It seems that the Chinese are pretty aggressive in aviation industry. It will most probably end up providing third world countries a cheaper alternative of airliners...
中國首架客機模型在港展出
(明報)2009年9月8日 星期二 17:40
在本港舉行的亞洲航空展,中國將展出首架C919客機的模型,預計可在2014年作處女飛行。
該架擁有200個座位的國產大型客機,預計可在2014年試飛,並於2016年交予買家,將與波音公司及空中巴士競爭。
負責製造的中國商用飛機有限公司製造了一個如私家車大小的模型,在周二的亞洲航空展中展出。
飛機可飛行短程至中程航線,最至可達5555公里,並可乘載約200名旅客。
Dear GMS
China I am afraid is biting of more than they could have chewed. They could have created a Bombardier or an Embrear focusing on 70 to 150 seaters. They chose a 200 seater directly in competition with the A350 and the Dream liner, I am afraid that they will not succeed very well but would create an airliner no one would buy. Designing and building it is one thing, getting airlines to buy it is another, will end up just like the Russian IL-96
Locke
Dear Tee
Thats for a regional jet like Embraer....I see a case for a regional jet, I do not see a case for a jumbo jet.
Locke
They can announce anything they want, but talk is cheap. It will take them tens of billions of dollars to get to production, if ever.
Dear GMS
I am afraid that the past Chinese Record for original Innovation leaves much to be desired. Chinese fighters were copies of soviets, the J-11 was a Russian SU-27, the J-10 was a Lavi derivative.
They will build an airplane, it will fly, but I doubt it will be a commercial success. They are in the same market segment as the A350 and the Dreamliner. They will built an airplane with the technology of the 767's and 747's but they will be at least a generation behind. The last independent Russian Airliner the 1l-96 with a western engine and western avionics was 30% cheaper than the comparable western product of that generation but sold only 15
Locke
Dear PAP
The break even point for any new aircraft from either Airbus or Boeing is 500 units. :_)) Even assuming that the Chinese Government forces all their airlines to replace 767's and A330's with their Jumbo jet can it really hit the numbers needed to cover development costs ?
The specs for the new aircraft will soon tell, how it stands against either the A350 or the Dreamliner
Cheers
Locke
Yes, you are right about that but Japan and Korea also did a cut and paste too. Actually, to an extend, some of the Chinese technology is from US as well.
I mean, nobody will want to reinvent the wheel, right? If I remember correctly, Japan isn't new to rocket technology. They have been trying it out since the last century with no fruitful results.
It is a strange thing though. The Japanese are well known for their good QC and such but it still ends up with quite a number of failures. While the Chinese are perceived to be lax in the quality of the things they produced but somehow, they are able to get it right.
I would say that both the Korean and Japanese do have certain urgency to get their rocket technology right because of the threat of North Korean missile threats.
Goh Meng Seng
You r one fucking prick. Ppl buy merc not for quality but for status you dork! LKY and his children use Lexus not because they can't afford the Mercs. Check your brain.Ah Goh, answer me straight and honest that for the same sum of $, will you fly Boeing or China made plane? I always take 'China can' with a pinch of salt.
Unless the china-made airplanes are falling off the sky every other day, why not?
If china-made airplane/airline offers $200 round trip to California, vs US-made Boeing $700, it would make a regular guy like me to make a decision pretty easy..
if you have tons of money you could 'shout out loud' to despite those 'china-made', 'perceived low quality' products and services.
If I have $$$ I would drive a German Mercedes Benz anytime, Japanese cars would have to wait..
Tell the Chinese to convince their ppl first about food safety, quake-proof building, quality electronics etc then talk lah. Nabei between a Lenovo and a Fujitsu, I take the latter anytime even though that may be the last comp as Fujitsu is exiting this product soon.
Different budgets buys different products. Some take bus, some drive to work. A lot of us, are buying China products because it fits our budgets and meets our purpose of ownership.
Jap excels because the top honcho slash their stomachs if mistakes are made. In China, scapegoats lose their heads instead and the merry continue to go round. Quality Chinese goods ah, can if pigs have wings!
In ths US, many great companies are brought to bankrupcy by some CEO who made wrond judgement/mistake, and they do not kill themselves (just like chinese). I think it is stupid to kill themselves, even a mistake is made (intentionally or not).
Last time, so tycoons from Sg were stupid enuff to go China for treatment of the cancers to meet a quicker.
Hello friend, people go to USA/Boston (reputedly the BEST) for cancer/health treatment and died there too. (e.g. HK richest women and Taiwan richest man)
Better me to remain skeptical than foolishly stubborn.
Agreed!
I don't know why you find it puzzling. I don't. It's what hokkien say "cee gong lan, long puay ch**"
If go golf driving range also can see it happening many times. Some idiots just thot they can already when out of umpteen hits, they got one right.
Conversely, even Tiger Woods can be humiliated with an 80+ score. The moral of my tale is over the long run, Japan will surpass China in every endeavour they take pride in. This may hurt many yellow skin stinkies who believe they are members of the People's Republic of China because of their skin color. I differ. Because I've worked with/for Japanese before. They have good work ethos and humble in general. They are inborn with desires to improve; necessary condition for success. If you're stubborn, so be it.
:oIo:
I had the luck to have worked with the Japanese for a number of years. The chance for a frog in the well. Yes, what they are, is the reason why they are a world power within a short span of time coming out of the devastation of WWII.
But the [Japanese "Humble"] has no definitions in general dictionaries. Neither is it in theirs, I believe. You have to understand their culture to put an appropriate meaning to the word....
Hahaha...
Older generations of Japanese, yes. They are a very hardworking lot but I really don't know about the newer generations.
I guess it is a common problem among more developed countries.. even HK and Singapore face such problems of complacency.
The Chinese at this stage, to what I see and heard, are a very hungry lot. Whether Japan can beat China in future, it is anyone's guess but at this very moment, they are catching up with great speed. Even in the financial centre, total market capitalization of both Shenzhen and Shanghai stock exchange is almost on par with Tokyo Stock exchange when I last check.
The Chinese too have high desire to improve and excel, though what seems to be lacking is ethics. But this may well change.
I visited Macau and despite the fact that it is supposedly a place that depends very much on tourism, their immigration system really sucks. Make comparison with the Chinese immigration at Shenzhen Luo Hu, you will see distinctive difference.
Most of the Chinese workers are very hardworking lot. Those who have been to Cambodia or Indonesia to visit their factories should realize that Chinese workers are really value for money even if they cost more. I guess among the developing countries, only Vietnam comes close to China's model.
This is said basically based on business sense and observations, nothing to do with race at all. I always caution my friends and immediate family members here in Singapore we should not be complacent at all. The Chinese are very competitive people and hungry for success... well, most of the time, quick success.
In terms of education, one cohort of students could well involve over a million students competing for the that few ten thousands of places in their top universities. This is why even their average students when come to Singapore, apart from English language, they are very good in many subjects. If you visit bookstores in China, you will see many people reading but here in Singapore and even HK, very few people are reading books nowadays. This is a distinctive sign of the hunger of knowledge and success for PRC.
If we are going to base on "academic merits" to allocate scholarship here in Singapore, we will be giving quite a high percentage to these PRC students. And this is exactly what is happening right now. Our students and people should not be complacent at all, we do not have the luxury to be complacent.
But if there are people who prefer to live in denial of the reality on the ground, so be it. Let history and time tell the full story.
Goh Meng Seng