80% of the consequences come from 20% of the causes.
What has this to do with COVID?
At this moment, we have 80% of the population vaccinated.
It is the other 20% that’s going to contribute to rising deaths, if transmission keeps shooting up.
This is what the experience in other countries, including Israel tells us. (They had 40% unvaccinated when they opened up).
Studies in other countries tell us that deaths are severe illness amongst kids are very rare. Deaths - 2 per million, and in kids with severe underlying conditions.
Although breakthrough severe COVID infections are possible in vaccinated people, they are also rare. Deaths are even rarer.
It is thus the 20% unvaccinated that will add to hospital bed capacity, ICU and deaths. What US President Biden calls the “pandemic of the unvaccinated”.
The right thing to do thus is not to impose more restrictions on vaccinated people in order to protect the few.
On the contrary, the 80/20 rule says that we should restrict the 20% to protect the 80%.
The right thing to do therefore is to ban all unvaccinated people from all indoor places, especially supermarkets and crowded malls. It doesn’t matter if they test negative, as these measures are to protect them. They should ideally also be banned from all F&B, which are high risk settings.
This is the logical thing to do.
However, politics is not logical.
It is the art of the possible, and people are unlikely to accept this.
In this case, we end up doing the illogical thing of putting back restrictions on the vaccinated to protect the unvaccinated.
If so, the measures should be as soft as possible:
- Work From Home for all office workers.
- Groups of 2 for F&B dining in; retain groups of 5 for less risky socisl settings.
But at a certain point we need to draw a line.
If not 80/20, then 90/10.
- CC



Ban his mother from Geylang also! So old still sell CB.

 

[laksaboy]

If the vaxxed ones are well-protected, why this paranoia?

 

[face the facts]

The 80/20 rule is also known as the Law Of The Vital Few.
It says that 80% of the consequences come from 20% of the causes.
What has this to do with COVID?
At this moment, we have 80% of the population vaccinated.
It is the other 20% that’s going to contribute to rising deaths, if transmission keeps shooting up.
This is what the experience in other countries, including Israel tells us. (They had 40% unvaccinated when they opened up).
Studies in other countries tell us that deaths are severe illness amongst kids are very rare. Deaths - 2 per million, and in kids with severe underlying conditions.
Although breakthrough severe COVID infections are possible in vaccinated people, they are also rare. Deaths are even rarer.
It is thus the 20% unvaccinated that will add to hospital bed capacity, ICU and deaths. What US President Biden calls the “pandemic of the unvaccinated”.
The right thing to do thus is not to impose more restrictions on vaccinated people in order to protect the few.
On the contrary, the 80/20 rule says that we should restrict the 20% to protect the 80%.
The right thing to do therefore is to ban all unvaccinated people from all indoor places, especially supermarkets and crowded malls. It doesn’t matter if they test negative, as these measures are to protect them. They should ideally also be banned from all F&B, which are high risk settings.
This is the logical thing to do.
However, politics is not logical.
It is the art of the possible, and people are unlikely to accept this.
In this case, we end up doing the illogical thing of putting back restrictions on the vaccinated to protect the unvaccinated.
If so, the measures should be as soft as possible:
- Work From Home for all office workers.
- Groups of 2 for F&B dining in; retain groups of 5 for less risky socisl settings.
But at a certain point we need to draw a line.
If not 80/20, then 90/10.
- CC



Ban his mother from Geylang also! So old still sell CB.

cannot ban his mother selling cheebye, then his family will have no income how to go supermarket buy condoms for her business?
motherfuckers like this, you can never trust to fight alongside with, will play out his own father for any monetary gain

 

[laksaboy]

I genuinely believe he is that guy whom the PAP allows to bark in a certain way to make themselves look good by comparison.

 

[Datingafter35]

So the data from icu and hospital admissions shown that those who fall sick are those who are unvaccinated?

Aeroplanes that survive during the wwii is because they got hit at areas where there are not vital parts.

The same with bullet proof vest. Your arms and legs are expendables so they protect your body like heart, stomach, lungs.

The same theory can be applied for hospital admissions. We don't want the sicked and ill to suffocate the operation capacity of hospitals.

We know that those who are in ICU have underlying conditions even though they are vaccinated and those that died are vaccinated and none vaccinated. So the old and weak are prone to attack regardless of protected or not. So far only the young who are vaccinated are prone to allergies. This is also pronounced.

What I want to know is those who are vaccinated but admitted. What's their recovery rate versus those who are admitted but not vaccinated.

Also you need to know where they have been and who they have been versus the unvax. Why? We need to determine if because of environment are they subjugated to being infected. Is that area have more vaccinated people or less vaccinated people.

This will tell us if the spread of virus happened more on vaccinated people or unvax. Unless contact tracing lacks these key information. GPS and timestamp. Doesn't matter who they are with as long as you know where they have been and at what time. You can already tell if that premises have more vaccinated people or not. Like school environment versus public places.

It's data intensive but not impossible unless those they hired are just glass door.

 

[Chase]

Chiu Cheng wants to ban all unvac from supermarket and crowded place​

please do that, then singapore retail will crash.

 

[syed putra]

If the vaxxed ones are well-protected, why this paranoia?

It's vax privilege. No vax, no food.

 

[Leckmichamarsch]

It's vax privilege. No vax, no food.

korrek
mudslimes no say in sg or any Xi land

 

[BigBlackCock]

 

[batman1]

Calvin Cheng Pak Chiu Cheng again.Luan Luan Shoot.

 

[Maxico]

Any evidence the unvaxxed are spreading when more than 500 bus drivers didn't ?
I think the unvaxxed should travel in buses and MRTs more often

 

[rushifa666]

It wilp be 20 80 as they die in a few years from vaccine

 

[dredd]

please do that, then singapore retail will crash.

Retail will crash because of 10% unvaxxed? 90% more or 10% more? You got pass maths in school or not...

 

[Rogue Trader]

Hercules sums it up the best

 

[JohnTan]

The 80/20 rule is also known as the Law Of The Vital Few.
It says that 80% of the consequences come from 20% of the causes.
What has this to do with COVID?
At this moment, we have 80% of the population vaccinated.
It is the other 20% that’s going to contribute to rising deaths, if transmission keeps shooting up.
This is what the experience in other countries, including Israel tells us. (They had 40% unvaccinated when they opened up).
Studies in other countries tell us that deaths are severe illness amongst kids are very rare. Deaths - 2 per million, and in kids with severe underlying conditions.
Although breakthrough severe COVID infections are possible in vaccinated people, they are also rare. Deaths are even rarer.
It is thus the 20% unvaccinated that will add to hospital bed capacity, ICU and deaths. What US President Biden calls the “pandemic of the unvaccinated”.
The right thing to do thus is not to impose more restrictions on vaccinated people in order to protect the few.
On the contrary, the 80/20 rule says that we should restrict the 20% to protect the 80%.
The right thing to do therefore is to ban all unvaccinated people from all indoor places, especially supermarkets and crowded malls. It doesn’t matter if they test negative, as these measures are to protect them. They should ideally also be banned from all F&B, which are high risk settings.
This is the logical thing to do.
However, politics is not logical.
It is the art of the possible, and people are unlikely to accept this.
In this case, we end up doing the illogical thing of putting back restrictions on the vaccinated to protect the unvaccinated.
If so, the measures should be as soft as possible:
- Work From Home for all office workers.
- Groups of 2 for F&B dining in; retain groups of 5 for less risky socisl settings.
But at a certain point we need to draw a line.
If not 80/20, then 90/10.
- CC



Ban his mother from Geylang also! So old still sell CB.

Calvin Cheng is a patriot. I've already banned unvaccinated staff from my premises. They will be terminated for poor work performance if they refuse to get vaccinated.

 

[Loofydralb]

Let the dog bark.