- Joined
- Oct 24, 2010
- Messages
- 32,792
- Points
- 113
I thought Prisons first in line to screw up!!! They alr let a top limping terrorist escape!!
That wasnt Prisons. It was ISD. Prisons Dept no control over Whitley Rd Detention Centre.
I thought Prisons first in line to screw up!!! They alr let a top limping terrorist escape!!
That wasnt Prisons. It was ISD. Prisons Dept no control over Whitley Rd Detention Centre.
So u basically have 2 prison type orgs and I bet they don't talk to each other. Real smart!!
The guy is driving a Merc so maybe he is an elite. If you are just a "lesser mortal" policemen I doubt that they want to play hero & risk losing their job by breaking an elites window or shooting his tire.?
With so many privileged elites now in Spore the police have to exercise maximum restraint
I'm very perplexed by what was reported in CNA (http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/crash-barrier-failed-to/1026082.html) which contained a picture of the cold hard steel tyre slashers and which stated '' failure of a security barrier was the key reason why a 65-year-old Malaysian driver in a gold Mercedes-Benz managed to breach the Woodlands Checkpoint on Saturday afternoon, even after the tyres were punctured."
If you looked closely at the video in the above earlier post by this bro, you can see that the barrier is very very flexible and flimsy.. and i replayed it a few times and looked closer and I cannot make out the cold hard steel teeth of the tyre slashers underneath this top cover, as reported in the CNA report above. what I can make out of this video is that the barrier has only a soft flexible top cover which is pneumatically pushed up from below.. it looks more like a flood (read: ponding!) barrier than a vehicle disabling barrier. Whats most damning is that at the end of this video leak, on the left side of the screen, you can see in all daylight that the this "barrier" top cover was bent totally vertical and there was no sign of the steel teeth! once the merc drove away....
Its either I'm looking at the wrong video or the CNA report has some serious reporting "mistake".... another point is that with these steel teeth, they are set at about 45-50 degrees and so will be at the optimum angle to impale the tyres and stab into the front chassis of the vehicle (most likely a saloon car).. my physics is not good, but common sense can tell this barrier setup will have the max? stopping power at this angle and with steel construction to halt a car... so how can a 1 ton plus car climb over and speed past this steel teeth construction unless its a tank? I dun even see the right front tyre deflate immediately upon contact with this barrier the first time the car bumped hard against the barrier and then the driver still pressed his front wheels against it later when he is trying to escape away by revving his rear wheels (correct me if I'm wrong by this old model Merc shld be RWD??).. if it was the steel teeth, the tyres would have been shredded when the driver revved up to escape (the tyres shld be turning in clockwise direction and the steel teeth are pointing towards top left, so the tyre rotation would make the tyre impact directly again the teeth and there is no way a spinning rubber tyre can stand up to steel ...)....
if the tyres of the Merc were indeed punctured as mentioned in the CNA report, won't anyone on the street or cops be puzzled as why the driver is still on the road with a few punctured tyres? This is highly unusual and anyone with a tyre puncture would stop to change it or call for a tow truck immediately, instead of still driving along the road.. No one saw or bother to see or no one bothered to call the cops to report??? CNA reported "The vehicle's front left and right tyres had been punctured and its back passenger-side window on the right smashed."... also I did not see the cops smashing the rear passenger window in the video even as the Merc drove away after overcoming the barrier... did you????
4.5 hrs (4pm to 8.30pm as reported in the CNA report "At about 8.30pm on Saturday, the authorities recovered the abandoned vehicle in an unknown location".) is a long time for this strange flat tyres car to be cruising along the roads....
So many questions, no answers......
I'm very perplexed by what was reported in CNA (http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/crash-barrier-failed-to/1026082.html) which contained a picture of the cold hard steel tyre slashers and which stated '' failure of a security barrier was the key reason why a 65-year-old Malaysian driver in a gold Mercedes-Benz managed to breach the Woodlands Checkpoint on Saturday afternoon......................
Lanjiao understand!!!!!
In past police wear shorts that time got "hi tech security barrier"?????
So last time no security barrier, all cars breach our borders is excusable lah.............LANJIAO!!!!!!!!!!
What kind of fucking excuse, think all ppl that daft.
it's not a tyre slasher lah.. it's just a ramp piece and a badly fabricated one. more like sardine can cover.
Uncle, you toking about the CNA news piece hor??
yah. Only shit from CNA and MIW cb mouth can get such a reaction.....
Peace bro....hope no misunderstanding.
Seriously, the problem with this forum is that too many do not engage their brains before putting mouth(fingers) into gear. The lack of the art of careful observation of images, moving or not, is also telling.
The barrier of metal spikes was not raised. Only the metal sheet cover was retained in the upright position. The barrier could have malfunctioned, a common occurrence no doubt. It was a stroke of luck for the driver.
Fuck! For the first time I have saved an MIW's arse!:(
The lack of the art of careful observation of images, moving or not, is also telling.
The barrier of metal spikes was not raised. Only the metal sheet cover was retained in the upright position. The barrier could have malfunctioned, a common occurrence no doubt. It was a stroke of luck for the driver.
Quite comical as it snarl an innocent driver on 21feb (See below) but the spike did not work yesterday. It was already a tell tale sign something is not right, did ICA conduct operational test on the barrier? We are right afterall, they dont give a F! What they are after are chewing gum smugglers,3/4 fuel tank rule,.... i doubt there be real fundamental change if TCH stays on. One too many laspes, top dog head must roll.
http://singaporeseen.stomp.com.sg/singaporeseen/this-urban-jungle/driver-has-car-bumper-pulled-off-by-spike-barrier-at-woodlands-checkpoint-with-no
Car bumper dislodged by spike barrier at Woodlands Checkpoint -- with no reason given
Posted on 21 February 2014
Stomper Jen said her friend's car was damaged after a spike barrier was deployed at Woodlands Checkpoint on Feb 20 without any explanation.
A spike barrier is a security control measure to prevent perpetrators from using vehicles to dash through the Checkpoint. It can cause severe damage even to heavy vehicles.
According to the Stomper, her friend was then told to file a claim against the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA).
However, no assistance was given to the driver nor was he advised on how to proceed. Hence, he is now at a loss as to what to do.
Jen, a Claims Officer, said her friend had related the incident to her. She told Stomp:
"My friend was exiting Woodlands Checkpoint on Feb 20. Suddenly, the 'Cat Crawler' was deployed without any reason and caused damage to his vehicle.
"He was at the ICA office for few hours after that, and all he got was his vehicle towed away and being told to make a claim against ICA.
"But there was no indication of who to approach and how the procedure to make a claim should be like. No one was there to advise him.
"We call up ICA and referred to a Woodlands Checkpoint officer, who could not even give us a clear direction. She replied that she was not sure as well."
Jen added that they are still waiting for ICA's response and as such, the car is still damaged.
Then did you think deeper? So it was excusable if there was a breach before the installation of such barriers??? So before having such barriers, anyone can drive thru and no one will be held responsible n accountable.????