Very sad but not surprising that they are more concerned about embarrassment than providing useful information.
Because it's an embarrassment for them.
Because it's an embarrassment for them.
Case 3014
8. Case 3014 is a 41 year-old male Singapore Citizen who has no recent travel history to affected countries or regions. He reported onset of symptoms on 9 April, and subsequent test results confirmed COVID-19 infection on 13 April. He is currently warded in an isolation room at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases (NCID).
9. He is employed as a doctor at Tan Tock Seng Hospital but had not gone to work since onset of symptoms.
Just remember they are infectious like crazy for a week or more before they kenna symptoms.
No temperature checks or anything can detect they shedding and shedding and wuhaning all around and about them
And even after they gone, their droplets will remain in the air and on door knobs and on handrails for days after they not there
Hospital staff by and large will be wearing masks.
Some can be lucky once, handle without proper PPE some more
KNN all the medical staff cases you think they got it outside and happen to be medical staff or they got it from the hospital ? KNN24 April Update:
Cases from public healthcare sector
Case 11580
7. Case 11580 is a 43 year-old female Singapore Citizen who has no recent travel history to affected countries or regions. She reported onset of symptoms on 20 April, and subsequent test results confirmed COVID-19 infection on 23 April. She is currently warded at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases.
8. She is employed as a nurse at Bukit Merah Polyclinic but had not gone to work since onset of symptoms.
KNN all the medical staff cases you think they got it outside and happen to be medical staff or they got it from the hospital ? KNN
KNN although not possible to confirm but at least can tell the probability if MOH can link any visitors or patients cases to the clinics or location of department they work KNN if not it is still a myth on whether it is easier to catch the virus in a hospital vs outside KNNKNN it is not revealed by MOH and is not possible to guess either, except for one of the earlier cases below which I am quite sure is from outside KNN
"Later on there was a doctor from NTF hospital and 2 cases from SGH, a nurse and an office staff. The nurse from SGH had travel history to the Middle East in March, which makes one wonder why she decided to travel there knowing fully well there was a global pandemic."
KNN although not possible to confirm but at least can tell the probability if MOH can link any visitors or patients cases to the clinics or location of department they work KNN if not it is still a myth on whether it is easier to catch the virus in a hospital vs outside KNN
KNN in my uncle opinion for now during cb the 2 most dangerous places is outside gp clinic and a&e KNN becas people with symtoms will either go gp or a&e KNN so hospital ground should be still safer than these 2 places KNNKNN even if MOH have linked the cases they are not revealing the link to the public but in my opinion it would be easier to catch the virus outside before CB and it would be easier to catch the virus in a hospital or clinic during CB KNN
KNN in my uncle opinion for now during cb the 2 most dangerous places is outside gp clinic and a&e KNN becas people with symtoms will either go gp or a&e KNN so hospital ground should be still safer than these 2 places KNN
wah lau eh... don't tekan him so hard lah...
already so many people tekan him in the last week or so...
but you can keep posting up MAY's picture. I love it!!