• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

CCB Govt Wanna Siam Comatose NSman's Hospital Bill!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Jan 11, 2009
</TR><!-- headline one : start --><TR>Parents sue Mindef <!--10 min-->
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- Author --><TR><TD class="padlrt8 georgia11 darkgrey bold" colSpan=2>By K C Vijayan
</TD></TR><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"-->THE parents of a former full-time national serviceman, who has remained in a coma for over three years after an incident in camp, is taking the Ministry of Defence to court over compensation issues.
They claim that then-corporal Jeremy Tan, now aged 26, is entitled to coverage for medical costs and a permanent disability package since the injuries occurred while he was in camp and in service.
Mr Tan, then a storeman at the Seletar East Camp, was found unconscious on a grass patch outside the block where his third-level bunk was located at about 6pm on Aug 3, 2005.
He was subsequently taken to Tan Tock Seng Hospital with severe head injuries, although his parents were also told when they arrived at the hospital that he had a severe viral infection.
But the issue which the courts are expected to address when the hearing starts on Monday before Justice Tay Yong Kwang is whether the injury was caused in the course of his service. Mr Tan would not be eligible for compensation if the injuries were not service-related. For the full story, read Monday's edition of The Straits Times.
 

popdod

Alfrescian
Loyal
Can win the lawsuit is another thing.
Scarly....parents have to pay for defamation loss....then how?


Bery dangerous stunt wor.

:o :( :o
 

DerekLeung

Alfrescian
Loyal
Can win the lawsuit is another thing.
Scarly....parents have to pay for defamation loss....then how?

For the price of getting a lawyer to fight for you in kangaroo court ! Knowingly it's kangaroo and you can court your chances of wining against Mindef.

Better use the money for hitman to hit on the people in charge and some mindef key personnel !
 

The_Latest_H

Alfrescian
Loyal
Hopefully if they have evidence that can overwhelm the government's, then perhaps they can win a good sum. By the looks of it, they should do fine. But remain wary, and do engage a good lawyer to spar. It wouldn't be easy at all.
 

newyorker88

Alfrescian
Loyal
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Jan 11, 2009
</TR><!-- headline one : start --><TR>Parents sue Mindef <!--10 min-->
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- Author --><TR><TD class="padlrt8 georgia11 darkgrey bold" colSpan=2>By K C Vijayan
</TD></TR><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"-->
But the issue which the courts are expected to address when the hearing starts on Monday before Justice Tay Yong Kwang is whether the injury was caused in the course of his service. Mr Tan would not be eligible for compensation if the injuries were not service-related. For the full story, read Monday's edition of The Straits Times.


FUCK!! It does not matter, when you are in uniform, they are suppose to care for you and your medical fees! Like that who wants to serve the army? Might just as well give them your life, not 2 1/2 years.
 
Top