Calvin Cheng is royally fucked now.. Vs Iris Koh and Raymond Ng

[tobelightlight]

Enforcement sent by Calvin Cheng.

Not that we don't want to pay, in the last case conference, we asked for the court order to be varied and awaiting the court's direction on 25 feb.
That is what The Straits Times did not report.
Looks like a "sting operation" when he lined up cameramen and the press before this surprise enforcement which Lee & Lee also did not warn us about.
This is from the guy who said that we are literally killing people and wants to jail and cane us.
For the record, the defamation lawsuit continues even though the injunction failed.
If you would like to support me and my fight against Cry Baby elites please support via PAYNOW 98291678 (Ref:CC)
Edited amount after checking with various people.
First Enforcement Order (DC/EO 15/2025)
Amount due to the enforcement applicant (including interest and costs): $911.12
Amount of enforcement costs:
Due to the Sheriff: $400.00
Due to the enforcement applicant: $1,000.00
Total for this order: $2,311.12
Second Enforcement Order (DC/EO 14/2025)
Amount due to the enforcement applicant (including interest and costs): $3,498.75
Amount of enforcement costs:
Due to the Sheriff: $400.00
Due to the enforcement applicant: $1,000.00
Total for this order: $4,898.75
Grand Total for Both Orders: $2,311.12 + $4,898.75 = $7,209.87
Seperately, as mentioned in Nov I am gathering a war chest to fight these CryBaby Elites. They have gathered $700k to fight our lawsuits but due to the large number of people who have defamed us and continue to defame us, we believe we have a way out of this.
Any extra from this campaign will go towards our ongoing legal actions to pursue justice, including suing Telegram to get our discussion group back. I thank you for supporting me and standing up against CryBaby Elites in Singapore who think they can get away with what they say without consequences.

 

[tobelightlight]

 

[tobelightlight]

From Whatsapp University.
Thank you to ANON.

Questioning the Processes and Procedures in the Enforcement Against Iris Koh and Raymond Ng

On February 10, 2025, a court sheriff and 2 lawyers representing former Nominated Member of Parliament Calvin Cheng attempted to enforce a court order to seize possessions from Iris Koh and her husband, Raymond Ng, at their residence. The enforcement was due to the couple’s failure to pay S$4,898.75 in legal costs and sheriff fees stemming from a defamation suit. While the legal system is designed to ensure justice and enforce court orders, the circumstances surrounding this case raise significant questions about the fairness, proportionality, and motivations behind the enforcement process.

Iris Koh and Raymond Ng have been embroiled in a series of legal battles, primarily related to their medical freedom advocacy. In December 2024, a district court dismissed an injunction on a defamation suit filed by Koh, Ng, and 3 others against Calvin Cheng, ruling that Cheng’s Facebook comments criticizing vaccine misinformation did not specifically identify them. While the injunction failed and the striking out of the 3 clowns succeeded, the main defamation lawsuit continues.

Similarly, in October 2024, Koh and Ng were ordered to pay S$12,000 in costs to the Health Sciences Authority for filing a judicial review deemed to lack a reasonable cause of action.

While these rulings may appear to paint Koh and Ng as frequent litigants, it is essential to scrutinize whether the legal system is being used impartially or if it is being weaponized to silence dissenting voices. The couple’s activism has made them controversial figures, and their legal challenges often touch on sensitive public health issues. This raises the question: are the legal actions against them truly about upholding justice, or are they part of a broader effort to suppress their advocacy?

Due Process, Proportionality and Fairness

The enforcement action on February 10, 2025, involved a court sheriff and 2 lawyers attempting to seize possessions to recover a relatively small sum of S$4,898.75. While the law allows for such enforcement, the proportionality of the action must be questioned. Is it reasonable to send a sheriff and 2 lawyers to seize assets over a debt of this size, especially when the debt arises from legal costs in a defamation case that was dismissed?

Moreover, the presence of the media during the enforcement attempt is unusual and raises concerns about the motivations behind the action. Media presence typically occurs in cases of significant public interest or when tipped off by involved parties. Given that Koh and Ng are public figures in the medical freedom movement, it is plausible that the enforcement action was orchestrated to maximize public scrutiny and embarrassment. This raises ethical questions about whether the enforcement was carried out in good faith or as a means of further punishing the couple for their controversial views.

While Koh and Ng’s legal challenges have been dismissed by the courts, it is important to recognize their right to seek legal redress. The dismissal of their injunction suit against Calvin Cheng does not necessarily mean their claims were without merit; in fact the main defamation lawsuit against Calvin Cheng continues. He accused Iris Koh and Brad Bowyer of "literally killing people".

Similarly, their judicial review application, though dismissed, reflects their commitment to holding authorities accountable, a principle that is fundamental to any democratic society.

Based on rules of court, the sheriff actually cannot enter the premise in the first attempt. However, it was wrongly portrayed as an act of defiance. Instead, many people would perceive the enforcement actions as unjust and disproportionate. Given the relatively small amount owed and the potential for negotiation or alternative arrangements, the decision to enforce the order so aggressively seems excessive.

Broader Implications

The case of Iris Koh and Raymond Ng highlights the delicate balance between enforcing court orders and ensuring that the legal system is not used to intimidate or silence individuals with unpopular views. While the courts have ruled against them in several instances, the enforcement process must be scrutinized to ensure it is not being used as a tool of retribution.

In a society that values free speech and the right to dissent, it is crucial to question whether the legal actions against Koh and Ng are proportionate and fair. The presence of the media, the small sum involved, and the couple’s status as public figures all suggest that this enforcement action may have been more about sending a message than about recovering a debt. As such, it is imperative to defend their right to advocate for their beliefs and to question whether the processes and procedures in this case were truly just.

ANON
Whatsapp University

 

[KingFook Sr]

These JLBs are wasting their lives and money trying to game society.
Only idiots will donate to keep them going.
Cheap lives.

 

[tobelightlight]

These JLBs are wasting their lives and money trying to game society.
Only idiots will donate to keep them going.
Cheap lives.

This is called community spirit.. bringing back the Kampong era.

 

[Balls2U]

The issue is whether Iris has obtained an order of court staying the execution process pending the outcome of whatever she's asking the court for. If she hasn't, then fuck-face Cheng can proceed with the enforcement.

 

[tobelightlight]

The press and many have asked me what would I be doing, after this historically unprecedented enforcement order.

Of course needless to say, I trust the Court. The whole society and potentially the government are probably ganging up to affect our lives and just 2 months back got my facebook accounts banned. I sued facebook via HC/OC 974/2024 and Court compels Facebook to restore my and Iris Koh's accounts. Government may fail me but the Court has NEVER failed me. So I put my future with the Honourable Court. So my method would be based on what a legal person would do using the Court system.

I would be doing the following;

1) Notice of Objection (on grounds we were waiting for clarification from His Honour to clarify the exact wording of the Court Order, via oral application and other reasons).

2) POHA on all the media that are there, from all indications CNA, Straits Times, and some other press were there.

3) Originating Summons to compel pre action discovery from the following persons in investigation on how the press or media got to be part of the bailiff process when bailiff process is meant to be discrete and non public.

a) Lawyer 1 from Lee & Lee - I am not here to shame any lawyer, so I am going to term it as Lawyer 1, on his how did the press know about this.

b) Lawyer 2 from Lee & Lee - he was further away and was shaking his head when I asked him politely his identity. It seems from his mannerism, he is not agreeable to what his colleagues were doing.

3) Bailiff officer from Court - I would ask him to provide a statement or sworn affidavit as to how the press is being communicated or how he did not prevent the press from being part of the process.

4) I have found defamatory remark, that is present in The Straits Times article which was re shared by other press and also thousands of people who reshared on social media - they would be sued after I file discovery orders on facebook to reveal their data.

Raymond

 

[tobelightlight]

https://singaporelegaladvice.com/.../what-can-debt.../

This is an article that describes what Debt Collectors can or cannot do under the law.

How many clauses do you think they violated?

One of the worst I thought was the section on "Unlawful Assembly"... There was clearly more than 5 pax outside my house coming to intimidate us.

Do you think the AGC would charge them for "Unlawful Assembly", intimidation, harrassment and violation of the debt collectors act?

I mean surely this type of unlawful assembly would really protect we the people don't you think? Not the type that charged me for asking people to wear a tshirt (that says United we stand for choice) outside the police station...or others for lighting candles outside Changi prison or delivering letters to the istana.

If the AGC takes action, it might disprove the theory that there are 5 departments after us.

What do you think? Will CryBaby Elites get away with these egregious violations of the law?

Really scary how our country has become when ordinary citizens like us have to face a sting media operation when we stepped outside the house, when we are already faced with hardship from debts, lawsuits and criminal charges filed to intimidate us.

This is the true lawfare.

Ministry of Law, Singapore any comments?

The next tragedy is: how many people really care?

If you care, please help me to share and viral and bring awareness to the terrible harrassment that has happened to me and Raymond over the past 3.5 years.
.
I ask for your continuous prayer and support to fight this evil and what is happening in our country.

Iris Koh

 

[tobelightlight]

 

[laksaboy]

The fucking will come from this eventually. This is far bigger than the drama with Calvin Cheng.

 

[tobelightlight]

He is removing evidence now that he has ordered the media sting operation on us. Luckily I have saved it already. He is going to get many many people in trouble, including his own lawyers and his media sting operation team.

Don't forget to thank him, Calvin Cheng.

Everything that I have done is legal and above board, including going to his house to serve him my Pre-Action to inform him that I'll be suing him. He did not even dare to come down and take my letter.

I have never once disclosed where he lives and we have always just focused on making announcements of the people we sued, which is totally legitimate.

What did he and his gang of supporters do?

The law will catch up on them.

I will be going to supreme court later to file more actions and to protect my rights.

Stay tuned for more action.

 

[sbfuncle]

Life is short and vulnerable.
放下屠刀吧

 

[Ah Max]

 

[sbfuncle]

Life is short and vulnerable.
放下屠刀吧

Some time back a gov entity charged me some $ for something which by principle should not have happened.
I fight and fight for it due to a matter of principles, and was rejected. I had thought to Leeport it to polis or make it known to the world or don't pay up as they also can't do anything to it. They will not go to the suing process 100% for sure as they will lose this case.

But later I rethink life is short and vulnerable so I decided to honour their standard procedure and I paid up. As I'm not the type of chow kuan person and leaving a outstanding bill dangling there is not my cup of tea.

Who knows shortly they realised it's their own non flexibilities and resulted in this incident. So they decided to waive it.
Since I already paid up they refunded me.

Moral of the story - just let it go lah.

 

[millim6868]

Like Elon said, examples of Russia n Ukraine, why ppl fight n kill each other just for some party or guys benefit from it, it's like ppl vote for pap but their life don seem to get better ,but pap n mp n their kaki n related their life get better n richer,think abt it, all hv to slog ,wake up early go work ,scare foreigners replace , make enough to pay forever increasing expenses , n foreigners get higher pay then locals for same jobs, mgrs are 90percent foreigners with PR or new citizen , favorite own country man,wat the fuck

 

[NanoSpeed]

These JLBs are wasting their lives and money trying to game society.
Only idiots will donate to keep them going.
Cheap lives.

I'm one of those idiots.

 

[NanoSpeed]

View attachment 214540

There is an aura of unvaccinated calmness about Iris.

 

[batman1]

Some time back a gov entity charged me some $ for something which by principle should not have happened.
I fight and fight for it due to a matter of principles, and was rejected. I had thought to Leeport it to polis or make it known to the world or don't pay up as they also can't do anything to it. They will not go to the suing process 100% for sure as they will lose this case.

But later I rethink life is short and vulnerable so I decided to honour their standard procedure and I paid up. As I'm not the type of chow kuan person and leaving a outstanding bill dangling there is not my cup of tea.

Who knows shortly they realised it's their own non flexibilities and resulted in this incident. So they decided to waive it.
Since I already paid up they refunded me.

Moral of the story - just let it go lah.

U have principles. Salute !

 

[NanoSpeed]

U have principles. Salute !

I saluted him before he turned KCB:

 

[Sustanon]

There is an aura of unvaccinated calmness about Iris.

Iris Koh got the balls to stood up and fought against the KNN PCB garbage zham. For that, she got my respect.