-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
China sends ships to islands disputed with Japan: Xinhua
- Thread starter streetcry
- Start date
Re: 还我山河
You fucking bastard. Who are you calling a chink?
Thanks Hong Lei. You've given credence to my claim that Japs are much more civilised than chinks. Two fucking smoke bombs? That's all?
You fucking bastard. Who are you calling a chink?
Re: 还我山河
[h=1]Mainland, Taiwan should safeguard territory integrity together: top political advisor[/h]
NANJING, Sept. 18 (Xinhua) -- Top political advisor Jia Qinglin on Tuesday said both sides of the Taiwan Strait should safeguard the nation's territorial integrity, interests and dignity together through their own means.
Jia, a Standing Committee member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee, made the remarks while meeting with Lien Chan, honorary chairman of the Kuomintang (KMT) Party, in the city of Nanjing.
Japan's recent action regarding the Diaoyu Islands, an inherent part of Chinese territory since ancient times, has seriously violated China's territory sovereignty and hurt the feelings of Chinese compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, Jia said.
The Japanese government on Sept. 10 announced the "purchase" of part of the Diaoyu Islands, despite strong opposition by the Chinese side.
"Both sides of the strait should surpass their differences and work together to safeguard the nation's territorial integrity, interests and dignity through their own means," said Jia, chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference.
Tuesday marks the 81st anniversary of the "September 18 Incident," which directly preceded Japan's invasion of northeast China.
Describing it as an unforgettable day for the Chinese nation, Jia said China suffered the most in previous times, when it was weak and hounded by foreign countries.
"Now, Chinese people on both sides of the strait are embracing historical opportunities to achieve common prosperity and development and struggle together for the nation's rejuvenation," he said.
He said the CPC, KMT and both sides of the Taiwan Strait should continue to promote the peaceful development of cross-strait ties and join hands for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation on the basis of opposing "Taiwan independence" and sticking to the "1992 Consensus."
Lien said the peaceful development of cross-strait ties is the right path, adding that the two sides share a common goal -- to boost the welfare of compatriots on both sides of the strait.
"We oppose 'Taiwan independence' and recognize the '1992 Consensus.' That is an understanding that we stick to unswervingly," Lien said. "Sticking to the one-China principle is a sure thing and I have deep confidence in the prospects for cross-strait ties."
On issues concerning the Diaoyu Islands, Lien said Chinese living in Taiwan share the same feelings as their compatriots on the mainland. "Our stance on safeguarding the sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands is beyond doubt," he said.
On Tuesday, Jia also met with representatives from mainland and Taiwanese business and economic circles who have arrived in Nanjing for a cross-strait entrepreneur summit scheduled for Wednesday.
[h=1]Mainland, Taiwan should safeguard territory integrity together: top political advisor[/h]
NANJING, Sept. 18 (Xinhua) -- Top political advisor Jia Qinglin on Tuesday said both sides of the Taiwan Strait should safeguard the nation's territorial integrity, interests and dignity together through their own means.
Jia, a Standing Committee member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee, made the remarks while meeting with Lien Chan, honorary chairman of the Kuomintang (KMT) Party, in the city of Nanjing.
Japan's recent action regarding the Diaoyu Islands, an inherent part of Chinese territory since ancient times, has seriously violated China's territory sovereignty and hurt the feelings of Chinese compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, Jia said.
The Japanese government on Sept. 10 announced the "purchase" of part of the Diaoyu Islands, despite strong opposition by the Chinese side.
"Both sides of the strait should surpass their differences and work together to safeguard the nation's territorial integrity, interests and dignity through their own means," said Jia, chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference.
Tuesday marks the 81st anniversary of the "September 18 Incident," which directly preceded Japan's invasion of northeast China.
Describing it as an unforgettable day for the Chinese nation, Jia said China suffered the most in previous times, when it was weak and hounded by foreign countries.
"Now, Chinese people on both sides of the strait are embracing historical opportunities to achieve common prosperity and development and struggle together for the nation's rejuvenation," he said.
He said the CPC, KMT and both sides of the Taiwan Strait should continue to promote the peaceful development of cross-strait ties and join hands for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation on the basis of opposing "Taiwan independence" and sticking to the "1992 Consensus."
Lien said the peaceful development of cross-strait ties is the right path, adding that the two sides share a common goal -- to boost the welfare of compatriots on both sides of the strait.
"We oppose 'Taiwan independence' and recognize the '1992 Consensus.' That is an understanding that we stick to unswervingly," Lien said. "Sticking to the one-China principle is a sure thing and I have deep confidence in the prospects for cross-strait ties."
On issues concerning the Diaoyu Islands, Lien said Chinese living in Taiwan share the same feelings as their compatriots on the mainland. "Our stance on safeguarding the sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands is beyond doubt," he said.
On Tuesday, Jia also met with representatives from mainland and Taiwanese business and economic circles who have arrived in Nanjing for a cross-strait entrepreneur summit scheduled for Wednesday.
Re: 还我山河
[h=1]Taiwan media: Rising Diaoyu Islands tension flamed by Japan's right wing activists[/h]
Taiwan media has been closely following Japan’s so-called "purchase" of the Diaoyu Islands. The Taiwan United Daily News says the rising tension over the Diaoyu Islands is being flamed by Japan's right wing activists.
And the so-called transfer of administration from the United States to Japan in 1971 was illegal. The islands may not be a gift for Japan. If Japan continues to take its own course, the situation may become out of control.
Taiwan’s Central Daily News says all the various Taiwan parties share views on the issue. More than 40 percent of people in Taiwan agree the islands should be protected militarily.
The China Times says more than half of people in Taiwan support cross-straits cooperation to protect the Diaoyu Islands.
[h=1]Taiwan media: Rising Diaoyu Islands tension flamed by Japan's right wing activists[/h]
Taiwan media has been closely following Japan’s so-called "purchase" of the Diaoyu Islands. The Taiwan United Daily News says the rising tension over the Diaoyu Islands is being flamed by Japan's right wing activists.
And the so-called transfer of administration from the United States to Japan in 1971 was illegal. The islands may not be a gift for Japan. If Japan continues to take its own course, the situation may become out of control.
Taiwan’s Central Daily News says all the various Taiwan parties share views on the issue. More than 40 percent of people in Taiwan agree the islands should be protected militarily.
The China Times says more than half of people in Taiwan support cross-straits cooperation to protect the Diaoyu Islands.
Re: 还我山河
Japanese Companies will be heavily hit with this on going Spat.
Correct me if im wrong here, China makes for around 23pc and 20pc of Nissan and Honda global sales respectively, while Panasonic & Sharp is starting to gain strong sales there.
Japanese Companies will be heavily hit with this on going Spat.
Correct me if im wrong here, China makes for around 23pc and 20pc of Nissan and Honda global sales respectively, while Panasonic & Sharp is starting to gain strong sales there.
Re: 还我山河
http://www.skycitygallery.com/japan/diaohist.html
Japanese Militarism &
Diaoyutai (Senkaku) Island
- A Japanese Historian's View
by Kiyoshi Inoue
Professor of History department, Kyoto University, Japan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Proceeding from the Japanese people stand of opposition to militarism, one should reject the name Senkaku Islands, which was adopted by Japanese Militarism after seizing them from China. Use the only correct name in history, namely, the Tiaoyu (Diaoyutai) Island"
----------- Japanese historian Kiyoshi Inoue. For more info, refer to his 278 pages book "Senkaku Retto".
In June 2004, another Japanese professor Tadayoshi Murata of Yokohama National University, published "Senkaku Islands vs the Diaoyu Islands Dispute" (some info is here) and supports that "Since the Ming Dynasty, Chinese maps and documents of many kinds marked Diaoyu Islands, Huangwei Islands, Chiwei Islands as being lying within the territory of China" . What does the view of some Japanese scholars tell us ? . Small islands – Big problem: Senkaku/Diaoyu
Japan's false claim of its purported "discovery in 1884" of the Diaoyu Islands as uninhibited isles contradicts with the navigation map in its own 1783 historical document, Sankoku Tsuran Zusetsu, published by prominent scholar Hayashi Shihei clearly stating the area a part of China.
Professor Murata said, "We tend to take the opinion of the government, political parties and media as being the correct views and accept them readily; however, those opinions do not necessarily represent the truth. To us scholars, what is important is what is real, what is true, not the national interest; over this point, political parties and media have the same problem."
The islands which are being called the Senkaku Islands in Japan and to which the Japanese Government claims title have historically been definitely China's territory. As the victor in the 1894-95 war with Ching (China), Japan seized these islands along with Taiwan and the Penghu Islands and incorporated them into Okinawa Prefecture as Japanese territory. The Cairo Declaration jointly issued by China, the United States and British during World War II stipulates the return to China by Japan of all the territory she had stolen from China during and after the Japan-Ching war, including Taiwan and Manchuria. The Potsdam Proclamation issued by the allies stipulates that Japan must carry out the clauses of the Cairo Declaration. These islands have been automatically reverted to China as its territory just as Taiwan has been automatically returned to China from the time Japan unconditionally accepted the Cairo Declaration and the Posdam Proclamation and surrendered to the allies including China. It follows that these islands are territory of the People's Republic of China, the only authority over the entire China.
But in collusion with U.S. imperialism, the reactionary rulers and militarist forces of Japan are making a clamour that the Senkaku Islands are Japanese territory in an attempt to drag the Japanese people into the militairst, anti-China whirlwind. This big whirlwind is sure to become fiercer after the return to Japan of the so-called "administrative right over Okinawa" by the U.S. armed forces on May 15 this year. We who are truly striving for the independence of the Japanese nation, Japan-China friendship and peace in Asia must smash in good time this big conspiracy of the U.S.-Japanese reactionaries. As a weapon for use in this struggle, I will give a brief account of the history of the so-called Senkaku Islands. For detailed and special historical research, please refer to my article published in the February 1972 issue of Historical Research magazine.
The so-called Senkaku Islands were recorded in Chinese documents in the middle of the 16th century at the latest, under the names of Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyu Island, Diaoyu Tai), Huangwei Yu, etc. (Yu means islet). In 1532 when the emperor of the Ming Dynasty of China bestowed the title King Chungshan of Ryukyu on Shang Ching, the ruler of Ryukyu at that time, his envoy Chen Kan travelled between Foochow and Naha. According to the Records of the Imperial Mission to Ryukyu, Chen Kan's ship set sail from the mouth of the Minkiang River on the 8th of the 5th moon, 1532, on a south-southwest course towards Keelung of Taiwan. (According to the preface of Chen Kan's Records of the Imperial Mission to Ryukyu, his trip to Ryukyu was made in the 13th year of China Ching, i.e. 1534. - Ed.) It turned eastward leaning a litter to the north on the waters off Taiwan and passed by the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) on the 10th of the 5th moon. He wrote in his diary : On the 10th, the ship sailed swiftly with a strong south wind ..... the Pingchia Hill (now called Pengchia), Tiaoyu Yu (now called Diaoyutai), Huangmao Yu (now called Huangwei Yu) and Chih Yu (now called Chihwei Yu) were left behind ..... On the evening of the 11th, the Kumi Hill (now called Kume Island) was in sight. It belongs to Ryukyu. The aborigines (Ryukyu people) on board were elated, happy to be home."
An imperial envoy was first sent to Ryukyu by the Chinese emperor in 1372. Since then, ten imperial envoys had travelled between Foochow and Naha before Chen Kan. They took the same route as Chen Kan, heading for Keelung and the Pengchia, Tiaoyu (Diaoyu), Huangwei and Chihwei Islands respectively, arriving at the Kume Island and finally entering Naha Port through the Kerama Islands. (In their return trips, they sailed northward directly from the Kume Island without passing the Tiaoyu (Diaoyu) Islands.) Therefore, if the records by the imperial envoys before Chen Kan were available, they would surely have mentioned the Tiaoyu (Diaoyu) and other islands. But regrettably those records have been lost. Those by Chen Kan are the oldest in existence. From the absence of any explanatory notes on the Tiaoyu (Diaoyu) and other islands, it can be concluded that the locations of these islands had been known long beore, and that they had not only been given Chinese names, but had also been actually used as marks on navigation routes. What is particularly important is that in his records. Chen Kan described how he started form China's territory Foochow and passed by several Chinese islands, and not until he had arrived at the Kume Island did he write: "It belongs to Ryukyu". The records pointed out specifically that lying ahead of the Kume Island was Ryukyu. This clearly shows that the islands he passed by before reaching the Kume Island were not Ryukyu territory.
Kuo Ju-lin, the imperial envoy following Chen Kan, set sail from Foochow on the 29th of the 5th moon in 1561. In his Re-engraved Records of the Imperial Mission to Ryukyu, he wrote: "On the 1st of the intercalary 5th moon, we passed by Tiaoyu (Diaoyu) and arrived at Chih Yu on the 3rd. Chih Yu is a hill bordering on Ryukyu territory. Another day of favourable wind, the Kumi Hill (Kume Island) will be in sight". In other words, what Chen Kan had written - the area beyond the Kume Island was Ryukyu territory - was presented by Kuo Ju-lin in the descrition that Chihwei Yu was the boundary between the Ryukyu region and China's territory.
It is clear from the above two documents that Ryukyu territory began from the Kume Island, whereas the Chih Yu Island and the area west of it were China's territory. But Toshio Okuhara, Associate Professor of International Law of Kokushikan University, argued that the records of Imperial Envoys Chen Kan and Kuo Ju-lin only mentioned that Ryukyu territroy began from the Kume Island and the area they covered before reaching there did not belong to Ryukyu, but that the records did not say explicitly that Chihwei Yu and the area west of it were China's territory. Therefore, he held that they were res nullius or land without owner ("Title to the Senkaku Islands and the 'Ming Pao' Article" by Okuhara, Chugoku magazine, September 1971).
This is but to explain ancient Chinese writing by interpretation of international law of the modern times. It is sheer sophistry. True, the Imperial Envoys Chen Kan and Kuo Ju-lin had not written explicitly that all were Chinese territory as far as Chih Yu. But they set sail from China's Foochow, passed through waters off Taiwan's Keelung which self-evidently is Chinese territory, and then passed by Pengchia Yu which again self-evidently is also Chinese territory; and finally upon arriving at Chihwei Yu after passing by Tiaoyu (Diaoyu) and Huangwei, they wrote that it was the boundary with Ryukyu. Moreover, when they came in sight of the Kume Island they added that it belonged to Ryukyu. From the structural coherence of such Chinese writing, is it not explicitly clear that to them, from Taiwan and Pengchia to the Taioyu (Diaoyu), Huangwei, Chihwei and other islands to the east all were Chinese territory ?
Okuhara also argued that since the records of Imperial Envoys Chen Kan and Kuo Ju-lin are the oldest in existence and since there are no similar records by imperial envoys after them, it would be valueless to take such ancient records as evidence for current issues. This also is utterly groundless and runs counter to the facts. Among the records by imperial envoys after Chen and Kuo, the Chungshan Mission Records written by the Imperial Envoy Hsu Pao-kuang in the 58th year of Kang Hsi during the Ching Dynasty (1719) cited passages from A Geographic Guide in Outline written in 1708 by Cheng Shun Tse, the most renowned scholar of Ryukyu in his time, which described the navigation route from Foochow to Naha, and when referring to the Kume Island, called it "the Chen Hill at the southwest boder of Ryukyu." Chen means garrisoning the state frontier or a village boder.
The Chungshan Mission Records also dealt in detail with the territory of Ryukyu, which comprised the 36 islands of Ryukyu including the Okinawa Island. Chihwei Yu and the area west of the it were not included. Furthmore, at the end of the explanatory notes on the Ishigaki and eight neighbouring islands of the Yaeyama Archipelago, it was written that the eight islands were "the southwestern most boundary of Ryukyu" (the Iriomote Island of the Yaeyama group among the Ryukyu Islands being the nearest to the Taioyu (Daioyu) Island).
The Chungshan Mission Records were based on writings by the great scholar Cheng Shun Tse and many other Ryukyu people as well as talks between Hsu Pao-kuang and high-ranking officials of the court of the Ryukyu king. Therefore, the above-mentioned descriptions of the Kume Island and Yaeyama Islands are actually the views not only of the Chinese but also of the Ryukyu people at that time.
Noteworthy is a description from the Records of the Imperial Mission to Ryukyu written in 1683 by Wang Chi, and imperial envoy before Hsu Pao-kuang. It said that when the ship passed beyond Chihwei Yu, a sacrificial ceremony was held to pray for safety on the sea. That area was referred to as chiao (outskirts) or kou (trough) and was clearly defined as the "boundary between China and foreigh land." Here, Okuhara's wish was met; it was explicitly written down as the boundary between China and Ryukyu.
Concluding from the above-mentioned, Ryukyu territroy began from the Kume Island and the area east of it, whereas Chihwei Yu and the Huangwei Yu and Tiaoyu Yu (Diaoyutai) to the west were Chinese territory. Obviously, this was defined in clear terms after the middle of the 16th century at the latest. There are no records or documents whatsoever by the Ryukyu side or the Japanese expressing disagreement or doubt. Moreover, there are not even legends, not to say documents about contacts of the Ryukyu people with the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) and Huangwei Yu in ancient times. Sailing from Ryukyu to the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) was particularly difficult because it was against the wind and the tide. In the middle of the 19th century, that is, the closing years of Japan's feudal period, the Ryukyu people knew the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) as Yokon (or Yokun), the Huangwei Yu as "Kubashima", and the Chihwei Yu as "Kumesekishima". This was confirmed by the records of the last Chinese imperial envoy. These in no way affect the title to these territories. The map and explanations about Ryukyu Kingdom in the book General Illustrations of Three Countries by Shihei Hayashi were completely based on the Chungshan Mission Records. The Chungshan Mission Records had found their way to Japan long ago and there was even a Japanese edition. This document was the most comprehensive and authoritative source of knowledge about Ryukyu for the Japanese people in the late Edo period.
After the Meiji Reform, in the period 1872-79 (from the 5th to the 12th year of Meiji), the Tenno government forcibly carried out the so-called "Ryukyu disposal", conquered the centuries-old Ryukyu Kingdom, and turned this former colony of the feudal lord Shimazu into a colony of the Tenno system under the name "Okinawa Prefecture". Naturally, the area of Okinawa Prefecture did not exceed the territorial limit of the former Ryukyu Kingdom.
The year when Ryukyu was turned into Okinawa Prefecture was also the year when the conflict between the Ching government of China and Japan concerning the title to these territories reached a climax. Shimazu conquered the Ryukyu in 1609 and turned it into a colonial dependency. But all the successive kings of Ryukyu pledged allegiance to the Chinese emperor as vassal, first to the emperors of the Ming Dynasty, then to those of the Ching Dynasty, and accepted titles from them. From the point of view of the Ching Dynasty of China, the whole Ryukyu was its dependency and claimed title to it against Japan's claim.
As to the dispute between Japan and the Ching government concerning the title to Ryukyu, the democratic revolutionaries of Japan at that time held that it should be decided by the Ryukyu people themselves whether Ryukyu should belong to Japan or to Ching (China), or became independent. If the Ryukyu people wanted independence, Japan should be the first to recognize and support it, and should tell the world at large the principle that big countries should not encroach on small countries. They declared that this was also the road for Japan to win full independence from the Western powers. Isn't this an idea that we should take over and develope today ?
We still leave this aside for the moment. Former U.S. President Ulysses S. Grant had in a private capacity mediated negotiations between Japan and the Ching government on the dispute. During the negotiations, the Chinese side put forward a formula to divide Ryukyu into three parts, stipulating the Amami Islands (which also belonged to the Ryukyu Kingdom before Shimazu conquered Ryukyu) as Japanese territory; Okinawa and its surrounding islands as the territory of an independent Ryukyu Kingdom; and the Miyako and Yaeyama Islands in the south as Chinese territory. As a counter-measure, the Japanese side proposed to divide Ryukyu into two parts: from the Okinawa Islands and to the north were to be Japanese territory and the Miyako-Yaeyama Islands Chinese territory. Since the Tiaoyu Islands (Diaoyutai) were beyond Ryukyu territory, they naturally were not treated as objects of negotiation either in Japan's or in the Ching government's proposal.
The Ching government finally compromised and in September 1880 the plenipotentiaries of Japan and the Ching government signed a treaty dividing Ryukyu into two parts in accordance with the Japanese formula. However, the Ching emperor refused to approved the treaty and instructed his government to continue the negotiations with Japan. The Japanese side then broke off the negotiations. In 1882 when Shinichiro Takezoe assumed office as consul in Tientsin, he resumed negotiations with the Ching government on the partition of Ryukyu, but no agreement was reached. The question was thus shelved by the Japanese and Ching governments until the Japan-Ching war broke out.
In other words, even after the Meijin Reform, until the outbreak of the Japan-Ching war, Japan had not even thought of claiming title to the Tiaoyu (Diaoyutai) and other islands or challenging Ching's title to the islands. It goes without saying that all people in the world regarded the islands as territory of Ching (China).
During that time, in 1884 (the 17th year of Meiji), Tatsushiro Koga, a native of Fukuoka Prefecture who lived in Naha since 1879 and made a living by catching and exporting marine products, found innumerable albatrosses on the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) and sent his employees there to collect albatross feathers on the island and marine products in its vicinity. His business grew from year to year. One month in 1894, the year when the Japan-Ching war broke out, he applied to the Okinawa prefectural government for a lease of land to develope his business on the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai). But according to reports published in the Okinawa Mainichi Shimbun (January 1 to 9, 1910), which lauded the merits of Koga, the prefectural government did not grant his application because "it was not clear at the time whether the island belonged to the (Japanese) empire". So Koga directly applied to the minister of the interior and the minister of agriculture and commerce in Toyko. In an interview with the ministers, he gave them an account of the island and begged their approval. His request was again turned down on the grounds that the title to the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) was "uncertain".
As the (Japan-Ching) war of 27th-28th year of Meiji had ended and Taiwan was incorporated into the (Japanese) empire, and as the Senkaku Islands were proclaimed our territory by Imperial Decree No. 13 in the 29th year of Meiji (1896)", Koga immediately applied to the Okinawa prefectural governor again for a lease of land. It was only in Septermber of the same year that his request was approved. (Okinawa Mainichi Shimbun)
This is important, decisive information. Whether Koga's application to the Okinawa prefectural and central governments for a lease of the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) was made before or after the outbreak of the 1894 Japan-Ching war remains inknown, but both the prefectural and central governments had declared that title to that island was uncertain. Had the Japanese Government regarded the island as res nullius in accordance with international law, there would have been no reason why it should not have promptly approved Koga's application. The Japanese Government was not in a position to approve Koga's application precisely because the island was clearly Ching territory, not a piece of land the title to which was uncertain.
As victor in the Japan-Ching war, Japan seized the Penghu Islands, Taiwan and other islands appertaining to it from Ching. At the same time, she also regarded as Japanese territory the Tiaoyu (Diaoyu), Huangwei, Chihwei and other islands - Chinese territory linking Taiwan and Ryukyu.
Despite the allegation that the Senkaku Islands had become Japanese territory by virtue of the 1896 (29th year of Meiji) Imperial Decree No. 13 as mentioned above, the fact remains that this imperial decree was issued on March 5 with regard to the formation of various districts of Okinawa Prefecture and said nothing about incorporating the Tiaoyu (Diaoyutai) and other islands into Okinawa Prefecture. The "Views Concerning the Title to the Senkaku Islands and Sovereign Right Over the Development of Resources of the Continental Shelf" made public by the Ryukyu civil government in Semptember 1970 said that these islands "have been made Japanese territory on April 1 in the 29th year of Meiji under the administration of Ishigaki Village, Yaeyama District, Okinawa Prefecture, after the cabinet decision of January 14 of the 28th year of Meiji and on the basis of Imperial Decree No. 13". But the Imperial Decree No. 13 is just as it is described above. Probably, the Tiaoyu (Diaoyutai) and other islands were incorporated into Ishigaki Village of Yaeyama District on April 1 in accordance with an order issued by the interior minister to change the boundary of the Yaeyama District, an order based on Article 2 of the March 5 imperial decree.
How was the afore-mentioned January 14, 1895 cabinet decision worded ? And why was it enforced 10 months after the Japan-Ching war had ended, the peace treaty had become effective (May 1895) and Japan had actually taken possession of Taiwan and other islands (June) ? I have not yet completed my investigations into these problems. But one thing perfectly clear now is that, as recorded in the afore-said Okinawa Mainichi Shimbun, the Tiaoyu (Diaoyutai) and other islands were regarded as Japanese territory only after Japan had seized Taiwan and other places from Ching through the Japan-Ching war as part of a series of territories wrested from Ching.
Four years afterwards, that is, 1900, Tsune Kuroiwa, a teacher of the Okinawa Prefecture Normal School, explored the Tiaoyu Islands (Diaoyutai). He gave the Tiaoyu (Diaoyutai) and Chihwei Islands and the group of reefs between them the name of Senkaku Islands, and published his report under the title of "Exploration of the Senkaku Islands" in the 140-141 issues of the 12th volume of the Geographic Magazine. It was only since then that these islands have been called the Senkaku Islands by Japan. The group of reefs between the Tiaoyu (Diaoyutai) and Huangwei Islands was called the Pinnacle Group in British naval and navigation charts at that time, a name adopted after the contour of the group. This British name was translated as the "Sento Islands" in the navigation charts of the Japanese navy. It was also translated by some as "Senkaku Islands". It was from this enlightenment that Kuroiwa had chosen the name. As the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) also looks like a rocky hill above the sea, it was given together with the Sento Islands and the Huangwei Yu, the general name of the Senkaku Islands.
Noteworthy here is that the Senkaku Islands, named by Kuroiwa and now claimed by the Japanese Government to be Japanese territory, do not include the Chihwei Yu. Probably the Japanese Government considers that the point at issue with China lies in the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) and intends to treat the inclusion of the Chihwei Yu in Japanese territory as self-evident. Thus, it tries to get away with it by mentioning only the "Senkaku Islands" represented by the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) while keeping quiet about the Chihwei Yu.
But geographically, the Chihwei Yu is one of the islands such as the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) and the Huangwei Yu on the verge of the Chinese continental shelf. As mentioned in detail above, it was recognized as Chinese territory simultaneously with the Tiaoyu (Diaoyu) and other islands in history and this was recorded in documents. Therefore, one should not be concerned only about what Japan calls the "Senkaku Islands" but forget the Chihwei Yu.
Proceeding from the Japanese people stand of opposition to militarism, one should reject the name Senkaku Islands, which was adopted by Japanese militarism after seizing them from China, and use the only correct name in history, namely, the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) or the Tiaoyu (Diaoyu) Archipelago represented by the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) and including Chihwei Yu to the east and all the islands in between. This is the only correct name.
The history of the Tiaoyu Islands (Diaoyutai) being as the above-mentioned, it follows that the People's Republic of China alone has title to them, as pointed out at the beginning of this article. There can be no other historical conclusion !
http://www.skycitygallery.com/japan/diaohist.html
Japanese Militarism &
Diaoyutai (Senkaku) Island
- A Japanese Historian's View
by Kiyoshi Inoue
Professor of History department, Kyoto University, Japan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Proceeding from the Japanese people stand of opposition to militarism, one should reject the name Senkaku Islands, which was adopted by Japanese Militarism after seizing them from China. Use the only correct name in history, namely, the Tiaoyu (Diaoyutai) Island"
----------- Japanese historian Kiyoshi Inoue. For more info, refer to his 278 pages book "Senkaku Retto".
In June 2004, another Japanese professor Tadayoshi Murata of Yokohama National University, published "Senkaku Islands vs the Diaoyu Islands Dispute" (some info is here) and supports that "Since the Ming Dynasty, Chinese maps and documents of many kinds marked Diaoyu Islands, Huangwei Islands, Chiwei Islands as being lying within the territory of China" . What does the view of some Japanese scholars tell us ? . Small islands – Big problem: Senkaku/Diaoyu
Japan's false claim of its purported "discovery in 1884" of the Diaoyu Islands as uninhibited isles contradicts with the navigation map in its own 1783 historical document, Sankoku Tsuran Zusetsu, published by prominent scholar Hayashi Shihei clearly stating the area a part of China.
Professor Murata said, "We tend to take the opinion of the government, political parties and media as being the correct views and accept them readily; however, those opinions do not necessarily represent the truth. To us scholars, what is important is what is real, what is true, not the national interest; over this point, political parties and media have the same problem."
The islands which are being called the Senkaku Islands in Japan and to which the Japanese Government claims title have historically been definitely China's territory. As the victor in the 1894-95 war with Ching (China), Japan seized these islands along with Taiwan and the Penghu Islands and incorporated them into Okinawa Prefecture as Japanese territory. The Cairo Declaration jointly issued by China, the United States and British during World War II stipulates the return to China by Japan of all the territory she had stolen from China during and after the Japan-Ching war, including Taiwan and Manchuria. The Potsdam Proclamation issued by the allies stipulates that Japan must carry out the clauses of the Cairo Declaration. These islands have been automatically reverted to China as its territory just as Taiwan has been automatically returned to China from the time Japan unconditionally accepted the Cairo Declaration and the Posdam Proclamation and surrendered to the allies including China. It follows that these islands are territory of the People's Republic of China, the only authority over the entire China.
But in collusion with U.S. imperialism, the reactionary rulers and militarist forces of Japan are making a clamour that the Senkaku Islands are Japanese territory in an attempt to drag the Japanese people into the militairst, anti-China whirlwind. This big whirlwind is sure to become fiercer after the return to Japan of the so-called "administrative right over Okinawa" by the U.S. armed forces on May 15 this year. We who are truly striving for the independence of the Japanese nation, Japan-China friendship and peace in Asia must smash in good time this big conspiracy of the U.S.-Japanese reactionaries. As a weapon for use in this struggle, I will give a brief account of the history of the so-called Senkaku Islands. For detailed and special historical research, please refer to my article published in the February 1972 issue of Historical Research magazine.
The so-called Senkaku Islands were recorded in Chinese documents in the middle of the 16th century at the latest, under the names of Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyu Island, Diaoyu Tai), Huangwei Yu, etc. (Yu means islet). In 1532 when the emperor of the Ming Dynasty of China bestowed the title King Chungshan of Ryukyu on Shang Ching, the ruler of Ryukyu at that time, his envoy Chen Kan travelled between Foochow and Naha. According to the Records of the Imperial Mission to Ryukyu, Chen Kan's ship set sail from the mouth of the Minkiang River on the 8th of the 5th moon, 1532, on a south-southwest course towards Keelung of Taiwan. (According to the preface of Chen Kan's Records of the Imperial Mission to Ryukyu, his trip to Ryukyu was made in the 13th year of China Ching, i.e. 1534. - Ed.) It turned eastward leaning a litter to the north on the waters off Taiwan and passed by the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) on the 10th of the 5th moon. He wrote in his diary : On the 10th, the ship sailed swiftly with a strong south wind ..... the Pingchia Hill (now called Pengchia), Tiaoyu Yu (now called Diaoyutai), Huangmao Yu (now called Huangwei Yu) and Chih Yu (now called Chihwei Yu) were left behind ..... On the evening of the 11th, the Kumi Hill (now called Kume Island) was in sight. It belongs to Ryukyu. The aborigines (Ryukyu people) on board were elated, happy to be home."
An imperial envoy was first sent to Ryukyu by the Chinese emperor in 1372. Since then, ten imperial envoys had travelled between Foochow and Naha before Chen Kan. They took the same route as Chen Kan, heading for Keelung and the Pengchia, Tiaoyu (Diaoyu), Huangwei and Chihwei Islands respectively, arriving at the Kume Island and finally entering Naha Port through the Kerama Islands. (In their return trips, they sailed northward directly from the Kume Island without passing the Tiaoyu (Diaoyu) Islands.) Therefore, if the records by the imperial envoys before Chen Kan were available, they would surely have mentioned the Tiaoyu (Diaoyu) and other islands. But regrettably those records have been lost. Those by Chen Kan are the oldest in existence. From the absence of any explanatory notes on the Tiaoyu (Diaoyu) and other islands, it can be concluded that the locations of these islands had been known long beore, and that they had not only been given Chinese names, but had also been actually used as marks on navigation routes. What is particularly important is that in his records. Chen Kan described how he started form China's territory Foochow and passed by several Chinese islands, and not until he had arrived at the Kume Island did he write: "It belongs to Ryukyu". The records pointed out specifically that lying ahead of the Kume Island was Ryukyu. This clearly shows that the islands he passed by before reaching the Kume Island were not Ryukyu territory.
Kuo Ju-lin, the imperial envoy following Chen Kan, set sail from Foochow on the 29th of the 5th moon in 1561. In his Re-engraved Records of the Imperial Mission to Ryukyu, he wrote: "On the 1st of the intercalary 5th moon, we passed by Tiaoyu (Diaoyu) and arrived at Chih Yu on the 3rd. Chih Yu is a hill bordering on Ryukyu territory. Another day of favourable wind, the Kumi Hill (Kume Island) will be in sight". In other words, what Chen Kan had written - the area beyond the Kume Island was Ryukyu territory - was presented by Kuo Ju-lin in the descrition that Chihwei Yu was the boundary between the Ryukyu region and China's territory.
It is clear from the above two documents that Ryukyu territory began from the Kume Island, whereas the Chih Yu Island and the area west of it were China's territory. But Toshio Okuhara, Associate Professor of International Law of Kokushikan University, argued that the records of Imperial Envoys Chen Kan and Kuo Ju-lin only mentioned that Ryukyu territroy began from the Kume Island and the area they covered before reaching there did not belong to Ryukyu, but that the records did not say explicitly that Chihwei Yu and the area west of it were China's territory. Therefore, he held that they were res nullius or land without owner ("Title to the Senkaku Islands and the 'Ming Pao' Article" by Okuhara, Chugoku magazine, September 1971).
This is but to explain ancient Chinese writing by interpretation of international law of the modern times. It is sheer sophistry. True, the Imperial Envoys Chen Kan and Kuo Ju-lin had not written explicitly that all were Chinese territory as far as Chih Yu. But they set sail from China's Foochow, passed through waters off Taiwan's Keelung which self-evidently is Chinese territory, and then passed by Pengchia Yu which again self-evidently is also Chinese territory; and finally upon arriving at Chihwei Yu after passing by Tiaoyu (Diaoyu) and Huangwei, they wrote that it was the boundary with Ryukyu. Moreover, when they came in sight of the Kume Island they added that it belonged to Ryukyu. From the structural coherence of such Chinese writing, is it not explicitly clear that to them, from Taiwan and Pengchia to the Taioyu (Diaoyu), Huangwei, Chihwei and other islands to the east all were Chinese territory ?
Okuhara also argued that since the records of Imperial Envoys Chen Kan and Kuo Ju-lin are the oldest in existence and since there are no similar records by imperial envoys after them, it would be valueless to take such ancient records as evidence for current issues. This also is utterly groundless and runs counter to the facts. Among the records by imperial envoys after Chen and Kuo, the Chungshan Mission Records written by the Imperial Envoy Hsu Pao-kuang in the 58th year of Kang Hsi during the Ching Dynasty (1719) cited passages from A Geographic Guide in Outline written in 1708 by Cheng Shun Tse, the most renowned scholar of Ryukyu in his time, which described the navigation route from Foochow to Naha, and when referring to the Kume Island, called it "the Chen Hill at the southwest boder of Ryukyu." Chen means garrisoning the state frontier or a village boder.
The Chungshan Mission Records also dealt in detail with the territory of Ryukyu, which comprised the 36 islands of Ryukyu including the Okinawa Island. Chihwei Yu and the area west of the it were not included. Furthmore, at the end of the explanatory notes on the Ishigaki and eight neighbouring islands of the Yaeyama Archipelago, it was written that the eight islands were "the southwestern most boundary of Ryukyu" (the Iriomote Island of the Yaeyama group among the Ryukyu Islands being the nearest to the Taioyu (Daioyu) Island).
The Chungshan Mission Records were based on writings by the great scholar Cheng Shun Tse and many other Ryukyu people as well as talks between Hsu Pao-kuang and high-ranking officials of the court of the Ryukyu king. Therefore, the above-mentioned descriptions of the Kume Island and Yaeyama Islands are actually the views not only of the Chinese but also of the Ryukyu people at that time.
Noteworthy is a description from the Records of the Imperial Mission to Ryukyu written in 1683 by Wang Chi, and imperial envoy before Hsu Pao-kuang. It said that when the ship passed beyond Chihwei Yu, a sacrificial ceremony was held to pray for safety on the sea. That area was referred to as chiao (outskirts) or kou (trough) and was clearly defined as the "boundary between China and foreigh land." Here, Okuhara's wish was met; it was explicitly written down as the boundary between China and Ryukyu.
Concluding from the above-mentioned, Ryukyu territroy began from the Kume Island and the area east of it, whereas Chihwei Yu and the Huangwei Yu and Tiaoyu Yu (Diaoyutai) to the west were Chinese territory. Obviously, this was defined in clear terms after the middle of the 16th century at the latest. There are no records or documents whatsoever by the Ryukyu side or the Japanese expressing disagreement or doubt. Moreover, there are not even legends, not to say documents about contacts of the Ryukyu people with the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) and Huangwei Yu in ancient times. Sailing from Ryukyu to the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) was particularly difficult because it was against the wind and the tide. In the middle of the 19th century, that is, the closing years of Japan's feudal period, the Ryukyu people knew the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) as Yokon (or Yokun), the Huangwei Yu as "Kubashima", and the Chihwei Yu as "Kumesekishima". This was confirmed by the records of the last Chinese imperial envoy. These in no way affect the title to these territories. The map and explanations about Ryukyu Kingdom in the book General Illustrations of Three Countries by Shihei Hayashi were completely based on the Chungshan Mission Records. The Chungshan Mission Records had found their way to Japan long ago and there was even a Japanese edition. This document was the most comprehensive and authoritative source of knowledge about Ryukyu for the Japanese people in the late Edo period.
After the Meiji Reform, in the period 1872-79 (from the 5th to the 12th year of Meiji), the Tenno government forcibly carried out the so-called "Ryukyu disposal", conquered the centuries-old Ryukyu Kingdom, and turned this former colony of the feudal lord Shimazu into a colony of the Tenno system under the name "Okinawa Prefecture". Naturally, the area of Okinawa Prefecture did not exceed the territorial limit of the former Ryukyu Kingdom.
The year when Ryukyu was turned into Okinawa Prefecture was also the year when the conflict between the Ching government of China and Japan concerning the title to these territories reached a climax. Shimazu conquered the Ryukyu in 1609 and turned it into a colonial dependency. But all the successive kings of Ryukyu pledged allegiance to the Chinese emperor as vassal, first to the emperors of the Ming Dynasty, then to those of the Ching Dynasty, and accepted titles from them. From the point of view of the Ching Dynasty of China, the whole Ryukyu was its dependency and claimed title to it against Japan's claim.
As to the dispute between Japan and the Ching government concerning the title to Ryukyu, the democratic revolutionaries of Japan at that time held that it should be decided by the Ryukyu people themselves whether Ryukyu should belong to Japan or to Ching (China), or became independent. If the Ryukyu people wanted independence, Japan should be the first to recognize and support it, and should tell the world at large the principle that big countries should not encroach on small countries. They declared that this was also the road for Japan to win full independence from the Western powers. Isn't this an idea that we should take over and develope today ?
We still leave this aside for the moment. Former U.S. President Ulysses S. Grant had in a private capacity mediated negotiations between Japan and the Ching government on the dispute. During the negotiations, the Chinese side put forward a formula to divide Ryukyu into three parts, stipulating the Amami Islands (which also belonged to the Ryukyu Kingdom before Shimazu conquered Ryukyu) as Japanese territory; Okinawa and its surrounding islands as the territory of an independent Ryukyu Kingdom; and the Miyako and Yaeyama Islands in the south as Chinese territory. As a counter-measure, the Japanese side proposed to divide Ryukyu into two parts: from the Okinawa Islands and to the north were to be Japanese territory and the Miyako-Yaeyama Islands Chinese territory. Since the Tiaoyu Islands (Diaoyutai) were beyond Ryukyu territory, they naturally were not treated as objects of negotiation either in Japan's or in the Ching government's proposal.
The Ching government finally compromised and in September 1880 the plenipotentiaries of Japan and the Ching government signed a treaty dividing Ryukyu into two parts in accordance with the Japanese formula. However, the Ching emperor refused to approved the treaty and instructed his government to continue the negotiations with Japan. The Japanese side then broke off the negotiations. In 1882 when Shinichiro Takezoe assumed office as consul in Tientsin, he resumed negotiations with the Ching government on the partition of Ryukyu, but no agreement was reached. The question was thus shelved by the Japanese and Ching governments until the Japan-Ching war broke out.
In other words, even after the Meijin Reform, until the outbreak of the Japan-Ching war, Japan had not even thought of claiming title to the Tiaoyu (Diaoyutai) and other islands or challenging Ching's title to the islands. It goes without saying that all people in the world regarded the islands as territory of Ching (China).
During that time, in 1884 (the 17th year of Meiji), Tatsushiro Koga, a native of Fukuoka Prefecture who lived in Naha since 1879 and made a living by catching and exporting marine products, found innumerable albatrosses on the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) and sent his employees there to collect albatross feathers on the island and marine products in its vicinity. His business grew from year to year. One month in 1894, the year when the Japan-Ching war broke out, he applied to the Okinawa prefectural government for a lease of land to develope his business on the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai). But according to reports published in the Okinawa Mainichi Shimbun (January 1 to 9, 1910), which lauded the merits of Koga, the prefectural government did not grant his application because "it was not clear at the time whether the island belonged to the (Japanese) empire". So Koga directly applied to the minister of the interior and the minister of agriculture and commerce in Toyko. In an interview with the ministers, he gave them an account of the island and begged their approval. His request was again turned down on the grounds that the title to the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) was "uncertain".
As the (Japan-Ching) war of 27th-28th year of Meiji had ended and Taiwan was incorporated into the (Japanese) empire, and as the Senkaku Islands were proclaimed our territory by Imperial Decree No. 13 in the 29th year of Meiji (1896)", Koga immediately applied to the Okinawa prefectural governor again for a lease of land. It was only in Septermber of the same year that his request was approved. (Okinawa Mainichi Shimbun)
This is important, decisive information. Whether Koga's application to the Okinawa prefectural and central governments for a lease of the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) was made before or after the outbreak of the 1894 Japan-Ching war remains inknown, but both the prefectural and central governments had declared that title to that island was uncertain. Had the Japanese Government regarded the island as res nullius in accordance with international law, there would have been no reason why it should not have promptly approved Koga's application. The Japanese Government was not in a position to approve Koga's application precisely because the island was clearly Ching territory, not a piece of land the title to which was uncertain.
As victor in the Japan-Ching war, Japan seized the Penghu Islands, Taiwan and other islands appertaining to it from Ching. At the same time, she also regarded as Japanese territory the Tiaoyu (Diaoyu), Huangwei, Chihwei and other islands - Chinese territory linking Taiwan and Ryukyu.
Despite the allegation that the Senkaku Islands had become Japanese territory by virtue of the 1896 (29th year of Meiji) Imperial Decree No. 13 as mentioned above, the fact remains that this imperial decree was issued on March 5 with regard to the formation of various districts of Okinawa Prefecture and said nothing about incorporating the Tiaoyu (Diaoyutai) and other islands into Okinawa Prefecture. The "Views Concerning the Title to the Senkaku Islands and Sovereign Right Over the Development of Resources of the Continental Shelf" made public by the Ryukyu civil government in Semptember 1970 said that these islands "have been made Japanese territory on April 1 in the 29th year of Meiji under the administration of Ishigaki Village, Yaeyama District, Okinawa Prefecture, after the cabinet decision of January 14 of the 28th year of Meiji and on the basis of Imperial Decree No. 13". But the Imperial Decree No. 13 is just as it is described above. Probably, the Tiaoyu (Diaoyutai) and other islands were incorporated into Ishigaki Village of Yaeyama District on April 1 in accordance with an order issued by the interior minister to change the boundary of the Yaeyama District, an order based on Article 2 of the March 5 imperial decree.
How was the afore-mentioned January 14, 1895 cabinet decision worded ? And why was it enforced 10 months after the Japan-Ching war had ended, the peace treaty had become effective (May 1895) and Japan had actually taken possession of Taiwan and other islands (June) ? I have not yet completed my investigations into these problems. But one thing perfectly clear now is that, as recorded in the afore-said Okinawa Mainichi Shimbun, the Tiaoyu (Diaoyutai) and other islands were regarded as Japanese territory only after Japan had seized Taiwan and other places from Ching through the Japan-Ching war as part of a series of territories wrested from Ching.
Four years afterwards, that is, 1900, Tsune Kuroiwa, a teacher of the Okinawa Prefecture Normal School, explored the Tiaoyu Islands (Diaoyutai). He gave the Tiaoyu (Diaoyutai) and Chihwei Islands and the group of reefs between them the name of Senkaku Islands, and published his report under the title of "Exploration of the Senkaku Islands" in the 140-141 issues of the 12th volume of the Geographic Magazine. It was only since then that these islands have been called the Senkaku Islands by Japan. The group of reefs between the Tiaoyu (Diaoyutai) and Huangwei Islands was called the Pinnacle Group in British naval and navigation charts at that time, a name adopted after the contour of the group. This British name was translated as the "Sento Islands" in the navigation charts of the Japanese navy. It was also translated by some as "Senkaku Islands". It was from this enlightenment that Kuroiwa had chosen the name. As the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) also looks like a rocky hill above the sea, it was given together with the Sento Islands and the Huangwei Yu, the general name of the Senkaku Islands.
Noteworthy here is that the Senkaku Islands, named by Kuroiwa and now claimed by the Japanese Government to be Japanese territory, do not include the Chihwei Yu. Probably the Japanese Government considers that the point at issue with China lies in the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) and intends to treat the inclusion of the Chihwei Yu in Japanese territory as self-evident. Thus, it tries to get away with it by mentioning only the "Senkaku Islands" represented by the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) while keeping quiet about the Chihwei Yu.
But geographically, the Chihwei Yu is one of the islands such as the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) and the Huangwei Yu on the verge of the Chinese continental shelf. As mentioned in detail above, it was recognized as Chinese territory simultaneously with the Tiaoyu (Diaoyu) and other islands in history and this was recorded in documents. Therefore, one should not be concerned only about what Japan calls the "Senkaku Islands" but forget the Chihwei Yu.
Proceeding from the Japanese people stand of opposition to militarism, one should reject the name Senkaku Islands, which was adopted by Japanese militarism after seizing them from China, and use the only correct name in history, namely, the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) or the Tiaoyu (Diaoyu) Archipelago represented by the Tiaoyu Island (Diaoyutai) and including Chihwei Yu to the east and all the islands in between. This is the only correct name.
The history of the Tiaoyu Islands (Diaoyutai) being as the above-mentioned, it follows that the People's Republic of China alone has title to them, as pointed out at the beginning of this article. There can be no other historical conclusion !
Re: 还我山河
Ho sei liao! Jay Chou, Chow Yun Fatt, Donnie Yen all protesting ... just star power and kung fu alone will nuke the Japs!
Chinese actors speak publicly in condemning Japan over islands dispute
By Adam Westlake / September 18, 2012 / 1 Comment
Several prominent Chinese celebrities have made public statements in support of their nation’s anti-Japanese sentiment and of China’s claims over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands. On September 17th, the Actor Committee of China Radio and Television Association announced its full support for the Beijing government and their threats of taking action against Japan. It’s always nice to see those with public prominence fanning the flames of petty nationalism.
The nonprofit Chinese organization is led by Tang Guoqiang, a renown actor, and consists of roughly 260 others from mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Among the other members include Chow Yun-fat, Donnie Yen, Jay Chow, Chow Wah Kin, and Li Bingbing, who recently turned down a Tokyo red-carpet premiere for a movie she was in to show support for her country.
Echoing recent statements from the Chinese government about Japan being responsible for the recent turmoil, the acting committee said that the Japanese attempt to nationalize the disputed territory by purchasing it was not only a provocation, but a violation of Chinese sovereignty. It added that Japan’s actions were not only threatening diplomatic relations between the two countries, but also harmful to world peace. The Chinese government also has the organization’s full support in protecting their territory.
Ho sei liao! Jay Chou, Chow Yun Fatt, Donnie Yen all protesting ... just star power and kung fu alone will nuke the Japs!
Chinese actors speak publicly in condemning Japan over islands dispute
By Adam Westlake / September 18, 2012 / 1 Comment
Several prominent Chinese celebrities have made public statements in support of their nation’s anti-Japanese sentiment and of China’s claims over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands. On September 17th, the Actor Committee of China Radio and Television Association announced its full support for the Beijing government and their threats of taking action against Japan. It’s always nice to see those with public prominence fanning the flames of petty nationalism.
The nonprofit Chinese organization is led by Tang Guoqiang, a renown actor, and consists of roughly 260 others from mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Among the other members include Chow Yun-fat, Donnie Yen, Jay Chow, Chow Wah Kin, and Li Bingbing, who recently turned down a Tokyo red-carpet premiere for a movie she was in to show support for her country.
Echoing recent statements from the Chinese government about Japan being responsible for the recent turmoil, the acting committee said that the Japanese attempt to nationalize the disputed territory by purchasing it was not only a provocation, but a violation of Chinese sovereignty. It added that Japan’s actions were not only threatening diplomatic relations between the two countries, but also harmful to world peace. The Chinese government also has the organization’s full support in protecting their territory.
Last edited:
Re: 还我山河
[h=1]Japan attempts to tamper history through Diaoyu Islands "purchase": German expert[/h] 09-19-2012 01:27 BJT
BERLIN, Sept. 18 (Xinhua) -- Japan's announced "purchase" of the Diaoyu Islandsis an attempt to tamper territorial history, a German sinologist said Tuesday.
Dr. Ingo Nentwig, a sinologist and ethnologist, wrote in an article published in the German daily Junge Welt that Japan occupied China's Diaoyu Islands in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894 -1895 and brought Taiwan and the Penghu Islands under its colonial rule through the imposed Treaty of Shimonoseki.
After World War II, Japan should have returned all the territories that it had usurped since the Sino-Japanese War to China based on the Cairo Declaration in 1943 and the Potsdam Declaration in 1945, both of which defined the terms for Japan's surrender, Nentwig said.
Although Taiwan and the Penghu Islands did go back into the arms of China afterwards, the Diaoyu Islands, together with Okinawa, remained occupied by the United States, according to the so-called Treaty of San Francisco in 1951.
However, China lodged an immediate protest against the 1951 treaty since it was not involved in the negotiations, Nentwig said.
"Therefore, the continuing control of the Diaoyu islands within the framework of the U.S. occupation was invalid under international law," the expert said. "As Washington 'returned' Okinawa and the Diaoyu islands to Japan in May 1972, China immediately protested against this illegal act."
Nentwig said that since last year, the "islands question" has become a card in Japan's domestic political fighting.
The Japanese government announced the "purchase" of Diaoyu Island and its affiliated Nan Xiaodao and Bei Xiaodao on Sept. 11, forcing China to take measures to protect its sovereignty, he said.
"It is clear that Japan has made an attempt to tamper the territorial results of World War II," Nentwig said.
"The memory of the aggression of Japanese militarism as Axis power is still fresh to many people in East and Southeast Asia, and it is strengthened in particular as many Japanese politicians, including leaders, showed little insight into their own history and even deny their war crimes in public," he said.
"Today we are witnessing a resurgence of aggressive arrogance of Japan, which stirs up bad memories of all its neighbors," he said.
[h=1]Japan attempts to tamper history through Diaoyu Islands "purchase": German expert[/h] 09-19-2012 01:27 BJT
BERLIN, Sept. 18 (Xinhua) -- Japan's announced "purchase" of the Diaoyu Islandsis an attempt to tamper territorial history, a German sinologist said Tuesday.
Dr. Ingo Nentwig, a sinologist and ethnologist, wrote in an article published in the German daily Junge Welt that Japan occupied China's Diaoyu Islands in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894 -1895 and brought Taiwan and the Penghu Islands under its colonial rule through the imposed Treaty of Shimonoseki.
After World War II, Japan should have returned all the territories that it had usurped since the Sino-Japanese War to China based on the Cairo Declaration in 1943 and the Potsdam Declaration in 1945, both of which defined the terms for Japan's surrender, Nentwig said.
Although Taiwan and the Penghu Islands did go back into the arms of China afterwards, the Diaoyu Islands, together with Okinawa, remained occupied by the United States, according to the so-called Treaty of San Francisco in 1951.
However, China lodged an immediate protest against the 1951 treaty since it was not involved in the negotiations, Nentwig said.
"Therefore, the continuing control of the Diaoyu islands within the framework of the U.S. occupation was invalid under international law," the expert said. "As Washington 'returned' Okinawa and the Diaoyu islands to Japan in May 1972, China immediately protested against this illegal act."
Nentwig said that since last year, the "islands question" has become a card in Japan's domestic political fighting.
The Japanese government announced the "purchase" of Diaoyu Island and its affiliated Nan Xiaodao and Bei Xiaodao on Sept. 11, forcing China to take measures to protect its sovereignty, he said.
"It is clear that Japan has made an attempt to tamper the territorial results of World War II," Nentwig said.
"The memory of the aggression of Japanese militarism as Axis power is still fresh to many people in East and Southeast Asia, and it is strengthened in particular as many Japanese politicians, including leaders, showed little insight into their own history and even deny their war crimes in public," he said.
"Today we are witnessing a resurgence of aggressive arrogance of Japan, which stirs up bad memories of all its neighbors," he said.
Re: 还我山河
[h=1]China launches 2 navigation satellites into orbit[/h] 09-19-2012 10:09 BJT
China has sent its 14th and 15th Beidou navigation satellites into orbit. This is the second time China has sent two satellites using one rocket, a Long March 3.
Navigation satellites are used in sectors that include transport, meteorology, fishing industry, forestation and telecommunications. China is set to launch another one at the end of this year.
By 2020, China plans to have a network with more than 30 satellites. This will allow more accurate services to its users.
<img title="China has sent its 14th and 15th Beidou navigation satellites into orbit. This is the second time China has sent two satellites using one rocket, a Long March 3.
" src="http://p4.img.cctvpic.com/program/newsupdate/20120919/images/1348024830709_1348024830709_r.jpg" border="0" width="550">
<img title="China has sent its 14th and 15th Beidou navigation satellites into orbit. This is the second time China has sent two satellites using one rocket, a Long March 3.
" src="http://p4.img.cctvpic.com/program/newsupdate/20120919/images/1348024858825_1348024858825_r.jpg" border="0" width="550">
<img title="China has sent its 14th and 15th Beidou navigation satellites into orbit. This is the second time China has sent two satellites using one rocket, a Long March 3.
" src="http://p4.img.cctvpic.com/program/newsupdate/20120919/images/1348024893770_1348024893770_r.jpg" border="0" height="550">
<img title="China has sent its 14th and 15th Beidou navigation satellites into orbit. This is the second time China has sent two satellites using one rocket, a Long March 3.
" src="http://p4.img.cctvpic.com/program/newsupdate/20120919/images/1348024921217_1348024921217_r.jpg" border="0" height="550">
China has sent its 14th and 15th Beidou navigation
satellites into orbit. This is the second time China
has sent two satellites using one rocket, a Long March 3.
[h=1]China launches 2 navigation satellites into orbit[/h] 09-19-2012 10:09 BJT
China has sent its 14th and 15th Beidou navigation satellites into orbit. This is the second time China has sent two satellites using one rocket, a Long March 3.
Navigation satellites are used in sectors that include transport, meteorology, fishing industry, forestation and telecommunications. China is set to launch another one at the end of this year.
By 2020, China plans to have a network with more than 30 satellites. This will allow more accurate services to its users.
<img title="China has sent its 14th and 15th Beidou navigation satellites into orbit. This is the second time China has sent two satellites using one rocket, a Long March 3.
" src="http://p4.img.cctvpic.com/program/newsupdate/20120919/images/1348024830709_1348024830709_r.jpg" border="0" width="550">
<img title="China has sent its 14th and 15th Beidou navigation satellites into orbit. This is the second time China has sent two satellites using one rocket, a Long March 3.
" src="http://p4.img.cctvpic.com/program/newsupdate/20120919/images/1348024858825_1348024858825_r.jpg" border="0" width="550">
<img title="China has sent its 14th and 15th Beidou navigation satellites into orbit. This is the second time China has sent two satellites using one rocket, a Long March 3.
" src="http://p4.img.cctvpic.com/program/newsupdate/20120919/images/1348024893770_1348024893770_r.jpg" border="0" height="550">
<img title="China has sent its 14th and 15th Beidou navigation satellites into orbit. This is the second time China has sent two satellites using one rocket, a Long March 3.
" src="http://p4.img.cctvpic.com/program/newsupdate/20120919/images/1348024921217_1348024921217_r.jpg" border="0" height="550">
China has sent its 14th and 15th Beidou navigation
satellites into orbit. This is the second time China
has sent two satellites using one rocket, a Long March 3.
Re: 还我山河
[h=1]China issues thematic map on Diaoyu Islands[/h]
BEIJING, Sept. 18 (Xinhua) -- China issued on Tuesday a thematic map on the Diaoyu Island and its affiliated islands.
The map is compiled and issued by the SinoMaps Press, announced National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said at Tuesday's routine press briefing that the issue of the map is another concrete measure taken by the Chinese government to enhance its administration of the Diaoyu Island and its affiliated islands.
Last Saturday, China's State Oceanic Administration (SOA) released a string of geographic coordinates of the Diaoyu Island and some of its affiliated islands, including the exact longitude and latitude of the Diaoyu Island and 70 of its affiliated islands. It also publishes location maps, three-dimension effect graphs and sketch maps for the Diaoyu Islands.
The announcement aims to help the public understand the information concerning the Diaoyu Island and its affiliated islands, the SOA said in a statement on its website.
[h=1]China issues thematic map on Diaoyu Islands[/h]
BEIJING, Sept. 18 (Xinhua) -- China issued on Tuesday a thematic map on the Diaoyu Island and its affiliated islands.
The map is compiled and issued by the SinoMaps Press, announced National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said at Tuesday's routine press briefing that the issue of the map is another concrete measure taken by the Chinese government to enhance its administration of the Diaoyu Island and its affiliated islands.
Last Saturday, China's State Oceanic Administration (SOA) released a string of geographic coordinates of the Diaoyu Island and some of its affiliated islands, including the exact longitude and latitude of the Diaoyu Island and 70 of its affiliated islands. It also publishes location maps, three-dimension effect graphs and sketch maps for the Diaoyu Islands.
The announcement aims to help the public understand the information concerning the Diaoyu Island and its affiliated islands, the SOA said in a statement on its website.
Re: 还我山河
[h=3]14 Century: Diaoyu Islands were first discovered, named and exploited by the Chinese
[/h]
[h=3]Ming, Qing Dynasties: Envoys sent to Ryukyu Kingdom 24 times
[/h]
[h=3]Ming Dynasty: Diaoyu Islands had become a coastal front line
[/h]
[h=3]Ming Dynasty: Annals of Taiwan Prefecture (Tai Wan Fu Zhi) have given detailed accounts of the administration on Diaoyu Islands [/h]
[h=3]Chinese & Foreign Maps: Maps prove that Diaoyu Islands belong to China
[/h]
[h=3]Japan´s Maps: No Diaoyu Islands on country´s earliest recorded maps[/h]
[h=3]Cairo Declaration & Potsdam Declaration: Both stipulated that all territory taken by Japan illegally[/h]
[h=3]Japan´s Unfounded Claims: So called "terra nullius" islands were in fact, China´s Diaoyu Islands[/h]
[h=3]Japan´s Intentional Occupation:
Japan Diplomatic Documents show that Japan knew full well China´s sovereignty over the islands[/h]
[h=3]14 Century: Diaoyu Islands were first discovered, named and exploited by the Chinese[/h]
[h=3]Ming, Qing Dynasties: Envoys sent to Ryukyu Kingdom 24 times[/h]
[h=3]Ming Dynasty: Diaoyu Islands had become a coastal front line[/h]
[h=3]Ming Dynasty: Annals of Taiwan Prefecture (Tai Wan Fu Zhi) have given detailed accounts of the administration on Diaoyu Islands [/h]
[h=3]Chinese & Foreign Maps: Maps prove that Diaoyu Islands belong to China[/h]
[h=3]Japan´s Maps: No Diaoyu Islands on country´s earliest recorded maps[/h]
[h=3]Cairo Declaration & Potsdam Declaration: Both stipulated that all territory taken by Japan illegally[/h]
[h=3]Japan´s Unfounded Claims: So called "terra nullius" islands were in fact, China´s Diaoyu Islands[/h]
[h=3]Japan´s Intentional Occupation: Japan Diplomatic Documents show that Japan knew full well China´s sovereignty over the islands[/h]
Re: 还我山河
[h=1]PLA navy conducts live-fire missile defense drill[/h] [h=3]（People's Daily Online） 15:13, September 19, 2012[/h]
Edited and translated by Liang Jun
A regiment of the air force of the East China Sea Fleet recently conducts intensive trainings, which includes intercepting the target with missiles. The training has significantly improved the regiment's operation capabilities.
[h=1]PLA navy conducts live-fire missile defense drill[/h] [h=3]（People's Daily Online） 15:13, September 19, 2012[/h]
Edited and translated by Liang Jun
A regiment of the air force of the East China Sea Fleet recently conducts intensive trainings, which includes intercepting the target with missiles. The training has significantly improved the regiment's operation capabilities.
Re: 还我山河
[h=1]Air force conducts island penetration and assault training[/h]
A regiment of the air force under the Jinan Military Area Command (MAC) of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) carried out an island penetration and assault training according to the characteristics of the current situation and the requirements of a training mission.
[h=1]Air force conducts island penetration and assault training[/h]
A regiment of the air force under the Jinan Military Area Command (MAC) of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) carried out an island penetration and assault training according to the characteristics of the current situation and the requirements of a training mission.
Re: 还我山河
The last group of people I will believe in are celebrities. They can do and say anything for money, e.g. endorsing products and etc.
They are only saying and doing this right now because China is their biggest market for their shows and many HK celebrities are moving over to China to film cause got better money and less dog-like treatment.
They would sign the tune of Japan if Japan has 1 billion people.
Ho sei liao! Jay Chou, Chow Yun Fatt, Donnie Yen all protesting ... just star power and kung fu alone will nuke the Japs!
Chinese actors speak publicly in condemning Japan over islands dispute
By Adam Westlake / September 18, 2012 / 1 Comment
Several prominent Chinese celebrities have made public statements in support of their nation’s anti-Japanese sentiment and of China’s claims over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands. On September 17th, the Actor Committee of China Radio and Television Association announced its full support for the Beijing government and their threats of taking action against Japan. It’s always nice to see those with public prominence fanning the flames of petty nationalism.
The nonprofit Chinese organization is led by Tang Guoqiang, a renown actor, and consists of roughly 260 others from mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Among the other members include Chow Yun-fat, Donnie Yen, Jay Chow, Chow Wah Kin, and Li Bingbing, who recently turned down a Tokyo red-carpet premiere for a movie she was in to show support for her country.
Echoing recent statements from the Chinese government about Japan being responsible for the recent turmoil, the acting committee said that the Japanese attempt to nationalize the disputed territory by purchasing it was not only a provocation, but a violation of Chinese sovereignty. It added that Japan’s actions were not only threatening diplomatic relations between the two countries, but also harmful to world peace. The Chinese government also has the organization’s full support in protecting their territory.
The last group of people I will believe in are celebrities. They can do and say anything for money, e.g. endorsing products and etc.
They are only saying and doing this right now because China is their biggest market for their shows and many HK celebrities are moving over to China to film cause got better money and less dog-like treatment.
They would sign the tune of Japan if Japan has 1 billion people.
Japan TV reported that 2 PLAN ships sighted 150KM North West of Daioyu islands. One of them is 054A frigate.
[h=1]Japan has never made effort to reflect its past: German paper[/h]
BERLIN, Sept. 19 (Xinhua) -- Japan has never made an effort to face up to its wartime crimes, which may be the real reason behind its repeated rows with neighbors, German daily Sueddeutsche Zeitung said in an article on Wednesday.
The article, which detailed the background behind recent tensions over the Diaoyu Islands between Tokyo and Beijing, said Japan argues that China lays claim to the islands because of the rich oil and gas resources in surrounding waters.
But for the Chinese, it said, the islands are a symbol of humiliation caused by Japan's occupation.
The newspaper also noted that the demonstrations were staged in China on Tuesday to mark the 81st anniversary of the "Sept. 18 incident," which was used as an excuse for the Japanese invasion of China's northeast, formerly known as Manchuria.
Air raid sirens also wailed in numerous cities across China on Tuesday, including in Shenyang, capital of China's northeastern province of Liaoning, where the incident took place.
"Japanese soldiers massacred civilians in many Chinese cities in 1937 ... During the war, Japan developed -- with human experiments on Chinese -- biological weapons and then used them in China," the article said.
"In Japan no one has ever had to take responsibilities for all these acts. From Japan's view there is no stain in the history," it said.
The article said Japan has never made an effort to come to terms with its wartime past, either denying the atrocities or downplaying them with empty phrases such as "it was just war."
"Although the Japanese government expressed several times their regret over the incidents in the war, those pseudo-apologies were always followed by relativizations."
"No Japanese politician has ever shown a great gesture of atonement like Willy Brandt who was on his knees at a memorial to the Warsaw ghetto in 1970," the article said, adding: "From Japan's perspective the islands disputes have nothing to do with the aggression of Japan in World War II."
Tokyo does not want to be sucked into any debate about its historical guilt, the article added.
BERLIN, Sept. 19 (Xinhua) -- Japan has never made an effort to face up to its wartime crimes, which may be the real reason behind its repeated rows with neighbors, German daily Sueddeutsche Zeitung said in an article on Wednesday.
The article, which detailed the background behind recent tensions over the Diaoyu Islands between Tokyo and Beijing, said Japan argues that China lays claim to the islands because of the rich oil and gas resources in surrounding waters.
But for the Chinese, it said, the islands are a symbol of humiliation caused by Japan's occupation.
The newspaper also noted that the demonstrations were staged in China on Tuesday to mark the 81st anniversary of the "Sept. 18 incident," which was used as an excuse for the Japanese invasion of China's northeast, formerly known as Manchuria.
Air raid sirens also wailed in numerous cities across China on Tuesday, including in Shenyang, capital of China's northeastern province of Liaoning, where the incident took place.
"Japanese soldiers massacred civilians in many Chinese cities in 1937 ... During the war, Japan developed -- with human experiments on Chinese -- biological weapons and then used them in China," the article said.
"In Japan no one has ever had to take responsibilities for all these acts. From Japan's view there is no stain in the history," it said.
The article said Japan has never made an effort to come to terms with its wartime past, either denying the atrocities or downplaying them with empty phrases such as "it was just war."
"Although the Japanese government expressed several times their regret over the incidents in the war, those pseudo-apologies were always followed by relativizations."
"No Japanese politician has ever shown a great gesture of atonement like Willy Brandt who was on his knees at a memorial to the Warsaw ghetto in 1970," the article said, adding: "From Japan's perspective the islands disputes have nothing to do with the aggression of Japan in World War II."
Tokyo does not want to be sucked into any debate about its historical guilt, the article added.
[h=1]Noda to send diplomatic envoy to China[/h]
Japan’s Asahi Shimbun says Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda and his government had expected tensions to rise with China after they purchased the Diaoyu islands.
But Noda said China’s reaction has totally surpassed his expectations. He says he is now considering sending a special diplomatic envoy to China to negotiate the matter.
Details of the visit are still under discussion. Noda said besides diplomatic means, he is also seeking to enhance bilateral communication in political and economic fields.
Japan’s Asahi Shimbun says Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda and his government had expected tensions to rise with China after they purchased the Diaoyu islands.
But Noda said China’s reaction has totally surpassed his expectations. He says he is now considering sending a special diplomatic envoy to China to negotiate the matter.
Details of the visit are still under discussion. Noda said besides diplomatic means, he is also seeking to enhance bilateral communication in political and economic fields.
