- Joined
- Jun 13, 2023
- Messages
- 6,878
- Points
- 113
But they will have to make prior announcement first, like the closure of SA next year.Why risk it? Anything is possible with PAP and it's PONZI scheme, the CPF.
If I had the evil mentality and greed of the PAP, I would now say that at 55, you are only allowed to withdraw $3K a year from your OA account.
At 57, $5K.
At 60, $7K.
At 63, $9K.
At 65, $12K.
The justification (or excuse) I would use is that the majority of Sinkies are still working and earning an income, so the do not yet need the money from the PONZI.
Then I would move the goalposts of CPF RA payout to start at 68. No longer at 65.
Long term, my target would be to restrict access to the PONZI fully so that upon death, all of it would end up in your beneficiary's CPF, thus the PONZI lives on!
No one will ever get their hands on PONZI money!
Hey PAP? Are you reading this? Isn't this exciting. The rock band Dire Straits said it succinctly: MONEY FOR NOTHING!!!
A sudden change for OA withdrawal is no longer ponzi, it becomes a robbery and many uncles will tear down their office lor.
As for the RA, there is a very high chance of a shift based on a sneaky laughter done by LHL previously when being asked about this.