-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Chitchat Burden of proof doesn’t fall on Govt for Pofma appeals, says High Court judge who disagrees with fellow judge
- Thread starter mastermaster
- Start date
Imagine still being somebodys bitch after you are high court or supreme court judge.
Never mind high court or supreme court judges...even the AG is a pocket bitch.
Their logoc is great. So if you call police to report suspicious character if you cannot proof he is a crook they wont come?
My multimillionaire ministers are behaving like high handed gods. They would be deciding the fate of sinkies but sinkies would continue to vote for them. Long live PAP, huat ahhhhhh
Similar threads
